mouthporn.net
#aegon and helaena – @horizon-verizon on Tumblr
Avatar

editorialized torpedo

@horizon-verizon / horizon-verizon.tumblr.com

she/her -- ASoIaF Enthusiast -- (I will be changing the title of this blog frequently just because I want to)
Avatar

Helaena & Aegon's Relationship -- A Book Reader Explaining How They Got Some Truths or Conclusions Out of an Unreliable Narrator/Account

Also can be found on Twitter HERE.

*HEADCANON*

Art Credit by fkaluis

There's really no reason to think that F&B is unreliably telling/twisting this moment, as this part is told through Munkun/Orwyle, Orwyle who was there to witness Alicent putting out this search party for Aegon to get him quickly crowned.

QUOTE of Helaena about Aegon's Whereabouts (in case pic below is illegible, not sure about pic quality)

Yes, Orwyle was writing to paint himself as non-complicit/innocuous as possible to avoid execution during his imprisonment.

Yes, Helaena is reported to be a "pleasant", seemingly non-confrontational person.

Yes, there is the possibility that he wasn't in the room when Helaena answered the searchers.

However, again, what we know of Aegon, his raping, his philandering, the fact he wasn't present and in the room with Helaena and had to be looked for maybe a few hours before being found and then found with a 12-year-old (he was in his early 20s), speaks volumes about their relationship alone. We do not hear anything that shows Aegon was even involved in his kids' development or nurturing or hung out with them, just because.

Meanwhile we absolutely, at least, know that Viserys kept Rhaenyra close to him at the feast while Aemma was alive, & even more so after he named her heir. (Viserys has got his own parenting issues even with Rhaenyra, but he was definitely loving towards Aemma & Rhaenyra and was present. Rhaenyra would have remembered him as putting in that parental effort).

We absolutely know that Baela and Rhaena, Aegon III and Viserys II & all the Velaryon boys were close with, trusted, or worshipped Daemon by:

  1. Jace trusting him with Dragonstone and the Seeds
  2. no would-have-been-used-against-Daemon rumor; not even rumors of contention between any of them (same guy -Daemon- that people feared? Plz they'd be talking)
  3. Baela being described as the female version of Daemon, or her going through mourning him by being "wild" as Aegon's council saw it
  4. Rhaena herself having Daemon's fire (fear of reaction to her 1st husband's death, love for attention, etc)
  5. Aegon III likely naming his daughter after him & Daena naming her son (the Blackfyre) after her grandfather Daemon (indicates Aegon expressed his love for Daemon to her)

And there is absolutely no indication that Aegon II's relationship with Helaena mirrored anything like Jaehaerys x Alysanne/Daemon x Rhaenyra/Alyssa x Baelon/Aemon x Jocelyn/Rhaenys x Corlys. The Targ/Valyrian couples have the most romantic stories of the ASoIaF universe (as told by narrative).

Even in the more contentious couples' (of my list) earliest, most romantic years. Not a one. No reports of longing glances, hushed conversations ignoring the rest of the room as if they were in a bubble, screams of pleasure, tender arm holding, flying their dragons together, no famous words of affection or appreciation of the other's attributes. Nothing.

And Helaena being a "pleasant" person does not negate the ability to establish boundaries, fight back when alarmed/annoyed/feeling intruded on, or had some Targaryen pride herself. Or have some self-possession.

So really, we absolutely can & should take as fact, that Helaena said what I quoted about Aegon not being in her bed.

Aegon & Helaena, despite some people's insistence, were never close & were never in love & were never a true couple. And Aegon was never a good father, nor a good husband or person all on his own merit.

Anyway, back to the prime point: we as readers have managed to understand characters, their motivations, relationships, etc even though the entire account of the Dance and before the Dance/war IS made up of many sources w/agendas 7 biases before we look at "So Spake Martin"/"The Citadel 'ASoIaF' Archive"--or anything like those--websites.

But of course, some people already know & acknowledge some FACTS about these characters from these sources, but will thump their way into ad-hominems and divergent tangents just to avoid it & affirm themselves.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

I do believe a lot of Green stans are hypocrites when they call out show!Viserys for being a rapist but, at the same time, totally ignore Aegon doing the same thing to his sister wife Helaena because then they would also have to condemn their beloved Alicent for marrying them in the first place and forcing her own daughter to become a child bride. Instead they're even claiming Aegon is probably nice to his wife in private because their mother would NEVER allow him to hurt her. They say it's just team black stans claiming the opposite, that it's marital rape. Honestly, who would want their drunk husband forcefully having sex with them? I doubt that line from episode 8 is supposed to mean anything else. And what's more, I've also seen some of them complaining the show ruined their relationship by citing the book, saying there was probably love between them. What?? First of all Aegon was a rapist in the book as well (something most of them have never accepted to this day and never will), he was out there sexually harassing the castle's serving maids and raping girls as young as 12 years old. This is not the behavior of a loving and loyal husband, but one of a cheater who forces himself on women. Unless I'm missing something, there's no indication their arranged marriage became a loving one at all (especially in the show).

You're not missing anything about their book relationship. Helaena herself indicates that their marriage was a fluke:

Princess Helaena was breaking her fast with her children when the Kingsguard came to her…but when asked the whereabouts of Prince Aegon, her brother and husband, she said only, “He is not in my bed, you may be sure. Feel free to search beneath the blankets."
("The Blacks and the Greens")

There's really no reason to think that F&B is unreliably telling/twisting this moment, as this part is told through Munkun/Orwyle, Orwyle who was there to witness Alicent putting out this search party for Aegon to get him quickly crowned. Yes, Orwyle was writing to paint himself as non complicit/innocuous as possible to avoid execution during his imprisonment. Yes Helaena is reported to be a "pleasant", seemingly nonconfrontational person.

Yes there is the possibility that he wasn't in the room when Helaena answered the searchers. However, again, what we know of Aegon, his raping, his philandering, the fact he wasn't present and in the room with Helaena and had to be looked for for maybe a few hours before being found and then found with a 12 year old (he was in his early 20s), speaks volumes about their relationship alone. We do not hear anything that shows Aegon was even involved in his kids' development or nurturing, or hung out with them just because.

Meanwhile we absolutely, at least know, that Viserys kept Rhaenyra close to him at feast while Aemma was alive, and even more so after he named her heir. We absolutely know that Baela and Rhaena, Aegon III and Viserys II and all the Velaryon boys were close with, trusted, or worshipped Daemon by:

  • Jace trusting him with Dragonstone and the Seeds
  • no would-have-been-used-against-Daemon rumor; not even rumors of contention between any of them (same guy -Daemon- that people feared? Plz they'd be talking)
  • Baela being described as the female version of Daemon, or her going through mourning him by being "wild" as Aegon's council saw it
  • Rhaena herself having Daemon's fire (fear of reaction to her 1st husband's death, love for attention, etc)
  • Aegon III naming his daughter after her, and Daena naming her son after Daemon (indicates Aegon expressed his love for Daemon to her)

And there is absolutely no indication that Aegon II's relationship with Helaena mirrored anything like Jaehaerys x Alysanne/Daemon x Rhaenyra/Alyssa x Baelon/Aemon x Jocelyn/Rhaenys x Corlys. Even in the more contentious couples' earliest, most romantic years. Not a one. No reports of longing glances, hushed conversations ignoring the rest of the room as if they were in a bubble, screams of pleasure, tender arm holding, flying their dragons together, no famous words of affection or appreciation of the others' attributes. Nothing.

And Helaena being a "pleasant" person does not not negate the ability to establish boundaries, fight back when alarmed/annoyed/feeling intruded on, or had some Targ pride herself. Or have some self possession:

Blind to her danger, the queen appeared as dusk was settling over the castle, accompanied by her three children. Jaehaerys and Jaehaera were six, Maelor two. As they entered the apartments, Helaena was holding his little hand and calling out her mother’s name. Blood barred the door and slew the queen’s guardsman, whilst Cheese appeared to snatch up Maelor. “Scream and you all die,” Blood told Her Grace. Queen Helaena kept her calm, it is said. “Who are you?” she demanded of the two.
("A Son for a Son")

So really, we absolutely can and should take as fact that Helaena said what I quoted about Aegon not being in her bed.

Avatar

About Who Arranged Aegon and Helaena to Marry in Fire and Blood...

This is the quote:

Following the ancient tradition of House Targaryen, King Viserys wed his son Aegon the Elder to his daughter Helaena. The groom was fifteen years of age; a lazy and somewhat sulky boy, Septon Eustace tells us, but possessed of more than healthy appetites, a glutton at table, given to swilling ale and strongwine and pinching and fondling any serving girl who strayed within his reach. The bride, his sister, was but thirteen. Though plumper and less striking than most Targaryens, Helaena was a pleasant, happy girl, and all agreed she would make a fine mother.
("A Question of Succession", pg 385)

Some claim that Viserys is the only one responsible for marrying Helaena and Aegon when Helaena was only 13, and not Alicent. But:

  1. Viserys allowed Rhaenyra to be unmarried for years (when we all know that he always wanted her to marry Laenor) after she already got her period (when a noble girl is considered "beddable" and weddable in Westeros). He forces Rhaenyra to marry Laenor when he did specifically because he wanted to maintain the Targ image in lieu of a possible affair b/t her and Daemon. Viserys shows himself as being fine with marrying his children later in their lives/teendoms. Thus, Viserys was not in any rush to marry his children together.
  2. We know that Alicent, at one point, wanted Viserys to marry Rhaenyra and Aegon for the sake of making Aegon closer to the throne and later seize its active power (quote). The quote I linked tells us 3 things: Alicent is very concerned for whom Rhaenyra marries as well as who her son marries for the sake of getting power for him/herself; Viserys needs to be convinced of things like anyone else and he didn't marry Rhaenyra to Aegon specifically bc he knew Alicent's desires for their son/herself, which he both disliked and it shows his clear disapproval for Aegon getting anywhere near the throne; AND Alicent has the ability to suggest a marriage that Viserys can say yes or no to, but Alicent still has that influence over him concerning their other children's marriages.
  3. Who does it benefit more for Aegon and Helaena to marry? Alicent or Viserys? Alicent or Rhaenyra? (Specifically in the game of thrones and claims) Alicent. While it is Targ tradition to marry siblings and Viserys is a Targ, he refused to marry Laena (a female relative much closer in blood than Alicent ever could be). By the time of Jaehaerys and Alysanne, Targaryen marriage lended a prestige and legitimacy to those married as well as it always having combined the claims of the couple. Also, Helaena and Aegon's children would very likely become dragonriders if they are married. Helaena marries Aegon in 122 A.C., and Rhaenyra and Laenor marry in 114 A.C. In the goal of putting Aegon on the throne and keeping him there, it would be in Alicent's best interests to marry these two, and to do it quickly. Esp in response to the marriages Rhaenyra has with Laenor and Daemon and the kids she has by then, 2 other dragonriders.
  4. It is more likely that Viserys could have married these two by Alicent's persuasions than because he earnestly believed that they had to get married so soon. He simply had less interest in Helaena's marriage than in Rhaenyra's because Helaena is not the one to inherit the throne and because she is not his favorite child. If he wasn't in such a rush to marry Rhaenyra to anyone, even Laenor, when Rhaenyra was young, he'd be even less motivated to marry Helaena and Aegon together when she is also so young. Alicent had much more ability to persuade him concerning Helaena than Rhaenyra. Thus she has actually a lot of influence as to Helaena's marriage. He'd likely be fine with just leaving her be. Alicent, though? She had a mission and purpose.

Alicent's main goal was always power through her son, Aegon, by putting him on the throne. She uses the idea of Rhaenyra killing her or her kids to convince the green council into installing Aegon as heir, but this is not a stupid woman and she would have known that Rhaenyra had no murderous will against her siblings, no matter how many times she calls her brothers her "half brothers". Here is a quote proving that ("The Blacks and the Greens").

Avatar
reblogged

Team Green acting like Aegon the disgrace II is morally superior because he, allegedly, hates incest; apparently, him ignoring Helaena except "sometimes when he is drunk" doesn't imply he assaults her when he's drunk but rather his inability to see her as anything other than a sister in the traditional, the Faith of the Seven way; I suppose we should also pretend he didn't insult her when talking with Aemond during Laena's funeral. Apparently, raping a woman and watching children (including his own) fight to death is way less repulsive than consensual incest between Rhaenyra and Daemon (which, likely, isn't considered incent in Westeros; don't know about the Seven, but Old Gods don't seem to consider a marriage between niece and uncle/nephew and aunt to be incest).

Excerpt of Episode 7 -- Aemond and Aegon talk about Helaena and the Succession

Aegon: We have nothing in common.
Aemond: She’s our sister.
Aegon: You marry her, then.
Aemond: I would perform my duty, if mother had only betrothed us.
Aegon: If only.
Aemond: It would strengthen the family. Keep our Valyrian blood pure.
Aegon: She’s an idiot.
Aemond: She’s your future queen.
Aegon: We actually do have one thing in common. We both fancy creatures with very long legs. Wench! Another!
Aemond: (sighs) Aegon.

What Helaena says in episode 8 concerning marriage and her/Aegon:

I would like to toast to Baela and Rhaena. They’ll be married soon. It isn’t so bad. Mostly he just ignores you… except sometimes when he’s drunk.

So if Aegon only touches her when he's drunk, and Alicen tis not going to be there trying to encourage him to sleep with his sister 100% of the time, and we know that Aegon is almost always drunk....there are times when he seeks Helaena out with no provocation but his own.

This makes him a fucking rapist, because who would want a drunk person thrusting into you out of nowhere and with no warning and no consideration for their wants or desires? From a person who pays no real attention to you otherwise?

Plus, by the look on the maid's face in episode 7, the power imbalance between him and that maid (he's a male royal, she is a female common-born servant expected to serve), how it's clear that he does it often and with no limit put onto him.

How do the pieces not come together that this is a person who rapes, who runs through and ignores anyone's boundaries with less power than him?

Media illiteracy, Misogyny, Classism.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

It’s truly fascinating that Greenies will carry on about Alicent being a child bride/maritally raped/sexually assaulted only to completely ignore that Alicent made Helaena an actual child bride and then they’ll turn around and defend Aegon being a rapist and claim he was treated unfairly by being made a rapist in the show even though it’s canon in the books.

Truly fascinating.

goodqueenaly explains HERE why Alicent would have pressed or approved of the marriage b/t Helaena and Aegon even though Helaena was 13. And since they aged down Alicent, Show!Helaena should be younger than in canon (if my math is good in the linked post).

In canon, Helaena marries Aegon in 122 A.C. (again when she is 13). 

But in the show, it is 125 A.C. that Aemond claims Vhagar and the two are still unmarried, going by how Aemond and Aegon talk. In my post talking about the show vs the canon ages, I say that by 125 A.C., in the show, Helaena is supposed to be 11-12. And we do not have a specific date for whe tney marry, but even if she did marry him when she turned 13 like in canon, Helaena, by the green’s estimation, would still be a child bride. And pressed into it by her mother.

Yes, so interesting that the green stans didn’t think about this.. Especially when the show made it a point to say that Aegon maritally rapes her with Helaena speaking about how he ignores her except when he is drunk and looks for her in episode 8:

Helaena: I would like to toast to Baela and Rhaena. They'll be married soon. It isn't so bad. Mostly he just ignores you... except sometimes when he's drunk.

...hmm.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

Helaena truly is one of the reasons Alicent deserves a special place in hell. She was forced to marry her abusive elder brother at 13, to give birth to his children at 14, to see them be gruesomely and violently murdered because of a war her mother started, and live the rest of her life in an insufferable amount of pain until she finally kill herself.

Helaena is a victim of her circumstance and while it doesn't make her an inspirational figure, her situation and death shows how the Greens were more ambitiously motivated than morally motivated, definitely. Alicent really couldn’t wait to marry her daughter off, and goodqueenaly breaks down what I think is why someone like Alicent would do that to her daughter.

For sure, Alicent is not seeing any heaven for any of this. Makes me almost upset for being nonreligious.

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
goodqueenaly
Anonymous asked:

Why was Helaena made to marry and give birth so young? Aegon had male heirs in his brothers, all siblings were dragonriders. Sure, Viserys' health was already poor, but why would Alicent endanger her like that? Why not wait a couple of years and only marry them for/at Aegon's crowning (there's still strong symbol politics in that) if their father carked it in the meantime? Really, it would be at least another decade before grandkids would be old enough for any real political/military benefit 1/2

It’s not like Helaena was on the marriage market as Rhaenyra had been, nor was there any available match to the (royal) Blacks that Viserys may have sought as a conciliatory move. I love George’s writing for the most part, however this is just another example (of far too many) of “wed them and bed them, as soon as you’ve bled them” for a *girl* he is want to do; that doesn’t make a whole lot of sense in-universe.

In my mind, I imagined Queen Alicent wanted to see Helaena married to Aegon as soon as possible in order to start producing Hightower-Targaryen heirs of the next generation. She had been frustrated in her primary marital ambition for Aegon, back in the early 110s AC - to wed him to Rhaenyra, thereby guaranteeing that he would be crowned and (if the Hightowers had any say in the matter) ruling as her co-monarch - and so needed a backup plan to assert her son’s dynastic rights. At the same time, Alicent and the rest of the court could see that Rhaenyra’s children with Laenor Velaryon were almost certainly not fathered by Ser Laenor, despite Rhaenyra’s insistence they were; anyone who accepted Rhaenyra as heiress of the Iron Throne had to accept as well that the king who would follow her would be a bastard. By wedding Aegon the Elder to his sister seemingly as soon as she was physically able, Alicent could reemphasize their Targaryen-ness; they might have a Hightower mother, but Aegon and Helaena were true Targaryens, wedding incestuously in Valyrian fashion, just like the prince’s namesake. 

Additionally, and directly to this question, Alicent might have thought that wedding them early would allow the “green” heirs of the next generation to be as old as possible once Viserys died. Alicent was no fool; if the greens wanted Aegon on the throne, they needed a strong argument for him in the inevitable succession crisis that would follow the king’s death. A brood of children, as Targaryen-looking as their father (and maybe mother, assuming Helaena shared those Valyrian features), would directly undermine Rhaenyra’s position. Both Aegon and Rhaenyra were dragonriding children of the Young King with arguable legal claims, both were married to suitable and dragonriding partners - but only Aegon could boast children that were indisputably Targaryen, a guarantee that the dynasty would not falter in a generation. Who do you want sitting the Iron Throne next, the greens might have asked rhetorically - the princes who were Velaryon by name but Strong in appearance and presumed paternity, or these children of a Targaryen prince and a Targaryen princess? Viserys was already showing signs of physical weakness by 120 AC, three years before the birth of Jaehaerys and Jaehaera; there was no time to waste if the greens wanted to boast that the Hightower-Targaryen succession was secure through Prince Aegon. These children might not have been ready to fight in battle yet, but they would be useful in their very existence, to bolster their father’s claim. Childless, Aegon might have seemed a doubtful prospect for the throne - what could guarantee that the crown would not pass to the dangerous Prince Aemond? - but with a Targaryen family of his own, Aegon might have appeared that much more certain of a true heir than his half-sister and her sons of doubtful legitimacy.

Of course, this question targets a topic which @joannalannister and others have discussed critically and well - GRRM’s reliance on child brides in a setting that, by his own words and the history upon which he claims to base it, should not have nearly as many as it does. We might say that Alicent, nothing if not ambitious for her son’s inheritance, would care far more about how quickly Helaena could give her brother an heir than about any lasting physical impact on her only daughter, but reasonable justification in one case (insofar as this is reasonable) does not negate the other cases in the series where no such justification exists.

Avatar
Avatar
reblogged
Anonymous asked:

Why do I have a feling that HOTD directors diminished or hid all incestuous couples romance (bare minimum for daemyra, no sympathy between Aegon and Haelena) but they created a gorgeous crispin/rhaneyra scene..?

Ahmmm I liked the Crispin/Rhaenyra love scene, especially the beginning where they are undressing awkwardly, that was cute, it felt very intimate and we have never seen something like that in Game of Thrones. Towards the end it was more basic and unrealistic for a first time, still better than anything we've seen in Game of Thrones.

But. Overall I prefer Daemyra love scene in episode 7 for the reasons I mention here. That was a very unique and intimate scene too, and it felt less porny than the Crispin/Rhaenyra one. The close angles and the dark lighting are kind of too much but it's very romantic and real and heavy. So overall I don't think that they had that in mind.

But generally speaking yeah they do hate Daemyra. As for Aegon and Helaena, I mean, what positive points can be made of that relationship?

Avatar

I think that what anon is trying to say about the "no sympathy between Aegon and Helaena" is that the writers or directors refused to show Aegon and Helaena alone and interacting sexually and/or nonsexually so that we may witness Helaena's feelings as Aegon drunkenly assaults her like how we see Alicent's before and during her sex with Viserys in episode 4 OR/AND how they (don't) interact when he isn't drunk. How he ignores her and if he does to speak to her, what that looks like and how does Helaena respond?

I could be completely wrong though. Maybe anon was thinking just about us seeing Aegon assault Helaena alone. Either way I think that this was a genuine ask. If it's sarcastic trolling then they really are too into their own voice.

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

What do you think of having made Helaena a dreamer in the series? I personally have mixed feelings about this, but one thing is for sure, giving him autistic traits was a mistake.

*EDITED POST* (3/19/24)

Disclaimer: I really don't know anything about neurodivergence or autism.

Here is one earlier post that I wrote about an issue with Helaena’s new characterization.

I used to think that it was nice to see some neurodivergent representation and that she got to be a little more than just the “plump” “fine mother” Gyldayn describes her. But it’s just that: “little”.

Now:

A) Dragon dreams are...dreams. Not visions you have while fully awake. So...

B) I think that it Helaena’s characterization suffers from the reliance on her neurodivergence. Neurodivergence does not equal personality. We don’t know her other than one small scene of her unintentionally(?) calling Aegon out, that she liked to play with bugs in her youth, and that she doesn’t like her own mother. These aren’t personality traits they are conviences for the greens’ image.

And the prophecies she speaks does nothing but tell us what we--the book readers--already know will happen, except for Rhaenys, but that was a scene that also never should have happened. We’re supposed to be wowed by how she is like Cassandra--the prophet who no one believes after cursed by Apollo for not sleeping with him or otherwise disobeying him. At least Cassandra is trying and much more active in her story, using her visions to try to stop catastrophe even though she knows or we may make the argument she already knew and thus this is where the Greek tale's futility comes from. HotD is not using this kind of futility but it is expressing a futility while keeping Helaena a passive victim.

But using the futility of Cassandra’s story element to express how “futile” and “tragic” the Dance was diminishes human choice more than i needs to--how Alicent decides to go after Rhaenyra and tries to get Aegon on the throne for power. Diminishes the activeness of human decision specifically for the people already having lost their ambition in the adaptation from the original story to the show:

  • Alicent is a such younger sexual abuse victim (after years of fans having said that there was too much sexual abuse or violence esp against women in GoT) who apparently can't really reason as she would have in the book version and is more vulnerable to her father's machinations rather than her being a go getter herself
  • Rhaenyra's muster has also been greatly diminished
  • even Aemond's whitewashed and made less active by his killing Luke made into an "accident").

Then there is what another writers says about how we know what will happen to her. The show gives us the only neuro-divergent character and we know she’ll lose her son to Blood and Cheese, of which she obviously blamed herself for, driving her into a mad grief. That she will die a horrid, “suspicious” death. Her suffering will be used to generate more sympathy for the greens, while diminishing and ignoring that Daemon only uses B&C for what Aemond did to Lucerys. (Again, eye-for-an-eye is not moral or justifiable. I’ have said over and over that it is rather Aemond and Alicent’s fault for targeting Rhaenyra.) The show till then inadvertently act like the biased Maester Gyldayn, who also just refers to Helaena's death; the writer ponders over how her death inspired rebellion against Rhaenyra and seems to lean towards Rhaenyra actually doing it, even though it brings up the missing Larys and the possibility that he spread the rumors to incite the peasants against Rhaenyra more than they would have otherwise.

This cheapens her, especially because we don’t really get to see her apart from her Alicent, her brothers, and her kids. Nor do we see her interact with Aemond or Aegon like the two eldest boys do in episodes 6-9.

Rhaenyra’s story was about how women in Westeros would be pushed further back into practically subservient positions, and Daenerys was meant to be a penetration into that element. Rhaenyra is the story of how a precedent against women in power came to be; Dany is when a women pushes back and begins to regain that power.

So Helaena doing nothing more than tell visions that don’t matter while she stays in her room with her children and tries to get her own mother to stop touching her and knowing that she’ll die a horrendous death after long grieving and torturing herself for her son’s death just so she becomes some sort of Martyr for green-stans makes for a more disheartening picture than I’d like.

Oh, and it doesn't really make sense for her to know what's going to happen to not just her siblings and parents but her CHILDREN and not go to Viserys, the most prophecy-focused person in her family as well as the most able to actually do something to turn things around.

Dragon dreams in ASoIaF are fixed but they do not say that a specific person WILL do this so much as someone must do this for that to happen...unless they're Dany, Daenys, Rhaegar, & Aegon I.

Avatar
Following the ancient tradition of House Targaryen, King Viserys wed his son Aegon the Elder to his daughter Helaena. The groom was fifteen years of age; a lazy and somewhat sulky boy, Septon Eustace tells us, but possessed of more than healthy appetites, a glutton at table, given to swilling ale and strongwine and pinching and fondling any serving girl who strayed within his reach. The bride, his sister, was but thirteen. Though plumper and less striking than most Targaryens, Helaena was a pleasant, happy girl, and all agreed she would make a fine mother.

Fire and Blood, by George R.R. Martin, pg 385

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net