mouthporn.net
#catelyn stark – @horizon-verizon on Tumblr
Avatar

editorialized torpedo

@horizon-verizon / horizon-verizon.tumblr.com

she/her -- ASoIaF Enthusiast -- (I will be changing the title of this blog frequently just because I want to)
Avatar
reblogged
Anonymous asked:

Can you talk more about your theory of Jaehaerys and Alyssa? You've mentioned Alyssa a few times, saying you didn't like how everyone talked about her, but I couldn't find a post going into detail about it.

oh yeah, i think like with his kids, jaehaerys is doing some hardcore editorializing when it comes to his mother’s legacy. i think the sources we have purposefully play down her influence and intelligence because depicting her as she was, which is a competent leader, a loving mother, and a shrewd politician, makes jaehaerys look really bad for vindictively stranding her in a shitty abusive marriage. so like, as an example, septon barth (who i usually love!! most of jaehaerys' good ideas come from barth or aly, it's THEM that was the Good, Peaceful King not jae!!) has this to say about alyssa:

“That Queen Alyssa wished to do the right thing, no man should doubt,” Septon Barth wrote years later. “Sad to say, however, she oft seemed at a loss as to what that thing might be. She desired above all to be loved, admired, and praised, a yearning she shared with King Aenys, her first husband. A ruler must sometimes do things that are necessary but unpopular, however, though he knows that opprobrium and censure must surely follow. These things Queen Alyssa could seldom bring herself to do.”

What's angering here is this is just false. Alyssa is not someone who is paralyzed by people pleasing; in fact, some of her biggest moments come from Alyssa taking decisive action and being willing to face the consequences! As a matter of fact, the exact issue she's having right at this moment when Gyldayn throws this in is Alyssa taking an action she knows is unpopular but sticking to her guns anyway!! She's confronted with her not even legal son making off in the night with her not even legal daughter and marrying, and last time this happened, her husband died from stress, her two oldest got stuck under siege for months, all of which culminated in a bloody civil war that got two more of her kids killed. OF COURSE she tries to stop it - she's doing the unpopular thing she thinks is right! And then, when Rogar tries to supplant Jaehaerys with one of her grandchildren and publicly humiliates her, she tells him to fuck all the way off and saves her son's throne yet a-fucking-gain. Oh so she didn't bother running tail tucked between her legs to her teenage son to apologize for getting angry at him for eloping with his barely pubescent sister? That's not a moral failing, that's a moral backbone.

And this is a pattern with Alyssa Velaryon. She attempts to help crown Aegon while still captive with Maegor, she plays along at court to try to protect her other children, she makes the difficult decision to abandon poor Viserys in King's Landing for the chance to escape to safety with the children she has on hand - which OBJECTIVELY is the only goddamn reason Jaehaerys is alive, because if Maegor had gotten his hands on another of Aenys' sons, he absolutely would have tortured him to death just like Viserys - she doesn't publicly contradict Jaehaerys to protect his claim, she refills the King's Guard in a smart move by giving people a fun little tourney to impress the royal family with, and when caught between Rogar and Jaehaerys, she sides with Jaehaerys every single time! Yes, she doesn't go to Dragonstone to get Jaehaerys after he marries Alysanne because Rogar tells her not to. But why does Rogar tell her not to? He plays on her fear of people seeing Jaehaerys as another Aenys! But does she let that stop her from trying to contact her son? NO! She sends ladies to him so she knows what the fuck is going on and so she's not publicly shit talking him. She sacrifices her marriage to protect Jaehaerys! And before the depression of having lost everything even though she's done everything she's supposed to do takes over her, she makes sure to get a competent Hand in that position!

But how does Jaehaerys repay all those years of Alyssa doing her best to protect him, of Alyssa sacrificing her own happiness and well being for him?

Thus was the peace made between the young king and his former Hand, and sealed that night by a feast in the great hall, where Lord Rogar sat beside Queen Alyssa, man and wife once more, and raised a toast to the health of Queen Alysanne, pledging her his love and loyalty before all the assembled lords and ladies. Four days later, when Lord Rogar departed to return to Storm’s End, Queen Alyssa went with him, escorted by Ser Pate the Woodcock and a hundred men-at-arms to see them safe through the kingswood.

He forces her away from court, to the seat of the husband that hates her, to die having his children. We know Alyssa is unhealthy during this time. We know she's older. We know she never recovers from the depressive episode after Rogar attempts a coup. Yet she has two more children! Even after she says how afraid she is of childbirth before the first one because of her age and her previous baby loss!! Jaehaerys stands there and does nothing while Alyssa is butchered by the husband he stranded her with!!

And then what does Jaehaerys do? Well, he does the exact same goddamn thing to his own wife. He forces pregnancies she doesn't want on her, pregnancies that severely impact her health, and then like...doesn't even bother parenting the children he's forcing on his wife.

The joy was therefore not entirely unalloyed when Her Grace was found to be pregnant once again. Prince Valerion was born in 77 AC, after another troubled labor that saw Alysanne confined to her bed for half a year. Like his brother Gaemon four years earlier, he was a small and sickly babe, and never thrived. Half a dozen wet nurses came and went to no avail. In 78 AC, Valerion died, a fortnight short of his first nameday. The queen took his passing with resignation. “I am forty-two years old,” she told the king. “You must be content with the children I have given you. I am more suited to be a grandmother than a mother now, I fear.”
King Jaehaerys did not share her certainty. “Our mother, Queen Alyssa, was forty-six when she gave birth to Jocelyn,” he pointed out to Grand Maester Elysar. “The gods may not be done with us.”
He was not wrong. The very next year, the Grand Maester informed Queen Alysanne that she was once more with child, to her surprise and dismay.

He says to the Grand Maester that essentially, he's totally cool with Alysanne being butchered during childbirth for the off chance that she has another healthy living child. This is the woman he's supposed to have a grand, amazing romance with and he treats her as disposable as he treats his own mother. So, in my opinion, just like how there's an underlying story here about a monstrous father who is likely raping At Least One of his kids and exerting severe and horrific sexual control of the rest of them, until he's dying and not a single one of his relatives even want to see him anymore, I think there's a story here about the ways in which sons will purposefully and vindictively harm their own mothers even when they have practical saints raising them.

He wants me gone, Catelyn thought wearily. Kings are not supposed to have mothers, it would seem, and I tell him things he does not want to hear.
Avatar
Avatar
Anonymous asked:

Something I think about a lot is the comment I once read that AsoIaF is a world where men and women are not socially equal, but that equality is not inherent.

Despite being a man and the male gaze often being felt (even in a painful and uncomfortable way), Martin managed to clearly outline a world where gender, sex and class converge in a complex way and no two characters react the same to the challenges they face.

I was thinking specifically about Cat today.I think she is an interesting case of gender, power and privilege because Cat has a lot of power given to her throughout her life by the men to whom she is subordinate (her father and her husband) , is aware of the differences expected according to gender and class and... She is comfortable with that.

When you compare her to Cersei and Lysa, two other women in equivalent situations, Cat seems comfortable in the way she navigates her position, what is expected of her, and what she can do. And I think part of her comfort and her inability to empathize with Arya and Lysa is that Cat wasn't hurt by being born a woman and the impositions that she carried.

Cersei, I think there's no denying that she suffers from penis envy. She sees the female gender as inherently lesser (dumber, weaker, pathetic) and herself as the exception, as limited and confined by virtue of her gender. Her femininity is a weapon and a symbol of prestige but there is also evident contempt. Cersei may have wanted to marry Robert at first, and she's no saint, but that doesn't mean that Robert constantly humiliated and abused her and that she feels the pressure to be the most beautiful because otherwise its value decreases.

Lysa grew up in Cat's shadow, being considered less pretty and less intelligent, which generated hatred towards her sister for something that was not the fault of either of them but of the system. She was forced to have an abortion, damaging her ability to have children (something she wanted and also a way in which her worth was socially mediated) and abused by all the men around her.Only with her husband dead and her father away can she take her son's power and exercise it (only to hand it over to the man she loves who is only using her).

Brianne and Arya deal with being considered unattractive and having a taste for fighting, which is a male sphere, So the elements of their femininity are denied and they are socially considered less worthy of being treated with love and respect.

Cat maintains the system because the system has not hurt her, for her there is nothing wrong with the system because in her experience if you do what you should and behave, everything should be mostly fine.Cat seems to have had certain privileges as the eldest daughter. She was loved, respected and held in esteem by her father and uncle. She has a small age difference with her husband, who respects and listens to her (You could say that Ned's only fault is not even having fathered a bastard but humiliating her by bringing him to be raised alongside her legitimate children.) She has had several children, which again is a social achievement and also personally she has loved each one of those children and those children love her. She seems to lack Cersei's vanity and her concern for her hair is that Ned loved it (which given all the context I actually see as kind of sweet).

Even when Cat feels frustrated and left out, or when she herself becomes aware of certain injustices committed against other women, on a deep, visceral level Cat cannot understand. She feels sorry for Brianne, she doesn't understand Arya, she doesn't seem to notice the terrible situation Lysa has been through and she understands Cersei as a mother, but I would be unable to understand Cersei's hunger for power because it was given to her and she is fine with the amount they gave her.

Maybe it's just me and I'm not saying that Cat had to suffer or that only through suffering could she understand (Cersei and Lysa have suffered under the same system and are more critical of other women than empathetic) but the impression I get is that the privilege and luck that have surrounded Cat have left her blind to the difficulties other women may face and how unfair the world they live in is.

Ahhh, discussions about blindspots created by privileges. Classic.

It's not just you, I agree. Maybe not so much "blind", I do think she's aware of how differently Lysa has it at least, but she, as you say, has had it relatively "easy" until Ned's death.

There is, too, though, the element of her performing a masculinized role after her brothers and then her mother died (A Clash of Kings - Catelyn VI):

I have always done my duty, she thought. Perhaps that was why her lord father had always cherished her best of all his children. Her two older brothers had both died in infancy, so she had been son as well as daughter to Lord Hoster until Edmure was born. Then her mother had died and her father had told her that she must be the lady of Riverrun now, and she had done that too.

She was a sort of undeclared "heir" for her father for years, if not just his favorite surviving child. And she didn't really investigate why male heirs were preferred so much as performed the duty she thought she needed to perform, therefore "earned" her father's esteem and sorta "relinquished" the heirship to a younger brother (not saying that she had the power to do so, I'm saying that she didn't even conceive of herself as deserving actual heirship).

It's all so very interesting.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
maloops
“Let him grow taller, she asked the gods. Let him know sixteen, and twenty, and fifty. Let him grow as tall as his father, and hold his own son in his arms. Please, please, please. As she watched him, this tall young man with the new beard and the direwolf prowling at his heels, all she could see was the babe they had laid at her breast at Riverrun, so long ago.”

Esse trecho acabou comigo 👍 catelyn com bebê robb.

eng: This excerpt wrecked me 👍 catelyn and baby robb.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

Unpopular opinion but Rhaenys is my most hated character after all the Greens, actually. I get what the showrunners are trying to do but it ain’t working. Especially when she said that maybe it started with Lucerys taking Aemond’s eye and I’m like gurl, did you forget your conversation with Rhaenyra in episode 2 ?? “Here is the hard truth, which no one else has the heart to tell you. Men would sooner put the realm to the torch than see a woman ascend the Iron Throne.” Like, I get it happened a long time ago but Rhaenys believing that maybe this all happened because of “this or that” is just insane.

Rhaenys knew that Rhaenyra’s ascension to the throne would always be challenged because she was a woman. She didn’t want Laenor to marry Rhaenyra was for this exact reason.

The machinations of the Greens began even before Rhaenyra was officially declared heir when Otto sent Alicent to Viserys’ room to “comfort” him. Even though Otto was the one to plant the seeds in Viserys’ head to name Rhaenyra, it was clearly his temporary solution to keep Daemon away from the throne. Once Otto succeeded in having Viserys marry Alicent, he believed that Viserys would put Rhaenyra aside and name Aegon, his grandson, his official heir. But he didn’t though so Otto did whatever he can to have Viserys change his mind. It became so obvious that Viserys was finally able to see through his ploys and had him removed as Hand. Like, Otto and Alicent’s supporters were determined to have Aegon be king.

No matter what, the Greens were always planning on usurping Rhaenyra from the start. Rhaenyra could have done everything right and it still wouldn’t have changed the outcome. Otto himself said it, “it wouldn’t matter if she were Jaehaerys himself born again. Rhaenyra is a woman.”

I don't hate Rhaenys most of all the cast in HotD, but neither do I respect her. My most hated is Criston Cole, I crash out whenever he comes to my mind (internally I crash out). And I don't dislike them for similar reasons--Rhaenys for how she's written and characterized, Criston bc of who he is. If I were to take show!Rhaenys as a "real" person, then she'd also be one of my least favorite characters.

The writers really wish to cling to the notion that the Dance's troubles began by the "stupidity" of Rhaenyra's rebelliousness in of itself, and I mean her having "bastards" at all. And the response to many of Rhaenys' unwise conclusions of things always gets excused as her being "complex", but she is still wise...no Rhaenys is no Catelyn Stark who has flaws and behaved un-ideally towards Jon, but neither is anyone saying she is a perfectly "wise" character either. Bk/show!Catelyn was working from an absence of information Ned deigned not to let her know about, knowing he is somehow lying to her about Jon, for how Ned effectively ragged on her own honor as a married noble lady taking care of his household by bringing a bastard into the actual abode so early into their marriage (and I mean early), etc., etc., it's been discussed. But Rhaenys has all the information, but we (not me, them, fans AND HotD's narrative) act like and call her the logical and moral center of the the entire cast of characters there. It's mind-boggling bc it's dishonest.

If show!Rhaenys should really blame Corlys, her husband, for Laenor's unhappiness AND Rhaenyra's sons not being his so she could get closer to the throne herself but then seeking to blame Rhaenyra when Laenor couldn't do his part, I'd rather this be ACKNOWLEDGED for the huge character flaw that it is. Not to mention that it isn't, as you already say, Rhaenyra's fault that the greens were going to usurp her whether she had bastards or not and claim that she does with almost everyone knowing Laenor was what we'd call "gay" (this identity, bc it is one, doesn't exist in their society).

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
fkaluis
“The flesh had gone pudding soft in the water and turned the color of curdled milk. Half her hair was gone and the rest had turned as white and brittle as a crone’s. Beneath her ravaged scalp, her face was shredded skin and black blood where she had raked herself with her nails. But her eyes were the most terrible thing. Her eyes saw him, and they hated.”
A Storm Of Swords, Epilogue
Avatar
Anonymous asked:

I've long considered Catelyn to be a well rounded character with engrossing POVs while criticizing her behaviour towards Jon. I see her as one of the examples of GRRM's strength as a writer for his characters, even the most well intentioned ones, aren't exempt from committing acts that are unlikeable. He humanizes his characters and part of what it means to be human is to have shortcomings and failings.

This is also why I cannot take Show Rhaenys and anything she said seriously. Including her behaviour towards Alyn. Because, contrary to Cat, she was the embodiment of Ryan and Sara's mediocrity as writers for she was entirely their creation and had nothing in common with GRRM's Rhaenys Targaryen save for her name. Show Rhaenys wasn't a person but a statement. They desperately wanted her to be likeable, going to the extent of presenting her as the only sensible voice on the show (even though she had irresponsibly murdered a bunch of smallfolk previously but that was obviously brushed under the rug because Rhaenys could do no wrong and also because the writers have double standards). She had to say and do everything that the writers of the show deemed 'appropriate' because any seemingly honest untoward behaviour from her side would reflect badly upon them.

It frustrates me to say something nice about Benioff and Weiss but the changes they made to Catelyn on the show were more palpable and believable. Show Catelyn had remorse about her behavior towards Jon but she was still, as long as she lived, connected to the character that GRRM had created in the book.

Maybe a response to this post that I reblogged.

I agree, utterly. Rhaenys is unrecognizeable, and no amount of "F&B was unreliable / F&B is a history book unlike the main novel's PoVs / the measters were trying to make more violently-inclined or assertive women's ambitions and actions villanous" will ever negate either that women are as capable of violence against innocents while still being an oppressed "class" AND "unreliable narrations and faux history doesn't mean we can't use our brains to glean at least a few very likely to just true conclusions".

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
thevelaryons

The thing about pitting Rhaenys (show) and Catelyn (show & book) against each other, in their reactions to their husband’s bastards, is that it completely ignores the context of their situations.

Many men fathered bastards. Catelyn had grown up with that knowledge. It came as no surprise to her, in the first year of her marriage, to learn that Ned had fathered a child on some girl chance met on campaign. He had a man’s needs, after all, and they had spent that year apart, Ned off at war in the south while she remained safe in her father’s castle at Riverrun. Her thoughts were more of Robb, the infant at her breast, than of the husband she scarcely knew. He was welcome to whatever solace he might find between battles. And if his seed quickened, she expected he would see to the child’s needs.
He did more than that. The Starks were not like other men. Ned brought his bastard home with him, and called him “son” for all the north to see. When the wars were over at last, and Catelyn rode to Winterfell, Jon and his wet nurse had already taken up residence.
That cut deep. Ned would not speak of the mother, not so much as a word, but a castle has no secrets, and Catelyn heard her maids repeating tales they heard from the lips of her husband’s soldiers.

A Game of Thrones, Catelyn II

Catelyn understands the social rules of the society she lives. She’s been taught the belief that men having affairs and fathering bastards is normal. But even in such a patriarchal society, there has to be a level of respect afforded to the wives of the men that cheat (especially if they’re noblewomen from powerful families). In Catelyn’s case, she feels slighted because her husband raised his bastard in the same household. It is considered a social insult to Catelyn that her husband did this to her.

She had come to love her husband with all her heart, but she had never found it in her to love Jon. She might have overlooked a dozen bastards for Ned’s sake, so long as they were out of sight. Jon was never out of sight, and as he grew, he looked more like Ned than any of the trueborn sons she bore him. Somehow that made it worse.

A Game of Thrones, Catelyn II

Obviously it’s not fair to Jon that Catelyn takes out her resentment on him. Though from her POV chapters, it’s shown that she holds no negativity towards Ned’s mystery mistress despite hating Jon. It’s impossible to hate someone you don’t even know. Meanwhile, Jon is a living, breathing reminder of her husband’s infidelity. While it would be a more reasonable reaction for her to dislike Ned rather than misdirect her negative feelings towards Jon, Ned is still her lord husband. It is easier for Catelyn to hate Jon.

When it comes to Rhaenys, her husband’s mistress and bastards are relatively unknown to her, even if she is aware of their existence. They were kept far away from her. So Rhaenys is less likely to resent them. That’s why Rhaenys addresses only Corlys with barely concealed anger but Alyn doesn’t earn her scorn. The scene between her and Alyn in episode 4 appears to be the first time those two have ever interacted. Rhaenys has not had to live every day with the reminder of her husband’s betrayal. If it’s out of sight, it can be (relatively) out of her mind.

I’m sure that the way this show characterizes its female characters as more gentler/calm individuals definitely plays a part with how Rhaenys reacts here too. Which is why the viewers are led to assume Rhaenys just quietly accepted the fact of her husband cheating on her.

In the book, Corlys never dared have his bastards around whilst his wife still lived. He kept the affair so discreet that had it not been for him personally presenting the boys at the Red Sowing, no one would have assumed him to be the father. Both Addam & Alyn were staying with their mother and serving in her fleet. In the show, Alyn is in Corlys’ fleet, and therefore more likely to come under notice (and that’s exactly what happens).

Princess Rhaenys, his wife, had the fiery temperament of many Targaryens, Mushroom says, and would not have taken kindly to her lord husband fathering bastards on a girl half her age, and a shipwright’s daughter besides. Therefore his lordship had prudently ended his “shipyard trysts” with Mouse after Alyn’s birth, commanding her to keep her boys far from court. Only after the death of Princess Rhaenys did Lord Corlys at last feel able to bring his bastards safely forward.

Fire & Blood, The Dying of the Dragons

Not only did Corlys have an affair with a young girl (coincidentally the same age Rhaenys was when she married him), but said girl is also a commoner. Rhaenys is a princess who could have been a queen. For Corlys to make his affair public would have been a huge insult to his wife, even if he never brought up the matter of his bastards. Rhaenys would have been rightfully furious at the shame her husband’s actions bring upon her. She was the first to speak up when her position as heir was usurped so that suggests she’s not the type to just turn a blind eye to anything she considers an injustice against her. Book version has a far more fiery personality than her show counterpart. Her reaction to the truth would probably be different too.

A detail in episode 4 which I did like is when Rhaenys corrected Alyn about her title. Princess not Lady. She’s asserting her position and status in that moment. Alyn serves the Lord of Driftmark so naturally his Lord’s wife would be a Lady to him. By correcting Alyn, Rhaenys places him in the position of an ignorant who does not even know the difference between the titles. Perhaps a subtle expression of classism towards another who is very much beneath her. But the glimmer of antagonism is gone as soon as it appears. Their interaction is not simply Rhaenys welcoming her husband’s bastard with open arms.

The show leaves Rhaenys’ original reaction, when she first finds out about the affair, to the imagination. So it’s difficult to say what exactly she felt in the moment. Unlike fiery tempered book!Rhaenys, the show version is more calm and collected. She is a person who seeks peaceful resolutions to problems (similar to Catelyn) so her reaction in the show makes sense for her even if it’s different from how the book version of her may have reacted. In the HOTD canon, we’re basically getting an interpretation of how Catelyn might’ve reacted to Jon had he been raised away from Winterfell.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

There is a post that says that Alicent is not delusional to think that Rhaenyra agreed to make peace after Luke's death and begins to make comparisons with Cat who freed Jaime because it was more important for her to get her daughters back than her revenge for Ned, so it wasn't delusional to expect that Rhaenyra would rather keep her other children safe than avenge Luke.

My initial reaction was 🤨 something is very wrong here, but then the more I thought about it my reaction changed to 🙄😒🫨😫😠😡🤬 and I can finally articulate it well.

First, yes, Alicent is totally and completely delusional, I want to clarify that from the beginning and that comparison and hope that Rhaenyra will kneel after Luke's death is many levels because it omits and erases the emotional and political contexts of both situations

A. The first thing that bothered me was the implication that Rhaenyra by choosing to fight is actively putting her children in danger (but not apparently Aegon 🙄).

B. Cat's daughters (daughter) were hostages who tried to use them as leverage to prevent Robb from moving forward. The whole point of getting Jaime and why so many bothered that they would release him It is because he was an ideal hostage precisely to force the return of the girls (Sansa) and good peace talks.

None of Rhaenyra's children are hostages, Rhaenyra could have done what she did later and kept her children out of the battle and close to her.If under that scenario she had lost, the normal thing in that society is that the eldest were sent to the wall and the youngest and most innocent were taken as 'wards' like Theon was or even locked up as the English kings historically did.

C. Freeing Jaime was an emotional response to the death of Bran and Rickon along with the loss of Winterfell, Sansa's marriage (with her possibly being raped), Robb in possible danger and the failure of alliances with the Baratheon brothers. That is why Cat acts at that moment when before Robb was winning the war and had a valuable hostage. This is what motivates Cat to decide that the war has to end NOW and she has to get her daughter back.

Rhaenyra is once again in the middle of raven conversations where it was essentially going to be a penis measuring "Look at my dragons and how many houses support me" that was the strategy of both sides while they sweetened the pot with other terms.

The real comparison on a political level is with Robb already having his army assembled BEFORE Nedd's beheading and on an emotional level to Rhaenyra when Corlys betrays her and Daemon and Joffrey die.

D. The implication that expecting Rhaenyra to act more like a mom and not like a politician was the right thing to do when the serious problem that women in power have had is precisely being labeled as emotional and this is already a criticism that Rhaenyra receives in and out of the universe really pisses me off.

E. I need someone to explain to me why the reaction of her son being murdered under what was essentially political immunity should cause her to submit to the mercy of those people. There is a reason why this is the cessation of peace talks and the beginning of hostilities

F. This sounds like Rhaenyra must have freaked out and bared her neck while handing over the knife herself. So I also need they to explain to me why kneeling would put her children in less danger by submitting to people who have already proven to be a threat.

G. Since the argument is apparently based on the fact that Rhaenyra must have felt intimidated by the danger her children faced because Vhagar is an unstoppable threat. and at this point I'm furious again I'm going to be petty and say that after B&C Alicent should give up and be scared, after all they are not safe inside their house and still their sons and granddaughters can die if they don't surrender!

H. I'd be more inclined to believe that Alicent isn't delusional and thinks Rhaenyra is stupid if the in-universe implication (even by others on the council) wasn't that her letters say: "ops on your dead son, bend the knee or we'll eat another one" because apparently no attempt has been made to smooth things over, more so because they have to be aware that after this THEY are the ones who have to make the repairs and the only thing they could do for peace is say "sorry for your son, here is the crown we stole from you, do you think you can forgive Aemond? Maybe send him to the wall instead of taking his head?"

Even if Aegon didn't make a banquet at the show Aemond has been promoted to best strategist without even a speech or display of censure after, once again, committing assassination of someone with essentially diplomatic immunity using the equivalent of a nuclear weapon

I. My last point is that I also want to know why people defend this line of thinking when, even if Rhaenyra doesn't know it, WE the audience know that the original plan was the murder of her and her family and Aegon and Otto lament how difficult things are because that didn't happen. Seeing that even Alicent admits that she has no power over Otto, Aegon and Aemond (because she never had it over her father and her children are getting out of hand) What exactly does that universe where Rhaenyra kneels look like?

ASoIaF fandom actually read the books and pick up on the blatant AND nuanced differences b/t several diff female characters challenge---FAILED.

Rhaenyra is once again in the middle of raven conversations where it was essentially going to be a penis measuring "Look at my dragons and how many houses support me"

Pfft..

D. The implication that expecting Rhaenyra to act more like a mom and not like a politician was the right thing to do when the serious problem that women in power have had is precisely being labeled as emotional and this is already a criticism that Rhaenyra receives in and out of the universe really pisses me off.

Yeah, damned if you do, damned if you don't. Continuously moving the goalposts. No escape. So you co think that being less politically minded is how she should have been? (not that giving up her kids was politically beneficial, as you pointed out: unlike Cat's daughters who were already hostages, Rhaenrya's kids were all with her...Cat was more compelled to save her kids' lives with them not already by her side).

F. This sounds like Rhaenyra must have freaked out and bared her neck while handing over the knife herself. So I also need they to explain to me why kneeling would put her children in less danger by submitting to people who have already proven to be a threat.

It's exactly they want her to utterly give up. they hate how bk!Rhaenyra refused to assert herself--they already decided that her going against status quo of female behavior condemns her and her sons and/or they are fed up-cornered by how woefully inferior show!Alicent is as a mother, so they collapse the whole meshes of nuance for both situations that and go after Rhaenyra's motherhood with paltry and narrow-minded "critiques".

Great breakdown anon, definitely going in my personal list of posts to reference. I don't have any notes.

Avatar
reblogged

Thinking of the most prominent succession struggles in asoiaf and realizing that a good majority of them are not even because of some evil bastard usurping their trueborn relative. Alys Karstark’s dilemma is caused by her uncle wanting to forcibly marry her and steal her birthright. Renly is Stannis’ trueborn brother and yet he declares himself king despite Stannis being older. Euron is Balon’s trueborn brother and Asha’s uncle and yet look at what he did. Littlefinger wants to use a trueborn Harry Harding to take over Sweetrobin’s rights (though not so openly). And the Dance of the Dragons was between a trueborn pair of brother and sister. And if we are to see a repeat of it, it will be between a trueborn daughter of the last Targaryen king (Dany) and a trueborn son (Aegon) of the previous crown prince.

That’s what makes the whole “Jon was a threat to Catelyn’s children” argument so frustrating because people act as if Jon was a ticking time bomb that was going to blow at any minute, purely on account of him being a bastard. When historically, we’re given much more precedent for trueborn relatives to usurp each other.

This frustrating argument arises out of two problems:

  1. ASOIAF stans are not engaging as critically with the text as they should be. Catelyn’s historical evidence lies in the series of Blackfyre Rebellions which happened after a legitimized bastard rose up against his brother. But context is key here. Not only were there several factors that led to this fallout (e.g., Daemon being given the conqueror’s sword Blackfyre, anti-Dornish sentiment not working in Daeron’s favor, Daeron himself being a suspected bastard, Daemon’s overall popularity, etc), but people ignore Bloodraven (a BASTARD!) who supported his trueborn brother’s claim during this series of conflicts. Daemon did not rebel because all bastards are inclined to treachery and all bastards bring evil to those around them. If any bastards raised near trueborns are a threat to the trueborn’s inheritance, then why not Bittersteel? Why not Shiera? Why didn’t other Stark bastards rebel against their trueborn siblings? Several factors led to the conflict specifically between Daemon and Daeron. Instead of taking Catelyn’s filtered history at face value, we should instead recognize that Daemon was given legal basis to push for his claim (after a series of events that symbolically recognized him as the worthy and true heir) as he was now a legitimized son, and succession struggles are, more oft than not, likely to happen between recognized legitimate competing claims. And here’s the thing, Ned Stark at no point indicated that he was going to give Jon legitimacy in the North. And he never indicated that he would give it to Jon over Robb. On the contrary, everyone knew that Robb was the heir. Robb was the one being given lessons, Robb was the one helping Ned attend to visiting lords, Robb was the one who would inherit Ice, etc. By Alys’ account in ADWD, preparations were being made for Robb’s future (NOT for Jon, who was largely ignored). There was no opportunity for Jon to pose any threat to Robb or his children because Ned did not give him legitimacy and he did not allow him to gain backing with the Northern lords. Aegon IV created Daemon and his subsequent rebellion(s), but Ned Stark did not do the same with Jon. Despite Catelyn treating Jon as a walking crisis center, there’s little evidence to the effect. In fact, we might as well say that Bran or Rickon or any of Sansa’s or Arya’s sons would pose an even bigger threat to Robb’s legacy than Jon would, you know given historical precedent and all that.
  2. Treating Jon’s mere existence as one that inherently comes with dire consequences for “le poor trueborns” plays into bastardphobia, which is actually in world bigotry (and grrm considers Jon to be a marginalized individual on account of his bastardy). Saying that Jon is a threat to the Stark kids is saying that all bastards are threats to trueborns but like….so are the trueborns. History, actual hiatory, shows us that trueborns are a bigger threat to each other. But no one is saying “Bran is a threat to Robb’s kids” even though there is precedent. Bran is also getting a lordling’s education just as Robb is, and Bran is allowed to engage with the upper class on important occasions and gain visibility just as Robb is, and Bran is even expected to command his own castle and men (which would even give him ability to stake his claim). So why isn’t he a threat? Instead, Jon is the one who is singled out - because he’s a bastard. He’s being singled out because Catelyn said he should be singled out, despite there being little actual evidence to his supposed incoming usurpation. Which is ironic because the literal purpose of his story is to critique these bigoted views. Jon is just as honorable and good and kind as any other trueborn son, if not more so. And we have seen him sacrificing his own happiness for his siblings (e.g., the direwolf pups and refusing Winterfell because he will not usurp Sansa’s rights). It’s one thing for Catelyn to show ignorance, but we as readers should know better because we have a full picture and not only do we have an understanding of the history being cited by Catelyn (and what is being purposefully ignored), we also know Jon. So we should be saying, “wait no, there’s no indication that Jon is any more a threat than any one of Ned’s sons”.

It is understandable (but not justifiable tbh) that Catelyn is biased against Jon; he is the ever present product of her husband’s affair. But that’s just it, she’s biased. So she has a biased application of history. And she has a biased (and bigoted) view of Jon’s place in it. We as readers have a full picture though. So shouldn’t we be having more nuanced dialogue regarding this instead of taking her biased word for it?

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

Since TG insist on watching HOTD trough a traditional/medieval lens, let’s remind them that according to GRRM himself and Westeros, Alicent isn’t a child bride:

https://www.westeros.org/Citadel/SSM/Entry/1050

A boy is Westeros is considered to be a man grown at sixteen years. The same is true for girls. Sixteen is the age of legal majority, as twenty-one is for us.

However, for girls, the first flowering is also very significant... and in older traditions, a girl who has flowered is a woman, fit for both wedding and bedding.

There’s a reason why Ned and Catelyn have absolutely no problem with Jon Arryn despite him marrying a teenager and Ned still worship him, there’s a reason why TG (who also happen to be Martell stans) support Daeron II selling his 15 years-old sister to an older Maron Martell, and defend Oberyn despite him having sex with a 16 years-old Alayaya.

A running line of hypocrisy...

Avatar
reblogged
Anonymous asked:

Viserys loved Alicent more than he ever loved Aemma. He loved her so much that he always saw the best of her. Offended Corlys Velaryon, the wealthiest man in the Seven Kingdoms, in order to marry her. Closed his eyes when Alicent abused and mocked his “favorite child”, and spread destructive rumours about her. Viserys clearly states in F&B he married once for duty so with Alicent he would marry for love. Alicent was the love of his life, otherwise she wouldn’t have been able to get away with going openly against her husband’s heir.

*EDITED POST* (4/13/24)

Response to this post? Or more likely this one by lady-corinne I reblogged.

Yes and no, he seemed to love her, but I don't know about it being the pure & unbending sort of love and favor you're trying to make it be. a lot of this will be diving into his head.

EDITED AND FURTHER...

Cat & Ned weren't in love when they married in an arrangement, too. But they fell in love and cared for each other very deeply. And they had multiple children/pregnancies. Neither she nor Ned were as young as Aemma when they married, so Catelyn was lucky enough to not have one other risk factor as she successively birthed their many kids.

Arranged marriages don't always mean the person cannot and will not fall in love or come to respect their partner. The romantic love and/or companionship-partner sort of love just depends on the person and how they are responding to specific circumstances/their values/their relationship to duty.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
maloops
"my lady" Ned whispered in wonderment.

inspirado na cena do começo do primeiro livro, em que eles se encontram embaixo da árvore-coração. eu me afeiçoei tanto aos starks e a dinâmica familiar deles enquanto eu lia, e a relação desses dois foi bonita e triste tudo de uma vez.

inspired by the scene at the beginning of the first book, where they meet by the weirwood. i was so endeared with the starks and their family dynamic while reading, and these two were lovely and sad all at once.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net