MAN CAN WE TAKE A MINUTE TO TALK ABOUT VISION and his relationship with Wanda and how it contrasts with Clint??

Keep reading

Man, so much this.  Vision is came off to me as really creepy and controlling.  I think one of the reasons (for me at least) Clint’s interactions work better is because in Age of Ultron he gave her a choice.  He asked her to decide if she wanted to be a civilian or if she wanted to help.  And she chose to help, so now he treats her like another superhero.  Perhaps one who is young and sometimes needs some harsh truth/encouragement, but someone who’s already made the choice to take action when they see wrong being done.

also if I might add one more line of Vision’s (which in retrospective, was an example too of how he views Wanda) when the Avengers are arguing about the Accords, and Wanda says “They’ll come for me.” Vision immediately replies “We’ll protect you.” which idk, I think it was supposed to be cute, or protective, signalling how Vision feels about Wanda, but in the light of the above meta, well… it’s more like problematic.

concept: space pirates who sound exactly like regular pirates, except replace all references to “the sea” with “the void”

“aye, the void is a harsh mistress,” the captain said, gazing out the window of her ship into the vast starry expanse. “she’ll take more than she gives, in the end. but those who are called to life in the void don’t know any other way.”

xr&v was the most satisfying rt animation show of the 2014 season honestly like its so silly and full of absolute bullshit but I feel like it accomplished more than rwby did plot wise and more than rvb on a writing level? and more than both of them on a pacing level all I’m saying is I’m lowkey EXTREMELY excited for xr&v

This is a PSA to ANY of my followers.

YOU CAN TAG ME IN STUFF.

YOU’RE NOT ANNOYING ME.

SEEING STUFF IN MY TAG.

MAKES MY DAY.

LIKE SERIOUSLY.

YOU THOUGHT OF ME. 

YOU INCLUDED ME IN YOUR POST.

YOU WANTED ME TO SEE SOMETHING.

BLESS YOUR SWEET SOUL.

BLESS.

YOUR.

SOUL.

In the MCU, Steve Rogers has killed people.

Matt Murdock has not.

Yet, Steve is still seen as morally good and Matt as morally questionable.

I believe it’s due to their conviction. Steve believes in what he’s doing; it’s the right thing to do, and he’s right, so the violence is treated as necessary and no big deal.

Matt, however, struggles with justifying to himself the violence he inflicts. Yes it’s the right thing, but he’s less sure about the necessity of violence than Steve. His own guilt at having such a violent nature makes the audience question his actions.

I love both characters, I just find it interesting how differently they are viewed despite their similarities. 

Warning: I DO use dude, man, bruh, and bro as completely gender neutral terms, HOWEVER if I call you one of the above and it bothers you, PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE tell me.

This has been a PSA 

Shake It Up was canceled 

*confetti and strippers*