What doesn't kill you makes you stranger

born to be a modern art hater forced to defend modern art from people who believe art only has value if it's a realistic depiction of something or is pretty, this is such a cross to bear

whole pussy out

dirt in my mouth

sing a lil ditty when i stroll down south

bone removal

without approval

i found your name and address on the google

you can always give your blorbos mobility aids btw . you can always make them disabled its always morally correct

Thats what i mean with this now . Fuckign commit violence against that beast until they have your disability we're getting representation the hard way 2night

PHRASE ADDED!

this is what i've been trying to say. yes the memes are funny, but leaps and bounds more important than that is Luigi Mangione first and foremost is in danger.

while he is innocent until proven guilty in the court of law, far too many people have jumped on the idea of him being the shooter because it's funny. however. there are a few key things i personally need to point out.

just. think critically for 30 seconds about any and all media surrounding this case that you read, and especially remember that the public opinion, while it isn't necessarily supposed to be, is influential in court cases.

Look, from over here, watching them release the name and face of a suspect is insane.

everyone immediately disecting this dudes life and socials and posting pictures of his tits online is fucking terrifying. If he's innocent, and he should be presumed innocent (seriously you guys are trusting the new York cops rn? The ones that shot their own cop and killed two people over a train fare????) then his life is completely ruined by this.

He will be a suspect for life. He will be considered a terrorist for life.

In Australia, a few years before I was born, in 1980, a woman had her 2 month old baby killed and eaten by dingos while on a camping trip.

Which is a fucking horror story on its own. But worse, the media released her name and that she was under suspicion of murdering the baby.

It was being debated on the TV every night. There was not a single person in the country who watched the news that didn't have an opinion on it. People were hyper analyzing her phrasing and her demeanor in interviews and deciding she was guilty because they didn't think she was mourning enough. And she was convicted of murder with no evidence, and given a sentence of life imprisonment. Because of public opinion. Because of a trial by media. She served over 3 years in jail. Where everyone thought she had killed her baby.

She was only released when her baby's little jacket was found in a dingo den, which opened an inquiry. 32 years after her baby was killed, her version of events was backed by the coroner.

However. Because of the media clown show that sold a story, there are people 45 years later who are still absolutely convinced that she killed her own daughter. Who hate her violently. Who would beat her if they saw her in the street. Everyone my parents age knows her by name and everyone has an opinion. Even though there were several inquests and coroner's evidence, there are still a LOT of people who believe fanatically that she killed her.

I literally had to sit through my hairdresser talking about how it was a conspiracy and a cover up, that she should never have been released, and that someone should have killed her. Like, last week.

Also beware people who act like they have a lot of wisdom but dont make any effort to make it so that its something you could use on your own without them. Not that its everyones job to teach you stuff, but if someone is like 'just trust me bro, im wise, you wouldnt get it' and just wants you to do what they say and not let you evaluate their reasoning for yourself. uh oh

Also beware someone who uses a whole lot of words to say not much, technobabble and spiritual babble is a common scam tactic (blinding with science). When a lot of words especially technical sounding ones are used to make the speaker sound smarter and more legitimate while either presenting false information, nonsense, or basic knowledge as if it is a new thing they discovered.

Spiritual scams use the basic knowledge repackaging part of this a lot, repackaging ideas like 'its good to be nice to people' in a lot more words to try to make the speaker look like they are saying something profound.

It will also be purposefully confusing, to make the reader/listener feel like something smart was said but they just dont understand it, when really nothing profound was said at all.

I think its fine and excellent to think youre hot shit but its important to remember that feeling like the smartest guy in the world is not an excuse to not research things, spread misinformation, or present your opinion as absolute truth.

Also a tip: if someone is like 'im very cool and its very difficult to impress me', especially if they dont say what specifically they are looking for in a person, this can be a gambit to get people to fawn for them and to seem impressive without actually having to do much.

Its important to take a step back and see if this person really does seem to be all that or if you just want to impress them because they presented themselves as difficult to impress.

And I say *can be* because I know I feel like im all that and a bag of chips and it *is* difficult to impress me, so I definitely dont want to write off others for this automatically, but it is important to pay attention to the *why* of these things and if they are setting it up like its a competition for their attention or not.

Thats also why I say not specifying what they are looking for/why its hard to impress them as something that may signal this tactic (bc I for example, try to be pretty explicit that its bc i have been abused a lot so I have a high standard for avoiding red flags for abuse).

That said what I am doing *in this post* can be a red flag, where I am setting up a situation where others doing something is bad but me doing it is fine. I think I have legitmate reasons and I wouldn't fault others for doing it in the way I have, but I just want people to be aware of that as a tactic as well, and to let people know that I do not think I personally should be exempt from your threat calculations.

It is important to take a step back and evaluate for yourself if you think what someone says and the way they present themselves has merit, *especially* anyone you find to be charasmatic, charming, or wise, since those are the ways people present themselves when running a scam.

The Joker + weapons

People used to get annoyed with me with how much I vented about a shitty Ex but honestly I think they are kind of boring for that. Do you not want to hear about the drama? the intrigue? the AUDACITY?

And I love hearing about peoples shitty Ex's! Someone called me on the phone vented for like an hour about people I never heard of before and boy I was INVESTED!

Anyways tell me stories about your shitty ex! DM or send and ask depending on if you want me to post it publicly! It can be an ex friend too I just love to hear people vent about this kind of thing, I love drama I love stories and I love helping people to process that kind of thing

💔 Simone

google how do i explain to doctor that they are asking me to develop a dependency with horrible withdrawal symptoms to this drug that yes does good things but also will cause bad effects that i am unlikely to want to continue with long term and thus i would be signing up for months of said horrible withdrawal symptoms to even give this a good shake and I DONT WANT TO FUCKING DO THAT STOP SUGGESTING ADDICTIONS TO ME WHEN I SPECIFICALLY STATED I DO NOT WANT TO TAKE THOSE TYPES OF DRUGS

feel like we forreal dont talk about dhalgren (1975) enough on the commie faggot pervert website

i don't always get treated like the scum of the earth for being disabled but when i do it makes me want to maul someone

Never before seen pictures of Heath Ledger's Joker makeup in The Dark Knight (2008)