On Book Reviewers and Author Interactions
Why This Must Be Discussed
TL;DR: I don’t want authors to interact with my reviews of their books anymore, and this long-ass post explains why. Disclaimer: I am NOT a professional book reviewer, but I fundamentally believe in the value of honest reviews.
Dearly beloved authors and aspiring authors, we need to have a talk about the purpose of book reviews and book reviewers of officially published books (traditional, indie, and self-published). While Book Twitter has been going off recently about negative reviewers who try to make authors see their reviews, I have been dealing with the exact opposite problem, which is the problem of authors who respond to the critique in reviews of the books WITHOUT being tagged or asked to respond.
After the third time this has happened (mostly with self-published authors, I might add), I’ve decided to come forward and not only ask authors to not interact with my reviews of their books, but also make a post about WHY authors interacting with reviews of their books is an extremely bad idea.
Look, I get why some authors, especially ones who are operating on their own, might think it’s fair game to interact with reviewers. No one told them not to. Many self-published authors are also fanwriters where reviews and comments are seen as “payment” to the author and interactions are encouraged. They may not fully realize the consequences of interacting with a review of an officially published work that may spiral out of control and permanently damage their reputations without a PR team or agent to advise them.
Regardless, it is a well-accepted maxim in the vast majority of publishing and reviewing spheres that book reviews are NOT written for the author. Book reviews are a snapshot of one person’s reading experience and intend to give an idea of what the book might entail. They are NOT a gift to the author and are written without the intention of ever being read by the author. Should the author decide to read their reviews anyway, it is expected that the author understands this rule of conduct and act accordingly.
Let’s break down what happens (as has happened to me), when an author decides to interact with the review anyway.
Levels of Authorial Intrusion Upon Reviewing Spaces
- At the least intrusive: The author might like a review of their book on goodreads or tumblr and that’s it. There’s nothing wrong with that, except it tells me that they are reading their reviews and might escalate if a reviewer says something they disagree with.
- At a moderate level of intrusion: The author responds to the critique in the review via a public comment on the review on a place like GoodReads, Amazon, or tumblr and might even PM the reviewer as well and solicit further interaction. This is the level I am at right now with certain authors who felt the need to respond to my critique, which never tagged them and was always for my book reviews of 3 stars or higher.
- At the highest level of intrusion: The author responds in a manner that implies they deserve only to hear what they want to hear from their reviewers and have the right to avenge anything they perceive as an insult to their work. This can present in various ways that have actually happened, such as Kiera Cass trying to erase one-star reviews, Kathleen Hale stalking a reviewer, Anne Rice being Anne Rice, and Richard Brittain physically attacking a reviewer. (Sources at the end.)
The last level is obviously the most dangerous level of interaction and the most permanently damaging and what I worry about the most when an author takes an interest in what I say about their books. It is always on my mind when I write book reviews because I unfortunately can’t take chances with my personal safety.
“But I Just Want to Talk!”
Let’s say an author wants to respond to their critique and would never dare to escalate to stalking or anything else. Okay. Let’s list off the potential consequences of this for their writing career, shall we?
- If they respond to the review, especially in a public manner as authors have interacted with me in the past, they are acting as their own brand and PR agent in that moment. What they say does not reflect on them as a friendly person having a chat, but the author’s personal brand, which carries implications for how they will handle their brand in the future. If they handle the interaction poorly, they could permanently damage their reputations and lest you think indie and self-published authors are safe from public scrutiny, might I direct you to the example of Faleena Hopkins, who has permanently damaged her reputation with the Romance Writers of America thanks to her actions on social media.
- If they attack the reviewer or respond to the critique and start following the reviewers’ reviews (THIS HAS HAPPENED TO ME PERSONALLY), they are intentionally or unintentionally saying “I am watching you, reviewers, and observing what you say to make sure you toe the line and I will continue to respond if you say anything critical of my writing.” Naturally, this has the net effect of discouraging people from reviewing their books honestly or even leaving reviews at all. Indie and self-published books are already hard-pressed to get any reviews so why would authors make it so much harder?
- If they solicit feedback or commentary on their books beyond what was in the review, it comes across to many reviewers as the author essentially asking for beta or editing help with their book AFTER it has been published and after beta-ing and editing should have happened. The review presents a snapshot of the reading experience of that specific book edition. If an author chooses to read critique and use it to write a different edition or direct their future writing, they can do so without defending themselves to the reviewer or sounding like they want free labor from their readership.
Basic Guidelines for Book Reviews
For authors and aspiring authors:
- If you can’t handle reading critique of your books, don’t read reviews.
- Book reviews are NOT the same as fanfic or WIP comments and beware of what you say publicly as an author.
- Resist the urge to respond to critique because 9/10 times, it will not reflect well on you and for the love of gods, don’t act entitled to what people say in reviews.
- Let’s say you read a review anyway and it upsets you. Go to friend who is okay with you ranting to them or a therapist, vent to them in private, and say absolutely nothing to the reviewer at all.
- Even if the reviewer is the sort of asshole who tags an author in a one-star review, it is better to say nothing and block them at most than to risk readers refusing to read your books because they mentally group you with the unreasonable authors.
- When in doubt, just don’t interact with the reviews or reviewers.
- As much as I would like to tell you that authors are all reasonable people who won’t harm you for writing something they don’t like, dangerous people do exist such as the ones listed above. I won’t tell you not to review their books, but do your own research and understand the potential consequences.
- For the sake of readers everywhere who rely on our honest reviews, we can’t behave as though all authors are gonna harm us, so my recommendation is to keep writing reviews, even for unknown authors, and block authors if you must or otherwise take action to keep your anonymity on reviewing sites secure.
- Don’t tag authors in negative reviews, if ever. Just don’t.
Sources