TOP 10 HOTTEST MOVIE MONSTERS (as voted by my followers)
#10. Darkness portrayed by Tim Curry (4%) ↳ legend (1985) dir. ridley scott
Whatever our souls are made of, his and mine are the same.
its really telling where you learned about lapis lazuli. put yours in the tags
Medusas, Javier Piñón
Another cowboy Spock wip ✨
I just saw a post that deeply annoyed me because it went, "Here's a story that's like a Regency romance, but I FIXED it by making the characters sexually liberated and shame-free and polyamorous!"
This is like saying, "Here's a story that's like a thriller, but I FIXED it by having the serial killer go to therapy instead of trapping victims in his evil maze and dismembering them."
.
The thing a lot of people don't seem to get is that the entire appeal of a Regency romance is watching a deeply repressed, perfectly controlled, buttoned up, straight-laced person who has never expressed an emotion before fall so hard for someone that something in them just breaks and they come completely unhinged.
It's a very specific kink that this genre is tapping into.
People who think the characters in a Regency novel are boring are missing the whole point. The characters are supposed to be boring, right up until they fall so madly in love that it drives them insane, at which point they become very interesting. Regency romance novelists are doing the writing equivalent of putting plain white featureless uncooked whole eggs in a microwave and waiting for them to explode.
reread furuba ERM sue me #straightlove
I HAVE BEEN FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGED BY YOUTUBE FISHING VIDEOS
Night on Bald Mountain - Fantasia (1940)
Destroy the myth that libraries are no longer relevant. If you use your library, please reblog.
Sketchbook cover!! I completed this back in Febuary for the new year.
It’s been a bit of a weird week, so I asked everyone on Twitter what some of their favourite animals were, and channelled my energy into drawing as many as I could! (All birds at the moment, because I’m slightly bias ahaha)
Marshall Field Department Store at the corner of State Street, Chicago, 1895.
Not sure if the source of this, but the photo is from 1902-1903, judging by the women's clothing.
look at all those women with their proportionally reasonable waist sizes!!! what about the doubtless universal quest for a 15" waist that we all know had Edwardian women fainting constantly?!?! </s>