cmpassionatesoul reblogged
Carlisle is actually a wolf in sheep’s clothing
So, just to clarify vital points demonstrating that Carlisle is a villain, portrayed as a saint and I even get the feelings that he acknowledges how evil he is, yet doesn’t change his racist/unethical shady behaviour from 17th century. Like we have to acknowledge his malicious essence. Feel free to add more please.
- He was born and grew up in 17th century London under a heavy Anglican influence. This had to have immense impact on his persona, even though he tries to deny it or whatever. The idea of morals were absolutely twisted: for example Anglican church was heavily involved in slavery and persecuted any other religions.
- Imperialist behaviour: the fact that they stayed on the Native land is just absolutely ignorant and vile. Devastating the lives of Native people. He took Jacob’s DNA sample!!!!! That’s the most unethical and dehumanising bullshit ever! As a doctor you’re not allowed to do that nor as a human being, you cannot exploit people for your own interest wtf
- Complex of superiority: he literally turned Edward, Esme, Emmett and Rosalie without any kind of consent? That’s just mad.
- Objectification of Rosalie/grooming: again, he thought of her as a potential partner for Edward. Not sure whether that was his sole reason to change her. Legacy perhaps of his old upbringing? Where women had literally 0 rights.
- Attracted to a minor/pedophilic: he literally was attracted to Esme when she was 16. This is questionable since it was Esme who was clearly mesmerised by him, but since the author is Mormon, wouldn’t be surprised. (Ed.)
- Awful morals: He invited racist/Nazi to live with his family. He was somehow able to get blood for Bella from hospital, like wtf mate? You cannot buy so much blood for your daughter in law. The entitlement, seriously.
- He is a billionaire