Archive of government documents and public information regarding national security, finance, international relations, government surveillance, and continuity of government operations.
amerikan fascism
Nationally, in 2011, the FBI and DHS were, in the words of Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, executive director of the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund, “treating protests against the corporate and banking structure of America as potential criminal and terrorist activity.” Last December using FOIA, PCJF obtained112 pages of documents (heavily redacted) revealing a good deal of evidence for what might otherwise seem like an outlandish charge:that federal authorities were, in Verheyden-Hilliard’s words, “functioning as a de facto intelligence arm of Wall Street and Corporate America.” Consider these examples from PCJF’s summary of federal agencies working directly not only with local authorities but on behalf of the private sector:
• “As early as August 19, 2011, the FBI in New York was meeting with the New York Stock Exchange to discuss the Occupy Wall Street protests that wouldn’t start for another month. By September, prior to the start of the OWS, the FBI was notifying businesses that they might be the focus of an OWS protest.”
• “The FBI in Albany and the Syracuse Joint Terrorism Task Force disseminated information to… [22] campus police officials… A representative of the State University of New York at Oswego contacted the FBI for information on the OWS protests and reported to the FBI on the SUNY-Oswego Occupy encampment made up of students and professors.”
• An entity called the Domestic Security Alliance Council (DSAC), “a strategic partnership between the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and the private sector,” sent around information regarding Occupy protests at West Coast ports [on Nov. 2, 2011] to “raise awareness concerning this type of criminal activity.” The DSAC report contained “a ‘handling notice’ that the information is ‘meant for use primarily within the corporate security community. Such messages shall not be released in either written or oral form to the media, the general public or other personnel…’ Naval Criminal Investigative Services (NCIS) reported to DSAC on the relationship between OWS and organized labor.”
• DSAC gave tips to its corporate clients on “civil unrest,” which it defined as running the gamut from “small, organized rallies to large-scale demonstrations and rioting.” It advised corporate employees to dress conservatively, avoid political discussions and “avoid all large gatherings related to civil issues. Even seemingly peaceful rallies can spur violent activity or be met with resistance by security forces.”
• The FBI in Anchorage, Jacksonville, Tampa, Richmond, Memphis, Milwaukee, and Birmingham also gathered information and briefed local officials on wholly peaceful Occupy activities.
• In Jackson, Mississippi, FBI agents “attended a meeting with the Bank Security Group in Biloxi, MS with multiple private banks and the Biloxi Police Department, in which they discussed an announced protest for ‘National Bad Bank Sit-In-Day’ on December 7, 2011.” Also in Jackson, “the Joint Terrorism Task Force issued a ‘Counterterrorism Preparedness’ alert” that, despite heavy redactions, notes the need to ‘document…the Occupy Wall Street Movement."
SOURCE
“I have nothing to hide!” is irrelevant.
- Privacy isn’t about having nothing to hide! Surveillance grants the government a great deal of power to make decisions about you, and because the surveillance is secret, you get no say in the decisions. (Please read the article, or the original paper; I cannot summarize it in a single bullet point.)
- We should all have something to hide. The civil rights movement, interracial marriage, and gay marriage would never have been allowed if nobody had anything to hide. Free speech is essential to the exchange of ideas in democracy, but so is the ability to try new and socially-unacceptable things.
- You do have something to hide. The United States Code is so vast and complicated that you probably commit several felonies a day. (Please don’t use the inevitable argument “If you have nothing to hide, take off your clothes” or similar arguments. The government isn’t proposing to watch you in the shower. Yet.)
- If the government erroneously believes you do have nothing to hide, there is absolutely nothing you can do about it. The evidence is secret and likely will never be presented to you.
- If the government chooses to use its surveillance against you, it can pick and choose which parts to present in court. Because the rest is classified, you do not have the right to use it to try to exonerate yourself.
- Even if the government does not attempt to attack you using surveillance data, any prosecution (or illegal abuses; see below) it takes against other people will make you reluctant to use your First Amendment rights to free speech. “Better not say anything, or I might end up like that guy.”
Oversight-free surveillance isn’t necessary for national security.
- The problem isn’t surveillance — it’s surveillance without adequate oversight and targeting. National security could be preserved by a program which also respects our civil rights. The Fourth Amendment does not ban surveillance. It bans surveillance without judicial oversight and clear limits. An order to collect all phone records clearly violates this.
- Terrorism isn’t as vast a threat as it’s made out to be. You’re just as likely to be killed by a deer as by Al-Qaeda. Food poisoning, drunk driving and obesity kill more people each year, but we’re willing to cede our liberty to fight terrorism and not to fight Big Gulps?
- Any large data-mining program is statistically bound to be overwhelmed by false positives which consume government time and resources and mean most people marked as “probably a terrorist” and put under more extensive surveillance will likely be innocent.
- Is there really evidence that this surveillance preserves our national security? So far, there is some doubt that the administration’s examples of foiled terrorist plots were actually foiled by the NSA’s surveillance. (Wyden and Udall agree.)
- The NSA could save more lives by using pervasive surveillance to mail tickets to people who text and drive.
Metadata invades your privacy.
Metadata is probably more invasive than most searches that require a warrant. You could not obtain most of this information by strip-searching me:
- From your choice of friends, I can determine your sexual orientation.
- Your cell phone records reveal your place of work, the popular events you have attended (including political events and protests), your mode of transportation, and presumably your favorite restaurants and spots for romantic flings.
- Your cell phone location records are unique, and four data points can be used to uniquely identify you. Switching cell phones will not save you — the new phone will show the same pattern of movement, and can be linked to you.
- Your credit card purchase history (which is also collected by the NSA) can be mined to reveal all sorts of details about you, such as whether you are pregnant.
Targeting people based on metadata, such as who they call and spend time with, is targeting based off of their First Amendment right to freely assemble and associate.
Revealing surveillance programs doesn’t harm national security.
- Oh no, now the terrorists won’t use phones or the Internet! Perhaps we can’t intercept messages sent by carrier pigeon, but by forcing them to switch to less efficient means of communication, we have already disrupted their plans.
- No terrorist will realize “the government is on to us!” after reading that the government is watching everyone. It’s equivalent to thinking the government is watching no one.
- The continued secrecy of programs which violate our rights harms our security — security from the abuses of our government. Consider the case of Joseph Nacchio.
The government has a history of abusing surveillance.
- HTLINGUAL was a CIA project to illegally read mail sent to the Soviet Union and China from 1952-1973.
- COINTELPRO was the FBI’s effort to put political advocacy groups, like the NAACP, Martin Luther King, various women’s rights groups, and anti-Vietnam War groups, under surveillance so they could be disrupted or stopped. Hoover ordered the FBI to “expose, disrupt, misdirect, discredit, or otherwise neutralize” the groups. The FBI attempted to blackmail and discredit MLK. Several people were killed by the FBI and police agencies.
- See also Operation CHAOS.
- Legal and judicial oversight did not stop the NSA’s earlier warrantless wiretapping program, which continued under executive order until exposed.
Yes, We Scan
Image via Adbusters
After Sept. 11, 2001, the Bush administration began waging a global war on terrorism both openly and on the “dark side.”
…
Directed by Vice President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, the White House expanded the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) into a global capturing and killing machine.
JSOC, which includes troops from a variety of America’s best units, grew from fewer than 2,000 troops before 9/11 to as many as 25,000 today.
While most of their missions remain classified, JSOC operators have been used far more aggressively in the past decade than ever before.
4 'bomb threats' in los angeles today CSULA Hollywood/Highland Hooters USC Downtown 5th/Spring/Broadway
Also. Two days ago the FBI were training campus security of some southern california schools at Pomona college. "The FBI has acted as the American equivalent of the GESTAPO, NKVD, etc. They came to Pomona campus in secrecy to train campus security. The FBI has historically sown misinformation and divisive confusion on college campuses, notably fueling a deadly rivalry between the US organization and the Black Panthers on the UCLA organization. The FBI requires that all colleges which receive federal financial aid enter crime reports into a nationalized database. This Orwellian practice leads to the disenfranchisement and criminalization of students. We must demand transparency and accountability. Why is campus security forming an alliance with the secret police? If campus security is supposed to serve us, why are we not consulted before they are trained by a known terrorist organization?"
TAKE DIRECT ACTION AGAINST THE SECURITY STATE.
Daniel McGowan is not a household name. Even among people who have devoted years of their lives fighting to protect the natural world from the predations of capitalism, his role in the history of the environmental movement is marginal and obscure.
It shouldn’t be. McGowan’s story tells us too much about the desperate situation we’re in — politically as well as ecologically — to be dismissed as a sideshow in the struggle to curb the excesses of human consumption before they destroy us.
Outside of radical circles, McGowan’s story is best known from its telling in last year’s Oscar-nominated documentary “If A Tree Falls.” McGowan was one of a dozen underground environmental and animal rights activists with the Earth Liberation Front and its sister movement, the Animal Liberation Front, who were swept up in a two year, multi-agency, multi-jurisdictional investigation called ‘Operation Backfire,’ which culminated in a series of high-profile arrests and prosecutions at the end of 2005 and beginning of 2006. (Two weeks ago, Rebecca Rubin, one of the three remaining fugitives in the investigation, turned herself in at the U.S.-Canada border.) The activists were charged with committing a series of arsons and other property crimes against numerous targets that they deemed to be agents of environmental destruction and animal exploitation, including U.S. Forest Service ranger stations, a horse slaughterhouse, a dairy farm, lumber company facilities, SUV dealerships, wild horse corrals, a university horticultural research center, a meat company, and, most famously, the Vail Ski Resort.
Though none of the crimes targeted people nor resulted in human death or injury, the Justice Department wasted little time in publicly declaring the arrestees “terrorists.” At a 2006 press conference announcing the defendants’ indictments, FBI Director Robert Mueller referred to perpetrators of environmental and animal rights-related crimes as one of the agency’s “highest domestic terrorism priorities.” Congress passed legislation later that year specifically singling out animal rights activists for enhanced criminal penalties, classifying property crimes against industries that exploit animals and even, in some contexts, First Amendment activities directed at agents of those industries, as “terrorism.” No such special legislation has ever been passed to selectively brand white supremacists, anti-abortion extremists, anti-immigrant vigilantes and right-wing militias — all of which have targeted, injured and killed humans — as terrorists.
In an interview with the Eugene Weekly in 2007, David Iglesias, the former federal prosecutor for New Mexico who was terminated by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales in the 2006 U.S. Attorney firing scandal, called the terrorism charges “political” and “overreaching.” “It seems to me what happened here should not fit my traditional definition of what terrorism is,” Iglesias explained.
McGowan was detained in two different prisons, both of them belonging to a category of new experimental facilities called “Communications Management Units,” or CMUs (he also spent a brief period of his incarceration in general population). CMUs were built to contain low-level terrorists rounded up in the War on Terror; most of their inmates are alleged to be connected to Islamic networks. They are designed to severely restrict and control the amount and nature of prisoners’ communications with the outside world, earning them the nickname among inmates and prison staff of “Little Guantanamo,” according to journalist Will Potter. For several years, their existence was kept secret. There are only two CMUs in the United States, in Illinois and Indiana; McGowan served time in both.
Last week, after seven years in federal prison, McGowan was released. For the next six months, he will be living in a halfway house in New York City, and then be under supervised release for three years before he is finally free from the terms of his sentence.
It’s easy to ignore McGowan’s story, to write it off as a criminal psychodrama a world away from the mainstream currents of today’s environmental movement. At the time when McGowan’s ELF cell was still operational, many advocacy groups were subjected to enormous pressure to make that chasm as wide as possible, or risk being marginalized themselves. To help discredit the political content of their crimes, prosecutors, politicians, law enforcement officers and the media have demonized ELF and ALF activists as terrorists, sociopaths, ordinary criminals hiding behind an ideology or, at best, naïve kids with overly romantic notions of what it means to fight for a cause. A more disinterested, less agenda-driven observer, however, might recognize the near inevitability of the ELF movement’s dialectical emergence out of a prevailing political culture that has stubbornly refused to even begin to address some of the most dire and vexing problems facing every living thing on the planet. When mainstream political institutions fail to rise to the scale and urgency of epochal crises like global warming, deforestation or massive species extinction — in some cases, even failing to acknowledge their reality — among those who understand what’s at stake, there will be some who are driven to desperate acts.
The ELF and ALF could never be the solution to the problems they point to, but neither are they merely incidental to them: radical movements tend to be harbingers of the struggles to come when ossified political systems bury their heads in the sand instead of measuring up to the profound challenges they face and to their own internal contradictions. Rather than vilify McGowan as a terrorist or mythologize him as a martyr for the earth, we should consider his story for what it tells us about a civilization so blind to its circumstances that it provokes individuals to engage in extreme political acts and risk serving years in Little Guantanamos in order to do something to stem an unfolding catastrophe. By, Leighton Woodhouse
welcome to the police state
"Barricades are completely surrounding Wall St. and Zucotti Park, police are forming lines around the entire park, police vans on every street in the area, mounted police are a couple of blocks away, security guards are guarding bank windows, every train station is guarded by police, and there's a watchtower overlooking Zucotti Park."
If you are anywhere near wall street, new york, zucotti park please lend your body to this struggle. Police resistance is a byproduct of our insistence of challenging the dominant financial elite, and their political and police lapdogs. We will not be afraid of bullies. We will not allow their intimidation to affect our actions- when the whole world suffers because of US imperialism.
Together we are powerful. If you have been following occupy events at all the last year, and you are genuinely ready for a different type of activism. Organic, horizontal, participatory and inclusive, please take your power back and lend your voice and body to the movement. Whatever your issue- take it to the streets. Direct action and beautifully collective will. My comrades are there. SOLIDARITY FROM LOS ANGELES.
Stratfor emails reveal secret, widespread TrapWire surveillance system
Every few seconds, data picked up at surveillance points in major cities and landmarks across the United States are recorded digitally on the spot, then encrypted and instantaneously delivered to a fortified central database center at an undisclosed location to be aggregated with other intelligence.