mouthporn.net
#survey – @earthstory on Tumblr
Avatar

The Earth Story

@earthstory / earthstory.tumblr.com

This is the blog homepage of the Facebook group "The Earth Story" (Click here to visit our Facebook group). “The Earth Story” are group of volunteers with backgrounds throughout the Earth Sciences. We cover all Earth sciences - oceanography, climatology, geology, geophysics and much, much more. Our articles combine the latest research, stunning photography, and basic knowledge of geosciences, and are written for everyone!
We hope you find us to be a unique home for learning about the Earth sciences, and we hope you enjoy!
Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
azvolrien
Rock Facts: The Mystery of Knockan Crag

In the late 19th century, a discussion arose in the geology community. It had been observed at Knockan Crag - a cliff in the Northwest Highlands, beside the road between Ullapool and Lochinver - that the rocks at the top seemed to be older than those below, with the Neoproterozoic Moine Schists lying above the Ordovician Durness Limestone. This turned out to be a topic of much controversy; while most people had long since moved on from the diluvial hypothesis, accepting that no, the rocks we see today were not all laid down in the single Biblical flood, the (fairly logical) idea that Younger Rocks Are Always Above gave rise to a couple of different schools of thought. Firstly: the Moine Schists were younger, they’d just been misidentified. Secondly: they actually were older than the rocks below and summin’ weird was afoot.

Enter British Geological Surveyors Ben Peach and John Horne. That’s them in the statue, though I’m not sure which is which. They carried out a long-term detailed mapping project of the area and, eventually, proved conclusively that the difference in age was due to tectonic activity: the older rocks of the Moine Schists had, over millions of years, been shoved up and over the younger rocks of the Cambrian/Ordovician succession in what’s now called the Moine Thrust, one of the first thrust faults to be identified.

Surveying techniques have come a long way since Peach and Horne and we now know that the Moine Thrust itself is just one part of a series of thrust faults running right through the Northwest Highlands from Loch Eriboll in the north to the eastern tip of the Isle of Skye. But in honour of that first identification, the whole complex is referred to as the Moine Thrust Belt.

I spent two weeks on a geological mapping trip based out of the Inchnadamph Field Centre at the end of my second year of university. I am extremely familiar with the rocks of the area.

Avatar

Geyser in stereo

There is so much that is neat about these photos shared by the US Geological Survey I hardly know where to start.

This is a pair of photos of Old Faithful geyser was taken in 1871 during the Hayden survey of the Yellowstone area. That survey was the first federally-funded survey of the Yellowstone country – part of a series of surveys conducted after the Civil War that enabled the construction of the trans-continental railroad lines and exposed the wonders of the west.

The photos and reports of the Yellowstone area sent back by the Hayden survey led to the US Government deciding to set aside the Yellowstone country for preservation, similar to what had happened with the Yosemite territory in California a few years earlier. Since Yellowstone was not in an area incorporated as a state, photos like this led to Yellowstone being established as the first National Park.

This is one of a series of paired photos taken to allow for stereo imagery. Stereo imagery involves taking a pair of photos from adjacent sites, simulating the view that the eye sees. It sometimes takes a bit of practice, but from photos like this taken and placed side by side you can actually train your eyes and brain to see 3-D structure. It takes a bit of practice and you might have to resize the images on your screen to get it.

-JBB

Image credit: USGS https://flic.kr/p/rM5HFT

How to see in stereo: http://bit.ly/1p3zKzn

The Hayden expedition: http://to.pbs.org/1F0EY8I

Source: facebook.com
Avatar

The Jungles of the sea...

Catlin Seaview Survey: Assessing the state of the world's coral reefs.

The reefs of the world are endangered. Damage resulting from nutrient pollution, global warming induced bleaching events, ocean acidification, human activities and invasive Crown of Thorns starfish is increasing year by year, and the homes of the largest ecosystems within the seas are disappearing fast. Reefs act as shelters and nurseries for many kinds of fish, and are a central pillar of the base of the marine food chain. The Caribbean was one of the world's great coralline provinces, and is estimated to have lost about 80% of its reefs in recent decades. Diving and snorkelling are critical to tourism in the region that provided many of its jobs, as well as sustaining fisheries on which many of the poorest depend for protein. Corals also protect beaches and coastlines from erosion, something that will become vital as the sea level rises in a warming world. This new survey will establish baseline data on what's left, in order to track changes as human and climatic pressures mount. Governments and NGO's will gain data that will hopefully help preserve the reefs, and the economies and livelyhoods that depend on them .

After surveying Australia's Great Barrier reef last year (now over 50% dead) , they have started in Beliz,e before moving north through Mexico to Florida, taking in several archipelagos on the way. The survey should allow a detailed picture to emerge of where the losses have happened and the individual causes in different ecosystems. Further degradation or conservation assisted progress will then be assessed in the future using this survey as a baseline.

They will use a combination of satellite images and diving surveys, and have designed a new underwater panoramic camera for the purpose. They have also created software that should be useful in similar surveys elsewhere, as it produces standardised results that can be easily compared. The photos will be processed to give a 3D image, and wildlife recorded to give us an overall impression of the reef's health. The software uses facial recognition technology to identify coral and fish species and their condition much faster than people can, allowing us to sift through huge amounts of data and giving us our highest resolution view so far of these ecosystems, just as they're under severe strain, providing a wealth of data for conservationists and managers alike.

Catlin aim to survey all the world's reefs over the next few years giving us a clear view of the jungles of the sea. In partnership with Google street view they also plan to make full panoramas available online for virtual dives, in order to promote the beauty and value of our global marine heritage. All the data will be open source and fully accessible.

Loz

Panoramic image: Reef near the island of Aruba, the shipwreck is the SS Antilla, a German cargo ship scuttled in 1940; credit: Catlin Seaview Survey.

http://catlinseaviewsurvey.com/surveys/caribbean/belize https://www.facebook.com/CatlinSeaviewSurvey http://www.catlin.com/en/AsiaPacific/About/Seaview-Survey http://science.time.com/2013/07/31/breaking-the-waves-catlin-seaview-survey-digitizes-the-endangered-oceans/ http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/aug/01/caribbean-coral-reef-loss

Source: facebook.com
Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
snailsplace

This little gem is a U.S. Geological Survey benchmark. Itʻs the azimuth mark atop Mount Haleakala. When you visited… did ya see it??? Nah, didnʻt think so. Most people never do, but these are fixed on the summit of named mountains. People just walk on by never looking down to spot it, but itʻs there waiting for you to discover it. #snailsplace, #fujifilm, #fujix100s, #hawaii, #maui, #geology, #mounthaleakala, #haleakala, #usgeologicalsurvey, #usgeologicalsurveymarker, #blackandwhitephotography, #benchmark

Avatar
earthstory

Yay for survey points on volcanoes!

Avatar

HOW DO WE VIEW OUR CHANGING CLIMATE?

News about climate change is seemingly everywhere. Scientific studies that pertain to the topic are released daily, but one can also find headlines about it in the mass media. It is even portrayed dramatically in movies. However, even though it is seemingly ubiquitous, does that mean that people care about the issue and want to learn more about it? According to a study conducted by researchers at the University at Buffalo and the University of Texas, Austin, and published in the April report of the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication and in the April 2013 issue of the journal Science Communication, this is not necessarily the case.

A study was conducted via an online survey of 736 undergraduates from two large universities in the United States. In their findings, the researchers noticed the following trends: those who feared the impacts of climate change were the most likely to research information on the subject, saw serious and dangerous consequences unfolding, and felt that they did not understand enough about the issue. This group actively seeks information in order to ensure that they are not in immediate danger. On the other hand, those individuals who felt the outcomes of climate change would be positive tended to avoid information on the issue, thought that climate change did not present risks to living things, and felt knowledgeable about the topic. The population who avoids climate change information would rather maintain its current viewpoints rather than receive potentially negative information, since this group could potentially be optimistic that climate variations are part of natural cycles, or feels that scientists are working hard to solve the crisis. Both of these opposing viewpoints are most likely influenced by our social interactions; those who we associate with will have a strong impact on our feelings and actions regarding major issues such as climate change.

The results of this study have implications in creating effective risk communication for anyone trying to distribute information on climate change. Since the public relies heavily on the mass media for science information, messages can be communicated through this outlet. The researchers suggest emphasizing the negative effects of climate change with a positive emphasis on learning more about the issue. This message can be communicated while promoting the positive outlook that working together with others will reduce greenhouse gas emissions. These messages should be informative and dispel any false preconceived notions on the issue so that people who are misinformed will be more compelled to conduct their own research and will cease to be complacent.

In understanding the psychology of individuals and their interpretations of scientific information, news outlets may be able to make decisions on how to better inform the public. An issue like climate change is vastly complex, and can be very depressing, which deters many people from caring and understanding its details. Unfortunately, actual experiences tend to be the most influential factor in swaying people. Repeated incidences of record-breaking temperatures have resulted in more people believing that climate change is a tangible issue, according to a recent article published in Nature Climate Change. These experiences, coupled with effective risk communication, may lead to more people understanding climate change and fewer people avoiding it.

-Jeanne K.

Photo courtesy of Lykaestria via Wikimedia Commons.

References: http://scx.sagepub.com/content/35/2/189.full.pdf+html

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2013/05/130515151442.htm

http://www.buffalo.edu/news/releases/2013/05/025.html

http://www.readcube.com/articles/10.1038/nclimate1768

For more information on the psychology of climate change perceptions, please see: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=490851650975884&set=a.490851557642560.1073741838.352857924775258&type=1

Source: facebook.com
Avatar

Australia's Great Barrier Reef: Counting the cost of bleaching

Images of devastation are emerging as authorities progressively survey the damage following on from the still ongoing global coral bleaching event associated with the strongest El Nino on record (see http://bit.ly/1t8y8wS for out recent coverage, and the posts linked below for an explanation of what bleaching is and our coverage as it spread). Fully a quarter of the coral over the entire reef is dead, and some areas have been totally wiped out. Many are now covered in algae which inhibit coral regrowth and collapse reefs to greater depths than those at which coral grows, and are hence potentially lost forever. If these events become more common as expected with global warming, we are facing the disappearance of the most productive ecosystems in the oceans, upon which an estimated half billion worldwide depend for protein and tourist revenue.

Survey diver Richard Vevers, a man who makes it his business to document the death of bleached reefs worldwide, (needless to say he's had a very busy couple of years) reports it as the worst event that he has ever witnessed in over 30 years of diving, having recorded some areas such as Lizard Island just before, during and now after the bleaching. The greatest horror was apparently the stench, as millions of dead animals that once lived in the reef supported food web rot. In his own words “The hard corals were dead and covered in algae, looking like they’ve been dead for years. The soft corals were still dying and the flesh of the animals was decomposing and dripping off the reef structure.”

While corals can often recover, it takes up to a decade, and does not always happen. The bottom line is that if the oceans warm too much, the corals will be heat stressed into extinction, and events are already taking a grim turn before the extra degrees induced by our greenhouse gas emissions over the 20th century really gets a chance to kick in. Already the reef has been damaged and stressed by previous mass bleaching events, including the global one of the last king hell Nino in 1998 and again in 2002. Each event has been more severe and damaging than the last, implying a long term developing trend that does not bode well.

By the mid 2030's this year's exceptional nature is expected to have become the new normal unless some drastic and rapid emission decreases happen now. We're already at 1 degree of warming (Celsius), the UN reports that a 2 degree rise will wipe out 95% of the world's reefs, so unless humanity changes its ways fast, you'd better get out there and visit what's left of one of the wonders of the world before it's too late.

Not only that, but this year the reef got lucky, the majority of the touristy places escaped the worst, as the fortuitously timed Cyclone Winston that damaged Fiji earlier in the year cooled the waters with its extensive rainfall. Next time it might not get away with it.

Our previous coverage of the current global bleaching event: http://bit.ly/28i5BVz, http://bit.ly/1Ukj0lJ, http://bit.ly/1ssKFKZ, http://bit.ly/23xFbMY, http://bit.ly/1EhnfaO, http://bit.ly/1MJqONe

Loz

Image credit: The Ocean Agency. http://bit.ly/1X84CmX http://bit.ly/28h72Dx www.theoceanagency.org

Source: facebook.com
Avatar

Overfishing is wildly underestimated

Global catches are falling three times faster than thought a new landmark study reveals in nature Communications, in a world ever more preoccupied with feeding the growing population in the face of the challenges of global warming and environmental destruction. Earlier FAO studies were based on recorded catches, and the new study takes into account small-scale, subsistence and illegal fishing and those parts of the catch discarded at sea, while surveying the rate of decline in some of our globe's marine food baskets. Over 2.5 billion people depend on this resource as their main source of protein, that's a third of the world's population.

Over 400 scientists spread worldwide spent a decade on the survey, seeking the best available data to fill in the gaps of official reporting and accumulating over 200 case studies. Many kinds of data were used to estimate the unknowns, including hotel receipts for fish bought in local markets and surveys of local consumption in coastal areas. No one has ever attempted such a huge t6ask of assembling so many data sets into our best global picture yet of the state of the world's fisheries. They reveal that catches between 1950 and 2010 were higher than thought, but that the rate has been shrinking fast since its peak in 1996 (we've heard talk of peak oil, but peak fish is a n even more worrying concept).

While some stocks are sustainably managed, the collapse of once major fisheries such as cod and the looming extinction of the bluefin tuna in the service of the world's sushi lovers show us that we need to extend these principles globally if we want to continue to be able to enjoy the resource in the future. All I can really suggest is think carefully about what you consume, remember that predator fish can concentrate ugly level of toxic metals up the food chain to us, and research where your fish comes from before you buy. The worst declines are in industrially fished regions, which should give some pointers of what to avoid.

Loz

Image credit, humpback whales hunting herrings, as a humble reminder that we aren't the only ones depending on fish: Picture Adventure Expeditions/Barcroft Media

http://bit.ly/23jPzYN http://bit.ly/1ZyXlt4 http://bit.ly/1nAcr5R Original paper, paywall access: http://bit.ly/1P3jTk1

Source: facebook.com
Avatar

Back in May of 2013, we shared with you the results of a study investigating the scientific consensus relating to anthropogenic climate change (http://on.fb.me/KPSJ31). Unsurprisingly, it was discovered that out of 13,950 peer reviewed articles published between 1 January 1991 and 12 November 2012, only 24 rejected the notion that the climate was changing and that humans were the main driver. Has this trend continued? Of course. A follow on study has applied the same methodology this time focusing on peer reviewed articles published between November 12th, 2012 and December 31st, 2013. The researchers found 2,258 articles, written by a total of 9,136 authors- Of all the articles, only one solitary article, written by a single author, rejected anthropogenic climate change. If 9,136 oncologists told you that you had cancer and one oncologist said you did not, ask yourself: would you take a chance on that one Doctor and refuse treatment? We have had a diagnosis for the state of our environment for many years, it’s time to treat it. -Jean Source: http://www.jamespowell.org/

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net