mouthporn.net
#collecting – @fundgruber on Tumblr
Avatar

@fundgruber / fundgruber.tumblr.com

Open Excess
Avatar
Within the field there is consensus that the politics of collecting, ordering, describing and curating objects in traditional GLAM institu- tions (galleries, libraries, archives and museums) are imbued with pro- cesses of governing and disciplining subjects (Bennett 1995). Recent work has even more strongly tied the politics of ‘collecting, ordering and governing’ information at these institutions with the nation-building and colonial projects of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries (Bennett et al. 2017). In short, invisible selection criteria, taxonomies and protocols in the curation of heritage objects intrinsically structure the narratives and heritage objects made available to the public. While similar cultural forces are at work in digital heritage infra- structures, the digitality adds additional challenges of technology and governmentality (see Capurro and Plets 2021; Thylstrup 2019). Complex software architectures and specialist programming languages make it incredibly difficult to reveal and understand invisible biases and choices. Therefore, research into how cultural heritage is collected, ordered and governed digitally is essential to develop a critical tool kit for understand- ing digital infrastructures. Ultimately, such a reflective lens would enable practitioners and academics to see digital technologies not just as use- ful tools, but also as powerful conceptual schemes that impact how we organise and represent the past. However, if we want to fully understand the politics, inner workings and impact of digital infrastructures, we need to examine these mechanisms on the micro-level of specific collections.

Gertjan Plets, Julianne Nyhan, Andrew Flinn, Alexandra Ortolja-baird, Jaap Verheul, “De-Neutralising Digital Heritage Infrastructures?: Critical Considerations on Digital Engagements with the Past in the Context of Europe.” Critical Heritage Studies and the Futures of Europe, edited by Rodney Harrison et al., UCL Press, 2023, pp. 243–62, p. 247

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
pwlanier

A COLLECTION OF GREEK AND ROMAN GLASS FRAGMENTS

CIRCA 3RD CENTURY B.C.-3RD CENTURY A.D.

The late 19th century small wood collectors cabinet with glazed lid and five drawers, filled with a quantity of glass fragments including core-formed, mosaic glass vessels, bead and inlay fragments, jewellery fragments, plain and marbled glass fragments and plain glass intaglios.

Christie’s

Avatar
In the last decade or so, the lockstep incursion of flat ontologies, notions of quasi-sentient matter, slime-lined and mushroom-sprouting vitalisms, and network-everything into contemporary art discourse and exhibitions has been hard to miss. Embraced with steady fanfare, a slushy and exhilaratingly immoderate carnival of chemistry and composting across our discursive landscape has us querying the unfathomable inexhaustibility of objects, their capacity to pipeline unwieldy forces and transgress the tiny territory of the real available to human access. But as excitement for this vivacious and mud-splattered thinking spikes, ostensibly terraforming a new plateau from which to assess our cultural artifacts, skepticism tactfully summons sharpened attention. Slight misgivings we felt all along for the conceptual pirouettes encouraged by this complicity with the powers of the object or the Earth or the cosmos find some oxygen and molt their modesty. As they are elaborated, it is evident that these suspicions can’t be hastily explained by charging intellectual miserliness before new proposals or blindness to the ways in which nonhuman forces are implicated in the structuring of things. It is, rather, that the scales and temporalities, the profound entanglements of apparatus and knowledge production, on which these discourses often rely and reflect in their native conceptual neighborhoods and disciplinary enclosures become, in transit and translation, something quite minor: the supposedly intractable potency and bottomless ineffability of art objects.

Gean Moreno, Introduction, In the Mind But Not From There - Real Abstraction and Contemporary Art. 2019

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
theories-of

andrea crespo-Center Stage, 2018 mahogany veneered plywood, digital prints on linen, cotton canvas, metal eyelets, metal screw hooks, cord metal brackets, screws 76.5 x 152.4 x 7.6 cm

Avatar
Die Intention des Sammelns und Ausstellens war auch in Berlin das Ausstellen der Primitivität der Welt. Völkerkundemuseen entstanden in einer symbiotischen Beziehung zum Kolonialismus. Sie gewinnen ihre Bedeutung aus dem Interesse des Bürgertums am Kolonialismus und sie befeuern die Überlegenheitsfantasien der Europäer, der Deutschen in diesem Fall, indem Sie Primitivität ausstellen.

Jürgen Zimmerer

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net