mouthporn.net
#f&b master post – @horizon-verizon on Tumblr
Avatar

editorialized torpedo

@horizon-verizon / horizon-verizon.tumblr.com

she/her -- ASoIaF Enthusiast -- (I will be changing the title of this blog frequently just because I want to)
Avatar
Anonymous asked:

https://www.tumblr.com/miss-dollette/751777149185376256/wake-up-call-for-ballistic-team-black-and-rhaenyra?source=share lol

Lucky for me, I never thought that Rhaenyra was Daenerys or Daenerys-like. (my "Rhaenyra and Feminism" tag) I have said these things about these two:

  1. Rhaenyra is not a feminist because no one can be at this time and feminism as a movement began in the 18th century under specific conditions of a particular philosophical movement and under specific economic conditions whereas Rhaenyra, Catelyn, Alysanne, even Daenerys all live in a completely different world, a medievalesque/"ancient" own.....does that mean we shouldn't care how any woman before the 18th century (or those in fiction who would exist out of a feminist-minded/included society) or who aren't full blown feminists do to try to gain autonomy for themselves or to help others altruistically? Misogyny still exists, and it existed "back then"; we need to understand these women and the contours of the sexist conditions under which they live which both helps us to define and trace sexism as well as understand and connect ourselves to these characters to understand oppressive structures' effect on individual who then go on to affect and respond to their oppressive societies. And thus, some women, because they are people too (novel idea) are going to be more selfish than others, and partly bc they have been subjected to this double standard and the socially-justified abuse done against them since young (Alicent-Rhaenyra, esp in the show with how fans kept saying "Alicent is queen, se can demand to see thr baby all she wants, Rhaenyra didn't have to go up there", ignoring the fact that Alicent is trying to humiliate her and she herself knows that she wouldn't like it if someone did the same to her when she birthed her kids; in the bk, she turns against Rhaenyra when R is about 9-10, after Aegon is born and Viserys kicks Otto out for protesting against his choice to keep Rhaenyra as his heir) So yeah, she became more self-focused.
  2. but that doesn't give us license to blame things that were not her fault or her doing or came form people who existed way before she was born; ignore the fact that she loved her kids and vice versa; that she died by femicide and bc of systemic sexism against overt female rulership; that she is one of the only woman and one of the last woman who actually had more political power than her husband and chose him (Rhaenys was the other one who got to choose); that after her death and fall, magic in the world took another hit and the dragons that could have been used to fight against the Others was lost before Daenerys Targaryen reawakened them and gave a reboot to magic in general; [🖇rhaenin-time] that after Rhaenyra's fall, after the fall of one of the few women who a Targ male relative actively supported in away unlike most men of her society instead of just abusing, sidelining, and using up, most if not all other Targ women--who never able to choose their husbands--were not protected from Andal patriarchy and its licens eof spousal abuse because the dynasty itself has fully assimilated into Andal patriarchy with the loss
  3. that fans discredit Rhaenyra's victimhood and problems stemming from sexism how they discredit Daenerys' past victimhood; and then they go on to say Dany wasn't a revolutionary figure bec she's a Targ and a child of incest and can ride "nukes" and profited off of slavery -- people will move goal posts to for their anti-woman agendas and the Dance is coming from and centered around that -- these two women are dehumanized both in-world and the fandom/real life because those do not like they are women who have both acquired power over men or "equal" to what men are granted/obtain for themselves
  4. talked myself to death about how "bastard" is a legal and sociopolitical term that can be "fixed" or argued agianst, how only a King/Monarch could legitimize, how Viserys decided--with Corlys--to accept Rhaenyra's kids into his household and thus include in the line of succession, etc. etc.

Some Master Posts with a List of Links Where I have Argued for Rhaenyra & Why We Should Care about Her

  1. POST
  2. POST
  3. POST [esp against Criston Cole and the Idea that Show!Rhaenyra was Predatory]

This is a story about how even the "realm's delight" could not be considered worthy enough to live compared to her rapist scum of a brother, because even the "realm's delight" will always be just a woman so she will always be inherently inferior to any man however pathetic or incompetent he may be. This is a story of tragic irony because it is a woman, and Rhaenyra's descendant specifically, that is currently bearing the Targaryen name, it is a woman reconstructing the Targaryen legacy, it is a woman that brought back the music of dragons, almost two centuries after Westeros would rather have them perish and destroy everything in their passing than allow a woman on the throne, the very dragons that are now meant to save Westeros from its impending doom. And this feels like justice to me. I'm sorry that some people are so blind in their contrarianism that they prefer to make up a bazillion nonsensical headcanons than acknowledge that this is the actual theme of this story.

If no one wishes to read from those links I give here, that's really not on me. It's be ironic, too, if they took the time to read all of that OP's long post anon' links, though.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

If Rhaenyra reconciles with Alicent in any way that’s just not her. That’s Condal & Hess’s self-insert OC. Because in F&B, Rhaenyra’s children are her joy, her pride, her strenght, her greatest love and reconciling with a person who actively participated in bringing the war that doomed her children ? That’s character assassination. And since the only similarity between TV!Rhaenyra and Book!Rhaenyra is the name, and Condal & Hess are obsessed with Rhaenicent, I wouldn’t put this theory past them.

Which is why I don't "hate" or "like" characters in the same way that one hates a character as if they could be real...bc I don't think of them as their "true" selves and thus its a waste of energy to "hate" them and not the writing for them. This show is that un-seriously insidious.

The assassination of Rhaenyra's character has really begun in the first episode, where, again, she's apparently only bosom friends with a girl who the show fails to show how they ever got to be in each other's confidence as you NEED to do with the "opposites Attract" trope AND how Alicent has never truly understood or accepted Rhaenyra's feelings and ideas about herself or her troubles.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

https://www.tumblr.com/aegonthebest/750611598237941760/want-to-hear-something-harsh-here-it-is?source=share

a fan of aegon and alicent saying this…

The worst thing is that that person thinks they are giving a great opinion when in reality they are just biased and hypocritical. lol

For reference:

Want to hear something harsh?, here it is, Rhaenyra spent the entire series being a spoiled brat hiding behind her father, she did bad things but she didn't care, because at the end of the day, Viserys, being the idiot king he was, found a way to protect her, Rhaenyra may be the heir, but that doesn't make her worthy of the iron throne, her fans idolize her as if she had never done anything wrong, and in the books the commoners themselves remove her from the throne because they don't like her, the famous Maegor with breasts, she is nothing more than a spoiled woman with a God complex who thinks that just because she is albino and has a pet lizard with wings she can do anything she wants, she died late

I have already listed so many things against all these thoughts in the past year alone. You can't beat good ol'e misogyny coupled with bad literacy skills. 🤷🏿‍♂️

List of Links:

Avatar

A List of Posts Since HotDS1 Describing Issues about HotD & Female Agency vs Victimhood (Pt.2)

la-pheacienne's posts:

ainomica's post about the love for stepmothers:

Excerpt:

Its not about the trope. Its about the execution. Do you know evil stepmother/evil mother in law is a STAPLE in most Korean, Thai, Indian, Pakistani, Chinese serial?? Its because we love to see the darker side of womanhood written and consumed by women who are not children anymore all the time. Its a time-tested classic.

poorshadowspaintedqueen's post on historical wrtiing and biases (good for understanding how the women are written):

rhaenyradelight's post:

rhaenyragendereuphoria's posts:

Excerpt of the-king-andthe-lionheart's reblog of the above:

Someone needs to educate these people on how not to right a patriarchal feudalistic medieval-inspired court/family drama.  Women can still be victims of that sort of patriarchal environment, and still be responsible for things.  They can still be as autonomous and ambitious.  They can still make bad decisions and horrific decisions and good decisions and everything in between despite their society.  I am screaming and crying for them to read up on medieval and Renaissance era queens/princesses/lady’s and actually read some educational books about women studies that focus on those eras.  Also actually reading the source material should tell them that their depictions and ideas are just plain wrong.  You can look at F&B and naturally come to the conclusion that the women being written about in that book are being demonized to a certain extent, because that’s true and is reminiscent of our own historical documentation, but that doesn’t erase all agency and wrong-doing from them.  Condal and Hess are literally idiots.  And the fact that they said this about Rhaenyra and Alicent, just goes to show  that they don’t understand human emotion either.  No one would forgive Alicent and her Green faction for the shit she has done, especially Rhaenyra.  Alicent abused Rhaenyra so badly for 10 years that Rhaenyra lost her fire, hence why young Rhaenyra and older Rhaenyra aren’t anything alike pretty much

libraol0gy's posts [TWITTER]:

Avatar

A List of Posts Since HotDS1 Describing Issues about HotD & Female Agency vs Victimhood (Pt.1)

theblackqveen's posts:

la-pheacienne's posts:

xenonwitch's reblog [Male Gaze]:

Avatar

Master Post of Anti-Criston Cole-ism

He was Never Raped or SA-ed

A) [HotD] HotD's Episode 4, from the Actor and Writers

i)

🔗LINK to Entertainment Weekly Article that Describes Frankel & Writers Making this Scene Consensual Sex Scenes where Criston "Chooses" to Forget his Vows

Neither of these reveal that either the actor nor the writers or directors wrote the sex scene to be something Criston was afraid of or didn't want. The way it's talked about, with people "discovering" each other and themselves shows consent and enjoyment. Frankel wanted to play out his fear of Criston's own desire to break his own vows and facing the guilt of that; Rhaenyra never pressured him into anything.

REMINDER: He's still not "commonborn" nor Dornish, since:

  • he has a last name, which peasants don't have AND his father/house is House Cole, stewards of the Dondarrions...the Tyrells at one point were stewards to House Gardner in the Reach & they were still nobles of that time, stewards don't mean full fledged "servants"
  • Blackhaven is in the Stormland part of the Dornish Marches, not the Dornish part of the Dornish Marches...Samwell Tarly's family's castle is in the foothill of a part of the Dornish Marches, ....Barristan Selmy's family's castle, Harvest Hill, is based in the Dornish Marches in Stormlander territory, so is Barristan Selmy Dornish? Cole is a Stormlander!
  • Marchers hate Dornish people more than other nonDornish Westerosi do...Criston said his dad was a steward of the nonDornish Dondarrions...HotD has never shown us whether either of his parents are Dornish by origin so what proof do we have he is Dornish even in the show?!!! And we see no discrimination (hint or overt) the court has against Cole...
  • lets' say that Cole was Dornish...the Velaryons are black and realisitically, even rich Black people do not manage to avoid subtle racial discrimination (there's a black woman on TikTok from a wealthy family that talks about it, idk her name)...so if Criston faces racism and the Velaryons don't either the writers are incompetent or don't know racism

Not only is this a misreading of what the Dornish Marches are on the HotD writers'/producers' part, it's a misreading or understanding of race either in medieval times or the modern day, AND people have tried to use a supposed racial disparity b/t Rhaenyra (Valyrian-Targ princess) to argue that Cole (the racially-inferior) felt racial pressure as well to comply to sleep with her and avoid censure or punishment if she blabs...as if his race would give him the right to sleep with a teen girl who some have argued was also very drunk here-- even if Criston was Dornish!

ii) [HotD] HotD's Episode 4, from the actual Episode

People don't know what SA or rape actually looks like...can we just, please?...

B) "If the Roles were Reversed" [HotD AND the Original Story]

i)

Rhaenyra didn't "make" him do anything b/c she doesn't have the ability to take on that new level of risk. So much protest using the "if the genders were reversed", and yet no acknowledgment or breakdown of what their respective unique positions are.

A male heir =/= a female heir in terms of power and privilege, gender really matters even here, as every source on the matter--whether HotD or the original story--has made every single minute to point out and emphasize...the only reason we are even talking about the Dance is that it was a group of people arguing that no woman should go before a man inn any line of succession which comes from the belief that women are inherently insufficient military leaders. And female chastity is a whole concept in of itself where the woman/girl must be sexually "pure" as to ensure that a man's and his family's lineage remains "proven" to be inherited by someone blood-connected to them. To preserve that wealth and privilege. etc., within that family. Female chastity - female "obedience" or submission to male supremacy.

Women could never be knights so they can never be Kingsguard.

Brienne is not a knight...yet[?], and she exists YEARS after the Dance; even if there were female monarchs before, check out real history for how medieval people regarded female rulers if they didn't happen to be very "good" ones...I mean just check out Juana I of Castile!

We can never equalize these situations in matter of gender because this society structures on the inequality of its genders.

A World of Ice and Fire shows us glaring examples of women over men being brutally sidelined or physically attacked to make way for male leaders or candidates (Shiera Blackwood, Agnes Blackwood, that unnamed Lannister woman who had to marry a non-Lannister man so he could take her name just so he could lead the Lannister house instead of her, Argella Durrandon, Marla Sunderland); Fire and Blood has a bunch of girls raped, mutilated, SA-ed or sexually manipulated so the men can inch their way towards power or to just feel in control (Cassandra Baratheon, Lucinda Penrose, those Tumbleton 8-year-olds, the septas, etc.).

Making as if sexual violence against men or just general violence against men is treated the same, as frequent, and socially justified as violence against women and girls both in real life and in the ASoIaF/HotD/GoT universes is disingenuous. As long as we live in a society where enough people think a woman's body is never totally her own, it never will be.

ii) Let's play with this "Reversal" Anyway:

a) We already see Rhaenyra-Criston in the version of her approaching him...

In F&B, we already have one verison of what happened b/t them in Mushroom telling us of a situation of Rhaenyra approaching Criston and Criston denying her, with no material consequences for him...and he freely decides to hate and try to destroy her anyway ("A Question of Succession"):

Even IF Rhaenyra approached Criston and in this way, she does not go to Viserys to ruin Cole or do anything else to him. She sleeps with Harwin instead. And why doesn't she go to Viserys to fuck Criston's life up? Bc he has been her trusted guard for ages, but also because of what I say below in section b) below and i) above.

Reminder, Viserys in both the show and book forces Rhaenyra to marry Laenor, and book!her explicitly is rumored to say she wanted Daemon. She faces censure or punishment, not Cole.

Show!Rhaenyra has also been "friends"/friendly with Cole for years; what reason do we have to expect or fear that she'd complain to Viserys? How much does Criston really expect Rhaenyra does, since he's the said friend in her "confidence"?

b) Occam's razor

Since women cannot be Kingsguard in Westeros, the female-Cole would either be a lower-ranked noble woman or she would be like Jonquil Darke, the female sworn-shield of Alysanne Targaryen (who still wasn't part of the Kingsguard). JD was also a Darkling bastard.

It's so very unlikely that even if female-Cole become the guard to young/older male-Rhaenyra.

That's inconceivable to these people. Why would the probably already-sword trained male-Rhaenyra need a personal female-guardsman when they'd have an actual Kingsguard knight (still all male) as the male-Rhaenyra's guard before a female warrior is ever considered? This is the mindest of these royals and nobles, btw.

And again, Jonquil was the protector of Alysanne, not Jaehaerys. But Jaehaerys did use Jonquil to stop Saera from running away, and this proves that Jonquil's "final boss" is and always has been Jaehaerys, aka, the Monarch, not the person she was protecting. If a male-Rhaenyra approached a female-Cole (but not a bastard) who was a sort of Jonquil Darke person, even with that female-Cole being well-versed in swordsmanship or anything physical to defend herself, the social consequences of that woman sleeping with a royal man while not being married to him is still as real and worse for her than for him. She'd be less willing to fully engage with him and dread the consequences of his growing angry with her.

What if female-Cole was just a regular noblewoman, either ranked high from a prestigious family/Great House (Starks, Martell, Hightowers, Lannisters, Manderlys] or from a lower ranked or not-as-prestigious and influential family (Tarlys, Selmys, Boltons, Wyls)? And male-Rhaenyra took a liking to female-Cole but didn't want to or expect to marry them?

Because female-Cole is a female noble and had grown up knowing that women & girls are socially condemned for actually practicing sexual autonomy, they'd be much more cautious and vulnerable to censure in either scenario:

  • If the female-Cole was from a more prestigious or "Great" House, male-Rhaenyra wouldn't as likely approach them unless they thought they'd be good for marriage because that house is powerful and important enough to put some pressure on them IF they ever found out. An affair is very possible, and depending on female-Cole's age and assessment of her own abilities and worth growing up female, we don't know whether they'd be willing to pursue a true consensual affair with male-Rhaenyra without there being a hope or guarantee for marriage. Because, like Lysa Tully, they still run the risk of tainting their family/house' image and face punishment or abuse from their own family if such affairs were made public. (If I have to explain Lysa Tully to people, they either forgot what happens b/t her & Petar Baelish or never read the bks, and if the latter they should not speak on anything to do with any character in things like this that requires lore knowledge AND some objectivity. Or they don't see what happened to her as "a big deal"...) Still, there is room for her to not want the attention because women are not a monolith of the exact same personalities or circumstances for us to believe every single woman would go for a real affair regardless of there being a desire or expectation of marriage. Thus what I describe below for lower ranked women/girls still counts. If anything, the stakes can be said to be higher because her family's prestige or power is so high that they could also take the path of blaming her. Therefore, a woman/girl of this group could still feel cornered.
  • If female-Cole came from a lower/less prestigious house, male-Rhaenyra is more interested & likelier of pursuing an affair or making female-Cole their paramour/mistress. Same situation, but the girl has even less reason to believe that there would be a marriage bc her house' rank/prestige/powers are so low for a possible marriage to the future King. She'd have to be either be mentally incapacitated (Priscella Hogg), under another immense pressure, or very young to believe that. So in this case, there is a stronger likelihood that if she sleeps with male-Rhaenyra, it's because she was cornered or felt she couldn't avoid him and had no assurances to avoid him later on. Or that he'd later feel slighted and begin rumors of her in court and her reputation gets ruined either way.
  • in either case, because male-Rhaenyra is a man while female-Cole isn't and men are far more likely to use physical force to intimidate or push a woman down then the reverse; men on average feel entitled to women's bodies' and attention, what more a royal prince like Aegon & Aemond? (I didn't use these examples by accident: that 12 yr old "paramour" Septon Eustace informs us and Alys Rivers)

And male-Rhaenyra would be the heir, still. There would be no doubt against male-Rhaenyra because she'd be male, male leaders are credited their deserving to rule armies by being male. His path to ascension is clearer than what real-Rhaenyra currently and will have to face. Male-Rhaenyra has no reason to even be all that secretive with female-Cole if he did intend on making her his paramour & he thought he'd get away with just making her his paramour...which is most likely a woman in a much lower "rank" or of a family with much lower powers than some others. Yes, Viserys would say that he is acting "unseemly", he could be called stupid or reckless, and some lords and ladies would think he's acting too licentuously...but no one would begrudge or hate male-Rhaenyra long for extramaritally/premaritally sleeping with a woman of any origin as to say they were a "whore" or try to use this as their primary reason be shouldn't be the next King. The "new" greens don't as much shit to stand on. They'd look silly(ier) for actually using this as a reason to say he shouldn't be King.

Female-Cole has little to no leverage against a male-Rhaenyra in the specific moment of a sexual cornering bc there is simply more risk for her than for him based on their respective genders AND ranking. We can't separate the two, they will inform the other.

Cole-Cole has more social leverage than a woman actually corned by a male higher-ranking noble/royal bc Rhaenyra-Rhaenyra's reputation can be ruined a lot easier than a male heir's. In any iteration, female-Cole rather than Cole-Cole has more risk & pressures in because women are given less grace in events where it's known they extramaritally/premaritally sleep with a man. Because she's already side-eyed or doubted to be a capable leader or worthy, censures against her lack of practicing female obedience and chastity would make her seem less deserving of the throne and give her enemies more fuel to fire their own agenda.

Again, this hierarchical feudal society is built on making gender, class, etc. essential differences that grant individuals privileges over others.

Finally, Criston Cole, his relationship with Rhaenyra, AND their sex /how it happened cannot be compared to a modern-day boss-employee-relationship/sexual harassment sort of sex-reversed MeToo! situation. Viserys is, as many have said on both camps, Criston's real and unequivocal "boss". Really, this whole argument then diminishes what actual SA is and the MeToo! movement's focus on holding mainly male professional superiors accountable for willfully using their positions to assault those under them.

The writers trying to make Rhaenyra the one in with more psychological control over Criston when canonically there' isn't much evidence to support that is very suspicious.

Reasons to Hate Cole

A) Show/House of the Dragon

i)

Let's really think about Criston's suggestion to run away and marry.

The guy said this in episode 5 of season 1:

I've soiled my white cloak. And it's the only thing I have to my fսck¡ng name! I thought if we were married, I might be able to restore it.

Criston's logic reveals he's more concerned about retaining his own sense and perception of his honor and not "honor" in general bc running away to elope would bring great disgrace to both his and Rhaenyra’s families & houses. Not just Rhaenyra herself. If it is Rhaenyra's "duty" to marry Laenor, she would be breaking her vows to become Queen. If she runs away, she arguably broke her vows to "protect" the realm from the Others as by her and Viserys' conversation about Aegon's prophecy. Cole may not have heard this from Rhaenyra, but he didn't want to hear anything from her because all he wanted was for her to go along with what he wanted, not to actually listen to her any misgivings she may have had.

He looked at marriage as a way to "bring back" a sense of honor for himself. Vows hold "sacred" honor. Criston is trying to distance himself from the very idea of freely and willfully “soiling” his cloak by trying to "replace" his brken vows with new marriage vows.

Remeber, he consented to sex with Rhaenyra, so it was his willful decision to sleep with her and "soil" his own "cloak". The writers and the actor, again, both work in the understanding that Cole "chooses to lie with Rhaenyra" [top of this post].

Criston absolutely knows that she can't marry him in the usual, open way and still retain her position as heir or even as part of the royal family. He's asking her to abandon her entire family...let that sink in. It shows a gender disparity that does not justify "if the roles were reversed". Lower-ranked-Female-Cole would never and could never hope to convince the male-Rhaenyra to run away with her and start an entirely new life, abandon both of their families (for marriage specifically) bc he doesn't have to in order to marry her. He may lose some people's respect if he marries her, but the consequences for him versus a female heir are not the same. A female heir would have to run away & not be among other Westerosi nobles, become a peasant, etc. to marry someone like Cole. *EDIT (3/17/24)* Example: Prince Duncan and Jenny of Oldstones. *END OF EDIT*

He was attracted to her, but his main motivation was to escape the shame of his soiled cloak and soiled honor. That his honor is actually a lie, a made-up thing in itself. That he, himself, soiled it and thus he, himself, has made himself a liar.

ii)

He has been living in court being Rhaenyra’s personal guard for years. Some of us thought that he should have known that nobles largely do not follow the same rules that excuse their positions through rumors. That they withhold and lie to protect themselves. (And generally, humans are wont to try to bend their own rules to satisfy their own desires.) 

And so we think that he should have done the same--patiently withhold information and observe what happens so he could adapt to it--while Alicent was getting to ask if Rhaenyra had slept with Daemon, and not if he slept with her.

It may not be faithful to one's vows, but if he actually knew what kind of person Rhaenyra was--that she would never run away with him (as he should after so many years of being with her and thus I think he did know but asked anyway, this he never really cared about her but himself)--then he should have never brought up the suggestion of running away or thought she'd ever marry him. What exactly did he think would happen for him after sleeping w/her? And as I argued, he had much more choice than some may think and took advantage of it. As nobles often do.

And yet, he decides that Rhaenyra is responsible for what he freely chose for himself AND what he could have easily avoided as a man/Kingsguard and her being female. And he does so so he can avoid accountability. Rhaenyra is much less likely to be able to & doesn't want to, once again, "make" him do anything with her. And Rhaenyra does not control Criston Cole's conscience nor his penis nor his reasoning.

Occam's razor again.

iii)

He decides to take it out on the Velaryon boys, as clued by what happens in the training yard of episode 6. It's obvious he refuses to treat them similarly to the green princes and train them at the same level. He's also much more physically rough with Jace than with either green boy. Finally he presses for Aegon to get more violent than necessary against Jace, clearly taking pleasure in vicarious revenge against Rhaenyra.

He's a loser who uses children's pain to inflict his own frustrations. And no, "illegitimate" children are not less human than "trueborn" ones.

B) Fire and Blood (The Original Story)

These are the versions of what happens b/t them, Septon Eustace's vs Mushroom's ("A Question of Succession"):

Really, alinahams already tackled this HERE, so check them out.

Excerpt:

In both versions, Criston is never involved with Rhaenyra in any way. Both versions take care to mention how it was all about Rhaenyra's choices about her life and body that bothered Criston and made him hate her. It's never about Criston being used and discarded. That is what makes Criston an Incel and a villain. Rhaenyra never did anything wrong to him. She didn't do anything to deserve his life long hatred and betrayal. It was his own twisted madonna/whore complex that ruined his friendship with Rhaenyra.

Criston decides to make it his life mission to destroy Rhaenyra because he couldn't handle her making her own decisions, bc honestly even if she (a 16-17 yr old) had decided to try to seduce him as Viserra did with Baelon...did Baelon hold it against Viserra or say that she was a whore or try to condemn her or get back at her for daring to "disturb" him in his grief over his dead wife, their sister, Alyssa?

Even with Baelon being a prince to Criston's Kingsguard, we see that both Viserra & Rhaenyra were desperate to have some sense of control over their own bodies through sex--and for Viserra through a marriage to a more powerful man--because it is through sex and marriage that their entire autonomy is being taken away or suppressed. And some in this fandom have argued that Viserra was bad or amoral for trying to seduce Baelon in his grief, and some have even said she was trying to take advantage of him! But does Baelon think this way or try to "avenge" himself on her? No.

Why try to ruin her and her kids' entire lives? Once more, Rhaenyra, even in Mushroom's version, does not ever complain to Viserys or try to ruin Criston. So....

Avatar
reblogged
Anonymous asked:

I don’t understand why Green stans try to act like Rhaenyra’s death was “pathetic”. She didn’t show any fear. She faced her death bravely and cursed Aegon. She didn’t beg for mercy. All of the official fanart of her being killed show her as looking brave. Rhaenyra’s curse also worked, because her allies continued to fight after she was killed and the massive army marching towards King’s Landing eventually led to Aegon’s own downfall and death by his own allies. Green stans should really not be making fun of anyone else’s death when Aegon was poisoned by his own allies.

Desperation. And deep denial. Don't know if there was magic in her saying her curse, but it does work symbolically to see how Aegon was still defeated in the end with the poison and absolutely no descendants to leave behind and perform any sort of glorious deed or culturally defining act.

The story was behind Rhaenyra because she was the one being usurped and the Targs really needed to stop their own internal misogyny against even its own members by taking away their chances at the ruling. Aegon, at no point whatsoever, was being only deprived of a sense of autonomy or doubt in his own abilities, even when he was being a drunk, rapist dunderhead.

Neither party didn't fully get to rule autonomously or without anxiety that their seat would be taken at any moment, even with Aegon throwing that feast for Aemond for Lucerys' murder and him commissioning two huge statues for his brothers after their deaths. But Aegon spent most of his rule seriously injured so that he had to be carried around on a litter (all his own fault, he didn't have to go into battle to prove himself but he did and got wrecked for it--Rook's Rest--and when he tried to take Dragonstone with Sunfyre). And Rhaenyra, not Aegon, was at least trying to do the hard parts of actual rule during her time AND several different uncommon challenges simultaneously: dealing with population control with the Tumbleton refugees; coming up with solutions under wartime pressure for the lack of money; trying to preserve her allies' loyalty during wartime; putting down actual riots; etc. Aegon II died from his own excess: not only pride but anger and revenge against Rhaenyra's supporters.

So really, Aegon's death was always the more pathetic one, by virtue of it his supporters (reluctant or not) finally deciding to eliminate him. Rhaenyra, however, died by her enemy.

Avatar

@miloisthebestdog

Rhaenyra and the Dragonstone Betrayers -- the Whys: POST #1 (scroll to "Because textually there is nothing") and POST#2 (boils down to Aegon inviting more war and violence when Corlys only even came to his side bc Rhaneyra was dead and Baela was put into danger and advised Aegon to abdicate)

Rhaenyra I vs Aegon II -- Activity during the War: POST

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

Daemon made and brought Nettles gifts such as “an ivory-handled hairbrush, a silvered looking glass, a cloak of rich brown velvet bordered in satin, a pair of riding boots of leather soft as butter.

This behavior from Daemon towards Nettles resembles the way he behaved towards Rhaenyra when he supposedly tried to seduce her/taught her the arts of seduction (depending on which tale you believe) early on in Fire & Blood, when King Viserys was still alive.

Daemon spent long hours in her company, enthralling her with tales of his journeys and battles. He gave her pearls and silks and books and a jade tiara said once to have belonged to the Empress of Leng, read poems to her, dined with her. […] Uncle and niece began to fly “together almost daily, racing Syrax against Caraxes to Dragonstone and back.

If Nettles was his bastard daughter, or if he cared about her as such and nothing else, he could have sent word to Rhaenyra about it. He could have gone to her himself, since his life was not in danger. Rhaenyra had been clear that Dameon wasn’t supposed to be harmed. If his relationship with Nettles was just platonic or even just sexual, he could have sent her away, realizing that his adventures (or what was perceived as an affair) with the dragonseed had gone too far, and returned to his Queen’s side, to rule beside her and fight her traitors. Daemon could have even killed Nettles himself if their relationship was simply transactional in the sense he wanted someone to sleep with while on his mission, and that would reinforce that even if he strayed away in their marriage, Rhaenyra was still his queen and the one he was loyal to. None of that would be out of character for him.

Instead, he allowed Nettles to escape alive and unharmed, in a scene that is written to convey how hard it was for them to be parting from each other and that they weren’t doing that willingly:

How the prince and his bastard girl spent their last night beneath Lord Mooton’s roof is not recorded, but as dawn broke they appeared together in the yard*, and Prince Daemon helped Nettles saddle Sheepstealer one last time. […] Maester Norren records, “her cheeks were stained with tears.” No word of farewell was spoken between man and maid, but as Sheepstealer beat his leathery brown wings and climbed into the dawn sky, Caraxes raised his head and gave a scream that shattered every window in Jonquil’s Tower.” 

Daemon’s actions after Nettles is gone is to fly towards Harrenhal to face Aemond and Vhagar by himself. It’s a suicide mission: he has no desire of surviving and coming back to Rhaenyra.

This ask is in response to this recent reblog.

Thanks for being the next person who did not read the posts I already made against each and every argument you brought up. One of them is a master post darklinaforever compiled, and I reblogged it HERE. If you like, you can click the ones I already gave in that reblog (the first one) I wrote to that person. That's not my issue or responsibility.

But I have others regarding how Gyldayn, Eustace, and some people who look at Daemon and Nettles Maidenpool interactions, Daemon's feelings towards Rhaenyra, and his feelings towards Laena all both have to do with this argument for why I don't think Daemon x Nettles are and ever will be a thing:

  • POST#1
  • POST#2
  • POST#3 (Gyldayn on Nettles)
  • POST #4 (Lord Mooton, the execution letter, gifts, and bathing)
  • POST #5 (Laena & Daemon)
  • POST #6 (or just click HERE for me tracking Daemon's premeeting with Aemond, the actual meeting before they battle, and the aftermath/legacy)

BONUS: hamliet goes over why Mysaria Could have wanted Nettles dead HERE.

Avatar
reblogged
There was this line in the book [Fire and Blood] that always fascinated me. Daemon’s wife, the Lady Rhea Royce of Runestone fell off her horse and her skull was crushed in the fall. And I read that and was like, “that’s such a weird detail to include with no context around it. […] Obviously Daemon went home and murdered his wife.“ 

Ryan Condal said this after episode 5, and I want to examine it.  Mostly because I think this is the wrong conclusion to make, and I have wholeheartedly disagreed with the interpretation that Daemon killed his wife even before I really cared about him as a character.  So I want to look at the entirety of this passage:

A year later, in 115 AC, there came a tragic mishap, of the sort that shapes the destiny of kingdoms: the “bronze bitch” of Runestone, Lady Rhea Royce, fell from her horse whilst hawking and cracked her skull upon a stone.  She lingered for nine days before finally feeling well enough to leave her bed…only to collapse and die within an hour of rising.  A raven was duly sent to Storm’s End, and Lord Baratheon dispatched a messenger by ship to Bloodstone, where Prince Daemon was still struggling to defend his meagre kingdom against the men of the Triarchy and their Dornish allies.  Daemon flew at once for the Vale.  “To put my wife to rest,” he said, though more like it was in the hopes of laying claim to her lands, castles, and incomes.  In that he failed; Runestone passed instead to Lady Rhea’s nephew, and when Daemon made appeal to the Eyrie, not only was his claim dismissed, but Lady Jeyne warned him that his presence in the Vale was unwelcome. (Pg. 374, Fire and Blood)

So now I want to argue against the notion that Daemon killed his wife.  

The Source:

Fire and Blood is a biased source of history written by Archmaester Gyldayn during the reign of Robert Baratheon, who uses several historical sources that may or may not be true in his recounting of Targaryen history.  Maester’s learn their craft at the Citadel in Oldtown where the Hightowers are Lords, and it is said that the Citadel was founded by Prince Peremore the Twisted, the second son of King Uthor of the High Tower.  The Citadel has always been incredibly loyal to the Hightowers.  The Starry Sept in Oldtown was also built by Lord Triston Hightower, in honor of his mentor and earlier regent, Septon Robeson.  The Faith of the Seven has always had issues with Targaryen’s.  Oldtown in general just seems to have issues with Targaryen’s.  Once you read Fire and Blood, one thing is for certain, during the Dance of the Dragon’s Daemon is painted in a really bad light, and he’s accused of killing a lot of people even though some of them make no sense.  The telling of Fire and Blood is pro-Green.  And yet….Daemon was not accused in Fire and Blood for killing his wife, Rhea Royce, unlike all of the other accusations of deaths thrown at him, so let’s get into the reason why he couldn’t have done this.

Daemon was nowhere near the Vale when Rhea Royce died.  He was all the way in the Stepstones.  I’ve seen people say that he could have easily flown on Caraxes and immediately disappear after killing Rhea, but why didn’t anyone see his dragon if this is true?  And I’ve seen people say that maybe Daemon hired a Catspaw or an assassin to kill Rhea Royce, and I have to question why they would leave Rhea Royce alive?  Rhea Royce survived for 9 days after cracking her head, and was actually awake.  If someone tried to kill her then why didn’t she say so?  Now let’s argue that she doesn’t remember her attack, like Bran doesn’t remember who pushed him from the tower, but I still have to question why Daemon or an assassin would leave Rhea alive?  Surely Daemon has enough money to employ a good assassin?  Maybe not a Faceless Man, but someone skilled enough and ruthless enough to do the job right.  After all, we aren’t talking about someone who would make the same mistake as the literal 12 year old Joffrey Baratheon in the main series.  However, I have to question why Daemon would do this now?  Why wait so long to kill his wife in the books?  Daemon married Rhea Royce in 97 AC and Rhea dies in 115 AC so why did it take 18-19 years for Daemon to do this?  It’s obvious they never got along, so why not cut his losses a couple of years in, and then marry someone he actually likes/loves or stay a bachelor for a few years?  Like I don’t even think you can argue that he was just waiting around for Rhaenyra, because why?  Rhaenyra was born the same year he got married, 97 AC.  So if he was waiting for Rhaenyra, why not cut his losses earlier in order for him to try to wed Rhaenyra as soon as she flowered?  Instead Rhea Royce’s death comes after the rumors of Daemon and Rhaenyra being sexual together AND Rhaenyra was already wed at this time to Laenor Velaryon as they married in 114 AC.  And let’s not forget that as soon as Daemon left the Stepstones he began courting Laena Velaryon and then wed her.  It really doesn’t sound like he was doing what was depicted in the show - killing Rhea to try to wed Rhaenyra.

I also don’t think it’s an odd detail to say that Rhea Royce fell in a hunting accident and cracked her head without context, after all we get none of the gritty details about Aemma Arryn’s death beyond the fact she died in childbirth.  It’s not like it says one way or another if Aemma died from childbed fever or hemorrhaging or a c-section.  I’m not even sure what Ryan Condal thought was weird about that statement.  My guess is that he doesn’t realize how dangerous horses and horseriding can be.  I grew up around horses and people who ride horses.  It’s typical for people who regularly ride to get injured in some way by horses.  When I was a kid, my mom’s horse reared up and smacked my mom in the face, knocking out a couple of her teeth and she had to have stitches.  I’ve been around people who have broken their ribs, hurt their backs, broken their collarbones, etc. all from riding horses.  Horses are also animals that can spook easily.  And let’s not forget that the Vale is rocky terrain.  It’s more than plausible to get thrown from a 800-1500 pound horse and smack your head on a rock, cracking your skull.  Even the most expert of riders can be thrown from a horse at any time.  HORSERIDING IS DANGEROUS!  Now if you don’t believe me I’ll give you some facts:

Each year, horse riders are injured, hospitalized or killed as a result of horse-related accidents and injuries.  Despite technological advancements in equestrian safety equipment, horse riding continues to be found more dangerous than motorcycling, skiing, football, and rugby.   Whilst injury can occur simply from handling horses, falling from a horse constitutes a dangerous fall from height, possibly at speed.  A rider’s head can be elevated up to 3 meters (9.84 feet) from the ground and horses can travel at speeds around 50 kilometers (31 miles) an hour. source

Now let’s look at some motorcycle accident statistics in America:

  • There were 89,000 motorcycle accident injuries.
  • 45% of motorcycle accidents result in more than a minor injury.  
  • There were 4,985 motorcycle deaths in 2018.
  • 4.24% of all motorcycle accidents are fatal.
  • 80% of all motorcycle crashes result in injury or death. 

Now let’s look at how common head (and other) injuries are from horse related accidents:

  • Head injuries are associated with approximately 60% of all equestrian deaths and 18% of equestrian injuries.  
  • Aside from death, brain injury survivors may suffer personality changes, intellectual and memory impairment, or epilepsy.
  • Head injuries are associated with approximately 60% of all equestrian deaths and 18% of equestrian injuries.  
  • Aside from death, brain injury survivors may suffer personality changes, intellectual and memory impairment, or epilepsy.  
  • Falling or being thrown from a horse accounts for the majority of mounted injuries, while being kicked or trodden on, accounts for most dismounted injuries.
  • Dismounted injuries require hospitalization approximately 42% of the time, while mounted injuries require hospitalization in only 30% of incidents.
  • Fractures, soft tissue damage, and head injuries are the most common types of injuries inflicted by horses.
  • The arm, leg and head/face are the most common body parts to be injured. source

It is not outside the realm of possibility that Rhea Royce did die from being thrown from a horse, thus smacking her head on a rock and dying 9 days later.  It is more than likely, because like I said even the most expert of horse riders can be thrown from a spooked horse and die.  I also want to mention how incredibly unlikely Rhea Royce was hawking alone.  Lord’s and especially Lady’s in her position would not go off alone, and usually hunting/hawking is a social sport for both men in women in our real medieval world.  Rhea should have had other ladies and attendants with her.  It would be incredibly weird, and awfully plot convenient for a noble woman to be off hawking alone in a territory surrounded by dangerous mountain clans.  The fact that Daemon isn’t outright accused by the source, tells me that there were witnesses to this event.

I completely disagree with Ryan’s interpretation of this part of the text.  It seems to me this is a man who didn’t check his facts on how dangerous horses can be or look at the context in which this could have happened.  It’s obvious, he pretty much considers Daemon more of a villain than a truly gray character at this point in the show, which is incredibly unfortunate considering this quote:

Over the centuries, House Targaryen has produced both great men and monsters.  Prince Daemon was both.  In his day there was not a man so admired, so beloved, and so reviled in all of Westeros.  He was made of light and darkness in equal parts.  To some he was a hero, to others the blackest of villains. (Fire and Blood)

So far we haven’t seen much of Daemon’s light in the show, and there are certain photos from trailers that suggest Daemon is going to go around killing more people that are “in his way”.  I can only hope that we will see more nuance for his character in the writing of the show going forward, that doesn’t entirely depend on Matt Smith’s acting to make him seem more complex.  Now don’t get me wrong, I don’t hate the show, so far I am loving it overall, but that doesn’t mean I can’t have criticisms, and so far my biggest criticism is the whitewashing of Alicent and Otto in the first 5 episodes to make them “more sympathetic and complex” while not even bothering to do the same for the characters that make up Team Black, yet more of them are surprisingly still complex and sympathetic even with flaws!  Shock.  Gasp.  And I’m not saying I expected Daemon to be whitewashed, I didn’t.  Daemon isn’t some poor little meow meow.  However, I expected him to be more of a middling gray character, rather than utterly chaotic and murderous, character with invented impotency problems.  I love me my gray characters, so I wouldn’t EVER want Daemon to be whitewashed by the narrative.  However, showing Daemon killing a bunch of people now in the story, I fear, is only going to cheapen a hugely significant event he orchestrates out of obvious grief and anger most likely in the beginning of S2.  But not only that, in my opinion the whole opening scene of episode 5 was not only poorly written but poorly edited and directed.  It was confusing.  At most they should have left Rhea Royce’s death open to interpretation like Daemon’s supposed “heir for a day” comment about whether he actually said it or not and in what tone and context.  I mean we already knew that Viserys exiled him back to the Vale, so in my opinion I think at the very least it should have been left off screen with the next time we see Daemon sauntering into Rhaenyra’s wedding.  And frankly, they could have used that five minutes to further establish the future relationships we’ll be seeing in the 10 year time jump.  And while I’m not a book purist, I just don’t see the point in re-interpreting and actively creating a different scene when you honestly can’t argue about the way Rhea Royce died.  In the show Rhea Royce was paralyzed, and Daemon obviously killed her immediately with a rock, but in the books Rhea Royce lingered for 9 days before dying, and she wasn’t paralyzed, as she was walking around the hour before she died.  So why completely reinvent this part of the story?  I’m sure you all will counter that they changed Aemma Arryn’s death, by her having a c-section, but that’s not the same.  We didn’t get any details beyond “when Queen Aemma was brought to bed in Maegor’s Holdfast and died whilst giving birth to the son […]”  There are no details here saying one way or another how Aemma died in childbirth.  It could be easily said she did have a c-section, so it’s not an entirely new thing they created.  Aemma still died in childbirth, when Rhea Royce obviously instead died the day she encountered Daemon, despite lingering for 9 days in the books.  Maybe if the interpretation and the scene had been written and filmed better, I’d be more forgiving, as I’m fairly forgiving of most of their decisions, but I just think re-imaging this scene to be something so different than what was depicted in the books, regardless of unreliable narrators (which honestly doesn’t count when it comes to straightforward causes of death, because why lie about things like this, when it’s obvious they aren’t trying to blame someone for the fall?).

So regardless of my own opinions about how the scene was written, directed, and edited, and how Daemon has been being portrayed so far, I really hope I’ve convinced you all, or at least gave you food for thought, that it’s not out of the realm of possibility that Rhea Royce in fact did get thrown from her horse, and sustained a serious head injury from the fall.  As it’s definitely more common than I think Ryan Condal knows.

Avatar
elliemuze

A very civil and well-laid-out take, other than just calling Ryan a fucking idiot. (Which of course he is, and one of those people calling him stupid was me.🤚)

Tbh, I’m not even sure it’s a lesser-known fact that horses can be crazy dangerous. I’ve only ridden maybe four or five times in my life, and even I know it’s terrifyingly easy for a horse to crush a human skull, in any number of ways. Granted, that’s just my own personal experience, but to me it seems like basic common sense? You shouldn’t even need to have seen a horse irl to comprehend that they’re huge animals capable of incredible power and strength. Hell, a kick to the head via horse has been a common media trope since film was ever a thing, not to mention it’s riddled just about every book, tome, and verbal anecdote since some person decided: “I might be wild for this… but I’m gonna ride that thing.”

It really is one of the most common fucking ways to die, dating back millenia. HotD writers have no excuse lmao. Plus I agree that the scene was shot so poorly, it just added insult to injury, making it a waste of time on top of everything else. It truly was unforgivably stupid, even on the logistical side, because I don’t think they really grasp how far away he was. A whole continent between them, to the point it took a raven and a messenger. One raven couldn’t make the full journey. Even with Caraxes, even ignoring he’d have been witnessed on dragonback, it would still take an obscenely long time to reach the Vale from where he was. Which, if you’re in the middle of fighting a war, the whole scheme becomes even more infeasible.

To put that into perspective, most commercial planes, on average, fly at speeds of 500mph (800km). I’m not sure what the literal mileage is between the Vale and Bloodstone, but a flight from Alaska to Brazil takes approximately 15 hours. Again, that’s while traveling at incomprehensible speeds, by medieval standards. A dragon is fast, but it cannot fly at 500mph, nor can it maintain a constant, breakneck speed. A dragon is a living thing, it tires and needs rest. Needs to eat. There are people far more capable than me who could work out some stellar math and provide a clear answer as to how long it would take, but holy shit would it take a long time.

There’s always going to be changes when adapting page to screen, and there will always be human error when it comes to plotholes, but like… it was free not to fuck this one up. This was a Nobody character who had, what, a single page to their name? Written from the perspective of Targaryen enemies, who’d gleefully blame global warming on Daemon if they had any concept of its existence. They had zero reason to cover for him and didn’t even bother to implicate him, because everyone and their dog would recognize how impossible it was. At that point, just say you’re biased or want to shake things up, Ryan. Just say you willfully rewrote history for shock value. You wouldn’t be the first to do so, and weirdly that would’ve been more palatable. At least then you wouldn’t have looked like the dumbest mofo on the planet.

I genuinely never thought it could get worse than: “Dany kinda forgot…”

I said it once and I’ll say it again. Prepubescent fanfic writers have more talent and put more thought into detail than these so-called professionals who somehow manage to keep landing Triple A jobs.

You make an excellent point that I forgot to mention.  Dragons in the books are not as fast as the dragons in S7-S8 of GOT.  It takes awhile to travel by dragon.  Yes, it’s faster than walking or horses or carriages or boats, but it would still take several hours to make the journey, and places for the dragon to rest and eat.  I think some people might argue that perhaps Daemon rode in on Caraxes in the dead of night and that’s why he wasn’t seen, but that still doesn’t make sense.  Did Daemon just hide until it was dark again before flying off?  If so why didn’t anyone see a huge red dragon parked somewhere?  And if Daemon got there in the dead of night, that means he’d be flying across Westeros for perhaps a couple of days to reach the Vale.  And no one spotted Caraxes?  I’d think several people would have and would have been talking about how the Rogue Prince who was supposed to be in the Stepstones was sighted all Westeros, so one would think the archmaester would have found sources condemning Daemon for the possibility of killing Rhea, yet there aren’t any, which says a whole hell of a lot considering how many of these sources were anti-Daemon.  But yes, I think I remember that Queen Alysanne’s dragonride from Winterfell to the Wall wasn’t even a fast journey.  It’s been awhile since i read over the passage, but I think it took at least a couple of days, and that’s only from WInterfell to the Wall, a journey that averages about 15 days of travel.  So imagine Daemon flying from the Stepstones to the Vale, and no one sees him?  It probably would have taken him several days to fly there.  Yet no one saw him?  Yeah, Daemon did not kill Rhea in the books.

Then there are those who cry “assassin”!

Not only, however, does your points about distance and time still matter but even more so because they would have to travel by slower means:

  1. it’s definitely not the Faceless Men, bc Daemon was bricktey-broke compared to most nobles around and whatever Vuserya might have given him as a royal allowance is definitely not enough for a Faceless Man; again, “second son” with little to no real prospects of inheriting much from the royal family after Visenya becomes king, which is one reason why he’s arranged to the wealthy Rhea Royce in the first place
  2. let’s say he did find an assassin. This assassin still has to be good enough to kill her swiftly and efficiently. Like you said, she died messily and took 9 days. If we say that the assassin was paid to make it look like an accident, only a FM would do I so well that no one or very little actually publicly blamed Daemon or accused him, and again, FM are too expensive for Daemon; other than that, the assassin is simply not paid enough to make Rhea’s death look like accident
  3. but if Daemon truly wanted to get rid of her, why would he risk himself and hire a bad assassin?! even if we ignore how he didn’t have her killed in all the years before he was reexiled?

I also despise the repeated quote of Martin saying there is a book vs TV canon. Often you hear green stans, Alicent Stans, and Aemond stans, Targ antis, Dany antis argue for how the show is good or logical or even faithful to canon by using book/original canon sources and lore. So they contradict themselves by saying there are two different stories here, that HotD is not fanfiction, and then try to argue about its validity and “truth” by using the original lore?!

Avatar
mononijikayu

i actually found myself saying the same things because the text was so obvious. daemon was away in the stepstones at this time, even by dragon travel he would have been days away from runestone and most of all, certainly would not have been sloppy if he wished to hurt anyone. that being said, rhea and he may have hated each other’s guts but they were married for MANY YEARS by this point and left her alone most of the time to entertain his own pursuits instead.

like we have him doing various jobs for viserys, we have him travelling, being a popular person in fleabottom, going off to war. like, daemon went out of his way to live his life and not have to deal with not only being hated in the vale but also being unhappy being married to a woman he was just forced to be with. YET, he would not kill her. when he had the opportunity for YEARS. and even then when he heard she had died, he halted war obligations to make sure she got a funeral. sure, he was on thin ice for asking about runestone and his possible inheritage as a widower but that was also part of his character and part of medieval society. some men inherited their wives’s property if their wives died without producing heirs.

ALSO, we have so many examples of historical accidents which we can mirror to rhea, both book and show. olenna tyrell lost her husband to a fall while doing a similar horse riding activity while hawking. mary of burgundy fell off her horse in the same way and was bedridden in pain for many days before her dying. like many records of death with just falling off a horse make up medieval record especially for nobles because they had horse related activities as a past time. even henry viii fell off a joust so badly it was thought he was going to die from how severe it was. people ought to understand that GRRM takes a lot of historical contexts for his work on ASOIAF and even on his sci-fi novels. forgetting that makes you lose the context of the time, society and nature they lived in and just find chaos in a very context edited interpretations.

Another thing that occurs to me that I forgot to mention when it comes to the statistics. Those are modern statistics in a world where a small percentage of people regularly ride horses enough to be injured. So just imagine a world before trains and automobiles, where horse riding was everyday life for most of the population. The statistics when it comes to death and injury would most definitely have more than quadrupled.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

Criston Cole deserves better. Fuck Rhaenyra.

https://www.tumblr.com/a0random0gal/726526376463745024/hot-take-but-i-personally-think-all-the-criston?source=share

*EDITED POST* 6/22/24

A)

B)

Primarily, it's the green stans not accepting the Dance is a tale of misogyny, and of they can get Criston's predatory behavior justified through him being PoC (which he is not, and even if he was Dornish, the Dornish are not PoC), they can argue that his lowborn, PoCness & whatever racism he experiences at court has made his rise into highborn "white" circles that much harder. And that it makes him more vulnerable to Rhaenyra's white privilege. Meanwhile, we all saw the episode where he never really pushed to leave AND he thoroughly enjoyed and enthusiastically participated in the one-night stand. His struggle was more between his desire and his vows of celibacy, Rhaenyra did not force him or threaten hi with either words, actions, or looks. That's not how SA goes even with women against men.

So, the implication is that if a PoC man seeks to rape or SA or even just to demand sex, bc white women can & have called out rape to avoid censure or punishment themselves, it's fine if it's a white woman being made the victim or being demanded to give herself to the man regardless of her personal feelings, aspirations, limitations, psyche, desires. And/Or, in this case, the man's flawed need to "prove" something through that sex and marriage. Regardless of who these people are and what kind of person Rhaenyra SHOWS herself to be instead of mere racial guesswork overriding what we see of her on screen and what Criston himself would have known after years of guarding her closely.

C)

After that user said: "I'm 100% certain that if the genders were swapped almost everyone would side with him.", I knew what I was getting:

Rhaenyra didn't "make" him do anything, she quite literally doesn't have the ability to take that new level of risk.

Criston Cole, his relationship with Rhaenyra, AND their sight together/how it happened cannot be compared to a modern-day boss-employee-relationship/sexual harassment sort of sex-reversed MeToo! situation AND the writers really tried to make Rhaenyra the one in psychological control over Criston when canonically there' isn't much evidence to support that, and this is very suspicious.

So much protest using the "if the genders were reversed", and yet no acknowledgment or breakdown of what their respective unique positions are. A male heir =/= a female heir (even if there were female monarchs before, check out real history for how medieval people regarded female rulers if they didn't happen to be very "good" ones) AND women cannot be knights (Brienne is not a knight...yet, and this is YEARS after the Dance) so they can't be Kingsguard.

A Kingsguard has more room to defend themselves over any nonroyal/royally-favored woman or even an ordinary noblewoman whose caught in such a situation. This hierarchical society is built on making gender, class, etc. essential differences that grant individuals privileges over others. Due to Criston's reputation, maleness, and his true "boss" being Viserys--Viserys is quite literally EVERYONE'S BOSS, including Rhaenyra--AND how Rhaenyra's own mired reputation can be ruined a lot easier than a male heir/she could be seen as more unworthy for the throne then if she were male, he, Cole, has way more advantages & leverage than a woman actually corned by a male higher-ranking noble/royal.

Criston is also still of a minor house himself--House Cole of the Stormlands, not Dorne--he is still an aristocrat with misogynist aristocratic expectations of a noblewoman.

See what I mean in that we can't really equalize these situations?

Therefore, Cole definitely wanted to have sex with Rhaenyra and was very willing to sully his own cloak. His asking her to run away with him so that he can try to get rid of his buyer's remorse without thinking that royals/noble have lovers (who can be from a myriad of ranks--"lower", "equal", "higher") is ridiculously self-contradictory and selfish.

Also, this crap about "if the genders were reversed" is silly because it usually is used to make as if gender violence is the exact same as sexual violence against men when it never is, and as long as we live in a society where enough people think a woman's body is never totally her own, it never will be.

LINKS:

My Assessments (NonAsks)

Others' Assessments

Asks Sent to Me

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

“Norren described Daemon teaching Nettles common courtesies and giving her fine gifts such as an ivory hairbrush, a silvered looking glass, a velvet and satin cloak, and leather riding boots. Maidservants said Daemon showed Nettles how to wash, sharing a single tub at times.”

Oh, Daemon needed to “teach” a girl how to wash ??? Why not ask a maidservant to teach her ? While a fraught Rhaenyra is having an aneurysm with her children dropping like flies and her allies turning on her, her husband is earnestly living out his Bridgerton fantasies. He is SICK (but extremely FUNNY, your wife going mad somewhere and you are doing this with someone a third your age, LMAO).

Definitely a response from the recent "daemon and nettles" tagged posts that ended HERE.

Answer to Current Ask:

Posts: #1, #2, #3

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

It’s actually very simple, Rhaenyra, as a person, isn’t feminist nor progressist, she even became a tyrant, but her story is a vehicle for feminist thematic exploration. Rhaenyra is a narrative tool to excavate societal critiques that the author is interested in, to explore the gendered violence that happens to her, to explain the oppression of women, and to address both the root cause of this oppression and its after-effects. Are Lady Macbeth, Scarlett O’Hara, Becky Sharp, Emma Bovary, Anna Karenina feminists ? No, not at all, but I read them as feminist characters and read their stories through feminist lens.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

There’s no justification for Rhaenyra having three obviously bastard children. It doesn’t matter that Laenor claims them. Everyone else can see that they are not Laenor’s children. If she hoped Jace would be blonde like her, then that’s an honest mistake. But she should have stopped getting impregnated by Harwin after she saw that his genes would clearly win out over hers. Luke and Joffrey should not exist.

We know it’s not fair, but Alicent is well within her right to call Rhaenyra’s children bastards and want her own trueborn children to inherit. Bastards have no claim unless they are legitimized. And if Jace were to ascend the throne, it would create a succession crisis. He would eventually face rebellion from his trueborn uncles, if not them then their descendants.

Links that say and argue otherwise, because I'm simply not going to repeat myself:

PRIME:

Others:

(You should look back at the first part of that reblog, which I had to cut off after the 5th point due to character limits).

And just to be that girl, this one by @theblackqveen:

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

In the show, what do you think of the argument that Alicent is justified in usurping the throne because she thought Rhaenyra would eventually kill her children? I don’t think Rhaenyra ever intended to harm her siblings, but some people say that Rhaenyra would eventually be forced to kill them because Aegon would be used as a figurehead in a rebellion against her whether he wanted to rule or not.

Some Green stans say that it would be impossible for Rhaenyra to rule peacefully with three living brothers, and that even if they were loyal to her, others would still declare rebellion in their name and to protect herself Rhaenyra would need to kill them. I personally don’t agree, because if the house was united, no one would dare rebel against all the dragonriders, and if they did, the rebellion would be crushed. What do you think?

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

I never understood this raving about: "Pro-Black accounts validate the Daemon & Nettles relationship." What fucking pro-Black tales are they talking about exactly? The tales are kept by the masters. More than the majority hated the Targaryens and relate events they didn't witness, years later, through other sometimes/usually biased sources and rumors. What pro-Black accounts are they talking about?!

I think they mean Maester Norren, the lord of Maidenpool Manfyrd Mooton, his guard's captain, Ser Florian Greysteel (the lord’s personal champion), and his unnamed brother (my post about them concerning DaemonxNettles), who were all Black supporters/fought for the blacks before Rhaenyra ordered Nettles’ execution. They defect and go green after Daemon leaves for Harrenhal since they disobey the order, for survival.

But in the post I linked in the parentheses, I already argue against the notion that one or any of these particular people thought Daemon was actually sleeping with Nettles. 

Gyldayn also continually writes more against Rhaenyra & Daemon than for them, especially in comparison to Alicent/Otto/Aegon II:

  1. Rhaenyra’s weight constantly negatively mentioned or used against her character (1, 2, 3)
  2. him constantly using Mushroom as a sources for her sexual escapades or not offsetting against Mushroom enough
  3. the misogyny against Nettles, maligning and contradiction of the idea of Daemon sleeping with Nettles
  4. him including her in the blame for the eye fiasco instead of just Alicent, who was the one who demanded Lucerys’ eye immediately 

So they can stuff it, honestly.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

▪︎Mastre Norren, present in Harrenhal, tells us that Daemon was crazy about Nettles, as a man would be about his daughter.

▪︎Nettles was 17 years old, the same age as Baela and Rhaena, Daemon's own daughters.

▪︎Daemon affectionately nicknamed Nettles: Nettie.

▪︎Mushroom, dwarf of the court of Rhaenyra, known for his unreliable, often sexual and where sordid testimonies, is the very first source to declare that Daemon would have fallen in love with Nettles and would have taken her as a lover, when he did not wasn't even present at Harrenhal.

▪︎4 / 5 other sources also maintain that Nettles & Daemon were lovers, these written after Mushroom's testimony, therefore relying on the latter as well as other rumors, having in fact not been present either Harrenhal.

▪︎Glyadyn meanwhile, the maester who wrote Fire and Blood, supports Mushroom's version as the most likely to change his habit. Except that Glyadyn writes the book at least 1 century later, when all the characters of the dance are nothing more than dust, therefore not having even attended the events, based on biased testimonies of 1st 2nd 3rd and 4th hand . Without forgetting that Glyadyn is a maester, not very "for" the Targaryens in general (like most maesters) a pure product of his time, himself a misogine with his own prejudices which would necessarily lead him to lean more towards the simple history of lovers, even if, as the book says, there is no concrete proof of this. The only thing we can be sure of between Nettles and Daemon is that they spent their days hunting down Aemond on Rhaenyra's behalf.

Some people: Let's conveniently ignore those CRUCIAL elements and information of this relationship, and that completely changes the context of the interactions/relationship between the two characters! It doesn't matter that all the sources recounting Nettles and Daemon as lovers have in fact never seen them interact, relying mainly on word of mouth, and that the only maester who has actually seen them interact supports a platonic relationship! He is necessarily the one who is wrong since he is the only one to say it!

Sorry, but that Daemon:

▪︎taught Nettles how to eat, stand, and dress properly.

▪︎gave Nettles gifts: A hairbrush, mirror, coat and boots.

▪︎had adjoining rooms with Nettles.

▪︎ always had dinner and lunch with Nettles.

▪︎would be able to go after the people of Harrenhal if Nettles was ever killed.

▪︎loses his smile/joy reading Nettles' execution letter.

▪︎chooses to go against Rhaenyra's order to free Nettles.

▪︎ sees his emotions expressed through the cries of Caraxes when Nettles leaves.

Absolutely NONE of these things basically indicate a relationship of a romantic and/or sexual nature. All of this can easily pass within the framework of an affectionate platonic father & daughter / mentor & student relationship. Some Daemon reactions may not even be completely related / relate to Nettles, such as the reactions to the letter and the shouting of Caraxes.

The only things that can really look suspicious, to our modern eyes, are possibly already; the baths and the possible bed sharing, which is actually not even safe. However, you and many others had dealt with these aspects in depth. I will just say that for the baths, they are described in a learning context, where Daemon teaches Nettles, a girl who has always lived alone in the street, with no one to really educate her, how to wash properly/have a healthy lifestyle. It's the people who romanticize and or sexualize the baths, because the text itself never does that. And yes, platonic baths, it fucking exists, no offense to some who think they are smarter by claiming the opposite. Nudity = sex is a concept that bothers me so much...

I didn't even know Nettles & Daemon was a thing until I came to tumblr to say. Never when reading the book did I interpret them as lovers and I'm amazed at how many people do?! How is that even possible?! It seems to be totally at odds with the way GRRM writes their romances, especially because of the specific age difference between the characters. Some even say that Daemon was living out his fantasy with Nettles, leaving Rhaenyra to fend for herself, which is essentially untrue. Where the hell is this bullshit coming from too?

I think the ASOIAF fandom is one of the worst I've seen. The Sansa, Arya and Daenerys stuff alone is crazy, but the Fire and Blood character takes are even worse!The stuff I saw on Aemond?! Enough to make me nauseous for weeks.

Overall I only liked the series for Daemyra (although I hated episode 10) and sometimes Viserys. The rest was crap. Alicent, one of my favorite villains ever was ruined and I'm not even talking about the rest of the adaptation massacre, of certain sets and especially the fucking costumes.

I agree with you anon. And relate. I also didn’t even know people shipped them or even thought they could have had sex until I created a Tumblr account back in Oct ‘22.

And I argued/proved against DaemonxNettles through these posts:

  1. Execution Letter/Sleeping Patterns/the Persons Deciding What to Do w/D and N after the Letter
  2. Credibility of Gyldayn, Nettles, the Maidservants, and Readers Looking back at the “Lessons” Mushrooms says Daemon gave Rhaenyra
  3. On Oberyn Martell being a Credible Source
  4. The Strangeness of Shipping DaemonxNEttles to Spite Daemyra/Rhaenyra/Targs (la-pheacienne)
  5. It is both Misogynist and Hypocritical of DxN shippers/green stans to Believe in DaemonxNettles
  6. An example of a green stan/DaemonxNettles shipper shooting themsleves in the Logical foot

One correction: Norren and the lord he works for are at Maidenpool, east of Harrenhal. Daemon and Nettles were at Maidenpool, not Harrenhal.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net