This is Suits Studio, a tailoring company specializing in women’s suits. 

We specialize in suits, but we’re not dressing men.

I’m ALL FOR THIS

HERE. FOR. IT.

yes i am here for naked faceless men as background scenery

@men who are all like “video games and comics are objectifying because the men are strong and muscular!”

no

this is what objectification looks like

not having a face. not being important. just a good looking collection of body parts.

Ryan Coogler vs. Joss Whedon

this is the difference between a director who sees female characters as fully developed people with agency vs a director who just sees female characters as hot, fuckable things

so apparently netflix was seriously gonna go with vanya as the white violin being in a skin-tight spandex suit until ellen page pushed the producers/netflix to not sexually objectify vanya like that……. the power tuxedo was ellen page’s idea…… her MIND

Thank you Ellen

is it time for frank cho and milo manara to die or what

That’s basically a naked woman I’m YELLING

What a pervert. What the FUCK does he not know how clothes work? What the hypothetical fuck is she wearing then if we can see all that?

It’s like how bath towels in comics miraculously wrap completely around breasts. Or how even when injured and dead on the ground women in comics have to be twisted into “sexy” poses. Or how women in comics walk like they’re in high heels even barefoot. 

It’s the only way men know how to draw women, because to them female characters are only there to be sexy. They only think of “women” as exploitative costumes and camera angles, high heels and titillation. Sex objects to ogle, plot objects to further male heroes’ narratives and drama, not heroes to cheer for. 

I’m sorry, I was labouring under the impression that this was the crowd that thought women should wear what they want..?

And that applies to fictional women who are depicted by men how? You can’t apply agency in the plot to something metatextual when it comes to fictional characters. 

Come on, let’s not pretend this is a male exclusive thing.

We’re going to have this argument are we? Not to mention you’re deviating from the original point that attributing agency to fictional characters’ clothing is asinine. 

What you have here are images of power, and do you really believe these characters are designed with titillating heterosexual women and bisexual and homosexual men in mind? Because I don’t think you do.

This is why the Hawkeye Initiative exists. Take common female poses in comics, put a man in the role, and see how “empowering” and “strong” it actually looks: 

Also: 

He got the painting for fighting against ‘censorship.’ Note that they handed him a gross design of a female being objectified, because at the end of the day, that is all they really want, to be allowed to objectify women. They don’t care about censorship in general it is about their ability to sexualise and degrade women without consequence.

You can see her butthole for chrissakes

I think the best imagery I’ve seen to explain the difference between what men think male objectification is vs what women actually want to see is the Hugh Jackman magazine covers.

Hugh Jackman on a men’s magazine. He’s shirtless and buff and angry. He’s imposing and aggressive. This is a male power fantasy, it’s what men want to be and aspire to - intense masculinity.

Hugh Jackman on a women’s magazine.  He looks like a dad. He looks like he’s going to bake me a quiche and sit and watch Game of Thrones with me. He looks like he gives really good hugs.

Men think women want big hulking naked men in loin cloths which is why they always quote He-Man as male objectification - without realizing that He Man is naked and buff in a loin cloth because MEN WANT HIM TO BE. More women would be happy to see him in a pink apron cutting vegetables and singing off-key to 70s rock.

Men want objects. Women want PEOPLE.

This is the first time I have EVER seen this false equivalence articulated so well. Thank you.

“What I didn’t realize, back when I was this twenty-five-year-old pinup for geeks in that me myself and iconic metal bikini, was that I had signed an invisible contract to stay looking the exact same way for the next thirty to forty years. Well, clearly I’ve broken that contract. Partly because, in an effort to keep up my disguise as a human being, I had a child at some point. And then, in an effort to stay sane for said child, I took pounds and pounds of medications that have the dual effect of causing water retention (think ocean, not lake) while also creating a craving for salad—chocolate salad. So yes, in answer to your unexpressed question, sanity does turn out to come at a heavy price.”

Aziz Ansari: Live at Madison Square Garden

Marvel’s First Female Superhero Movie.

Men Stop Threatening To Kill Your Daughters Boyfriends To Prove Your Masculinity and Show That Your Daughter Is Your Property 2k14

Azealia Banks Is Right; Madame Tussauds’ Wax Figure Of Nicki Minaj Is Complete Bullshit

True

Didn’t think of it like this

“ And while you may cry, “Stop nit-picking, it’s just a wax figure,” remember that this will be the permanent representation of one of the strongest black females in pop culture to millions of Tussaud tourists for, uh, forever. This was the pose they determined “represented her best” – the one “iconic” moment they chose to highlight out of millions of others. Not her in any of the other scenes in the video, and not her standing up with a mic, spitting bars and killing it – but her crawling on her hands and knees; the ultimate stance of deference.”

“It’s just ironic that her “Anaconda” video, as an incredible anthem to female sexuality, is being used in this way – and will be, as Banks aptly notes, something people will just use to stick their crotch in for funny photos.”

damn :/

i didnt even think of this like that damn ^

That’s how I felt when I first saw it.

Do NOT See Pixels

Not only is Pixels stupid, crude, and another complete cash-grab by Hollywood, it is downright sexist. One of the villains beamed down is the heroine from Dojo Quest, but in human form instead of the other characters like Donkey Kong or Pac Man (big and pixelated). She is used only as sex appeal (and one of the ONLY female characters in the entire movie) until one of the characters who sexually obsessed over her as a teenager gets to keep her as a LITERAL TROPHY at the end of the movie. Don’t let this movie be successful. Please do not go and see this movie, even ironically. 

INSTEAD YOU SHOULD WATCH THE MOVIEBOB REVIEW ON YOUTUBE, BECAUSE THEN YOU’LL KNOW HOW SHIT IT IS WITH THE ADDED BONUS OF MOVIEBOB’S HILARIOUS INSULTS

Had to attach the video because you have to see this it’s too excellent and so worth your time.

WATCH THE FUCKING VIDEO PLEASE

Tell me again why we don’t need feminism.

The Newsroom on rape 

i’m never leaving my house again, this world is just too fucked up.

WHAT!?

gross gross gross gross gross

Good morning disgusting. Remember ladies:

boosting the fuck out of this

They have this in Continental Midtown in Philly, it’s fucking creepy and not cool at all

the most obvious solution i can think of is to break that motherfucker. what are they going to do? sue you for breaking something they shouldnt have had?

That’s fucking disgusting.

Hey, fellas. You ever feel like you have to check if you’re standing in front of a two-way mirror? Women do.

This needs to be known

how to “pander to sjws / feminists”: in depth characters and storytelling, non objectified female characters, characters of all manners of races, identities and backgrounds

how to pander to gamer boys: make titty wobble

Wow no wonder they don’t want to make games more accessible to women, they’d have to reveal their lack of actual talent.