mouthporn.net
#biology – @fred-erick-frankenstein on Tumblr
Avatar

Pardon, but your tie is not symmetrical.

@fred-erick-frankenstein / fred-erick-frankenstein.tumblr.com

Fred|27|he/him|bi|I'll never tag any of my posts as "q slur", "d slur" or any of that matter - unfollow me if you think IDENTITIES are a slur!|Instagram: @fred_erick_frankenstein|German|icon from a gif by @poirott
Avatar
Anonymous asked:

I have a shark question! Why are different shark tails different shapes? What makes it good to have a symmetrical tail for a great white while cat sharks have the little lobe type tail thingies?

I think that this might constitute more than one question, lol.

About 'dem shark tails

Shark tails, like most things, evolve depending on things like environment, diet, hunting, general physiology and so on. So, in this case, sharks can have different shaped tails because they need a different shape for... swimming faster (Mako shark), stunning prey (Thresher sharks), fast take off for escape (Angel sharks), and so on.

Shark tails are like the propellers on a boat. Some boats need larger propellers because they're big, some because they need the speed, and some need asymmetrical ones for whatever reason. The same goes for shark tails.

The lifestyles of some sharks mean that they have to have long tail lobes (top and bottom), a longer top lobe, or a longer bottom one. This physiological variation can be seen pretty clearly in Thresher sharks compared to Great Whites compares to Angel sharks.

[source: shark-world]

The caudal fin aka the tail, affects thrust, velocity, and speed when swimming. Some sharks can't swim all that fast (though don't be fooled into thinking they're slower than you are in the water: they're not) while others can shoot off like a pop-rocket suddenly with a flick of their tail. Some sharks use their tails for communication (shark body language yoooo) though the Cookiecutter shark, which I talked about here, is one of the few with bioluminescence in their tails that they use to communicate and attract prey for- ya know- dinner.

Anyway. The caudal fins of sharks can be categorised into several groups, depending on different evolutionary purposes of the tail adaptations.

1. Typical sharks: the upper lobe of the tail is longer than the lower and has a little upward angle. Great White sharks and Threshers have tails like this.

- Note: not gonna lie, when I see the shape of a Great White's tail, i can't not see the way Kermit's mouth opens comically wide as not being dissimilar.

[source: blogspot]

2. Fast swimming sharks:

these tails are crescent shaped with the upper lobe extending further out, but not too much (not up, out as in horizontally when looking at a side-ways view of the shark) with a little divot in the bottom of the top lobe. The picture below shows what I'm trying (badly) to describe. Fast-swim sharks tend to be open ocean kind of swimmers, so having a good caudal fin that lets you swim at a decent speed without costing you too much energy is *insert ok-fingers emoji*.

[source: github]

3. Benthic (heh, ben afflick thicc) sharks:

the top lobe of the tail is angled slightly and pretty darn long compared to the bottom lobe. They don't turn all that quick or swim all that fast, but they tend to also swim more like eels with the wiggles rather than the loooooong swish like a Great White. These kinds of sharks spend a lot of time on the ocean floor so they're basically the Carpet And Ground Sharks Of The Ocean and have tails suited to that lifestyle.
Note: Houndsharks are Benthic. As are Nurse Sharks, hence the image below showing the eel-like tails they have.

4. Cirrhigaleus and Squalus genera sharks:

the names sound very fancy and Academic but they essentially mean the Dogfish shark category. Interestingly male and female dogfish have slightly different tail shapes. Female dogfish tails are a little... uh puffier I guess. The images below show a male (1) and a female (2)

[source: image 1, male dogfish]

[source: image 2, female dogfish, shark trust]

You can see that the female's tail is smoother, with less sharp definition like the males. They're still the same species though. Dogfish.
Now, interestingly enough, the longer upper lobe of a dogfish's tail doesn't slow it down. It can still swim fast, still rack up some speed quick, and maneuver well. This is because the spine of the dogfish extends through the top lobe at a lower angle than the lobe itself (you can see that in the pictures).
If you've read my other Shark Facts asks, you'll have probably seen the recent one about Great Whites and their dorsal fins being designed in way that makes them more rigid the faster they swim. If you haven't then it's here. Anyway, the same sort of logic applies. More rigid top lobe, the better it is for fast swimming.

5. Angel Sharks:

last on our list of shark tail types, we have Angel sharks. Honestly, these sharks have a larger bottom lobe than they do an upper lobe because they tend to be the I'm Going To Sit Here And Not Move For A Lifetime Then Shoot Out From Beneath You And Eat You. These shark tails allow the sharks that have evolved them to have a higher percentage of speed/velocity/acceleration in situations where they need to haul ass quick.
You can see the bottom lobe of the tail of the Australian Angel Shark is larger than the top lobe in the image below. They look, honestly, not unlike a ray but with a thicc tail instead of a needle of death (if you're a stingray, that is). You can definitely tell that sharks and rays are related when sharks like these exist, can't you.

[source: wikipedia]

What makes it good to have a symmetrical tail for a great white while cat sharks have the little lobe type tail thingies?

Okay so, I think you can guess what the answer to this specific question is if you've managed to read all the droning on I've done above. If not, then cool, I'll cliff-notes this shit.

1. Great White sharks need tails for speed and agility in the ocean, but also tails that aren't like the Basking Shark because they also go into shallow waters.

2. Cat sharks (my bae's) are ground sharks. Great Whites are not ground sharks. Tail differences are expected.

3. The image below shows you the differences in a Catshark's tail and a Dogfish's but you can see how it's considerably flatter on the top lobe than a Great Whites is. This is because, like Dogfish, Catsharks hunt specific types of prey (small fish, crabs, basically the stuff of the shallows/mid-depth waters of the world)

[source: wildlifeonline]

Basically, the differences can only truly be summed up with the following images.

Great Whites:

[source: knowyourmeme]

Catsharks (when threatened, I shit you not):

[source: memegenerator]

I hope this has been informative, educational, mildly entertaining and, as always, made you love sharks more.

After all, statistically speaking, sharks aren't the deadliest thing in the ocean to humans. Australian Box Jellyfish exist after all. As do Coral Reef snakes. Blue-Ringed Octopus. Pufferfish. And Stonefish.... so yeah.

A shark might bite ya, but it's not gonna kill ya like a pufferfish might just for the hell of it.

The ocean is a hellscape and we evolved outta that shit a couple million years ago, why we wantin' to go back in there, huh. Apologies I've been watching Casual Geographic on youtube, the whole "no ocean swimming advised, it deadly" vibes be spreading

Avatar
Avatar
Avatar
ask-a-vetblr
Anonymous asked:

I recall at least one of you guys having worked with livestock animals. Why are cows so damn indestructible while horses keel over and die if mercury is in retrograde or a dog barked in Kazakhstan?

gettingvetted here.

Let me tell you a story about how livestock animals work.

In the beginning, God created the horse. God looked at the horse and saw that it was beautiful and strong. “However,” God said, “it breaks too easily.”

Then God created the cow. God looked at the cow and saw that it was more durable than the horse, and tasted good to boot. “However,” God said, “it poops too much.”

Then God created the goat. God looked at the goat and saw that it was perfect.

God looked around and saw that he still had some spare bits of fluff on his work table, but no brains to put into it. So then God created the sheep.

Now let me tell you what my equine surgery professor said on the first day of class.

“Horses are only interested in two things: homicide, and suicide.”

And that’s all you need to know about horses.

Avatar

Except every goat is just waiting its turn to die of pneumonia

Sorry I’m not over “if a dog barked in Kazakhstan”.

My entirely half-assed understanding of Why Horses Explode If You Look At Them Funny, As Explained To Me By My Aunt That Raises Horses After Her Third Glass Of Wine:

Horses don’t got enough toes.

So, back right after the dinosaurs fucked off and joined the choir invisible, the first ancestors of horses were scampering about, little capybara-looking things called Eohippus, and they had four toes per limb:

They functioned pretty well, as near as we can tell from the fossil record, but they were mostly messing around in the leaf litter of dense forests, where one does not necessarily need to be fast but one should be nimble, and the 4 toes per limb worked out pretty good.

But the descendants of Eophippus moved out of the forest where there was lots of cover and onto the open plains, where there was better forage and visibility, but nowhere to hide, so the proto-horses that could ZOOM the fastest and out run thier predators (or, at least, their other herd members) tended to do well.  Here’s the thing- having lots of toes means your foot touches the ground longer when you run, and it spreads a lot of your momentum to the sides.  Great if you want to pivot and dodge, terrible if you want to ZOOM.  So losing toes started being a major advantage for proto-horses:

The Problem with having fewer toes and running Really Fucking Fast is that it kind of fucks your everything else up.

When a horse runs at full gallop, it sort of... stops actively breathing, letting the slosh of it’s guts move its lungs, which is tremendously calorically efficient and means their breathing doesn’t fall out of sync.  But it also means that the abdominal lining of a horse is weirdly flexible in ways that lead to way more hernias and intestinal tangling than other ungulates.  It also has a relatively weak diaphragm for something it’s size, so ANY kind of respiratory infection is a Major Fucking Problem because the horse has weak lungs.

When a Horse runs Real Fucking Fast, it also develops a bit of a fluid dynamics problem- most mammals have the blood going out of thier heart real fast and coming back from the far reaches of the toes much slower and it’s structure reflects that.  But since there is Only The One Toe, horse blood comes flying back up the veins toward the heart way the fuck faster than veins are meant to handle, which means horses had to evolve special veins that constrict to slow the Blood Down, which you will recognize as a Major Cardiovascular Disease in most mammals. This Poorly-regulated blood speed problems means horses are prone to heart problems, burst veins, embolisms, and hemophilia.  Also they have apparently a billion blood types and I’m not sure how that’s related but I am sure that’s another Hot Mess they have to deal with.

ALSO, the Blood-Going-Too-Fast issue and being Just Huge Motherfuckers means horses have trouble distributing oxygen properly, and have compensated by creating fucked up bones that replicate the way birds store air in thier bones but much, much shittier.  So if a horse breaks it’s leg, not only is it suffering a Major Structural Issue (also also- breaking a toe is much more serious when that toe is YOUR WHOLE DAMN FOOT AND HALF YOUR LEG), it’s also hving a hemmorhage and might be sort of suffocating a little.

ALSO ALSO, the fast that horses had to deal with Extremely Fast Predators for most of thier evolution means that they are now afflicted with evolutionarily-adaptive Anxiety, which is not great for thier already barely-functioning hearts, and makes them, frankly, fucking mental.  Part of the reason horses are so aggro is that if deinied the opportunity to ZOOM, it’s options left are “Kill everyone and Then Yourself” or “The same but skip step one and Just Fucking Die”.  The other reason is that a horse is in a race against itself- it’s gotta breed before it falls apart, so a Horse basically has a permanent terrorboner.

TL;DR: Horses don’t have enough toes and that makes them very, very fast, but also sickly, structurally unsound, have wildly OP blood that sometimes kills them, and drives them fucking insane.

Avatar
Scientists working off the western coast of Mexico say they have found a previously unknown species of whale.
Three beaked whales were spotted last month by a team of scientists working with the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society near the San Benito Islands, some 300 miles from the US border, according to a press release published Tuesday.
The team had set out to try to find out what kind of whales were making an unidentified acoustic signal previously recorded in the area.
Beaked whale experts working alongside Sea Shepherd’s scientific department managed to take photographs and video recordings of the three whales, and also recorded their acoustic signals using an underwater microphone.
Avatar
Avatar
despazito
Avatar
baaulp

I just remembered that apes smile when hostile. This isn’t a happy scene. This monkey has full meter and a full screen projectile in it’s move list. This is an invitation to death.

Humans have this distress response too! If you watch the smaller of their young you will spot the occasional baring of teeth in upsetting situations. You can see this with adult humans as well, but it’s harder to catch because they have a fairly deep somatic vocabulary assigned to smiles; it is probably easiest to recognise after minor injury like stubbing a toe or receiving an injection.

It’s a lot of fun comparing how related species have related behaviours, and also neat to contrast how they have specialised them!

this is interesting but 

If you watch the smaller of their young

why did you word it like that

Thanks for the question! My area of expertise is more generally avian than it is  mammalian (or primate), so I don’t really know the technical nomenclature for the specific stage of human offspring development I mean to communicate. 

With the vocabulary I have the closest I can get semantically is ‘mid-nestling to fledgling fresh-fallen from the nest’ but the concepts don’t quite map to how human offspring develop. Another way to phrase it is able to move around under their own power but still heavily dependent on parental intervention for survival.

Hope this helps clear things up! Have a nice day :)

You studied birds so long you forgot that the word toddler exists and I think that’s just delightful.

Avatar
When young men and women come up against sexist stereotypes masquerading as science, Angela Saini wants them to be armed with the facts. “I call my book ammunition,” she says of her 288-page prize-winning work Inferior: The True Power of Women and the Science that Shows It. “There are people out there who insist that somehow the inequalities we see in society are not just because of historic discrimination, but also because of biology – the idea that there are factors within us that will cause men or women to be better at some things than others.”
She wrote Inferior to demonstrate that “actually, science doesn’t support that point of view. I think it’s important we understand these scientific facts. We need that ammunition to counter the weird mistruths that are circulating within and outside science about sex difference”.
To female scientists fed up with being treated as though their brains are the odd exceptions among their sex, Inferior is more than just a book. It’s a battle cry – and right now, it is having a galvanising effect on its core fanbase. On 31 July a crowdfunding campaign to send a copy of Inferior to every mixed secondary school in England with more than 1,000 pupils was launched by Dr Jessica Wade, a British physicist who writes 270 Wikipedia pages a year to raise the profile of female scientists. Within two days the campaign had raised £2,000. Yesterday it reached its original £15,000 target and was powering its way towards £20,000 – a figure which would allow the book to be sent to every state school in the country.
“There’s nothing you want more than for people to be inspired by your work,” says Saini, 37, a multiple award-winning science journalist, who first became intrigued by sex difference research when she wrote about the menopause for the Observer. “What Jess is doing means such a lot to me. I hope if my book can empower her, it can empower other young women, and men, too.”
The key message she hopes her readers will take away is that nothing in science suggests equality is not possible. “We are not as different as the inequalities in our society makes us believe we are. Even now, there are people saying we shouldn’t be pushing for gender equality because we’re never going to see it for biological reasons.” For example, many people think there are large psychological differences in spatial awareness, mathematical reasoning or verbal skills between men and women. “Actually, those differences are tiny, a fraction of a standard deviation,” says Saini. “Psychologically, the differences between the sexes are not enough to account for the inequalities we see in our society today.”
You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net