mouthporn.net
#field work – @earthstory on Tumblr
Avatar

The Earth Story

@earthstory / earthstory.tumblr.com

This is the blog homepage of the Facebook group "The Earth Story" (Click here to visit our Facebook group). “The Earth Story” are group of volunteers with backgrounds throughout the Earth Sciences. We cover all Earth sciences - oceanography, climatology, geology, geophysics and much, much more. Our articles combine the latest research, stunning photography, and basic knowledge of geosciences, and are written for everyone!
We hope you find us to be a unique home for learning about the Earth sciences, and we hope you enjoy!
Avatar

Fieldwork: Not just a geology holiday

As a geologist I often come across people who think my fieldwork is just an excuse to go relax in the sun while looking at the occasional rock. I can understand the confusion, why fly out to a different continent to study rocks when the department is already full of samples?

  1. The samples are biased Most non geologists and first year students will often wonder why we don't just look at samples, after all the department will be teeming with rocks collected by good natured researchers. Unfortunately, these samples are unrepresentative of a rock outcrop for two key reasons.

Firstly, the samples brought out to teach first year students will always be the simplest and clearest examples of that rock type. Most outcrops will not look like this but, for the purpose of teaching, these samples will help drum rules into the foggy mind of the hungover fresher/freshman better than an hour long lecture ever could.

Secondly, an outcrop’s geometry as well as its homogeneity (how much variation there is across the unit) tells us a lot about the environment of deposition, information that is lost in just a sample. Look at the picture below, its shows stacking elongate beds and actually indicates the direction in which a Jurassic reef was growing and therefore the direction of the open ocean. Pretty neat, huh?

  1. Fresh rocks are always better Each department will have a piece of halite that has become polished by the tongues of hundreds of freshers as they try to see if it tastes salty, potentially obscuring the rock fabric and making it harder to study. Fresh rock samples will always be able to tell you more than specimens that have been stored in rock drawers for many years. Whilst mapping I could identify one rock type based upon the strong sulphurous smell it gave off when fresh, while one of my lecturers can smell if a rock is dolomite. You also start to notice weathering patterns for different rock types, as well as identifying river systems by the characteristic channelized shape.
  2. You can predict what is under the surface Samples don’t let you take measurements such as dip and strike (the direction in which a bed is tilting and how much it is tilting by) as they are out of situ. By building up an idea of which rocks are dipping in what directions you can predict what rock units you would encounter if you were to dig beneath the surface. This is important in both hydrocarbon and mineral exploration as companies use surface outcrops to predict where to drill/dig their next hole.
  3. Rocks are rarely ever the same While it’s great that your lecturer has shown you what a fluvial sandstone will look like in class, I can pretty much guarantee that it will not look like that in outcrop. It is these differences that really make fieldwork important and lead to the idea that the best geologist is the one who has seen the most rocks. Only by going out and studying a range of lithologies in a range of localities can you start to build up an idea of what those brightly coloured diagrams are really trying to show you.

Some of you may still be thinking fieldwork sounds pretty easy, just moving from one locality to another to stare at rocks. Well when you factor in hiking up hills and scree slopes, scrambling over boulders and carrying a bag that can weigh up to 10kg (without samples) then it starts to seem less relaxing. Add to that the fact fieldwork continues regardless of weather (I have personally worked in minus conditions where the rain was so heavy you could barely see in Scotland to 40 degrees celsius at midday with no shade in Morocco) and it's starting to sound like hard work. Finally factor in walking several miles just to realise that your hammer/compass clino/gps is still at the last outcrop (conveniently at the top of the hill you just climbed down) and even a geologist may admit to having a bad time.

Luckily we tend to love the outdoors and obviously have a somewhat unhealthy obsession with the rocks we find out there. So just remember this; you can either let your resident geologist have their few precious weeks of fieldwork or you can endure them galloping off when on holiday to go and study a nearby exposure. Your choice.

Who am I kidding, we’ll still look at rocks even on holiday.

  • Watson Image Credit: Watson
Source: facebook.com
Avatar

Trump Administration Authorizes 'Cyanide Bombs' to Kill Feral Hogs. Seriously.

One of my readers shared this with me and it’s relevant since many geologists are out at random spots in the field. Notably, this is “renewing” the authorization to use these things, not allowing something new, but I’m not sure I want to randomly run into one of these on a ranch somewhere. https://earther.gizmodo.com/trump-administration-authorizes-cyanide-bombs-to-kill-f-1837086560/amp

On Thursday the Trump administration authorized another weapon in America’s war on the hordes of 30 to 50 feral hogs running through yards and terrorizing our nation’s children: “cyanide bombs.”
That’s what critics call M-44s, traps used by federal agencies like Wildlife Services to kill coyotes, foxes, and other wild animals ranchers and farmers would consider pests. The spring-loaded devices got their moniker from the sodium cyanide—i.e. poison—they spray when triggered.
After finishing its first round of a review Tuesday, the Environmental Protection Agency reauthorized the government’s use of these traps nationwide, the Guardian reported. That is, at least until 2021, when the EPA plans to hand down its final verdict regarding M-44s.
These “cyanide bombs” have earned plenty of detractors over the years. Wildlife Services reported killing around 6,500 wild animals with the devices in 2018, but the device’s indiscriminate triggering has also reportedly led to the deaths of endangered animals and household pets. More than 200 animals were unintentionally killed by M-44s in 2018, according to the USDA data.
One such case captured the nation’s attention in 2017. That year, a teenager in Idaho accidentally set off an M-44 while on a hike with his dog. The device injured him and killed his dog instantly, prompting Mansfield’s parents to sue Wildlife Services. After several environmental groups followed suit, the agency temporarily stopped using M-44s in Colorado and Idaho.
While a vehement campaign from conservation groups demanding a ban didn’t sway the EPA’s decision Tuesday, the agency did tack on new restrictions. Among other measures, M-44s can no longer be placed within 100 feet of a public road or trail.
By the looks of that USDA data, “cyanide bombs” don’t take out anywhere near the 30 to 50 feral hogs threatening rural Americans yards on what I can only assume is an hourly basis. So this week’s viral Twitter question remains unanswered.
Avatar
reblogged

Geology Help

So, I’ve had this blog for some time now and I have yet to do anything useful with it.

I would love to do a few posts about geology, and in particular about fieldwork because I know a lot of people struggle on that front.

If there is anything you would personally want to know, then feel free to drop me a message and let me know and I’ll put it into a post soon.

I’ve been studying gedogy for 8 years now So I’m sure I can answer at least a few questions.

Avatar
reblogged

Took a class last semester where I learned all about the geology of Northern Mexico and after the semester ended, we spent two weeks exploring! It was a trip of a lifetime! We learned a lot along the way and it made me realize how different it was rather than sitting in a classroom looking at pictures! Truly interesting and inspiring :)

Avatar
jimthegeologist When 10% hydrochloric acid meets Gambier Limestone pyroclasts in a volcaniclastic tuff deposit, Mount Gambier, southeastern South Australia. Fizz away! Even the silt-sized fraction reacts, thus confirming the Gambier Limestone was the groundwater reservoir that fragmented as the lava in the Newer Volcanic Province rose through the crust 4,500 years ago, forming the Mount Gambier maar volcano. Limestone and basalt comprised the pebble-sized fraction. Fourth day of fieldwork with the John Monash Science School crew @officialjmss 
Avatar
reblogged

Sampling a massive basalt (?) outcrop near Carlo Creek, AK.

Avatar
earthstory

Wondering why a caption “anthropology” is sampling basalt and hoping someone will tell me. Matching chemistry with some sort of artifact? Dating the site?

Edit: the answer "My colleague and I pursue the geochemical analysis of stone found at archaeological sites. She works in Alaska, and I work in Florida. We use various methods (XRF, NAA, LA-ICPMS) to analyze stone tools and their corresponding lithic raw materials to study how people acquire and transport lithic raw materials!"

Avatar

OLD GEOLOGISTS NEVER DIE: They just enter the Fossil Record

The Wall Street Journal recently reported that “old time” geologists can be worth their weight in gold – literally.

While many are GPS, GIS, and generally digitally challenged (count how many fingers they have left, just to make sure), these real dinosaurs of the science world have valuable field assets envied in the profession: in short, recent new discoveries of coal, gold, REE deposits, petroleum, and lost field trip participants have been found by elder geologists. Mining executives around the globe respect them not because of their age, but because the old guys can still bring in new economic deposits.

Sometimes it’s just utilizing their memory of an area: deposits that were sub economic in past decades are valuable today. Who, for example, has the time to go out and map the entire state of Nevada over again just to locate some “shows?” (Hey, young geols -- do you know what “shows” are? Small occurrences, sometimes just a few cm2 in size, of some economic mineral or other that you once spent decades hunting for and mapping over several thousand square kilometers of mountains long before the advent of GPS… no wonder my knees hurt today!)

Sometimes it’s a sort of gut-experience: It’s not always easy to explain just why you know that a landslide will happen here and not there, or explain why that feature on the mountainside is a fault, and you ought to be careful before you tunnel into it… the road-building engineers look at the elder geologist curiously, ignore what he/she has to say, then regret it when the landslide does occur and the tunnel does collapse as any idiot would have known if they took the time…

…Took the time to spend most their lives observing geology in the field. These days, doing field work is considered pretty much passé except in extreme circumstances such as on Mars using robots and where actual rock samples may be required. Why field work is considered an expense to be cut as much as possible is beyond me – two guys and a jeep for two months costs 0.01% of the price of a drilling a borehole; possibly more time in the field could cut a few unnecessary boreholes and save money.

The Wall Street Journal article also mentioned a couple of field exploration quirks used by “old guys” which made me laugh because I use them still (which does I suppose qualify me as an “old guy”). Adding some to the list, here are –

Verified “Oldie but Goodie” field tricks: --Ant hills: Yes, examine ant hills to see what the little buggers are bringing up. It’s not only that they might bring up something from as far underground as their tunnels go, but sometimes they are choosy about what they bring up. Ant nests in central Texas are topped by piles of fusilinids (which makes collecting easy), and in Greece I’ve seen them topped with small grains of sulfides that apparently they dislike. --Vegetation is also host-rock dependent. Some flowers like/dislike sulphide deposits. Also observe – why is the vegetation on the west of the valley so different from that on the east? Possibly different host rocks produce different soil chemistries, hum? --Sniffin’ those rocks: If you see an “old guy” in the field who smells all the rocks he/she breaks open with his/her field hammer, you’ll recognize someone who probably worked in West Texas where the petroleum odors of certain limestone units are mappable features. Also, scent is found to be extremely useful for locating the few sulphide-bearing rocks hidden among kilometers and kilometers of pillow lava formations. --Being able to continue to sketch-out a fault over kilometers in the field from a single vantage point because you can read the topography without using a GPS. Added benefit: it saves a lot of climbing. While we all admire the use of a computer to make 3-d models of geologic terrain, it’s so helpful to be able to envision the same when in the field itself. --Actually being able to identify minerals with a hand lens.

Something new in the “old geologist” club is the entry of increasing numbers of female geo-dinosaurs, moi included. Like most sciences, geology was once a sexist field. As recently as the mid-1970’s, having a woman in a mine was considered bad luck (at least in the USA, it was fine in Greece), and women were not allowed on oil drilling platforms, which kind of took the fun out of being a petroleum explorationist. However as time passes, we female geo-dinosaurs expect we will also take our places among the bolo-tie, khaki slack-wearing, knee-joint challenged elder generation of geoscientists – who envy your youth, your knees, and your ability to master Geographical Information Systems!

GOOD ADVICE FROM AN OLD (extinct, sadly) GEOLOGIC COLLEAGUE: “The geophysicists were wrong in 1939, and they just might be wrong today!” (Jan Brunn, 1908 – 2006)

Annie R.

Obviously I created this image myself. My assistant Anna Batsi who is brilliant at GIS is at right; Dina Ghikas drew the original dino sketch.

http://live.wsj.com/article/SB20001424127887324338604578326174138247186.html http://www.lucianne.com/thread/?artnum=725814 http://geology.about.com/b/2013/03/05/among-geologists-older-is-often-better.htm

Source: facebook.com
You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net