the genealogy of the patriarchs , why they name certain sons and daughters and not the others, and their descriptions of age are confusing to me. why were these figures written in that way? and if they are symbolic, it is not clear what they symbolize. if they are to be taken literally, why are we left with the historical problems that cant really pinpoint this genealogy in the ANE?
the history here is as about the mothers and fathers of the narrative as it is about the hands that held, shaped, named that narrative. the redactors, the oral stories, the voices of the unsaid—this is their history, too. and so the figures here need not appear neat to us, the holes need not be filled. the narrative hazes, opens itself for us, inviting and familiar and foreign at once. move alongside it, not against it