I kinda wanna post a8out something i posted a8out a while 8ack 8ecause i think i can word it 8etter this time
While an individual has the right to refer to their ids any way they wish, i do not like the way the general radqueer community considers any transitioned trans id a "cis id"
While some methods of transition can result in one being cis (for example: if a trans amputee gets an amputation, they become a cis amputee), not all of them do (for example: if a trace individual socially transitions to present as their race, this does not make them cis race)
This is not inherently invalidating of anyone's identity. Referring to a trans man as trans does not invalidate their identity as a man, and i feel we should think of other trans ids the same way. Your identity is your identity regardless of whether it is cis or trans
I 8elieve that the current status quo of transitioned ids often being referred to as cis ids (when they are not) perpetuates the dysphoria and invalidation some feel when their identity is acknowledged as trans rather than cis. We put cis ids on a pedestal, there8y treating trans as the inferior and less valid w8y to 8e. We need to get rid of the notion that trans ids are any less real or valid than cis ids and 8ecome more comforta8le calling ourselves trans
Take pride in your trans identity. A trans man is a man, as a trans amputee is an amputee, as trans asian individual is asian. I don't say this as a responsi8ility for trans individuals who struggle with dysphoria to such a great extent that they must refer to their identities as cis to alleviate it. This is not their 8attle to overcome. Rather, we as a community should perpetuate positivity and validity for trans ids on the s8me level as cis ids, just as the transgender community has done with gender, so that we can cre8 a more comforta8le sp8ce for those struggling to eventually come out of their shell and acknowledge th8y are trans without discomfort