mouthporn.net
#transformative fandom – @izzyizumi on Tumblr
Avatar

(((Digimon Is Forever)))

@izzyizumi / izzyizumi.tumblr.com

Near-100% DIGIMON blog with a focus on + POSITIVITY for fav series DIGIMON ADVENTURE/02 (also TRI/KIZUNA/2020 POSITIVE + ANYTHING ADVENTURE{S} to come), fav charas KOUSHIRO IZUMI, TAICHI YAGAMI, DAISUKE MOTOMIYA, and others; otps TAISHIRO, KENSUKE/Daiken(suke), and DAIKARI, and multishipped others (JOUMI, SORATO, SOMI / SoraMi(mi), TAKOUJI, Michi/TaiMimi, Miyakari, Mimato, YamaJou, Joushiro, Koukari, Meikeru/TakeMei, MiMei, Kenkari, Jurato, Jenkato, RukiJuri, Junzumi, Kiriha/Taiki, LGBTQIA+ ships / portrayals in general~ (my old main blog with Digimon tags and older reblogs as well: here!) REPEAT?_verse - my Taishiro & side-ships / (+ships) AUs / Adventures-centric ficverse / AMV-verse ! (most recent AMV with links to past AMVs can also be found here!!!) READY?_ - my older and incredibly self-indulgent but "fun" OTP Fan-Soundtrack?? AMVs index - my Adventure(s) AMVs ! Fanworks Index - All Gifsets/Icons, etc.! (MORE ABOUT/RULES & FAQ) (BEFORE FOLLOWING / interacting!!!) (+ my posts! / my gifs! / my edits! koushirouizumi - my Digimon centric personal / writing / other TOP FAVS (charas, ships, creations etc.) blog This blog has fanart posted with permission or from OPs only! *Any NSFW is tagged 'r18' (depending on contents).
Avatar
reblogged

Not gonna draw attention to the post because I suspect the person might blow a gasket, but it's always so funny to me when you see someone picking apart fanart, in this case, a popular fan Ot3 pairing, and they're like, "y'all have brainrot, this'll never be canon, you realize that?"

And maybe I'm just ancient, but since when has fandom ever been about validating canon? Canon is incidental to fandom output. It is, at best, a guideline. You can stick to it, or you can go so far off the beaten path that you fall off the edge of the world and wind up in a new one where the map has words like "here be dragons" stamped in the upper corner.

Fandom is about exploration beyond the canon. It can look like canon, talk like canon, and sometimes even emulate it so perfectly you'd swear you've found the author's secret account, but it doesn't have to.

Ultimately, however, it's about having fun. And if you can't understand that, I have no idea what you're doing here.

Avatar

💥🙌👏

Well shit, Henry Jenkins, out here in 1997 dropping truth bombs

Oh hey I need this for a research paper I’m writing, thank you!

Avatar
angstbotfic

i mean he had been out here since 1988 dropping such bombs:

“‘fandom’ is a vehicle of marginalized subcultural groups (women, the young, gays, etc.) to pry open space for their cultural concerns within dominant representations; it is a way of appropriating media texts and rereading them in a way that serves different interests, a way of transforming mass culture into a popular culture”

Jenkins, Henry. “Star Trek Rerun, Reread, Rewritten: Fan Writing as Textual Poaching.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 5, no. 2 (1988): 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295038809366691.  

there are even some earlier works in fan studies but that’s what i have ready to hand. 

Avatar
neil-gaiman

Henry’s been amazing for a long time.

Avatar

Not gonna draw attention to the post because I suspect the person might blow a gasket, but it's always so funny to me when you see someone picking apart fanart, in this case, a popular fan Ot3 pairing, and they're like, "y'all have brainrot, this'll never be canon, you realize that?"

And maybe I'm just ancient, but since when has fandom ever been about validating canon? Canon is incidental to fandom output. It is, at best, a guideline. You can stick to it, or you can go so far off the beaten path that you fall off the edge of the world and wind up in a new one where the map has words like "here be dragons" stamped in the upper corner.

Fandom is about exploration beyond the canon. It can look like canon, talk like canon, and sometimes even emulate it so perfectly you'd swear you've found the author's secret account, but it doesn't have to.

Ultimately, however, it's about having fun. And if you can't understand that, I have no idea what you're doing here.

Avatar
reblogged

do i excessively share my thoughts about the content that I consume on a very public platform? yes. do I also never ever want the creators of said content to be aware of or god forbid interact with said content? also yes.

the idea that people want to be observed by their favourite celebrities is incomprehensible to me. can you imagine being on a platform like twitter where creators directly judging you for your opinions is not only possible but culturally acceptable? unthinkable.

that's why i am on tumblr. this is a safe space. no self respecting celebrity would use this hellsite in an official capacity, and its lack of verified accounts and general anonymity would make it difficult anyway. the author might not be dead but the doors are barricaded.

Avatar
reblogged

"I hate fandom, it's everywhere on this site," Sir (gender-neutral) this is Tumblr, aka the Denny's parking lot at 3 am of websites.

Of course, fandom is everywhere. Their tagline on the app store used to be "the home of fandom." You're the one who walked in here, you can walk yourself right back out.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
fansplaining
Fan reactions to disabled and neurodivergent headcanons in fic can really vary. I’ve had really positive comments on my fic from other disabled and neurodivergent fans—we seem to enjoy seeing our shared disabled headcanons written in fic—a lot of us can see the possibilities for reimagining our favorite characters as disabled. But I’ve sometimes had non-disabled and neurotypical fans take offense when their favorite characters are written as disabled. There is still a huge amount of stigma around disability, and that exists in fandom as well as anywhere else. I want to see more characters like me on screen, and to have them identified in canon as disabled or neurodivergent. But until that day comes, I’ll keep writing characters that look and think and act like me.

@sophiainspace in our “Disability and Fandom” double episode. Click through to hear their entire segment or read a full transcript.

Avatar
reblogged

One thing I would love to see fandom get away from is an obsession with canon.  So many fans seem unhappy when what they wanted to see doesn’t become canon, and I am here to tell you that this is exactly what fandom should be for!  

Canon is great and all, and if you’re jiving with it, fantastic.  But if you’re not, if canon veers in a direction you don’t enjoy, or there are just aspects of canon that aren’t your thing, then fandom is exactly the place you should be able to disregard them.  Explore whatever rabbit hole you like.  Create alternate timelines to suit your tastes, ship non-canon ships, ship all the ships, end things differently.  Do what you like, and stop getting hung up on what canon says.  Fandom should be about pursuing your joy, even if (and often especially if) that joy veers of the well-trod canon paths.

Canon is a guideline that brings us all together.  It’s not the law.  It’s not the only path you can walk.  Please, I’m telling you, the sooner you give up canon fundamentalism and embrace the fanon that makes you happiest, the healthier and happier everyone is going to be in fandom.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
inu-fiction

PSA: Stuff You Maybe Didn’t Realize You Can Back Up To AO3, And How To Tag it

Tumblr seems to be in potential death throes or at least, incredibly volatile and unreliable lately, but we’ve done some pretty good and informative work on canon analysis and reference guides so I was looking for ways to back it up without losing it…and the solution became obvious to me: Archive of Our Own, aka AO3.  “What?” you might ask if you are less familiar with their TOS. “Isn’t that just a fanfic archive??” No! It’s a fanWORK archive. It is an archive for fanworks in general! “Fanwork” is a broad term that encompasses a lot of things, but it doesn’t just include fanfic and fanart, vids etc; it also includes “fannish” essays and articles that fall under what’s often called “meta” (from the word for “beyond” or “above”, referencing that it goes beyond the original exact text)! The defining factor of whether Archive of Our Own is the appropriate place to post it is not whether or not it’s a fictional expansion of canon (fanfic), though that is definitely included - no, it’s literally just “is this a work by a ‘fan’ intended for other ‘fannish’ folks/of ‘fannish’ interest?”  The articles we’ve written as a handy reference to the period-appropriate Japanese clothing worn by Inuyasha characters?  The analyses of characters? The delineations of concrete canon (the original work) vs common “fanon” (common misconceptions within the fandom)? Even the discussion of broader cultural, historical, and geographic context that applies to the series and many potential fanworks?  All of those are fannish nonfiction! Which means they absolutely can (and will) have a home on AO3, and I encourage anybody who is wanting to back up similar works of “fannish interest” - ranging from research they’ve done for a fic, to character analyses and headcanons - to use AO3 for it, because it’s a stable, smooth-running platform that is ad-free and unlike tumblr, is run by a nonprofit (The OTW) that itself is run by and for the benefit of, fellow fans.  Of course, that begs the question of how to tag your work if you do cross-post it, eh? So on that note, here’s a quick run-down of tags we’re finding useful and applicable, which I’ve figured out through a combination of trial and error and actually asking a tag wrangler (shoutout to @wrangletangle for their invaluable help!): First, the Very Broad: - “ Nonfiction ”. This helps separate it from fanfic on the archive, so people who aren’t looking for anything but fanfic are less likely to have to skim past it, whereas people looking for exactly that content are more likely to find it. - while “Meta” and “Essay” and even “Information” are all sometimes used for the kinds of nonfiction and analytical works we post, I’ve been told “ Meta Essay ” is the advisable specific tag for such works. This would apply to character analyses, reference guides to canon, and even reference guides to real-world things that are reflected in the canon (such as our articles on Japanese clothing as worn by the characters).  The other three tags are usable, and I’ve been using them as well to cover my bases, but they’ll also tend to bring up content such as “essay format” fanfic or fanfic with titles with those words in them - something that does not happen with “Meta Essay”.

- I’ve also found by poking around in suggested tags, that “ Fanwork Research & Reference Guides ” is consistently used (even by casual users) for: nonfiction fannish works relating to analyses of canon materials; analyses of and meta on fandom-specific or fanwork-specific tropes; information on or guides to writing real-world stuff that applies to or is reflected in specific fandoms’ media (e.g. articles on period-appropriate culture-specific costuming and how to describe it); and expanded background materials for specific fans’ fanworks (such as how a given AU’s worldbuilding is supposed to be set up) that didn’t fit within the narrative proper and is separated out as a reference for interested readers. Basically, if it’s an original fan-made reference for something specific to one or more fanworks, or a research aid for writing certain things applicable to fanworks or fannish interests in general, then it can fall under that latter tag. 

- You should also mark it with any appropriate fandom(s) in the “Fandom” field. Just like you would for a fanfic, because of course, the work is specifically relevant to fans of X canon, right? If it discusses sensitive topics, or particular characters, etc., you should probably tag for those. E.g. “death” or “mental illness”, “Kagome Higurashi”, etc. 

Additionally, if you are backing it up from a Tumblr you may wish to add: - “ Archived From Tumblr “ and/or “ Cross-Posted From Tumblr ” to reference the original place of publication, for works originally posted to tumblr. (I advise this if only because someday, there might not be “tumblr” as we know it, and someone might be specifically looking for content that was originally on it, you never know) - “ Archived From [blog name] Blog ”; this marks it as an archived work from a specific blog. And yes, I recommend adding the word “blog” in there for clarity- Wrangletangle was actually delighted that I bothered to tag our first archived work with “Archived From Inu-Fiction Blog” because being EXTREMLY specific about things like that is super helpful to the tag wranglers on AO3, who have to decide how to categorize/”syn” (synonym) various new tags from alphabetized lists without context of the original posting right in front of them.  In other words, including the name AND the word “blog” in it, helps them categorize the tag on the back end without having to spend extra time googling what the heck “[Insert Name Here]” was originally

Overall, you should be as specific and clear as possible, but those tags/tag formats should prove useful in tagging it correctly should you choose to put fannish essays and articles up on AO3 :) Oh, and protip sidebar for those posting, especially works that are more than plain text: you can make archiving things quicker and easier for yourself, but remember to plan ahead for tumblr’s potential demise/disabling/service interruptions. The good news: You can literally copy and paste the ENTIRE text of a tumblr post from say, an “edit” window, on tumblr, straight into AO3′s Rich Text Format editor, and it will preserve pretty much all or almost all of the formatting - such as bold, italics, embedded links, etc! But the bad news: keep in mind that while AO3 allows for embedded images and it WILL transfer those embedded images with a quick copy-paste like that, AO3 itself doesn’t host the images for embedding; those are still external images. This means that whether or not they continue to load/display for users, depends entirely on whether the file is still on the original external server! As I quickly discovered, in the case of posts copied from the Edit window of a tumblr post, the images will still point to the copies of the images ON tumblr’s servers. What this means is that you should back up (save copies elsewhere of) any embedded images that you consider vital to such posts, in case you need to upload them elsewhere and fiddle with where the external image is being pulled from, later.  Personally, I’m doing that AND adding image descriptions underneath them, just to be on the safe side (and in fairness, this makes it more accessible to people who cannot view the images anyway, such as sight-impaired people who use screen readers or people who have images set to not automatically display on their browser, so it’s win-win)

Avatar

hey uh

this is probably somewhat awkward for a fiction written years ago, but today i read both of the mirror mirror-verse fictions and found them quite enjoyable. thank you for writing them.

Avatar

Okay, so, I think the reason that explanations about this aren’t gaining traction is that we as ficauthors instinctively respond by focusing on our experience to reassure you–“No, it’s great! I love getting comments on older fic! No fanfic author is going to object to that!”–and the reason that doesn’t have much of an effect is that it’s inherently subjective. Just because one person has a positive reaction doesn’t mean everyone does, and besides, we might just be polite, right?

Here’s the actual explanation: Your anxieties are misplaced because you are mistaking a fanfiction site for social media.

Ao3 isn’t Facebook! It’s an archive. Works there are intended to be easily found and enjoyed years after their creation, exactly the same as books in a library!

It’s not “awkward” to say you just read Fahrenheit 451 for the first time even though it was written years ago, and in the same way, new readers are SUPPOSED to be constantly finding fic and enjoying it regardless of publishing date. That’s the entire point of publishing it.

Fanfiction sites are not social media. There’s no such thing as “creeping” in someone’s old posts. In a very real way, there’s no such thing as “old posts” at all. Again–by that logic, you’re being creepy whenever you pick up a book at the library that’s more than a few months old! That’s insane.

If this is your first time reading Macbeth, then it’s a totally new experience to you and you can and SHOULD talk about your impressions and reactions to that story in the context that you’re reading it. There’s entire courses and academic careers dedicated to doing exactly that. If today was the first time you went looking in the right section of the site to find our mirrorverse fic, then that fic is a new story to you and you should join the conversation.

These fics are there to be preserved so that people can always find and read and interact with them for the first time. That’s actually the entire point.

Avatar
Avatar

I feel like I’m seeing a lot of critiques of fandom being passed around lately that keep conflating actually harmful behaviour with completely innocuous stuff, and frequently cross over into ableist territory what with making fun of stuff like “comfort characters” or people “making media part of their personality,” or generally bashing people for being emotionally invested in media in a non-normative way (and then deflecting critiques of the ableism with “stop using that as an excuse for bad behaviour!” when there’s nothing inherently bad about the things being lumped in with those behaviours). Like… Jesus Christ people. Can we not.

Avatar
doomhamster

Right?! I am 100% behind respecting people who “don’t engage with media the way I do”. Which is why I don’t go around posting long rants about how dare people prefer meta to shipping?! How can they claim to be truly fans when they’ve never had a character resonate with them to the point they get irrationally protective?! Isn’t it sad that these lowly creatures are allowed to take up fandom space?

Also? I’m autistic and I agree it’s potentially ableist, but even if it *weren’t*, I don’t think it’s okay to look down your nose at someone for their interests, or for where they find emotional comfort.

Honestly. And it’s such a bizarre turnaround from what I was seeing a few years ago, which was that meta was inferior and just a shallow, pale imitation of fanfic (???), fanfiction was the superior, more progressive and transformative form of engagement, and anyone who enjoyed the more criticism-focused approach to media was doing fandom wrong, and ought to “just write a fanfic like everyone else” if something in a story fell short for them or felt poorly constructed. (See: the dunking on “curatorial fandom” and pedastalization of “transformative fandom”, which imo also had a touch of ableism given how autistic-coded a lot of behaviours associated with curatorial approaches are.)

That was all pretty upsetting for me, as someone who actually really likes meta, and who initially got into online fandom primarily to have and read meta conversations. But this new approach is also attacking a form of engagement that really enjoy and find meaningful - and many people like both! The tone and method of my engagement changes a lot depending on which one I’m doing (and really, they’re not that mutually exclusive). People are capable of code-switching. 

Avatar
Avatar
fanhackers
The idea of fan cultures, or “fandoms,” cultivating fan fiction writers began at the earliest in the 1920s with societies dedicated to Jane Austen and Sherlock Holmes, but took off in the late 1960s with the advent of Star Trek fanzines. The negative stereotype of “fans today is that of obsessed geeks, like “Trekkies, who love nothing more than to watch the same installments over and over…” However, this represents a core misunderstanding of what it is to be a fan: that is, to have the “ability to transform personal reaction into social interaction, spectatorial culture into participatory culture… not by being a regular viewer of a particular program but by translating that viewing into some kind of cultural activity.” Henry Jenkins, a Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor and expert on fan culture, likens fan fiction to the story of The Velveteen Rabbit: that the investment in something is what gives it a meaning rather than any intrinsic merits or economic value. For fans who invest in a television show, book, or movie, that investment sparks production, and reading or viewing sparks writing, until the two are inseparable. They are not watching the same thing over and over, but rather are creating something new instead.

Update: Now with link to an open access version of the paper and correct page, apologies for the typo.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net