mouthporn.net
#thank – @entrenous88 on Tumblr
Avatar

werkin on that ster trak

@entrenous88 / entrenous88.tumblr.com

Semi-hiatus until July.  EntreNous @AO3. Writer, coffee drinker, over-thinker. Fandom adjacent (star trek tos/aos, pinto, unsolved,whatever I want, gosh).
Avatar
Avatar
nerdgasrnz

I’ve been thinking about this a lot, and come to the conclusion that it’s not the characters who have preferences about this, or anything else to do with sex, it’s us. And that’s OK.

Sometimes you see a character and your id’s all “wow, I would so love for him to get a good, hard fucking” and why the hell not? Create, curate, and consume all the fanworks about your fave getting his arse pounded.  Someone else’s id might look at the exact same character and reckon they should be dishing out a dicking rather than receiving one, and they are every bit as entitled to their own pursuit of happiness.  It’s a big internet, the porn rations aren’t about to run out.

Preferred sexual positions are not a reflection on personality, appearance or, saints preserve us, ethics.  It’s just about what’s hot.  Sometimes you’ll see a character and just know that she needs to sit on all the faces, but let’s not pretend that’s some intellectual deduction.  Sometimes you want a character to be stuffed with dicks and it’s fuck-all to do with their height (unless you have a height kink of your own, of course).  And switching for spicy fun is great, but has fuck-all to do with equality.

You can’t tell how sensitive someone’s prostate, or clit, or nips are by the way they relate to family members in canon, y’know? There’s no objective truth about how someone’s height, or their character arc, how assertive or loud or shy they are, their age, favourite food, or how they dress that determines their sexual preferences, and it’s only when we pretend that it does that things start to get icky.  

It’s totally cool to have preferences about characters you like to see top or bottom, sub or dom, switch or abstain, or whatever, but let’s all just own our own preferences and not pretend they are anything more than that.

Source: twitter.com
Avatar
Avatar
castiel

getting to know each other

Star Trek (2009) dir J.J. Abrams

ok but….

these characters are different from tos. they’re at a younger, less mature point in their lives. not to mention that they have only JUST MET. aos kirk grew up without the loving, supportive family that tos kirk did. so of course he’s going to show his friendship and love in different ways. we see him smack bones so many times, because that is how this jim shows his affection. he’s afraid of losing those close to him but doesn’t know how to properly show that. 

if you take this scene in context, spock literally threw jim off of his ship. he didn’t send him to the brig, he didn’t confine him to his quarters, he marooned him on an ice planet. jim doesn’t think that there’s any hope of he and spock ever being friends at this point. when spock prime calls him ‘friend’ he goes so far as to say that aos spock HATES him.

when spock prime mind melds with him he feels the full extent of the pain and horror spock felt when Vulcan was destroyed and he begins to realize that there’s a lot more going on under the surface of spock than he’s seeing. being with this older version of spock who had such a close relationship with the other version of himself gives him a new perspective. maybe there is another path for them.

so when he pushes spock, sees him lash out in pain that he himself has just felt and sees that spock STILL comes back to the bridge and wants to help save earth because it’s the only home he has left… that’s when jim sees the glimmer of hope that maybe they can be friends. that this person who is in so much pain and has just lost his mother, still wants to do what is right… that’s someone he wants at his side. and he decides right then that he chooses to hope. to believe in spock. just as he’s coming to trust and believe in the rest of his crew. 

“i’m coming with you.” the one thing that he wanted growing up, was to not be abandoned by the people he cared about. to know that he has someone on his side, no matter what happens. unconditional support and love. he offers the beginnings of that to spock. 

spock has seen jim with bones, he knows the rough physical affection that jim exudes. he’s baffled that his human who he had just marooned and then choked on the bridge would be not letting him go alone. and that he would offer physical affection in any form to him after what he’d just done. 

right after this on the narada, jim tells spock he’ll cover him. “are you certain?” spock still finds it hard to believe that jim doesn’t hold a grudge. “ya, i got you.” and he does

while a lingering gentle touch would have been nice, it wouldn’t have made sense for these characters, in this universe, at this point in their relationship.

Avatar
Avatar
dare-to-dm
“As the Bechdel Test began to creep into the sightline of mainstream movie criticism, it was notable to see the surprise of some male critics that their favorite movies—One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, Goodfellas, The Princess Bride, Clerks, the original Star Wars trilogy, the entire Lord of the Rings trilogy, and even Tootsie, when you get right down to it—so soundly flunked it. For many women, the reaction was more of a shrug, along with relief that, finally, there was a simple way to help writers and directors step over an embarrassingly low baseline. To be clear, applying the rule isn’t about snatching away the well-earned status of Raging Bull or The Godfather or even This Is Spinal Tap. As Anita Sarkeesian, creator of the Web site Feminist Frequency, noted in a 2009 video about the rule, “It’s not even a sign of whether it’s a feminist movie, or whether it’s a good movie, just that there’s a female presence in it.” The latter point is something that many people fail to grasp when trying to explain away why their favorite movies don’t pass the test (“But Batman is the hero of the movie! Of course the women characters are going to talk about him!”): the Bechdel Test is not a judgment of quality or nuance. After all, the beautiful, moving Gravity fails the test, while a formulaic rom-com like 27 Dresses passes with no problem. But the test itself is a simple, bloodless assessment of whether female characters are deemed important to a story—and a way to conclude that, most of the time, they aren’t.”

— We Were Feminists Once: From Riot Grrrl to CoverGirl®, the Buying and Selling of a Political Movement (Zeisler, Andi)

This makes me happy that it has an explanation, because too many people misunderstand the point of the test. “It sets the bar too low!” They say. That’s the point. It’s the lowest bar possible and many movies can’t pass it.

Avatar
Avatar
bipirate

not to be harry potter on main but i honestly think the fantastic beasts series would have been so much more interesting if it was just about the beasts. i don’t give a fuck about grindelwald, just give me a movie about an eccentric wizard travelling the world looking for magical animals and teaching us the power of friendship

Avatar
What she says: I’m fine.
What she means: Nurse Christine Chapel was in as many Star Trek episodes as Chekov and even had an entire episode devoted to her background and how she wound up on the Enterprise. She was an interesting character with a bunch of hilarious lines and appears in several photo shoots with the other major seven characters, but for some reason no one ever considers her part of the main crew. The fact that she isn’t considered a main character but Chekov is is likely the result of the overvaluation of male characters and the undervaluation of female characters. Christine Chapel is part of the main crew and I’m so pissed that she isn’t included in very many space family posts.
You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net