mouthporn.net
#science! – @drumlincountry on Tumblr

We are so lightly here

@drumlincountry / drumlincountry.tumblr.com

I'm Eefa and I talk to strangers. She/her. Irish.
Avatar

[ID: a tag reading, “#don’t eat citrus if you have any mental health problems #the vitamin C is so bad for you” end ID]

losing my fucking mind over how people will come on here and say just the easiest to disprove absolutely inane lies. for no reason at all

This is so funny because of how long a chain of telephone it is. The starting point is that grapefruit juice SPECIFICALLY can interact negatively with several mental health medications (notably, not amphetamines). Then this tumblr post* and MULTIPLE NEWS ARTICLES got popular, stating that consuming anything acidic (including vitamin C) within an hour of taking your ADHD meds would render them ineffective. In reality, a large dose of vitamin C taken directly with an amphetamine-based ADHD medication has the potential to cause a minor dampening effect, but has no effect on other ADHD meds

These presumably got filtered/combined into the idea that vitamin C is bad to take with ANY mental health meds, which then got turned into the idea that if you have mental health problems, scurvy may be right for you!

Avatar
ashelyskies

also turned into the myth that citrus nullifies HRT

if ur depressed you know what would help? scurvy

Avatar
thegreenpea

Bleeding from gums and old wounds 🤤

Avatar

Some highlights:

  • Astrologers helped design the study
  • No one did better than random chance, even though they only included people in the study who are experienced with astrology and stated that they expect themselves to do better than random chance
  • They gave every astrologer a set of 50 things about a person and 5 birth charts to choose from. They weren’t even coming up with the chart themselves!
  • After taking the test, most thought they nailed it. Zero out of 152 did better than 5 out of 12. None nailed it
  • Astrologers who rated themselves highly experienced (“world class experts”) did the same or worse as those who said they have limited experience. Both performed the same as random chance
  • This is hilarious
Avatar
reblogged

i feel like making the word “holistic” synonymous with “homeopathic” was such an L for society

what holistic health/care currently tends to mean: alternative medicines and therapies that are often unstudied/unproven, snake oil schemes, often targeted at people with lower education levels + people with long-term or chronic health disorders + mothers with young children + other vulnerable groups, talk therapy as the start and end of treating emotional distress

what holistic health/care should mean: clinical testing and evaluation for illness/disease PAIRED with access to mental health support, focus on maintaining general health (access to baseline annual health checks such as blood tests for vitamins, hormones and other health markers, blood pressure, allergies, skin checks, sexual health checks, addressing changes or concerns) + (access to professional guidance on exercise, diet, hygiene, personal care that can be tailored to suit individual needs), resources to ensure patients are able to financially receive medical care as well as other baseline essentials such as housing, food, clothing, focus on support for dignity and autonomy, easier access to physiotherapists + other specialists who can head off problems before they become serious, access and referral to supportive social workers…it goes on…

good article critiquing issues with the way we currently use “holistic” in terms of care here

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
kaiasky

Guesstimation game: no googling!

How far away is the moon?

  • No using the web, books, maps, etc. No checking the notes!
  • Put your guess and reasoning behind a readmore, so your followers also get a chance to play.
  • The goal isn't to get the RIGHT answer (or even get close), it's to see how you and others come up with a guess. It's also not a competition, don't worry about how you do in relation to others!

my answer

Avatar
sigmaleph

my answer

Avatar
gostaks

my answer

Avatar
blessphemy

my answer: arctic tern migration edition

not too far off!

Avatar

me: sometimes 'science,' as a mode of inquiry, is put to explicitly power-bound ends like creating and reifying categories of 'race' or shoring up imperial and colonial power

57 people on this website immediately and in unison: i agree, sometimes the honourable good enlightened morally good venerable scientists have their noble enlightening edifying inherently valuable work misused for nefarious ends by some other actor whose goals are a horrible anomalous deviation from normal scientific functioning! good post op!

Avatar
Anonymous asked:

I saw a comment on your blog that says 'the way you eat does not cause diabetes'...are you able to expand on that or provide a source I could read? I've been told by doctors that my pre-diabetes was due to weight gain because I get more hungry on my anti psychotics and I'd like to fact check what they've told me! Thank you so much!

Pre-diabetes was rejected as a diagnosis by the World Health Organization (although it is used by the US and UK) - the correct term for the condition is impaired glucose tolerance. Approximately 2% of people with "pre-diabetes" go on to develop diabetes per year. You heard that right - TWO PERCENT. Most diabetics actually skip the pre-diabetic phase.

There are currently no treatments for pre-diabetes besides intentional weight loss. (Hmm, that's convenient, right?) There has yet to be evidence that losing weight prevents progression from pre-diabetes to T2DM beyond a year. Interestingly, drug companies are trying to persuade the medical world to start treating patients earlier and earlier. They are using the term “pre-diabetes” to sell their drugs (including Wegovy, a weight-loss drug). Surgeons are using it to sell weight loss surgery. Everyone’s a winner, right? Not patients. Especially fat patients.

Check out these articles:

Also - I love what Dr. Asher Larmie @fatdoctorUK has to say about T2DM and insulin resistance, so here's one of their threads I pulled from Twitter:

1️⃣ You can't prevent insulin resistance. It's coded in your DNA. It may be impacted by your environment. Studies have shown it has nothing to do with your BMI.

2️⃣ The term "pre-diabetes" is a PR stunt. The correct term is impaired glucose tolerance (or impaired fasting glucose) which is sometimes referred to as intermittent hyperglycemia. It does not predict T2DM. It is best ignored and tested for every 3-5yrs.

3️⃣ there is no evidence that losing weight prevents diabetes. That's because you can't reverse insulin resistance. You can possibly postpone it by 2yrs? Furthermore there is evidence that those who are fat at the time of diagnosis fair much better than those who are thin.

4️⃣ Weight loss does not reverse diabetes in the VAST majority of people. Those that do reverse it are usually thinner with recent onset T2DM and a low A1c. Only a tiny minority can sustain that over 2yrs. Weight loss does not improve A1c levels beyond 2 yrs either.

5️⃣ Weight loss in T2DM does not improve macrovascular or microvascular health outcomes beyond 2 years. In fact, weight loss in diabetics is associated with increased mortality and morbidity (although it is not clear why). Weight cycling is known to impacts A1c levels.

6️⃣ Weight GAIN does NOT increase the risk of cardiovascular OR all causes mortality in diabetics. In fact, one might even go so far as to say that it's better to be fat and diabetic than to be thin and diabetic.

Dr. Larmie cites 18 peer reviewed journal articles (most from the last decade) that are included in their webinar on the subject, linked below.

Avatar
Avatar

Every time I see some moral panic article about how some alarming % of teens admit to vaping or smoking or doing drugs or whatever, I think about that time in 9th grade when school handed us a survey on substance use, told us we had to fill it out, and me and a half dozen friends reported that we’d been habitual users of heroin, cocaine, and acid since the age of 9.

“Mischievous Responder Bias” is a known problem in surveying youth but it’s annoying and expensive to overcome it so often people don’t….also the things that come up when people try to look for it are hilarious, like 99% of the kids who reported having a missing limb were lying.

It is my favorite thing about education research: that you have to remember that your subjects are a bunch of little scamps trying to prank you.

Avatar
Avatar
zeiat

okay it might very possibly because i’m so tired but this article in the toronto star about a newly discovered microbial predator has me in stitches. i keep reading quotes out to harry and then laughing so hard i start crying. please read along with me.

it starts with this headline:

UBC scientists discover entirely new branch on the tree of life — and they are likely to ‘nibble’

great start. going in really strong here. it’s a new branch on the tree of life and they are likely to, quote, Nibble. questions for the toronto star: who is they? is it the scientists? why are they nibbling on a branch of the tree of life? because you have implied, grammatically, that it is the scientists who will be doing the, quote, Nibbling, here.

ok. ok ok. we’ve clicked. we’re finding out who is Nibbling. here is the lede:

Scientists recently discovered a new “supergroup” of rare, microbial predators called Provora that are genetically distinct from any other living being on earth.

now we’re talking! that is actually pretty cool. still not sure who is likely to ‘nibble’ or why we are talking about that in the headline and not the fact that they were genetically distinct from every other living being on earth which is objectively both much cooler and much less confusing.

Their findings, published Wednesday in the journal Nature, placed the microbes in a new supergroup of organisms they named “Provora.” You can think of them as the “lions of the microbial world,” said Patrick Keeling, a senior author of the study and a professor researching evolutionary microbiology at UBC.

ok fun comparison! evocative, though i’m not sure of what. how are they like lions?

“They’re numerically very rare. For every lion, there’s thousands of animals that aren’t lions,” Keeling told the Star. This was why we never detected them until now, despite their presence everywhere, he said — there were too few of them to stand out.*

oh they’re like lions because…they’re rare? ? ? for every lion… there’s thousands of animals… that Aren’t Lions. ok so true patrick keeling, i’m with you. for every lion there’s thousands of animals that aren’t lions, so, like lions, scientists didn’t discover these new guys until just now. because they’re rare like lions!

Despite their scarcity, Provora, like lions, could play a vital role in the food chain, Keeling said: “If you disappeared all the lions, not only would we all be very sad, but the whole ecosystem would change.”

IF YOU DISAPPEARED ALL THE LIONS

NOT ONLY WOULD WE ALL BE VERY SAD

BUT THE WHOLE ECOSYSTEM WOULD CHANGE

you know what? guys? this is so true. my man patrick has made a point here. if you disappeared all the lions we WOULD all be very sad, and the food chain would undoubtedly take a hit! just like these new guys, which are just like lions.

Each organism falls under two categories, the paper reads: there are the “nibblerids,” which like to “nibble” their prey to death with special tooth-like appendages;

ohhhhh nibblerids! seven paragraphs in and now i understand, they like to ‘nibble’! this still doesn’t explain why the scientists are quote Nibbling on these new guys who are just like lions but microbial though.

and there are the “nebulids,” which prefer to swallow their prey whole.

me: harry? do lions swallow their prey whole?

harry: no!

me: ok. i am still failing to understand how these guys are like lions.

Related creatures on the tree of life have similar genetics — for example, the human “18S rRNA” gene is only six nucleotides away from its guinea pig equivalent, Keeling said. When he tested the same gene in the microbes, however, he found a staggering difference of up to 180 nucleotides.
“You look at their DNA sequence and you go like, holy crap. These things are not closely related to anything we’ve ever seen before,” Keeling said.

ok this is neat! this is the cool shit. Cool New DNA. just like how lions are also radically different from other felines, a bit like aliens if they were cats. (sorry. sorry for beating this dead horse. or nibbling it as the case may be.)

“The foundations of our entire system is microbial,” Keeling said. “If the microbial world were to change catastrophically in its biodiversity? Well, we would all die, and so would everything else we’re familiar with.”*

patrick! so true my man. once again it would be really bad if we changed the entire ecosystem, even if it didnt end up in all of us being sad because the lions died.

“The biodiversity of microbes and the ecology of microbial ecosystems is something that we should care about a lot more,” Keeling said. “If humans are going to screw up and go extinct, it’s probably going to be because of (them).”*

LAST PARAGRAPH. PREDICTIONS FOR THE APOCALYPSE. GOING OUT WITH A BANG, JUST LIKE HUMANS WHEN WE FUCK UP MICROBES AND GO EXTINCT, AND WITHOUT EVEN ONCE ELUCIDATING HOW THESE GUYS ARE LIKE LIONS. there is some knowledge humans just weren’t meant to have i guess.

Courtesy of @thecountessofcats​​:

[Image description: a screenshot of tags that say “quite frankly this reads like patrick and co found provora, went to have a celebratory smoke, and were suddenly presented with having to explain this stuff to a journalist while high as shit.” End of description]

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
foone

The problem with writing a fantasy story where they have computers that are powered by magic is that computers are already magic.

Seriously. Moreso than any other subject I know, computers are the ultimate bell-curve, where people who don't know much about how they work and people who know a lot about how they work both agree: they're magic.

Like, do you know how we make computers? We etch intricate patterns in crystals. Using light. The shape of the drawings determines how they work.

Seriously, that's how they're made. We grow super-pure crystals, cut them into wafers, cover them with acid, then shine a light on them through a mask to activate or deactivate the acid, etching away some of the silicon surface. It's called photolithography.

Only we've since decided light is "too big" and we've moved up to using x-rays, which are smaller. This lets us fit smaller drawings on our crystals!

The best part is that because some processes use light to harden the photoresist layer and some processes use light to break it down, it means some computers are made of light (because the parts of the crystal that got light on them remained behind) and some parts are made of shadow (because the parts that got light were washed away.)

Do you have a Light CPU or a Shadow CPU? You'll probably never know. This is industrial secret stuff.

And because we're making them with light, we can make them tiny and we can make lots at once. Like, I found a reference once that said that MOSFETs (a type of electrical switch) is the single thing Humanity has made the most of over our entire time on this planet.

How many have we made, exactly? It's estimated that between 1960 and 2018, we made about 13 SEXTILLION of them.

That's 13,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.

If every human alive (all 8 billion of us) lived to 70 and devoted our whole lives to making them, never sleeping, just making MOSFETs, we'd have to make 736 a second to make 13 sextillion MOSFETs.

Computers are magic. And we're very good at being wizards.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net