mouthporn.net
@jayahult on Tumblr
Avatar

Jay A. Hult

@jayahult

Writer / Author of Heresiarch / 20s / Feel free to send asks!
Avatar

About

Hello! I'm Jay A. Hult, also known by a few other names. I'm a writer and an artist, with a particular interest in the occult, horror, linguistics and fantasy. I'm currently in college. My current big project is Heresiarch, a horror-fantasy web serial the updates weekly. You can read it here. If you like my work and want to support me directly, please check out my Patreon. I'll be posting updates to Heresiarch here from now on, in addition to other places where I share it.

I'm mostly focusing this blog on my personal work and other works that I like. I try my best to tag content that might be considered sensitive. You can check tags for ones you might want to block, or seek out if that strikes you as a fun activity.

Also, if you have any questions about me, my works or just want a recommendation for a good book, go right ahead! I'll try to answer in a timely, reasonable fashion.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
monikatouhou

Tip: you can microwave stale croissant for 15-20 seconds and it will become soft and warm and nice. Cut it open, put butter in it. Peace and love

Avatar
evil-tips

Tip: you can refrigerate stale croissant for 3-6 hours and it will become mushy and cold and unpleasant. It won't cut well, so just put a big clump of cold, hard butter on it. Strife and hatred.

Avatar
maidthings

Tip: you can do nothing to a stale croissant for any arbitrary length of time and it will remain as is. Do not cut it, or add butter. Stasis and stagnation.

Avatar
jayahult

Tip: you can perform various operations on a stale croissant until it is no longer able to be recognized as a croissant. Cut it until it is shreds upon shreds and add so much butter that it is more butter than croissant. Change and movement.

Avatar
reblogged

agh i'm trying to remember the name of this web comic about a tumblr scene kid who went to jail for murder or chopping up a body and it was about the traumatic experience of having to deal with tumblr users constantly bringing it up

Avatar
jayahult

You're thinking of What Happens Next.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
bace-jeleren

Accidentally wound up on "hear me out cake" tiktok, and I swear, if another one of these bitches puts down an at-most-unconventionally-attractive human man, Lady Dimitrescu or Nick Wilde/Robin Hood I am going to lose my fucking mind.

Saw one where the first person they named was Disney's Aladdin and I tapped out so hard I entered a fugue state and didn't regain full consciousness for like a solid hour.

Girlies giggling and gasping because they said their 'hear me out' was Gill from Finding Nemo, like

I'm so sorry, babygirl, but that's a hot fish. I know you thought you were being so controversial, but that is one of the most fuckable cartoon fish in existence. This is weaksauce.

Avatar
trans-rites
Avatar
shining-dawn
Avatar
reblogged

its weird to me the extent to which people on here use "for adults" to mean "of literary quality". like, to be clear, being for adults is (for the most part, im sure people will argue exceptions) is generally a *necessary* condition, but its certainly not a sufficient condition! theres lot of trash for adults. like, the vast vast majority of novels! romance novels, airport thrillers, etc

self-help books

Avatar
st-just

pop-psych, anything 'written' by a currently campaigning politician, 99% of fantasy novels with a map at the front....

Avatar
jayahult

What about fantasy novels with a map at the back?

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
jayahult

I try not to get too political on here, which is sort of a fool's errand. All speech, of course, is political speech, it is just that some topics appear neutral. The biggest sticking point for me has always been less controversy and more a lack of audience. I do not have many followers, and so for a long while now I have felt like my voice, while heard, would not be heard by many. That said, over the past twelve months I have felt increasingly compelled to speak on the matter of Israel and Palestine. My conscience will no longer permit any further silence, even if my words only reach a few people.

I am not Israeli, nor am I Palestinian, but I do not need a nationality to know what is wrong from what is right. A year ago today, Hamas engaged in what is fairly called a horrific attack on Israel, and took hostages. It killed nearly a thousand people. The horror that followed, though, beggars the October 7th attacks. The direct death toll of the IDF's terror campaign has been counted in the range of 40,000 and counting. This of course does not count the indirect death toll, and those that are missing. Were that taken into account, it would point to a death toll that now approaches the mark of 190,000 dead.

I live in a small town of about 8,000 people. I think about this - that had it been the IDF attacking my home, they would have killed every person there, every man, woman and child, almost 240 times over. Every person I have passed on the street, every child who took the bus to elementary school, every family, every person I liked or disliked here, my family, all would be annihilated. And then I think again of Gaza and my heart feels nothing but the deepest sympathy for them, and the greatest anger at the IDF for putting them in this position.

What angers me even more is that, by dint of being American, my government has made me complicit in this matter. It takes my taxes, spends them on bombs and planes and guns and ammo and ships them off to men who kill children to achieve aims that are at best inscrutable. Even the most jaded, cynic, realpolitik bastard you could think of would probably admit that at the very least Israel must be reigned in before the war escalates any further; that Israel's actions have seriously damaged the image of America abroad, even more so than before; and that in continuing support we burn international bridges that may not be able to be repaired for a long time. And yet my government, one I voted for, seems set upon supporting Israel's military forces without any thought of this.

Let me remind you now that this problem is not a new one but it is not an old one either; it is not one of religious conflict between Muslims and Jews. Religion and ethnicity play a factor, certainly, but that factor is as an agent of justification, not an agent of cause. The justification of this conflict is spiritual and racial; the cause is material and simple. Israel is akin to South Africa or Rhodesia, and yes I make that comparison intentionally, because Israel does indeed perform apartheid upon its Palestinian populace. Its cause since its inception with the British Mandate have been one and the same with South Africa and Rhodesia and even French Algeria: to displace and dispossess a native population of people at the barrel of the gun for the purpose of creating profit and landed ownership for a select few; to create a promised "living space" for the upper class; and to ensure the oppression and brutalization of a racialized underclass for further profit, be it through the military-industrial complex or forced labor on the part of the underclass, or both. You could call that apartheid, or settler-colonialism, or any other number of names. You could call it ethnoreligious conflict (though I would disagree with so weak a term) if you wanted. But what you must understand - what you must come to grips with - is that the Israeli government's actions are unequivocally wrong, and my government's support of them fundamentally debased.

I do not know what arguments will convince the unconvinced upon this matter, or what the great trepidation and cowardice is with people trying to defend these actions. When viewed with a clear eye it becomes obvious that the Israeli government has the attitude of an errant dog, loosed from its long American leash upon the innocents of Gaza, of Palestine in general and now of Lebanon where the genocidal warmongering seems primed to spread. Pundits and politicians continue to equivocate about Hamas's actions. Do they think we're fools? It's plain to see that if we are measuring butchers, the IDF have the better of them, and my government continues to enable them. Every bomb dropped and every person killed in Gaza is a black stain upon history which, if there is any justice, will live in infamy so long as history itself persists.

Perhaps there are those among my American audience who are so-called patriots; you believe that because Israel shows affection towards the US and its aims, that its actions and the United States' interests are so aligned. Perhaps you trust in your leaders to make the right choice in this matter. I would count this as also quite foolish, though perhaps understandable. The love of country blinds men to the love they should lavish on their fellow man. You only need look to Israel's actions for proof. That sort of patriotism will only let your leaders deceive you. Do not let them! If you must love your country, be clear-sighted in that love and do not let it outweigh your common sense and morality! We must put to our leaders great critique on the handling of this matter, on the left and the right, for their inadequacy and failure to do anything to restrain these acts of needless and unjustified aggression and genocide.

Perhaps there are those among you who would say that the Jewish people must have a state, and that state must be allowed self-defense, and these actions have been taken in that interest. To this I must say that I frankly must disagree, and I will word myself carefully here because I wish to make myself absolutely clear. I hold no animosity towards Jewish people, nor any religion in specific. I have animosity towards Israel's state; were it a Christian state, or a Muslim state, or a Buddhist state, or any other state with such an affiliation committing to these same actions, I would earnestly hold the same opinion. I do indeed believe that the movement for Palestinian freedom must brook no quarter for antisemitism, both for moral and strategic reasons which I presume to be obvious. Having said that, the root of my animosity is this: I have said before that I am an American by birth, and I must say that while I am not a patriot, I am endeared to certain values which are found in the US Constitution. Among them is the separation of church and state. How can I, a believer in this principle, in good conscience support a state bonded to a religion in its foundation? How can I understand Zionism, so defined as a ideology seeking the foundation of a Jewish state, as anything other than a direct violation of that principle?

Another of mine is this principle is this: only a man has a right. A state can have a right only so far as it defends the rights of men, and Israel has vastly breached that rule in this war. How lucky I am to worry for my right to free expression, to my religion, to my free movement; the people of Gaza must worry about their right to drink, to eat, to live uninjured by bombs, to live, and it is Israel who denies them these rights. If this is what self-defense means on the scale of nations, then it ought be abolished altogether on account of how it interferes with the rights of the subjects of that "defense."

Perhaps there are those among you who would say that there is also an ethnic component to Judaism. To this I have little to say, besides that a state bound to a single ethnicity and a single religion stands apart to me as substantially worse than just one or the other, perhaps even more than the sum of its parts. That is all I can muster on the matter.

Perhaps there are those who believe that this problem, at its root, is intractable. This is something I would consider too pessimistic, though I understand more the trepidation here. The crimes committed are obviously not easy to remediate or reconcile. However, the solution to this is not to stand idly by and allow these crimes to continue to happen. As I have mentioned before, the United States has continued to deliver weapons to the Israeli government in full knowledge of their crimes, and that only serves to make the problem more intractable, not less. The only way to start the process of healing these wounds will be to stop the bleeding. The only way to stop the bleeding is to prevent the continued assault on Gaza. And, though these situations are different, when we look to places like South Africa, we can see that reconciliation is possible. There can be a day - there must be a day - where Palestinians and Jewish people may live in peace together, without oppression, without fear of dispossession, without fear of violence or danger.

That day can only come with great effort, with collective action, with courage, intelligence and patience to see the whole thing through, not just in Israel and Palestine but around the world. We live now in a world more connected than ever, for good and ill, and we may wield that fact for good. The Israeli economy is, like most, reliant upon the global network of trade and commerce. This is why Boycott, Divest, Sanction is doing such important work. I would pay particular attention to their words; their work is to try to strategically force companies to divest themselves from the Israeli economy, disrupting the war machine and their ability to continue these actions, and would suggest that you take part in this effort if you can. This is something almost anyone can do, and every part counts if it is part of these strategic efforts; it only asks that you do not spend your money. But if you do have money to spare, I would suggest donating. There are of course many vetted fundraisers on this site. I don't think you'll need to look far to find them. I would also suggest the UNRWA, who are deeply underfunded in the face of the present crisis and need all the help they can get to in turn help the Palestinian people.

And, of course, I would suggest that you protest. I unfortunately live in an area where there is little opportunity for this, but if you can join a demonstration or protest, I think you ought to. We will not get the attention of our leaders without us letting them know, and public protest is one way to do that. I would also gladly suggest that you write to your leaders. Tell them that this matter weighs heavily on your conscience. Tell them that you are concerned on where they stand on the matter. Tell them that your support may be at risk if they do not stand in favor of Palestine, regardless of whether that is true or not. Get your friends involved. Get your family involved, wherever you are. The genocide can stop. The genocide must stop. The genocide will stop.

I hope, if you were not already convinced, that this has changed your mind, and I am sad that I did not say anything earlier. That is all.

I had feared that this sort of thing would show up on this post. Let me firstly clarify on this matter, @ereinii0n, since you seem confused: what occurred one year ago was a terrorist attack, and once again a horrific one. I have no qualms with saying that those responsible for killing civilians on both sides of this conflict ought be prosecuted under international law. But when you say that the deaths of 190,000 people - most innocent of any crime, thousands of whom were children - mean nothing to you, then I am not certain where you stand morally at all. Are you simply one who sees this level of indiscriminate and violent slaughter as necessary? How could you value their lives so little? On what basis do you justify such an action?

Secondly, I will not keep quiet on the matter. If this is the sort of response I receive, then it is only reason to be louder.

Avatar

I try not to get too political on here, which is sort of a fool's errand. All speech, of course, is political speech, it is just that some topics appear neutral. The biggest sticking point for me has always been less controversy and more a lack of audience. I do not have many followers, and so for a long while now I have felt like my voice, while heard, would not be heard by many. That said, over the past twelve months I have felt increasingly compelled to speak on the matter of Israel and Palestine. My conscience will no longer permit any further silence, even if my words only reach a few people.

I am not Israeli, nor am I Palestinian, but I do not need a nationality to know what is wrong from what is right. A year ago today, Hamas engaged in what is fairly called a horrific attack on Israel, and took hostages. It killed nearly a thousand people. The horror that followed, though, beggars the October 7th attacks. The direct death toll of the IDF's terror campaign has been counted in the range of 40,000 and counting. This of course does not count the indirect death toll, and those that are missing. Were that taken into account, it would point to a death toll that now approaches the mark of 190,000 dead.

I live in a small town of about 8,000 people. I think about this - that had it been the IDF attacking my home, they would have killed every person there, every man, woman and child, almost 240 times over. Every person I have passed on the street, every child who took the bus to elementary school, every family, every person I liked or disliked here, my family, all would be annihilated. And then I think again of Gaza and my heart feels nothing but the deepest sympathy for them, and the greatest anger at the IDF for putting them in this position.

What angers me even more is that, by dint of being American, my government has made me complicit in this matter. It takes my taxes, spends them on bombs and planes and guns and ammo and ships them off to men who kill children to achieve aims that are at best inscrutable. Even the most jaded, cynic, realpolitik bastard you could think of would probably admit that at the very least Israel must be reigned in before the war escalates any further; that Israel's actions have seriously damaged the image of America abroad, even more so than before; and that in continuing support we burn international bridges that may not be able to be repaired for a long time. And yet my government, one I voted for, seems set upon supporting Israel's military forces without any thought of this.

Let me remind you now that this problem is not a new one but it is not an old one either; it is not one of religious conflict between Muslims and Jews. Religion and ethnicity play a factor, certainly, but that factor is as an agent of justification, not an agent of cause. The justification of this conflict is spiritual and racial; the cause is material and simple. Israel is akin to South Africa or Rhodesia, and yes I make that comparison intentionally, because Israel does indeed perform apartheid upon its Palestinian populace. Its cause since its inception with the British Mandate have been one and the same with South Africa and Rhodesia and even French Algeria: to displace and dispossess a native population of people at the barrel of the gun for the purpose of creating profit and landed ownership for a select few; to create a promised "living space" for the upper class; and to ensure the oppression and brutalization of a racialized underclass for further profit, be it through the military-industrial complex or forced labor on the part of the underclass, or both. You could call that apartheid, or settler-colonialism, or any other number of names. You could call it ethnoreligious conflict (though I would disagree with so weak a term) if you wanted. But what you must understand - what you must come to grips with - is that the Israeli government's actions are unequivocally wrong, and my government's support of them fundamentally debased.

I do not know what arguments will convince the unconvinced upon this matter, or what the great trepidation and cowardice is with people trying to defend these actions. When viewed with a clear eye it becomes obvious that the Israeli government has the attitude of an errant dog, loosed from its long American leash upon the innocents of Gaza, of Palestine in general and now of Lebanon where the genocidal warmongering seems primed to spread. Pundits and politicians continue to equivocate about Hamas's actions. Do they think we're fools? It's plain to see that if we are measuring butchers, the IDF have the better of them, and my government continues to enable them. Every bomb dropped and every person killed in Gaza is a black stain upon history which, if there is any justice, will live in infamy so long as history itself persists.

Perhaps there are those among my American audience who are so-called patriots; you believe that because Israel shows affection towards the US and its aims, that its actions and the United States' interests are so aligned. Perhaps you trust in your leaders to make the right choice in this matter. I would count this as also quite foolish, though perhaps understandable. The love of country blinds men to the love they should lavish on their fellow man. You only need look to Israel's actions for proof. That sort of patriotism will only let your leaders deceive you. Do not let them! If you must love your country, be clear-sighted in that love and do not let it outweigh your common sense and morality! We must put to our leaders great critique on the handling of this matter, on the left and the right, for their inadequacy and failure to do anything to restrain these acts of needless and unjustified aggression and genocide.

Perhaps there are those among you who would say that the Jewish people must have a state, and that state must be allowed self-defense, and these actions have been taken in that interest. To this I must say that I frankly must disagree, and I will word myself carefully here because I wish to make myself absolutely clear. I hold no animosity towards Jewish people, nor any religion in specific. I have animosity towards Israel's state; were it a Christian state, or a Muslim state, or a Buddhist state, or any other state with such an affiliation committing to these same actions, I would earnestly hold the same opinion. I do indeed believe that the movement for Palestinian freedom must brook no quarter for antisemitism, both for moral and strategic reasons which I presume to be obvious. Having said that, the root of my animosity is this: I have said before that I am an American by birth, and I must say that while I am not a patriot, I am endeared to certain values which are found in the US Constitution. Among them is the separation of church and state. How can I, a believer in this principle, in good conscience support a state bonded to a religion in its foundation? How can I understand Zionism, so defined as a ideology seeking the foundation of a Jewish state, as anything other than a direct violation of that principle?

Another principle of mine is this: only a man has a right. A state can have a right only so far as it defends the rights of men, and Israel has vastly breached that rule in this war. How lucky I am to worry for my right to free expression, to my religion, to my free movement; the people of Gaza must worry about their right to drink, to eat, to live uninjured by bombs, to live, and it is Israel who denies them these rights. If this is what self-defense means on the scale of nations, then it ought be abolished altogether on account of how it interferes with the rights of the subjects of that "defense."

Perhaps there are those among you who would say that there is also an ethnic component to Judaism. To this I have little to say, besides that a state bound to a single ethnicity and a single religion stands apart to me as substantially worse than just one or the other, perhaps even more than the sum of its parts. That is all I can muster on the matter.

Perhaps there are those who believe that this problem, at its root, is intractable. This is something I would consider too pessimistic, though I understand more the trepidation here. The crimes committed are obviously not easy to remediate or reconcile. However, the solution to this is not to stand idly by and allow these crimes to continue to happen. As I have mentioned before, the United States has continued to deliver weapons to the Israeli government in full knowledge of their crimes, and that only serves to make the problem more intractable, not less. The only way to start the process of healing these wounds will be to stop the bleeding. The only way to stop the bleeding is to prevent the continued assault on Gaza. And, though these situations are different, when we look to places like South Africa, we can see that reconciliation is possible. There can be a day - there must be a day - where Palestinians and Jewish people may live in peace together, without oppression, without fear of dispossession, without fear of violence or danger.

That day can only come with great effort, with collective action, with courage, intelligence and patience to see the whole thing through, not just in Israel and Palestine but around the world. We live now in a world more connected than ever, for good and ill, and we may wield that fact for good. The Israeli economy is, like most, reliant upon the global network of trade and commerce. This is why Boycott, Divest, Sanction is doing such important work. I would pay particular attention to their words; their work is to try to strategically force companies to divest themselves from the Israeli economy, disrupting the war machine and their ability to continue these actions, and would suggest that you take part in this effort if you can. This is something almost anyone can do, and every part counts if it is part of these strategic efforts; it only asks that you do not spend your money. But if you do have money to spare, I would suggest donating. There are of course many vetted fundraisers on this site. I don't think you'll need to look far to find them. I would also suggest the UNRWA, who are deeply underfunded in the face of the present crisis and need all the help they can get to in turn help the Palestinian people.

And, of course, I would suggest that you protest. I unfortunately live in an area where there is little opportunity for this, but if you can join a demonstration or protest, I think you ought to. We will not get the attention of our leaders without us letting them know, and public protest is one way to do that. I would also gladly suggest that you write to your leaders. Tell them that this matter weighs heavily on your conscience. Tell them that you are concerned on where they stand on the matter. Tell them that your support may be at risk if they do not stand in favor of Palestine, regardless of whether that is true or not. Get your friends involved. Get your family involved, wherever you are. The genocide can stop. The genocide must stop. The genocide will stop.

I hope, if you were not already convinced, that this has changed your mind, and I am sad that I did not say anything earlier. That is all.

Avatar

Had a dream that there was a new Assassin’s Creed and there was a character creator. There were three options for gender: “male, female, and biglady.” As expected biglady was an extremely tall woman, we’re talking about 10+ feet tall. When you chose this option you immediately got the option to “go into photo mode with smallcuck.” Smallcuck was always a very good digital recreation of the person currently holding the controller, and would either be holding the MCs hand or sitting on her lap depending on what you were doing in photo mode. People were mad about this online.

There were other gender options which were mostly some variant of a woman with a penis (inexplicably all involved were nude) but for some reason everyone was mad at smallcuck and biglady. I suppose probably because of the massive amount of surveillance needed to make a personalized smallcuck for every copy of the game.

Avatar

Foreknowledge

"Oh, yeah, I was out there, man. The 90s and early 2000s were a sorta wild time in the scene. You had all of the stuff about Project Open Book coming out. I was with the FBAA at the time, and I remember flicking on the news when the stuff in Mindanao was going down. I actually went out there myself. Easier when you can just fly there yourself, of course, to see what's really going on. It was a disaster, head to toe.

Now I'm not trying to equivocate here, the PAF and Yanluo were fascists. End of story, they had to go. What happened in Seattle is proof enough of that. But we did some damn criminal things over there. We armed local militias that we shouldn't've, we deployed powers that we shouldn't've, and we did it using bad information from a black box project that was torturing US and foreign nationals. And everyone talks about the deployment of Screamer, rightfully, but he wasn't the only Akers we put out there. I once watched a US-affiliated guy - I'm not sure which one - get a single order and telekinetically implode a whole apartment block. It looked like it nearly killed him. But I'm sadder by far for any poor sap that was inside. That was about when I had enough and went back, and quit the FBAA.

I remember when Open Book leaked. A lot of people don't even know what we were doing, exactly, besides a lot of precognition and torture. The whole thing kicked off as a competitor to the precognitive cells they have over in China. Ever since the USSR fell out of the picture, they've been on basically every three-letter agency's shitlist, and the four-letter agency was roped in too. I read the whole thing, all of the leaks. I felt like I had to. Not a lot of people recall that pathokinetics and sense-alterers were also in the mix. You had prisoners pre-confessing to crimes they would commit, prisoners screaming because they were being forced to hallucinate dead family members, prisoners who were forced to fall into love with their torturers. That real scary Kansas City shit. And we still don't know where most of them ended up. One of them was seventeen...

Abner - I'm not calling him former president Abner, he doesn't deserve that respect - went up and denied it. It was bullshit, and everyone knew it. This was one of his administration's projects, projecting our power over foreign rivals. We knew a little bit about precognitive interference back then, just not that it worked both ways, regardless of side. And when the dust settled even his own party wanted him impeached - it was the only way for the Republicans to save face on their foreign policy planks, and, I mean, it fucking worked man. I hate to say it, but that's how McCain got elected, by being the first to break ranks over it. And of course he resigned before anything could come of it.

And of course nobody thinks about where all those guys went after Open Book. The guys in units like Cherry Tree or Almighty Providence. You know their unit mottos? "You cannot tell a lie," "It shall come to pass." Disgusting. yeah, they made a show of putting a few of them away. But anyone that was actually valuable? They needed to keep them, they're just deployed in subtler ways. Places people wouldn't think to look. Think about it this way: have you ever noticed that since 2007, there hasn't been a single product recall from the FDA? It's odd, isn't it. Almost like they're catching the bad stuff before it ever comes to market. Like they've got foreknowledge."

Avatar
reblogged

Help Appreciated

Sorry to beg, but I’m low on renting funds today after needing to spend money on utilities, groceries, and my phones battery deciding to explode in size to break my screen into pieces.

Thank you and please take care of yourselves.

Avatar

Precognetics

Precognetics (a neologism of precognition and cybernetics) is a multidisciplinary field that studies the theory and practical applications of precognition. Precognetics sits at the intersection of a variety of fields, including powered studies, information theory, game theory, computer science, neurology, economics, geopolitics, legal studies, and military strategy and tactics. [1][2] It is also considered a subset of hypercognetics, The term precognetics was coined in 1995 by Jacques Phillips, deriving it from the field of cybernetics in his work A Fixed Future: Precognition and Human Development, which also laid the core groundwork for the field. [3]

Precognetics can broadly be split into two fields: theoretical precognetics and applied precognetics. Theoretical precognetics primarily deals with the upper bounds and limitations of precognitive powers, alongside the philosophical implications of the existence and practice of precognition. Originally, it was thought that precognition was entirely free of error within a given precognitive's Meinhoff field, but this was later found to be untrue with the discovery of precognitive competition, result poisoning, cognitohazardous feedback loops, and local precognitive interference, among other issues. [4][5][6] This gave rise to the field of applied precognetics, which primarily studies the implications of precognition for everyday life and the operations of institutions ranging from government agencies to financial instruments. The further subfield of legal precognetics deals with interactions between precognitive powers and civil and criminal law, particularly with regard to heroes and villains. [5][6]

[Contents] [Overview] [History of Precognetics] [Notable applications] [Intersection with theology] [See also]

  • Applied precognetics
  • Theoretical precognetics
  • Hypercognetics
  • Outline of Powered Studies
  • Powered psychology
  • Precognitive limits
  • The Astrologer
  • Project Open Book
  • The Mindanao Incident
  • February 13 Guangzhou bombings
  • The Great Recession
  • Ohio v. Black
  • California v. Willis
  • Oklahoma v. Smithson
You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net