You are severely misrepresenting literally every single screenshot you provide of the FCAS newsletter (which can be found in its entirety here), often in ways that are directly contradicted even in the words of the screenshots themselves.
Does FCAS “consistently conflate” all Jews with Israel?
Actual evidence of the claim that the FCAS “consistently conflate[s] all Jewish people with the country, leaders, and policies of Israel”, are notably absent from the actual newsletter. Reading through the entire thing, there isn’t a single instance in which an actual criticism of a specific Israeli policy or leader is antisemitic. the ONLY time Israeli leadership is even mentioned is in a screenshot of an antisemitic tweet doing exactly that (conflating Jews with Israeli government) by accusing Netanyahu and “God’s Chosen”, the Jews, of “betraying” Trump because Jews voted overwhelmingly Blue:
It’s tweets like that, scapegoating Jews (whether in America or in Israel) for the results of the US presidential election and playing into tropes about dual loyalty & the stabbed in the back myth, that provide the context for the first screenshot you showed, where you have cherrypicked the phrase “support of the Jewish people and Israel” to pretend FCAS is saying “any criticism of Israel is antisemitic”.
In reality, if you go back to the heading of that section, and even the first line, it’s clear what FCAS is actually focused on there: Jewish voters being the target for ire from both the left and right for the way they voted, in America:
It’s true that blaming Harris’s loss on Netanyahu & Israel is a conspiracy theory that makes zero sense if you think about it for even two seconds (however critical one might be of Biden & Harris’s foreign policy, Trump promised to be worse), and finding a way to reach & blame the result of the entire US election on Jewish individuals; whether “all Jews” or “some Jews”, whether in the Israeli government or not, still is an example of scapegoating Jews for the outcomes of US politics, and that it is something you can and should expect an antisemitism watchdog group to point out. but that’s not really what FCAS is focused on.
look at how this is framed: in a section about Jewish voters facing backlash for how they voted, FCAS shows rightwing tweets reacting negatively to a poll showing the fact that 79% of Jews voted for Harris, followed by leftwing tweets saying Harris’s platform was “genocide”—the implication of which is that voting for Harris is voting for genocide. the logical end conclusion of saying that when 79% of Jews voted for Harris, is the accusation that 79% of Jews voted for genocide—an accusation I personally have seen before and after the election.
far from “conflating Jews and Israel”, here we see an instance of FCAS providing a very blunt example of that conflation as an example of antisemitism from the right, and of people abusing criticism of the Israeli government in ways that rope a majority of Jews who aren’t even in Israel into the blame for its actions (the same conflation, just with extra steps) as an example of antisemitism from the left.
“Conflating Jews with Israel”
But while we’re talking about it, the idea of “conflating the Jewish people and Israel” as you are presenting it is an inherently problematic misrepresentation of what was said and what that phrase even means.
In its original form, the idea of “conflating Jews with Israel” is a Jewish criticism of the dual loyalty trope (treating Jews as suspicious or assigning guilt to Jews due to association—real or perceived—with Israel) primarily, and secondarily, philosemitic support for the Israeli government/military as a substitute for actions that provide actual care for Jewish individuals in more tangible/direct ways. What it means is that we are not a hivemind that slavishly serves a foreign nation at the cost of the countries we live in, and that support for Israel is not a substitute for supporting Jews. It does not mean that the Jewish people as a whole is not deeply connected to or does not identify with Israel—the land, the country, and its people—or that acknowledging any overlap or alignment between Jews and Israel is somehow problematic.
The simple reality is that there is a MASSIVE overlap between the two and most Jews do view themselves as connected to Israel. This is not my opinion; it is an empirical fact supported by all available data. Nearly HALF of the entire Jewish population in the world lives in Israel, and practically every Jew that doesn’t either has friends/family in Israel, or is close with someone else who does. When polled, the overwhelming majority (80-90%) of Jews consistently say they have long-standing connections to Israel, care about Israel, that doing so is an important or essential part of being Jewish and of their identity, that Israel has a right to exist as a Jewish state, and even that the US should support Israel in some way. Many of the kosher items that Jews in the diaspora need to follow kosher laws and live a Jewish life are manufactured/produced in Israel because that’s where the largest most concentrated population of Jews lives; it’s the only place where that kind of infrastructure can exist at scale. So in a real, material, practical, literal sense, what affects Israel affects Jews. This is not incompatible with the fact that many Jews—myself included—are critical of Netanyahu, of Likud, and the actions of the IDF, and other aspects of the Israeli government.
But the weaponization of this phrase against Jews to problematize any acknowledgment of this overlap or reference to shared interest between Israel and the Jewish people is a bastardization of this criticism. It’s also a bastardization that, ironically, is falling into exactly the dual loyalty trope it exists to criticize.
Because when you see a Jew or a Jewish organization simply acknowledge the overlap between Jews and Israel, or point out how a specific criticism of Israel is rooted in a specific antisemitic trope, and you conflate that criticism of antisemitism or support for Israel (in the sense of being a country—support for the people there, & their right to live in peace) that most Jews share with the worst of the individual politicians & policies in the Likud government, in that case, you are treating Jews’s benign love of a country—its people, its culture—as inherently suspect & sinister & accusing that Jew of having “blind support” for (ie, a dual loyalty to) the Israeli government that they haven’t really expressed.
“Israel Means Government; Palestine Means People”
There’s also another weird conflation—or rather a rhetorical splitting—happening here that I’ve noticed is common in the Israel/Palestine discourse (ubiquitously on the Pro-Palestine side, mostly at the more extreme/conservative end of the Pro-Israel side), in regards to the distinction between a country, its government, and its people.
For some reason, according to the way you are treating FCAS and their criticism of Cornell & Columbia faculty, “Pro-Israel” automatically means “Pro- the worst policies & people in the Israeli Government”, but “Pro-Palestine” is never meant to be understood as “Pro- the worst actions & people from the Gazan government (i.e. Hamas)”. (even in the case, as with the listed antisemitic faculty, where they have actually said deranged things in defense/support of Hamas itself)
You can’t have it one way with one country and another way with the next. If Palestine is the Palestinians and not Hamas, then Israel is the Israelis and not Likud; if Israel is the Israeli government and not the Israelis, then Gaza is Hamas and not the Gazans.
Even pretending for a second that these faculty members had not said anything antisemitic, this framing of “Pro-Israel = Pro-Netanyahu/Likud/policy/killing Palestinians, but Pro-Palestine = Pro-Palestinian” is still a double standard, and one I think anyone would be forgiven if they couldn’t help but notice, happens to be erasing the peoplehood of half the world’s Jews and the more than 2 million Arabs living in Israel.
Antisemitic Faculty
Personally I think this is the most egregious misrepresentation here.
You claim “the newsletter is saying: opposing Israel is antisemitic. Being pro-Palestine is antisemitic” but that is just a bald face lie. The newsletter is very explicit about what they’re saying is antisemitic and even cites and links to its sources, which if you spent any time looking at, is shocking in its brazen antisemitism.
So let’s walk through this point by point:
Cheyfitz’s framing of Palestine as a “Colonizer Vs Indigenous” issue with rhetoric like “Gaza, Indigeneity, Resistance” and calling Zionism “Settler-Colonialism” is an erasure of Jewish indigeneity. This is an erasure of Jewish history and Jewish identity, which is antisemitic
As if that weren’t bad enough, here are just a few of the deranged things he’s tweeted over the years:
You keep saying it’s FCAS “conflating Jews and Israel” but here is Eric Cheyfitz, the person you’re claiming is just “Pro-Palestine”; he’s the one saying Jews. That is antisemitic.
He routinely engages in Holocaust Inversion, calling Jews Nazis and appropriating Jewish suffering in the Holocaust to project it onto Palestinians. This is DARVO directed at Jewish trauma, and that is antisemitic.
He calls Hamas, which massacres and tortures Palestinians and Jews alike, which has passages about Jewish Free Mason control of the world quite literally cribbed from Nazi propaganda & about hunting Jews to the ends of the earth in their charter “freedom fighters” “the resistance” “leaders”. This is antisemitic.
Okay, but what about the other guy, Joseph Massad?
He’s written multiple racist screeds in Al Jazeera, Middle East Eye, and Electronic Intifada—all organizations with ties to Hamas—about how the Jews aren’t the real Jews, and don’t experience antisemitism, and actually Palestinians are the Jews nows
It’s just repackaged Khazar Theory—the same antisemitic conspiracy theory that the antisemitic doomsday cult Aum Shinriyko, Christian Identity white supremacists, and Kanye West believe—with more Holocaust Inversion sprinkled in
All of this is pretty cut and dry antisemitism, and FCAS is entirely right to call it out.