Portrait de la jeune fille en feu (Portrait of a Lady on Fire) 2019 | Céline Sciamma
mentally i am chewing on Polly Pocket clothing
okay me
Vintage apartment filled with green wallpaper | styling by Rydman & photos by Ostling
whoever created all these stock photos of this particular smarmy, insufferable android knows what’s up
As a robot myself, I hate this particular android. He looks like he’d try to sell me bitcoin
come… follow me into this dense white mist… I have lots of bitcoins for you there…
Yes… yes… come further now… don’t worry about the darkness, can’t you see how shiny this bitcoin is?
I almost,,, have it,,, just,,, need to get closer,,,
GOTCHA!
Finally… we can be together….
What a pity it is that you meatsacks live such brief lives. That’s the price of planned obsolescence, I suppose.
Ah well… another one for the collection.
Barnard Bulletin, New York, December 20, 1935
Glad to know that the people in 1935 were EXACTLY the same as we are lol
50 years later, the Zodiac Killer’s legendary cypher has been solved! Amazing!
I’m so embarrassed. I’m not a real person yet.
In Obvious Child, the scenes with Jenny Slate and Gaby Hoffmann. When they hang out, Hoffmann brings her tea; they try on clothes and they’re throwing them at each other. There are similar scenes in Working Girl, but they don’t have the same intimacy. I feel like one of the things that male directors tend to miss is how intimate women are with each other in female friendships. Women are more likely to hug each other, share clothes or say ridiculous things to each other that they don’t say in mixed company. A lot of that gets lost when men try to translate female friendship on to the big screen.
we’re really gonna go back to ‘women should just choose to not date men and call that lesbianism!’ again huh
we’re gonna do part 2 of this? in 2018???
it’s such an insult to bi women AND lesbians to just dismiss how fucking hard it is to love women. and it’s an insult to bi women and straight women to act like we’re dumb or less woke for potentially loving men as if we had a choice in the matter.
and, yeah, i am defending straight women here. like… it’s not funny or just pitiable that every time they develop feelings for men and act on them they risk severe violence (physical or otherwise) from their oppressors. the idea that one of the most pure feelings in the world (love) is an inherent risk for women of all sexualities isn’t like… funny or a race to prove how your love is more work. loving men? is a huge fucking risk when it comes to things like domestic violence, being forced to take on domestic labor, and just about all the other shit that comes with being with men. loving women? is a huge fucking risk when it comes to homophobic violence and other forms of discrimination.
women’s attraction, desire, and behaviour is framed as a lose-lose-lose situation and to act like we can just “choose” a better option is fucking insulting. there’s really no better term for it–it’s just insulting.
“Well, women can just choose to not date at all if they aren’t attracted to women!” The idea that women must live lives without romantic love because being with men is such a risk isn’t like… something we should celebrate or act like it’s an easy task. It isn’t fair to put the onus back on women to “protect themselves” from men instead of putting the onus on men to end patriarchal oppression or at least be decent enough individuals that women can feel safe loving them.
why am i living in this universe and not in any of the alternative ones i’ve made up
Oregano is a sexier herb than we give it credit for
i wouldn’t mind the hanging but the laying in the grave so long poor boy