mouthporn.net
#social war – @dystopiance on Tumblr
Avatar

fiction or fascism

@dystopiance / dystopiance.tumblr.com

in the sea we make our home revolution is not a metaphor.
Avatar
The cis/trans binary also furthers centralization and colonialism, assimilating and categorizing all identities outside of itself. Like all forms of representation, the cis/trans binary as an all-encompassing set of categories is both flattening and inadequate. There are genders that are not cis but do not place themselves under the trans umbrella. Despite this, anyone who isn’t cis is assumed to be trans, and vice versa. An LGBTQ avant garde moves to assimilate all “unusual” genders, and even the lack of gender, into trans-ness. This leaves no room for anyone to fall outside of these categories. This often plays out in a colonial manner, rendering non-western genders legible to and manageable by western LGBTQ narratives of gender and sexuality.

Against Gender, Against Society - nila nokizaru (via hazelxvx)

Avatar
Avatar
otpglobal

BLACK BLOC - A Story of Violence and Love (english subtitles)

this is kinda silly- romanticizes property destruction- but also demystifies it. we were not who we are today, yesterday. ya feel me?

I also felt this was romanticized & way too contrived. But it does attempt to ground the actions of Black Bloc in a place beyond just things that happen in the street. That there is thought behind action, although some of the thoughts presented here sound quite a bit uninformed.  That said, the resistance in Brazil is inspiring & it shows that resistance does not necessarily come from theory but (of course) also from lived experience.

Avatar
dystopiance

'resistance does not necessarily come from theory but (of course) also from lived experience'

just seriously important to understand 

Avatar
reblogged
We stand in opposition to grand juries while denouncing rape apologists. We are in solidarity with Jerry’s grand jury resistance and we are against his disgusting, vicious, and destructive actions of the near past. We are comfortable in this contradictory position of solidarity and antagonism: It is the position in which we live every day. There are many of us here. We encourage all comrades to realize that you do not need to ignore someone’s destructive behavior just because they are under attack from an enemy. To argue that Jerry’s repression at the hands of the state trumps or mitigates his misogynist and racist actions is a grave political mistake.

There’s Something You Should Know About Jerry or, On Nuance (via ninjabikeslut)

Avatar
reblogged

i find it really bizarre when people bring up social categories that they don’t even belong to as an example of how certain tactics are alienating or incomprehensible or only capable of being performed by a select few people.

like when you’re a white person saying “people of color and migrants can’t participate in riots/black blocs/militant street action” do you understand how you’re actually contributing to a narrative of disempowerment? are you ignorant of the countless times people of color have engaged in riots and militant actions in the United States, and how many migrants in European countries (and the U.S., maybe not recently) have done the same? to what extent are you consciously using the image of some oppressed group for the sake of backing up your argument? this isn’t the same as saying “people of color and migrants face different issues and consequences when it comes to engaging in illegal action”. there is an obvious difference.

likewise with saying shit like “what use is smashing windows to a minimum-wage employee or a single mother on welfare, how are they going to look at that and find anarchism appealing” or some shit like that. you don’t fucking know the motivations of every person in your victimized group du jour. i know single mothers on food stamps who would love to see some yuppie business district getting trashed and i know plenty of minimum-wage employees who want to burn down their workplaces. there are places where anarchist ideas and tactics have been articulated to such an extent that people immediately understand the motivations of some random kid trying to burn down a bank. there are places where multi-generational histories of radicalism exist. appealing to material conditions isn’t the only way to appeal to people.

which of course leads to the question of whether “the mass appeal of anarchism” is even the key feature of an anarchist success. i wouldn’t say so.

and anyway i don’t even see how members of an oppressed group can claim to speak on behalf of the identity as a whole. individual experience and applying analysis are one thing but i still find it fucking absurd when somebody says “x group cannot y action” no matter who it is.

that’s the end of my inarticulate rant i guess.

Avatar

I don’t know how to tell the variations of ‘I miss you’ to take consuming caresses into the realm of conversation

to capture a thread of desire and share it with you unraveling like unsewn prints in every direction we fail to look these are the thoughts that comfort me on rough nights spent between yearning and reflection but either way I am drawn to dark to spaces and fields where I can do much but never enough where the mirror of our masters pushes me to taste bitter and bite back at the hope where the fog of this war dreams rhythm into my steps and my reach towards another is only a breakaway from what is known where vibes of hatred and pain or sentiments of happy a spectrum of shared moments give fuel to revolt this visage of struggle in our veins does nothing to dampen desire a wing stretching it’s cartilage out of the cramped condition digging our heels into concrete a knot forming on my tendon a bruise pulsing the beat of my mortality reminding me of all that I could give

Avatar
Avatar
jeanwhy
The moment you publicize or “share” your dissidence, release and/or disseminate it into civil discourse, it loses contact with the act of defiance from which it arose. In this, like momentum lost as heat, the deed sheds its tethers to “resistance” as such and rejoins the scenery furnished by media—external, social, always impersonal. What happens to those on display, self-procured or unwitting, who appear speak themselves bluntly of subversion and dissent, is a happenstance of spectacle, and not of consequence. Such figures merely symbolize opposition. True resistance, individualism, these spring from a source too internal to intimate (and too eternal to imitate). It involves choosing by instinct; it is choosing alone.

(via jeanwhy)

well, so much for this fucking tumblr then.

but really, “choosing by instinct"? Where can those instincts come from if not the mediated sphere wherein others share their own dissident experiences? if the revolution has to be perfectly spontaneous and utterly free of influence from any compromised source or sense of performance, we can kiss that shit goodbye.

i think it's meant to be a critique; a reminder that all of our resistance and defiance can easily be recuperated into the spectacle, viewed, measured and then passed upon and then, easily commodified by capitalism. most mediums and media that seek to 'represent' our ideas play upon mimesis- the imitative and reproductive way in which we reflect and perform the world by the 'scenery furnished by media'. we can stoke desire and defiance but its important to note how the methods of sharing or the medium or the methods by which it is filtered into someone else's processing does dilute whatever spark that went into provoking us in the first place. that's why i think that direct action is the best outreach because it creates spaces for each other to explore our potentiality, it doesn't depend on transmitting an experience to others (though it is also recuperated via imagery into the spectacle); and even still- capitalism has a monopoly on the exchange of our desires and our perceptions/lenses have been so shaped by consumer culture that we process ideas and images as spectacle. when you stoke resistance and pursue radical alternatives and direct action- others see these actions and process them according to their own socialization because they are not participating themselves. you come to symbolize opposition, and for those that take more controversial action- those actions become viewed as too distant from the social quo to be applicable to the mass, it becomes viewed as 'specialized knowledge' taken by cadre rather than tactics available to all only depending on the desires of autonomous people acting in unison. this was kind of an expansion on not just the discourse but on practice too.

Avatar

rant

there is so much to detest and sometimes even the little things lose their shine we live in a terrorist regime

unless there is some sort of call out or break in day to day reality (disrupture) and people not only stop acting from a place of apathy, but from a place of conformity to this fucking political process, we're gonna fucking die under a magnifying glass. 

we need to break the police narrative. we need to break the reform narrative. we need to break the 'work real hard for your boss' narrative. the narrative of assimilation. of moving up in the ranks, competing, earning power oh yeah, we need to break the power narrative the social war narrative that fucks up our lives everyday

i mean some people are just resigned to oppression because they believe it is the responsibility of an outside force (whether religious or political) to save them. they either view death as a revolution (transformative rapture) or wait for some 'end of times' sort of 'right' mixture of sparks and masse to.. what. 

our struggle is already nearly insurmountable with difficulty on an individual and interpersonal level- society causes anxiety, marginalization, alienation and silencing preventing most from recognizing their own oppression. we are busy deconstructing our own fucked up internalized shit meanwhile the world is still being run by dictators and patriarchs, secret societies, armies and a dominant moral cisheterosexist social code.

i don't want individual liberation; i need collective revolt. through our revolt we will build spaces to fucking exist in and breath for five goddamn seconds but we can also build capacity to project back outwards into the meaningless void that captures our bodies and minds- the social war.

it's like people need to wait for the point of no return or some big flashing neon sign or billboard so we can realize we need to act in solidarity with one another. we need to act. it's like people have already decided that OUR struggle together against doom is so futile they can't possibly imagine acting against it, so they just justify their inactivity or passivity because of 'measured risk' or this predetermined narrative (whether biblical or fucking theoretical).  

because if this is fascism, then OUR struggle (as opposed to the audacity of our individual struggles in society) against society and the mechanics, structure and function of this capitalist and authoritarian regime is INEXHAUSTIBLE.  we cannot possibly do enough to destroy enough to breathe enough angst into the void that is this fucked up clusterfuck of powermongering shitfuckery. and we shouldn't have to water our shit down or apologize for calling out oppression or have to paste our anger into cookie cutter soundbites that sound good for the status quo.

there are not going to be LESS police. there are not going to be LESS pressures/stresses. what the fuck are people fucking thinking voting for some privileged master at the top of the symbolic representation system.  that urges assimilation and 'equality' like we're not HERE and QUEER and fucking over this system that compels us with expectations and false idols.

it's gotta be subliminal messaging or some shit because i'm like HOW CAN YOU NOT SEE THIS WHAT THE FUCK. people are not taught to think, to talk, to share, to listen, to FUCKING LISTEN, to fucking think that we could fucking have our own ideasl that we could put them into practice without them being commodified/ without creating consumers, without oppressing people! 

what. the. fuck.

meanwhile in classrooms all over amerika today people said the pledge of allegiance, they talked shit on republicans and democrats by fucking label, they ate their fucking cheerios while reading the new york times thinking they are well read engaged 'citizens', they violated people, they justified their urges for power, they thought about moving up at work, they thought about how to get laid, they thought about being more popular than their friends, they thought about making enough money to buy some technological apparatus, they thought about food but not growing it, they thought about consuming and consuming and consuming but not CREATING or compassion.

we have no energy consciousness. we are not taught consent. we do not learn various and varying interpersonal communication skills. we are not taught to explore our sexuality, our ideas, our identities, to make ourselves fluid and not binaried or fucking isolated and uniform. we are taught to be miserable and to work for the benefit of a few.  every aspect of our lives tries to bully us into conforming.

the only way i feel i can exist and have it be 'worth it' at all at this point of realizing how fucking produced i have been by this chaotic unjust factory of a so called 'civilized' thoroughly colonized society is by thoroughly challenging or betraying every value that has been inculturated into me. this will be my revolt. there is no 'creating the new' we are only possibly capable of unlearning the old and in that process we practice things that are new to us- ideas and energies and methods that can attempt to not replicate oppression. all we have is the attempt.

it's an attempt! god will not grant us any serenity for our attempt. 'god' the figurative, a theoryhead, a complex symbology of humyn identity and meaning. we will die, but do you see? this society will not die with us! if you live up this world for all its excess as you consume it will consume you. there is much to betray, comrade. let us do what we cannot not do, what we must. let us forget what we 'can' do, or what is possible. and let us only, always and continuously attempt.

Avatar

When you go to LA Pride or whichever Pride this year please take a moment to remember the noncompliance, entrapment, hate crimes and police brutality that the gay liberation movement faced in the 50's and 60's and 70's and 80's out on through today. remember that before there was a 'gay rights' movement that catered to the political bottom line (a middle class ascribing white gay moderately conservative male) there were queers and drag and liberation and rejection of assimilation in favor of radically altering the hegemonic social institutions that capture us, assign us genders, police our sexualities and assimilate us to stop being queer so we can be good workers for capitalism! Please remember it's not all about CORPORATIONS making money off of your struggle by treating you like the rest of their consumer/customers. Please remember it's not about that sheriff recruitment booth, and think of how many POC and queers are uncomfortable by the spectacle that has become Pride because of the constant thread of forced assimilation or celebration. What have we become?! when do marginalized communities have enough people together or space to actually talk or even do something about the issues/oppressions they face? well i'll tell you, when we do have enough people to actually talk about the issues that face us we're drowned out by music, or programme, or symbolic marches. We're told to celebrate our tokens. As if there is not yet work to be done! as if our genders and sexualities aren't being policed! as if we don't continuously exclude TRANS folk from our spaces by erasing their struggle with all kinds of normativity! as if forced assimilation and the narrative of 'equality' really applies to ALL of us! Please remember that 'rights' are only privileges when they can be selectively granted and taken away by the governmental and even social institutions that dominate our lives. and that privileges are not YOURS to hold onto, but a system to betray! Some of us don't want to keep begging for the rights given out by this system built by white property owning puritan males; it wasn't written for us. it doesn't represent us. and we can never be represented by another, we want to determine our own lives!. we don't want tokenized space facilitated by friendly faced cops, we don't want what humynity people care to grant us with a vote or forced smiles and less gay bashing! we want to take it, to bash back! remember this as you celebrate, that we exist. that this conversation is unfolding and will continue to unfold. and just maybe, understand that these spaces will not go unagitated for long. LIBERATION NOT ASSIMILATION. Solidarity with all those who resist the commodification of our dissent and the rendering of our ongoing struggles into symbolism and consumerism.

Avatar

consequence is not a reason not to act. in fact, usually any particular consequence has been created deliberately to keep you from believing you can act, and is built on the basis that people cannot be trusted to act. hence, law.  these unwritten and written codes of action/consequence preserve a dominant social order and keeps us immobilized, and so we only ever have or take as much as is permitted to/of us. 

we only fail when we determine our actions, or fail to act, on the basis of external consequence rather than our communal needs.  the number one reason for this is because we don't have access to the power narrative that has created 'consequence', it is not used by all people but by particular people (who usually carry privilege) to subordinate some and protect themselves or legislate other, usually more marginalized, people. these people have been called 'minorities' in reference to their degree of power, and the fact remains that consequences for those with power and consequences for those without power are different because of the dynamics of power itself. it is the power of inclusion, and of exclusion, of applause or of consequence.

this shows us a very important thing. if power determines consequence, then what is the consequence of challenging power itself- the definition and application of it, the inversion of it, the demolition of it's forces. could it be that negating consequence is a negation of power itself?

the urge to act according to consequence (or to avoid it) produces an allegiance to a static relationship with our environment (stability- when we are not static beings) and a societal fear that we can lose more and have less than we already have unless we perform accordingly. this causes us to assimilate in order to 'improve' our conditions under the framework they have been granted to us. instead of believing we can digress and transform our frameworks, to make these conditions extinct.

we are constantly told to make what we can of our oppression in order to improve it, to change our lives in 'appropriate' ways and to avoid consequence thus correlating change with positive reinforcement and demeaning actions towards change that engage confrontation rather than erase it. the social war does not care for consequence because it plays out in secretive manipulative ways; it polices our genders and tells us that if we want to be safe we have to identify ourselves accordingly.

meanwhile the consequences of poverty and patriarchy play out over and over again in the night on dimly lit streets. if we are to ignore it, the consequence of our ignorance may find us anyway- in the form of an assault or any other traumatic experience in the hostile spaces of public or social life. if we are to engage it, the very disruption of breaking the narrative of acceptance and consequence-avoidance is seen as a challenge on society itself (and why shouldn't it be!) and these actions carry with them consequences that exist beyond formal imposition (i.e. not just laws or police, but other institutions such as family or friends, informal coercion to re-conform to silence and acceptance of social oppression). 

but if we engage it; there are others like us who will find us. who may not have found us otherwise. if one of us ignores or deviates consequence; then this brings the light of mind to others who lurk in shadows avoiding it. this is our courage; not in avoiding the nasty promises fascism has for us lurking in the night but knowing that their violence and terrorism is only justified if it succeeds in preventing us from expanding our ideas and practicing to act.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net