mouthporn.net
#taxation – @dragoni on Tumblr
Avatar

DragonI

@dragoni

"Truth is not what you want it to be; it is what it is, and you must bend to its power or live a lie", Miyamoto Musashi
Avatar
reblogged
Republicans may act like they want to transform the GOP into a “workers party,” pretend they care about the concerns of struggling coal miners and farmers, rail against abortion, cheer the appointment of conservative judges, and talk about fighting terrorism and deporting immigrants, but there is one thing that matters more to Republicans than anything else — and that is helping the nation’s very wealthiest individuals and families become ever richer.
That is the singular domestic achievement of the Republican Party in its 38-year run of dominance over American politics, and it’s obviously something the party wants to push as far as it possibly can while it still clings to power in Washington.
Avatar
dragoni

Republican Capitalism is really about Trickle Up. 

The only money that Trickles Down is to the lawmakers who pass laws written by their donors, i.e. Koch brothers and other GOP mega donors. Just ask Paul Ryan. #RepublicanSWAMP #TrumpSWAMP Hand outs and Welfare for the Rich!  

Here’s the rub. The people who benefited from the tax cuts passed earlier this year will be the same ones who will benefit from the capital gains tax cuts!

"86 percent of the benefits of indexing capital gains would go to the top 1 percent of the population “

That's because most investment income flows to the top of the economic pyramid. 
Like income and wealth, stock ownership is heavily concentrated in the uppermost echelons of the economy. 
  • The bottom 60 percent of households COMBINED own just 1.8 percent of American stock
  • The top 1 percent, by contrast, owns over 40 percent of the country's stock, up from 34 percent in 2001. 

Why is wealth distribution in Western Europe more representative than in the US? #PWNED

Avatar
reblogged

Call Your Senators to Preserve Equity Compensation for Startups

The latest Senate version of the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” has a stab in the eye for startups. It proposes to tax certain stock options and RSUs at the time of vesting. An earlier House version also contained this provision, but the House removed it. 

Startups are a key part of innovation. Often joining a startup means accepting a lower cash compensation for a higher potential upside. This upside usually comes in the form of stock options or other stock based compensation such as restricted stock units (RSUs). For these to be effective means of offsetting lower current compensation, they need to provide upside with no downside.

In particular, an employee should not own taxes on the appreciation of the capital until they actually have liquidity in the asset. Everything else runs the risk of having to pay taxes on paper gains that subsequently evaporate. This problematic situation exists today already for many employees who leave companies and have to exercise their options and there have been legal efforts under way to change that.

The Senate version of the bill does the exact opposite. It now moves the tax payment for options to the point of vesting. So imagine working for a highly successful startup. At each vesting date you would owe a tax payment on the difference between your option strike price and the now fair market value. These could be substantial payments! Not only do you not have the money to pay those unless you are already wealthy but also you have no idea what those shares will eventually be worth. It could easily be much less again. Possibly zero! We have seen plenty of companies that had been valued in the 100s of millions and some in the billions of dollars that went to 0 without ever achieving liquidity along the way.

Now it is somewhat unclear whether this would affect all options or only so-called non-qualifying options. If it only affects the latter, then one possible way to fix the issue would be to dramatically increase or entirely remove the cap on the amount of equity that can be awarded in an incentive stock option (it is currently $100,000 which is why many executive grants wind up being non-qualifying).

I don’t know if this tax bill has a chance of passing. I suspect that it does as it appears less controversial than the healthcare bill. If you want startups to continue to be able to readily use deferred equity compensation then I encourage you to call your Senators right away and let them know you are opposed to Section III(H)(1) of the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.”

Avatar

Vestager doesn’t play: Here’s your tax bill. Now pay up.

Time to end corporate tax havens because they’re only used for TAX EVASION.

Amazon is in cahoots with Luxembourg, according to the European Union, which fined the company 250 million euros (almost $300 million) for illegal tax benefits on Wednesday. Margrethe Vestager, the EU’s commissioner for competition, said, “Luxembourg gave illegal tax benefits to Amazon. As a result, almost three quarters of Amazon's profits [in Europe] were not taxed.”
Based on a three-year investigation, the Commission for Competition found that Luxembourg’s tax administrators essentially helped Amazon run a shell corporation. They allege that Luxembourg’s 2003 tax deal with the conglomerate allowed it to form Amazon Europe Holding Technologies, a company that did not have to pay European taxes.
You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net