the eurocentric mind simply cannot fathom the idea that deserts are large carbon sinks, that they are complex ecosystems that host a large amount of life and a life that cannot exist anywhere else. and that is why they think turning deserts green is somehow a good, or feasible idea. a desert is not a wasteland. the dying plants that you plant on top of it because they cannot deal with the heat though? that’s a wasteland!
Wait deserts are effective carbon sinks? I knew a healthy prairie was but how can a desert sequester Carbon they can't sustain that much biomass or bury carbon quickly, cause Rainforest has high Biomass, and Prairies can bury carbon fast because of how prairie grass grows overtop itself but how do deserts sequester Carbon?
Most deserts actually have a lot of vegetation. The sandy deserts are the kind we usually think of, like the Sahara, but most look like this example in Australia:
Desert plants need to have deep roots to reach groundwater reservoirs. Those roots carry carbon deep into the soil, where it reacts with mineral to form calcium carbonate; not only do they sequester carbon, they sequester it in mineral form, where it's much more stable than carbon bound in plant tissues that will decay on a faster time scale!
A lot of carbon storage is done in the fungal networks around plant roots, as well, which are far denser and more extensive than the visible plant biomass on the surface.
i. fuckign thought thid. post was talkinh aboit desserts. the food. why am i so stupif
They also have a lot of carbon in them
Isn't it bad to artificially change any environment? Like, of course we shouldn't be trying to turn deserts into forests, but some areas are getting desert-ified because of human activity and that's the context where I've heard some anti-desert rhetoric?