Go To Hell!

I mean you can summon an angel as easily as you can a demon but everyone always forgets that huh. Because binding an angel to your will would be wrong

This should count as a form of discrimination

drowning, dissolving in holy water, nothing left at all and you have taken the shape of the container you were placed in

Take off the old personality and embrace the death of self

It's morally okay to inflict divine madness on humans for fun

Those people all had it coming for existing within my path

I made a post a billion years ago about how God essentially commands humans to eat meat and refusing is disrespectful because “why are you calling unclean that which I have made clean” so therefore vegetarianism is a sin but now I can’t find it anywhere

Like there were two separate occurrences in the Bible where humans were outright commanded to start consuming certain animal flesh. Those commands freaked people out at the time but now those types of meat are everyday staples. Humans in the garden of Eden were herbivores

Premise 1: eating honey is bad (even though it doesn’t harm bees and responsible beekeepers are good for bee populations and have a vested interest in keeping their bees healthy) because it’s mistreatment

Premise 2: communion isn’t bad, because eating the flesh of some dude who got tortured to death is not mistreatment

Conclusion: the only thing more detached from reality than xtians and vegans is xtian vegans

This is a super minor detail but I do wanna clarify: the honey discussion is relevant regardless of whether or not honey is vegan. The point is that we have to at least address whether the bees are being exploited in order to establish whether honey is vegan. Honey bees are not exploited - but if they were honey would be non-vegan despite not being animal tissue.

Crucifixion is a more nuanced issue, because Jesus (in theory) was harmed but it's disputable whether he was exploited. He explicitly consented to the process (arguably under duress) and I don't know that his mistreatment should be considered part of communion production.

It's kind of impossible to separate Jesus' role in Christianity from his crucifixion, so I guess you could say it's part of the process of producing communion. But OTOH, the first communion pre-dates the crucifixion. Can food production be rendered immoral by something that happens after the food is consumed? Was communion fine the first time but never since?

And then there's the fact that a major concern for many vegans is contributing to future suffering. It's not just about eating the meat, it's about buying it and therefore causing other animals to be killed for profit. Like the fundamental question, I think, is:

Does taking communion contribute to or benefit from Jesus' suffering?

Imo, yes, absolutely. First of all the Trinity is fake and was made up by Big Nicene Council to sell more Polytheism. Jehovah absolutely exploited the fuck out of Jesus and directly benefits from his suffering and death, then and now. His son being tortured to death was necessary in order to secure God's heavenly rule. In the system that he created. There's major conflicts of interest there. Any reasonable judge would have issues with this case.

Taking communion validates this choice and proves God right in his fundamental argument that he should be the supreme ruler of the universe. When you do that, you're siding with him, saying "yes, God was and is right. What he did was right." Taking communion essentially makes you complicit in Jesus's torture and exploitation. From a vegan standpoint, it's immoral.

My point here is that you have to choose. You can either be vegan or you can be Christian

Does he not watch? Does he not cringe at some and sigh at others? Which one is he secretly hoping will be used next? Do you think he favors harsher punishments or lighter ones? Did he invent any methods or did he delegate that?

Guys signing that petition going around to ask God to remove the curse he put on women isn't going to do anything. If it gets one million signatures, sure, he might read it, but it's going right into the trash afterwards. The only way we will achieve true gender equality and end the curse of women's subjugation under men is if we slay God in his throne

It turns out that punishing groups for the actions of one violates the Geneva Convention, so I think we have a pretty good case of this being a human rights violation if it goes to court. Maybe the UN will do something