mouthporn.net
#boston – @diegueno on Tumblr

Is It in My Head?

@diegueno / diegueno.tumblr.com

Avatar
The Olympics is always a humanitarian disaster. For how much money and impact the Olympics has on the world, the least they could do is pick a place where the athletes and fans, heck even the people that live there on a daily basis don't have such serious health risks just by being in that area.

No wonder that Boston dumped their Olympic bid. Bostonians aren't so much humanitarians as much they know that they won't cater to aristocrats and their senses of entitlement:

Source: facebook.com
Avatar
I can't think of a worse conflict on of interest than David Koch sitting on the Board of Trustees at Boston's PBS station, WGBH. Join me in telling WGBH: get the radical climate denying Koch off the board of WGBH!

Did you know that David Koch, who along with his brother Charles has spent millions on climate change denial, currently sits on the Board of Trustees at Boston’s PBS affiliate, WGBH?

It’s hard to believe, but the nation’s biggest financial backer of right-wing causes helps oversee the station that brings us educational classics like Frontline and NOVA. Until earlier this year, Koch was also on the board of New York’s PBS affiliate, WNET, but he resigned after a New Yorker exposé uncovered the embarrassing revelation that WNET staff refused to air a documentary critical of the Koch brothers, fearing that doing so would jeopardize a major planned contribution from David Koch.

The WNET episode was a disturbing example of how even the presence of someone like Koch can lead to dangerous self-censorship in our public television stations. We have no idea if the same kind of self-censorship is happening at WGBH. The station insists that there are strong firewalls to prevent that sort of thing from happening. Until recently, so did WNET.

But behind the very real possibility that Koch’s presence affects WGBH’s content is an even larger question for WGBH and its members: Why should it be acceptable for a radical climate-denier like David Koch to be on the board of a well-respected institution like WGBH, which is dedicated to educating the public?

The answer is simple: it shouldn’t be acceptable.

The world is already feeling the painful impacts of climate disasters like Superstorm Sandy and this summer’s wildfires. It’s time for important societal institutions like WGBH to draw a line and say that lying to the American public about the reality of climate change is unacceptable, and we will not be associated with it.

The New Yorker piece and Koch’s resignation from the WNET board have created a major opening to reconsider the relationship between public institutions and climate deniers like Koch. That’s why Forecast the Facts members are seizing this opening and mobilizing to get Koch off WGBH's board. The first step is to gather as many petition signatures as possible to deliver to the full Board of Trustees at their October 9th meeting.

Avatar
If you think the death penalty is a just response to murder or important to provide victims’ families with closure, then trying to limit it to a small number of multiple murders makes no sense. Why does taking one life not merit death, while taking two, three, or any other arbitrary number does? Why is the pain of one victim’s family any less important to address than the pain of families whose loved one was part of a multiple murder? There are many families that deserve the satisfaction of knowing their loved one’s murderer received society’s stiffest sanction for their crime, and it’s far from clear that the death penalty fills that need better than life without parole — indeed, it may even prolong a families’ grief. Yet the moment we say one victim, or set of victims, must be avenged by death, we lose the ability to consistently limit the death penalty’s application to rare cases — and the uncertainty and arbitrariness that plagues capital sentencing generally comes flooding back. When life without parole is the harshest penalty our courts dole out, such a sentence will stamp everyone who receives it as among the very worst criminals without opening the door to an unjust and unconstitutional policy.So the death penalty is arbitrary. It discriminates on the basis of race and income. It kills the innocent. It is unconstitutional. And it may even deepen the wounds of families already grieving from the most terrible tragedy imaginable.

What about capital punishment being a futile act? How restorative is it?

Avatar

I gotta say, I like watching each and every one of these teams lose. On the other hand, I hope they keep their powder dry and deliver revenge ice cold.

Source: via.me
Avatar

This is how people reacted, PUBLICLY, when a black man scored a game winning goal in a hockey game.   They put their NAME on that shit.

Please, you guys, try to keep your sports fanaticism and your horrible inbred flippant racism separate.  For all of us.

Here’s How Racists On Twitter Reacted to Joel Ward’s Series-Winning Goal Against Boston (Deadspin)

And just when I was starting to really dig hockey.

People suck.

Avatar
diegueno

Here is the kicker: Willie O'Ree played for those moron's Boston Bruins before he played for my San Diego Gulls.

The aspect that leaves the greatest lasting impression about bigotry is the stupidity of it more than the hatred. No wonder I have such a distaste for Boston sports fans...it's amazing that they can speak and walk upright.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net