Late Spring (a.k.a. Banshun) (Yasujiro Ozu, 1949): empty spaces
Poster for “晩春” Late Spring - 1949 by Yasujiro Ozu.
Late Spring, Yasujirō Ozu (1949)
Setsuko Hara and Chishû Ryû in Yasujirô Ozu’s Banshun (1949), Tôkyô monogatari (1953) and Tôkyô boshoku (1957)
“Far from a Manichaean take on the oppressive power of lingering social norms, Late Spring is a hushed battlefield where no one is right or wrong. We watch the infliction roll out inexorably, wishing there were a cheesy, American-style resolution somewhere on the horizon in which all of the well-meaning characters could be happy. But that’s not Ozu. Ozu is the natural energy of Noriko’s generous grin, dispensed selflessly in all social situations, until she realizes where her life is helplessly headed—and the blood-cooling shock of seeing that resilient smile finally drop.“ -- Michael Atkinson, “Home with Ozu”
Late Spring, Yasujirō Ozu, 1949
"The father or mother sitting alone in the now empty house is an image common enough in Ozu's films to serve as an epitome. These people are no longer themselves. We know they will somehow survive, but we also know at what cost. They are not bitter, they know this is the way of their world, but they are bereft. The reason they impel our sympathy is that they are neither victims of their own flaws, nor the prey of a badly organized society; they are the casualties of things as they are, the way that life is. And here we are, all of us, similar casualties." -- Donald Richie, Ozu
晩春 / Banshun / Late Spring Yasujirô Ozu. 1949
Temple Kenchō-ji, 〒247-8525 神奈川県鎌倉市山ノ内, Japan See in map
Banshun (Late Spring), 1949, Yasujiro Ozu
Behind the scenes of LATE SPRING (Ozu)
Late Spring (Yasujiro Ozu, 1949)
Happiness isn’t something you wait around for. It’s something you create yourself.
- Late Spring | dir. Yasujirô Ozu (1949)
"Ozu’s highly disciplined but selfless view is deepened by cuts that are subtle jolts or shifts in space, little awakenings that underline the transparency of the moment. Each shot, enhanced by a clear and declarative cut, is transformed into a package of space with its own precise weight. The screen, in union with its subject matter, becomes a luminous square—a reflecting pool of surface tension and depth. Within this delicate structure that the characters have the freedom to be. Late Spring (1949), so continually ripe with this state of cinematic revelation, ends with a final cut to the open ocean. all the suffering of the human circumstances we have so tenderly experienced throughout the narrative are suddenly discovered into a transparent, elusive memory, just as life itself, at the moment of death, may fall from our minds like the nighttime dreams disappearing into our morning activities.” - Nathaniel Dorsky : Devotional Cinema
'Many critics and scholars have commented upon the fact that frequently Ozu, instead of transitioning directly from … one scene to another, interposes a shot or multiple shots—as many as six—of an object, or a group of objects, or a room, or a landscape, often (but not always) devoid of human figures. These units of film have been [most frequently called] “pillow shots”.
The most discussed instance of a pillow shot in any Ozu film … is the scene that takes place at an inn in Kyoto, in which a vase figures prominently … After Noriko confesses to her father that she found the thought of his own remarriage “distasteful,” she looks over to discover that he is already asleep, or seems to be. She looks up towards the ceiling and appears to smile.
There follows a six-second medium shot, in the semidarkness, of a vase on the floor in the same room, in front of a shōji screen through which the shadows of leafy branches can be seen. There is a cut back to Noriko, now looking sad and pensive, almost in tears. Then there is a ten-second shot of the same vase, identical to the earlier one, as the music on the soundtrack swells, cuing the next scene.
Abé Mark Nornes, in an essay entitled “The Riddle of the Vase: Ozu Yasujirō’s Late Spring (1949),” observes: “Nothing in all of Ozu’s films has sparked such conflicting explanations; everyone seems compelled to weigh in on this scene, invoking it as a key example in their arguments.” Nornes speculates that the reason for this is the scene’s “emotional power and its unusual construction. The vase is clearly essential to the scene. The director not only shows it twice, but he lets both shots run for what would be an inordinate amount of time by the measure of most filmmakers.”’ (x) Banshun (Yasujirō Ozu, 1949)
”We would sigh or let out a great breath from the depths of our hearts, for what we felt was precisely this: Can it be possible that there is such a woman in this world?”
Words written by author Shūsaku Endō after watching Setsuko Hara on screen.