mouthporn.net
#fandom – @dyspunktional-leviathan on Tumblr
Avatar

Hate Wins and Love Loses

@dyspunktional-leviathan / dyspunktional-leviathan.tumblr.com

✨ Quit assuming others' lack of disability ✨ Just started the project @fundraising-with-audiobooks ◆ it/its, gender-neutral language (+ no -x- words) ◆ Everyone's least favorite disability discourser ◆ Anarchist as in against any and all hierarchy, not just anti-state ◆ Transhumanist, youthlib, animal lib, anti-civ (*not* anprim; anti-primitivism) ◆ Antizionist Jew ◆ Against all exclusionism ◆ Anti-relativist ◆ Real life pathetic blorbo ◆ Crippled immortal mage-robot-cosmos with severe executive dysfunction ◆ Angry nonbinary ◆ Heartless lovequeer aro ◆ Asks are very welcome, but I might answer *very* slowly (though occasionally, I do answer fast) ◆ Art blog — @whatruwaitingfor-draw-spades, fandom blog — @skies-full-of-song (reblogs mostly go to main), ao3 — disabled_hamlet ◆ Icon art by Virgil Finlay ✧ Freedom of one ends where freedom of another begins; and not a hair's breadth before that ✧
Avatar
Avatar
hiveswap

"Is it a safe space to say i hate-" NOT IN THE MAINTAGS IT ISNT

"I hate [character] from [show] soo much #character, #characters's full name, #show, #character's boyfriend's name"

ARE YOU INSANE

Avatar
sodomit

Main tags are for everything related to the media. Not for positivity. Hating a character is just as much a valid form to feel and self express as loving them, and both belong in the main tags. Let's not create an artificial hierarchy of which feelings matter and which don't.

Avatar

It's everywhere

There's also it's more 'diverse' fandom twin

[ID 1: drawing of four non-descript characters smiling lined up, three of them have pale skin while one has brown skin and a more mischievous expression, the characters has text pointed to them reading “that one character that gets the melanin because they’re angry/agressive” End ID]

[ID 2: drawing of four non-descript characters lined up, three of them have varied brown skin and expressions while one has pale skin and a more calm smile, the characters has text pointed to them reading “that one character that gets less of the melanin because they’re passive/calm/fancier” End ID]

Avatar

character: (staring directly at the camera) i am plural. a system. a plural system. a collective. etc.

singlet audience: hmmm but what if its actually a metaphor

really its not even it being called a metaphor thay bugs me - it can be both tbh! but a lot of people will be like "well they dont have 'multiple personalities' its just a metaphor" which DOES bother me

Avatar
Avatar
rokkazu

i guess like there is something to be said about a community gravitating towards a specific set of characters and tropes because that's whats popular and gets the most eyes on it, and naturally people want to feel like other people like what they're making. if you're making yourself draw stuff you think other people want instead of what you want, yeah that's an issue. but that's not the fault of the people who genuinely just love the popular stuff either!! everyone should just do what they want forever i think. your art is for you first and foremost. you can extend it to other people as a gift but not one of them will ever be entitled to it.

Avatar

i've had multiple people ask me "why would you rec something with distasteful elements (implicit ableism or racism or similar, character bashing, etc)? wouldn't you only rec things you wholeheartedly like?" at this point, and it's... interesting!

i don't think anyone's wrong for having that point of view. like. enjoy what you enjoy, for any reasons you enjoy it, who gives a shrimp. it's just not how i operate, and it's interesting to me that how i operate is so... removed from that perspective, because i thought that the way i engage with art is pretty obvious from the outside!

basically, there are two important pieces here:

  1. i am pretty uncommonly aware of social hegemonies (systems of power and control, ways members of society are marginalized)--which isn't a brag, it's just something i've latched onto autistically and have an inclination toward granularly analyzing to a degree most people do not and would not enjoy
  2. i love art. i'm insane for art. art is, quite genuinely, my greatest passion in life and one of the only things that i can say truly and uncomplicatedly makes me happy.

so, i love art, and all art is made in a society (joker voice), and society is full of hegemonies that are enforced from birth, at every turn, usually through violence (whether physical or social). all art is made by people, and all people were raised in this society, and therefore all people have been affected by these hegemonies.

and the hegemonies that affect me and are particularly important to me are not ones that most people question. i'm insane--like, literally psychotic, low-empathy, narcissistic, multiple personalities, you name a violently stigmatized entry in the DSM and i've got it. i'm disabled to the point that i can't perform labor, i can't work, and the vast majority of society believes this genuinely makes my life less worthwhile.

and i love to nitpick.

i am autistic. every single manifestation of these hegemonies is equally important to me. i get just as fixated on a single-minute interlude with a side character that's ableist as i do a ten-episode plotline featuring a central ship that's ableist as i do a fundamental conceit of the worldbuilding that's ableist. i might critique those things differently in public, but seeing them is the same to me. i notice all of them just as much.

so i love art. and art is made in a society that enforces these ideas. and art is made by people who genuinely believe these ideas. and i'm going to notice and engage with these ideas in art regardless of how minorly they feature in a piece. so it's like... i can stop loving art, or i can treat them as objective pieces of the art.

sometimes they make the art worse. sometimes there are multiple lenses you can read their inclusion through (like, revolutionary girl utena is racist toward anthy! and also that racism says something about racist hegemonies! both can be simultaneously true). sometimes their inclusion outright makes a piece better (the locked tomb would be a vastly different series if john was not a man with deeply internalized white colonialist ideologies, which are expressed via fundamental aspects of worldbuilding due to john's place in the world). but either way, i've gotta be willing to deal with them in the way i do any other aspect of art, personally, because otherwise i'd never be able to enjoy anything.

Avatar
Avatar
prokopetz

Folks act like "maybe the author isn't the final authority about what their work means" is some wanky post-modern nonsense and not a simple recognition that a lot of authors are perfectly prepared to bullshit about their own work. Like, leaving big-name popular media aside, I have personally encountered authors being actively disingenuous about their own work for all of the following reasons:

  1. A true answer wouldn't fit the image they've cultivated.
  2. They've decided they like the explanation the readers/viewers have come up with better than what they actually had in mind.
  3. Something that was originally intended as a standalone work ended up growing into a franchise or series, and now they're pretending that was the plan all along for some reason.
  4. They don't want to admit that the bit you're asking about is genuinely just a plot hole.
  5. The real answer gets into some shit they don't care to discuss, so they've prepared a cover story to explain away the parts they don't want to talk about.
  6. Their politics have changed since they wrote it, but they don't want to acknowledge that, so they're constantly trying to re-interpret everything they've ever written to be perfectly consistent with whatever their positions are this week.
  7. They wrote it decades ago and they honestly don't remember what they were thinking at the time, so they're just making shit up; sometimes they also don't remember what shit they made up the last time, so the answer is different every time they're asked.
  8. The work in question is at least partly autobiographical and they can't tell the truth without confessing to a crime in the process.
  9. Most of the good bits are plagiarised and they don't really understand it themselves.
  10. They're lying to you on purpose, for evil reasons.
Avatar
Avatar
dalishious

I want to write a follow-up to this post, since I've been getting a lot of Solas related asks lately. I still stand by what I previously said, I just want to expand on things and defend his character from what I consider to be outlandish claims made by people who have a weirdly obsessive hate towards him.

Can y'all help me with this by sharing some example unwarranted things you've seen people say about Solas? Direct links or direct quotes would be especially helpful. (I will be avoiding using identifiers from who made such comments, and I do not encourage harassment of any kind.) I will then share my thoughts on each stance with a rational argument.

Avatar
Avatar
dalishious
Anonymous asked:

So people on twitter are mad about Morrigan and the Morrigan movers come out in force to protect her. Going in on how Morrigan is an elven expert because her mother was Flemeth, pretty much not knowing any of the games lore before DAI. In top of that they are mostly white so as a black fan, it makes me feel like fandom just sucks In general no matter where I go.

People are so quick to forget (or they didn't play Witch Hunt in the first place) that Morrigan VERY LITERALLY STOLE the knowledge she has from the Dalish. Like, she literally STOLE their ancient texts about eluvians and ran away with it. Ariane's whole purpose of being in the DLC is because she's trying to track down Morrigan and recover what she STOLE! She's just like British scholars who fan themselves over their "expertise" on their colonial theft; the only reason she knows anything at all is because she STOLE IT from the people she claims to be an "expert" on.

AND MORRIGAN HAD NO IDEA THAT FLEMETH HAD A PIECE OF MYTHAL IN HER!

Ugh. I like Morrigan a lot in Dragon Age: Origins, I do. But her presence in Dragon Age: Inquisition is a nightmare.

Avatar
Avatar

"fandom isnt activism" means that shipping destiel isnt the same thing as fighting for queer liberation and posting about a brown character doesnt make it impossible for you to be racist. "fandom isnt activism" does not mean that anything done in fandom spaces says nothing about you as a person and is beyond reproach. some of you spend all day showing your whole ass and then get all shocked pikachu dot jpeg when someone says you might have some biases to work through

Avatar

I can list so many fandoms rn

danganronpa, homestuck, dead plate (not the media itself but the rody x vincent shippers), oshi no ko, the coffin of andy and leyley (literally how do antis exist in this fandom), south park, yansim, anything with the yandere trope in general (cmon antis, you arent better than us for liking stalker x victim over age gap or sa), okegom, omori (not the media itself but the creator), ranfren, scott pingrim vs the world, and dare i say the christian bible.

Bonus: the art is *about* those things, but they refuse to admit it. Because hey, writing wordwalls about how this relationship where one character constantly does things to the other against their will literally including sexual acts btw while they act so exceptionalist about them *and* there's a massive power imbalance is not abuse ackshually is protecting the victims!! Get away from my art you abuse fetishizing freak!!!!

Intermission fandom I am looking at you

[Plaintext:

Intermission fandom I am looking at you

/End plaintext]

Fucking promise everyone getting off to fictional abuse while admitting it's that and properly warning the potential audience is not harmful and This Shit Really Fucking Is

Avatar
Avatar
fanhackers

Fans' attitudes toward AI-generated works

Irina Cisternino, a PhD candidate of Stony Brooke University, is writing their research on topics related to technology, art and fandom. You can participate by filling out a survey and additionally, signing up for an interview. The survey is expected to last until at least the end of April, those, who signed up for the interview, will be contacted later. You need to be at least 18 years old to participate in either, be able to understand and speak English and identify as a fan.

After the completion of the research, it will be accessible as the dissertation of the researcher. If you have further questions, you can contact Irina Cisternino at [email protected] or Lu-Ann Kozlowsky at [email protected].

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net