Archbishop Fulton Sheen
Archbishop Fulton Sheen
What do you think of non-believers?
Well, it would be pretty silly of me not to speak highly of them. Every believer was a non-believer first.
You know they say there are two types of people in this world: those who say all the time that there are two types of people in this world, and those who don't. Well, count me among the former.
I just wouldn't break down the world into believers and non-believers. Let's think in terms of "those who are seeking truth" and "those who have given up on seeking truth." Because you'll find a little of both amongst both believers and non-believers.
For me the real tragedy is when someone gives up on truth. It happens lots of ways: not getting the answer to something and assuming that there isn't an answer, living the "turn on, tune in, drop out" lifestyle of just living to be entertained, taking the easy road, etc.
It's one of those cases where low expectations usually get rewarded with proportional results, and life loses all real meaning. It's just going to work and going to the store and going to eat and going to sleep... all over again all the time.
So the really interesting people -- and there are lots of them on Tumblr -- are the ones who care. I can talk to them all day, whether they're atheist or agnostic or Hindu or Catholic or whatever. But I also see it as part of my mission to try to get through to those who don't care.
Jesus said, "Seek and you will find." Whether you agree with that or not, I think you can agree with me on its inverse: "If you don't seek, you won't find."
Be good.
- Father Shane
Bishop Mario Grech (Gozo)
Yay! It's open again.Alright, I've been wondering this question for a while: If I do not believe in a literal heaven, a literal hell, a literal bodily resurrection, or pretty much anything supernatural, but hold all these concepts dearly to my heart and live correctly, can I still be officially considered Catholic? I am always open to the possibility that these things might be literally true, and I do not attempt to tell people who do believe in them that they are wrong, but at the moment for me to say I believe or can believe in these things literally is false. However, in my heart I still consider myself Catholic, however liberal that may be.
Well, if you're baptized, you're Catholic. But if you drift away from faith, you're drifting away from communion of belief with the Church and from communion with God too. "Communion of belief with the Church" includes communion with all the Catholics who have lived and died over 2000 years, including especially those who are in heaven now. So that's a big deal.
The fact that you're set on clinging to the label "Catholic," though, is intriguing. What keeps you interested and what keeps drawing you back? That's a question that you have to answer for yourself, because it's neither self-explanatory nor common.
"Living correctly" isn't what Catholicism is about. We're not really into rules. We're into relationships. If your Catholicism isn't a relationship with God the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit -- a relationship of love -- then it simply isn't recognizably Christian. From that relationship will flow a desire to please God and do what's best for yourself as a human being (morality), a desire to learn more about your Lover (truths of the faith), a deep hope in the resurrection to eternal life that God promises you, etc. But the relationship comes first, not some sort of abstract "forcing yourself to believe something that doesn't make sense."
Have you tried praying about any of this? Just a thought. Because of course you can believe. It's just that you say you don't at the moment and you're not doing anything (at least from the sound of it) to open yourself (which is different from passively "being open") to God.
Just as a final note, you probably shouldn't call yourself "liberal" just because you don't share our faith in God... I know a lot of folks who would label themselves "liberal Catholics" who would be rather offended by the idea that "liberal" includes "agnostic."
God bless you and I hope you find your way back to greater communion with God and with the Church!
- Father Shane
(Sorry if you receive this question twice, my computer crashed while I was sending it.)I am agnostic and feel drawn to the Catholic Church. I went to a service at my local church and some bits made me feel really connected to God but other bits were confusing and I was scared to speak to the priest at the end of the service. I haven't gone back as I am too nervous (I get anxious a lot) and I don't know where to go from here. Should I try and speak to the priest? I feel like a fake because I am not sure if God exists. Are there any prayers that will help me connect with/discover God?Thanks x
Well, thanks for opening up at least here this way... it's a first step.
Some ideas:
- Go at your own pace. If that means going back and being a fly on the wall for a while, even for quite a while, that's perfectly fine.
- It's totally normal to have questions. The strange thing would be if you didn't. No priest is going to look at you like you're weird because you have questions. :-) But wait until you feel comfortable to ask. Of course you know that this askbox is open (until it fills up again), so this is one place you can get answers easily (but not always promptly). :-(
- Don't worry about "feeling like a fake." Just be yourself. If you don't know whether God exists, that's fine...
- The Catholic liturgy is really complex. Everything is there for a reason, but those reasons are deep and historical and usually Biblical too. It's not something you can expect to figure out "on a first date." Some people take years to wrap their minds around everything, and I'll bet you could stump almost any Catholic around on at least one point of the Mass. :-) But the answers do exist, so feel free to ask around or poke around on the Internet.
- Prayers to connect with God? I would suggest maybe spending some time with the Bible. With an open mind and an open heart, asking God to speak to you through it. Now as we all know, it's a book (more like a library of books) written between 2000-3000 years ago in a culture that is very foreign to us, so you have to take that into consideration. Some of the Psalms (not all of them, for that very reason) are excellent, though. I'm thinking of Psalms 23, 51, 131, 139, 150... for starters. But really if you get the chance to sit down and read one of the Gospels either in part or straight through, it can be really helpful. Or some of the shorter letters of St. Paul, especially Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians... Try to let it wash over you and let God speak to you.
- Praying the "Our Father" slowly (you'll find it in Matthew 6:9-13) is also an excellent way to discover God's heart and how he wants to be spoken to.
- But don't expect "connecting" with God to be like some sort of emotional surge. Sometimes it happens, but "fireworks" aren't our usual "daily bread." Just expect some little seed of faith or seed of openness to be planted each time you pray. Ask for light and it will never be denied you.
- Every Catholic parish has a program set up for adults who are interested in getting instruction about the faith and perhaps eventually entering the Catholic Church, so there's always something that you can plug into when you feel ready.
I hope it helps! Like I said, those are just some random ideas. God bless you and count on my prayers.
- Father Shane
Hello Father, I have a theory that I'd like to see your opinion of. I'm asking you because not only are you a Catholic priest, but from reading your blogs you seem to be a little more open-minded than some that I've encountered over the years, and you obviously take care to look into and understand what people ask you.A very wise teacher of mine once told me that students don't fail school, schools fail students. I looked into this concept more and came to realise that it is true, not necessarily in it's exact wording but in the concept behind it. Everyone can learn anything, it's all merely a matter of finding a way to help them understand and learn. If they aren't interested, some people might call it a lost cause, but a good teacher will find a way to make a topic interesting to a listless student.My theory is that this also applies to religion. I suspect that a huge reason why so many people end up turning away from their faiths and churches is because of the same essential principal.Faith in any religion is based on exactly that, faith. To believe without requiring any form of evidence. To accept what is taught without doubt, without questions, and with blindness. Life itself teaches many people some rather harsh lessons in gullibility. We learn the hard way that taking what someone says on blind faith alone gets us hurt in many ways over and over again. To expect a sentient adult to just accept the existance of God merely because a priest told them he exists is insulting that person's intellect. Of course they're going to think, "Why should I believe you? So you're a priest, but you're still human. Human's aren't perfect, many are wrong about the things they say and believe. Just look at all the alien conspiracies, Santa Clause, the Easter Bunny, the tooth fairy... and you expect me to believe in God just because you think I should?"Most people that lose faith in God need some sort of evidence, or some sort of extreme event (good or bad) in their life to occur, to bring them back again. I was recently flatly told by a Catholic priest that belief in God should not require any kind of "evidence" and we shouldn't attempt to question that God exists let alone try to prove it. I suspect that this attitude is a case of the teacher failing the student. Humans need to understand in order to believe, and most have learned in life that understanding doesn't come from someone they hardly know simply telling them it is so.That being said, once someone has been given enough evidence that what a person tells them is true, they will become inclined to take the rest of the information given to them on faith, for so long as it all makes sense to them. For example, if someone can be convinced that God does indeed exist, the concept of heaven and life after death will be more likely to be accepted on faith.Now I'm not suggesting that someone should go and construct some huge scientific exploration into proving the existance of God to prove it to all of society. What type of evidence a person needs is going to be the same as what might catch their interest in education: it's different for everyone.Do you think that if the leaders of the Catholic church - or any church for that matter - were more willing to look into an individual's interests and ways of thinking and find something that will appeal to that person as being sufficient evidence of God's existance and the Catholic teachings to be correct, with an open-mind that not everyone is a carbon copy and might not believe in the exact same things in the exact same way (eg: some may think scientifically, others historically, others spiritually) that maybe more people might find (or in many cases re-find) their faith in God and turn (or return) to the church?
Thanks so much for writing all that! It’s a very interesting reflection, and I want to start by agreeing wholeheartedly with what you say in your last paragraph. It’s something that the Church in general is very aware of — that the way faith is discussed and lived has to vary a great deal across different cultures and their subgroups — but that doesn’t always happen well at street level.
For starters, we priests and bishops aren’t always as good at “being all things to all people” as we would like to be. The existence of the Vatican’s new YouCat, the World Youth Days, and youth ministry in general is a good move in the right direction, though. Definitely the language of, say, the Catechism of the Council of Trent (copyright 1566) isn’t quite as legit as it used to be… and the YouCat (copyright 2011) discusses the really important issues in a way that is a whole lot more understandable to us 21st-century types.
Now to dig in to the meat of your question. Quite obviously, there are 3 totally different answers that 3 totally different types of people would give you. If you’re (1) an atheist, faith is definitely meaningless and (if you’re a Hitchens devotee) even destructive. If you’re (2) a deist, God does exist but he isn’t going to give you any help in figuring that out. I mention those two to bring out a key (and sometimes unnoticed) difference with (3) most believers in monotheist religions: We believe that not only does God exist, but that he has revealed his existence to us along with something about what he would like our relationship with him to be.
Why is that relevant? Because it totally changes the ballgame. Faith will no longer be mere “blind acceptance.” If it is, then religious people certainly are the most gullible people around and we certainly are insulting everybody’s intellect. Faith isn’t about what we see, but it is about what we hear: faith on our part is a response to something God says. So in one sense it’s blind but in another very important sense it isn’t at all.
God speaks. So sure, we need evidence, but the evidence we’re looking for isn’t of the same type as, say, evidence that a molecule of water is composed of two hydrogen atoms and an oxygen atom. The Resurrection is quite literally evidence for us, as well as the fact of its announcement having been handed down from generation to generation down to us. But true faith in the Resurrection is ultimately God’s gift and the Holy Spirit’s inspiration.
But the Church — and in this there seems to have been some sort of misunderstanding in what the priest told you — does in fact say that we can have “evidence” about God’s existence that is a prelude and a preamble to faith. (It’s in Vatican I’s Dei Filius 4 and in St. Paul’s Romans 1.) In other words, that God’s existence can be demonstrated with an argument from reason. But to figure out that God is a Trinity… well, that’s beyond human knowledge and God had to tell us himself.
Our reason is very important. Very important. But it’s not the be-all and end-all. For my teaching, I spend a lot of time reading science and philosophy, and if there’s anything that scientists and philosophers will agree on — and they don’t usually agree on much ;-) — it’s that even though human knowledge has progressed so much, the realm of what we don’t yet know and in fact might never be able to know is simply immense.
So if that’s the case, I simply can’t count on my reason — besides the fact that I’m not even remotely the smartest person on Earth — to definitively figure out questions that are so crucial.
And yes, the way of getting to those answers is going to be different for everyone.
Just one more point: You can be a car thief and a philanderer and still make great scientific discoveries; your moral life doesn’t affect your scientific prowess. But moral life does affect our ability to discover God. Some folks don’t realize how much their own moral preferences underlie their rejection of God, and others don’t realize that they’ll continue to be blind to God’s continuous presence and love until they make the moral decisions that they need in order to be freed from the things that blind them. It sounds weird, but it’s true.
If you click here, you’ll get some sample pages from the YouCat. Scroll down to what’s page 7 in the PDF document (pages 14/15 in the book) and you’ll see that some of your questions are addressed there. Fwiw. Hope it helps!
God bless you, and let’s say a little prayer for each other!
- Father Shane