Is there another term for someone who doesn't experience romantic or sexual attraction besides aroace? Apparently SAM is bad to use and I should just call myself aro, but I'm not comfortable dropping the ace part of my identity yet.
To start I wouldn’t necessarily consider someone identifying as aroace as using the SAM, unless they personally identified that way. But for a lot of aroaces (myself included) we tend to see our identity as one identity. Just like say someone who is gay may be both sexually and romantically oriented towards the same gender, I’m oriented towards no one. My sexual and romantic orientations are not separate. So I would definitely bristle at the idea of being told I’m using it for my identity.
But also I don’t see the issue with the SAM. And I’m a little concerned about where that’s that coming from. The fact is that people’s romantic and sexual orientation are not always the same, and this has been observed all the way back to at least the 1800′s. It’s not even something that originated with ace and aro people. I’d look at who’s saying this and question if they’re doing it in good faith.
(I’ve also seen some people who I know mean well but are ignorant post anti-SAM things too, the messaging is strong. But even when they’re only arguing for non a-spec people, it’s still a problem because even non a-spec people may have a split attraction and find that model useful. The only argument I see is people who are not ready to accept being gay or bi may use it to hide or get confused, and frankly that’s a terrible reason to tell people their label is invalid. And I’ve seen that same argument used against ace and aro people, and bi and pan people. Exploring labels and trying on labels before you’re ready for the right one for you is actually quite healthy. It’s much worse to force someone into a label before they’re ready.)
Anyways hopefully that’s helpful. Please identity with what makes you comfortable and describes you how you want to be described. And please be wary of people who identity police.
All the best and good luck!
But even when they’re only arguing for non a-spec people, it’s still a problem because even non a-spec people may have a split attraction and find that model useful.
Bingo. This is not just an intersectional thing between bi/pan romantic and Acepec, and Arospec with bi/pan sexual. Non a-spec people can also have split attractions, experiencing romantic attraction to more than one gender, but only ever experiencing sexual attraction to one gender, or vice versa.
The split attraction model was first introduced in the 1800's.
In our modern understanding, the Split Attraction Model is designed to cover everyone. If someone who is Heteroromantic Heterosexual Allosexual, Homoromantic Homosexual Allosexual, Aromantic Asexual, Biromantic Bisexual Allosexual, etc, I can see why they may not personally use the Split Attraction Model, as one label would cover them, this assumes certain *defaults* which just are not the default for everyone.
Having these separate in the Split Attraction Model helps everyone to fully find, understand, and (when needed) state/explain their identity.
Whether you're Biromantic Asexual, Homoromantic Demisexual, Panromantic Heterosexual Graysexual, Biromantic Homosexual Allosexual, or anything in-between, Split Attraction has you covered.
Identify how you feel comfortable identifying, whether it's with one label or a split label. The Split Attraction Model will always be here for everyone who identities with it.
- Mod K-P