mouthporn.net
#steven universe – @burningcomputerpersona on Tumblr
Avatar

gonna grow you a place safer than this

@burningcomputerpersona

Currently obsessed with american pop punk band The Wonder Years. This blog is mostly just a collection of things that I'm interested in at the moment, whether it's music or a new fandom or just queer memes in general. I'll probably appear once in a while to reblog a bunch of posts about a new obsession that you didn't follow me for and then vanish off into the unknown again. Current interests include: the wonder years, spanish love songs, hot mulligan, against me, doctor who, etc.
Avatar

the steven universe hate is insane bc people are (or at least were) more upset that fictional war criminals got fictional hugs than they recognize that it singlehandedly advanced queer rep in children's media by lightyears and then straight up ate heavy retaliation for the nerve.

It does have real flaws that are worth discussing, but it also put their male protagonist in dresses and skirts and played it straight and even empowering, they aired a lesbian wedding on television, it was a genuinely queer, genuinely diverse piece of media through and through. It did a lot of real good for the real world.

But also the fictional characters caused fictional harm to other fictional characters, and didn't get an onscreen firing squad sentence. So, you know, it's basically ontologically evil in real life.

Avatar
outofthedeck
Avatar

I was thinking about why Rose Quartz/Pink Diamond is so hated.

The obvious answer is because of the horrible things she did.

But the other diamonds did horrible things too…worse things even.

Pink abandoned Spinel, which is wrong, but Spinel was planning to kill every living thing on Earth to spite the son of a person who was no longer even alive. Yet, no one talks about what a monster Spinel is.

So many Steven Universe characters have hurt people, but we forgive them and are happy to see them redeemed.

So why not Rose?

Then, it hit me: because Rose’s redemption arc is told to us in reverse.

The first time we see Rose is toward the end of her life when she is pregnant with Steven. We see her appreciation for life and how full of love she is for Greg and her future child. She’s willingly sacrificing herself to bring a new life into the world.

But then, we start learning who Rose used to be, all her mistakes, all the people she hurt.

The loving mother in Steven’s video becomes a distant memory.

For those of you who hate Rose, imagine her backstory unfolded a little differently for us.

We’re introduced to Pink Diamond: she’s spoiled, bratty, immature, irresponsible, and inconsiderate.

She throws temper tantrums when she doesn’t get her way.

Not exactly an endearing character, right?

But one day, her tantrum injure Pink Pearl, her best friend. From that day on, she keeps everything to herself. Now we see her dealing with a consequence of her bad behavior.

Then we see how she’s abused by the other diamonds. We start to sympathize with her.

We see her try to save Earth. We see her trying to do the right thing for once.

But it backfires horribly.

She spends the rest of her life trying to fix it, but she can’t.

She meets Greg. Here is where Rose has the most emotional growth as a character. She learns what is truly means to be a “real person.”

Finally, she grows such an appreciation for human life, that she decides to sacrifice her form to bring her son into the world.

The reason Rose is so much more controversial than other characters who have done problematic things is because her story is told in reverse, her redemption comes across as a fall from grace.

But there are plenty of characters who have a fall from grace who are still not as controversial as Rose. The reason why many people are less sympathetic to Rose is because we never see how Rose reacts to her mistakes. We never get much insight into how Rose feels about herself and the things she’s done. We get small hints:

For everyone who hates Rose, I get why. But I think we need to remember who she became instead of who she was.

Avatar
apollo18

I feel like to older fans her arc feels like a betrayal, she was supposed to something for Steven to look up to and aspire to be, and that could never do anything wrong because she was put on such a pedestal where if you implied she was anything other then kind or loving or perfect was blasphemous. 

But she’s a person, people make mistakes, they get hurt and they lash out.

But she’s a person,

people make mistakes, they get

hurt and they lash out.

Beep boop! I look for accidental haiku posts. Sometimes I mess up.

Avatar
lastoneout

Forgive me for the essay but also I think a key part of the hatred is because Steven Universe does something not a lot of stories–and especially not a lot of stories for children–are willing to do; they treat Rose’s death as truly final.

In a lot of stories the dead are never really shown as being truly gone. Which I understand, most humans are kinda hard-wired into believing that the dead are still with us in one way or another, we don’t cope well with the idea that someone can just stop, but that means that not a lot of writers are willing to actually engage with death as something final in their narratives. Not to paraphrase wiser people than I, but Geoff Thew of Mother’s Basement pointed out in one of his critiques of SAO that killing a character is interesting and tricky because it means they are no longer a force that can effect the narrative. Whatever arc they were having is cut short, their relationships cannot progress in a way that isn’t one-sided, they are stuck as who they were when they died and no longer have agency. They are stagnate, frozen in time, unchanging as everything and everyone else changes without them.

So a lot of stories will confirm that the character is “still there” in some way. They will come visit another character in a dream or as a ghost to offer comfort and advice, or it will be hinted/confirmed that they are doing things behind the scenes like protecting living loves ones, they’re still around, just not in the same way the living characters are. And while that can be sweet and wonderful and some stories deploy it in truly masterful ways that make me weep so hard I can’t breathe and live rent free in my head forever…it’s also a bit of a cop-out imo. You don’t have to contend with the massive narrative shift that is having an entire character just stop, you just slide them into a passive state where they can keep going in their own way that’s separate but still present.

Steven Universe does not take that cop-out. Rose is dead. She’s gone, they DRIVE that home time and time again. Everything that was Rose became Steven, and that might mean that she’s essentially reincarnated or whatever, but for all intents and purposes Rose as she was is 100% gone forever and will never be coming back.

That on it’s own is interesting, but then SU does something even smarter; it sets Rose up as the perfect embodiment of all things good and pure and then spends the rest of the show meticulously tearing her back down. We see ALL of Rose’s mistakes come to light, every unkind and messy and hurtful and awful thing she’s done is dragged out in front of our very eyes and ROSE IS NOT THERE TO FIX ANY OF IT. We don’t even get her BEING there to remind us that she was a flawed person with unfathomable power in a horrible situation with no good options trying her hardest to do as much good as she possibly could under the circumstances. All we see now is Rose’s problems. Her flaws. The mistakes she made. And she’s not there to help us pick up the pieces.

Rose probably would apologize to Bismuth and Spinel and Pearl and everyone she ever hurt if she could, we can tell when she was alive she was absolutely drowning in guilt and regret, but she can’t mend those wrongs because she’s dead. She doesn’t get to visit Pearl or Greg in their dreams and beg them to stop hating each other, or release Pearl from her unintentional vow of silence, she can’t apologize to Bismuth or even just TELL anyone where Spinel has been all this time, she cannot explain why she did the things she did to Steven so he can understand her better or get closure or even just tell him that she really did love him more than anything. Rose cannot fix her mistakes, she cannot give anyone closure, she can’t do anything at all.

She’s gone, and all we are left with is the memory and legacy of an imperfect person who tried her best and failed far more than she succeeded but still loved with everything she had.

The closest thing we get to Rose adding her own voice to the story after she’s gone is the tape she leaves for Steven, in which she is the person she became after everything; a kind, flawed gem who loves her family and earth so deeply that she’s willing to die just so her son can have a chance to experience the joy that is being alive. And tbh I wish more people would remember that version of her, and offer her a bit of grace or at least recognition that she did change and mend things as best she could, but still. We can’t ask the tape questions. The tape can’t tell us what Rose would have thought about whatever was going on at the time. The tape cannot beg our forgiveness or express remorse. It’s a snapshot of a brief moment where Rose was free and happy, a reminder that she did love Steven, but it can never replace her.

The show even goes out of it’s way to drive Rose’s absence home, by having Steven TRY to use her room to make her, only to realize he’s still just talking to his perception of who she might have been, not who she actually was. So much of his grief and pain in the show comes from the fact that he cannot talk to the one person he needs to speak to more than anyone because she’s gone, and that’s the point.

Steven Universe is about grief just as much as it’s about love, and that’s something I really appreciate both as a writer and as someone who has lost people I loved dearly.

I think that’s part of the issue. People just don’t get what Rose being dead means, and they hold her to a standard the show is actively working against. We understand that death is not redemption, redemption is a flawed concept in the first place but it requires the person trying to make things right like, actually being alive to make things right. Rose had her redemption arc off screen for the most part, and Steven never got to see it, WE never get to see it outside of flashbacks. We never get to spend a lot of time with post-war but pre-Steven Rose, when she was at her best. We mostly just see her mistakes because those are what’s causing half the problems in the show. We see her in reverse, going from being a goddess of goodness to someone so profoundly flawed it’s hard to even know how to feel about her, and then the show drives home that you just have to learn to live with that.

The show is asking us to accept that Rose was flawed, and has done things that she shouldn’t have as well as things that are probably hard if not impossible to forgive, but that she was good, and she loved so deeply and profoundly that she was willing to fake her death, cut ties with everything she ever knew, go to WAR, and eventually die so her son could live, and she’s gone now.

She’s gone.

Steven Universe really is one of the most realistic and beautiful depictions of death and grief I’ve ever seen and I hate how all of that gets ignored in favor of making Rose out to be a supervillain rather than the flawed yet good person she really was. Y'all have to stop standing at the foot of her statue and demanding she answer for her crimes. She can’t. But we, the characters and the fans, can accept her for who she was flaws and all, let her go, and pick up the pieces ourselves.

That’s the whole point.

Avatar

Okay, but the thing that lion did is so much important to me.

Look.

Here we see our Steven. He’s starting to look at everyone with more and more panic. Did he do something wrong? Did he unintentionally hurt anyone when he was a monster? Why is everyone looking at him? He is so scared and overwhelmed

Everyone is just...looking. Why is everyone looking, what did he do again-

And then all he sees is lion. Steven immediately has all his focus on this pink fluffy beast. Lion knows it’s very hard situation for Steven and he wants him to calm down and he knows it’s not going to be easy with literally everyone staring at him almost crying. So for now, lion asks Steven to focus on someone who isn’t emotionally drained right now. Lion asks to only focus on him.

And Steven does that. He hugs the only thing that is stable and calm enough to let Steven dump all his emotions on it. Steven is so tired. He needed that hug. He needed lion and no one else.

And that’s why having a pet in your life is so important and amazing 🦁

Best emotional support pet lion ever

Avatar
Avatar
penny-anna

Before Steven was born Amethyst used to say ‘fuck’ all the time & so when he was a baby Greg had to sit her down and explain that she has to stop swearing around Steven because he’s young & impressionable

So Amethyst is like “but that’s my favourite word, when will be stop being young & impressionable so I can say it again??”

And Greg is like “uhh I don’t know, 15 I guess? 15 is probably old enough” 

“Got it”

flash forward to Steven’s fifteenth birthday and he is woken at dawn by Amethyst yelling “wake the FUCK up Steven it’s FUCKING TIME”

& he spends the entire day losing his mind

Steven: w-what’s happening

Garnet: *deadpan* Amethyst just got her favourite word back

Amethyst: *running around the house* FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK

Greg: what’s going on

Amethyst: you said once Steven was 15 I could say fuck again

Greg, who only hazily recalls the conversation in question: ……i DID?

Amethyst: *runs outside* FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK *distant sounds of spooked birds*

Pearl: Steven the *whispering* F-word is a bad word that Amethyst USED to say before-

Steven: I know what fuck means Pearl

Amethyst: *stopping dead in her tracks* WHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATT??

Pearl: who taught you that word mister!!

Steven: um… Lars and Sadie… *mumbling* five years ago…

Amethyst: I’ve been denying myself my favourite word for FIVE YEARS for NOTHING??

Greg: uh even if he knows what it means it’s still not really appropriate for you t-

Amethyst: *running outside* FFFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCCCK

Steven: …

Greg: …

Pearl: …

Garnet: …*quietly* fuck

Everyone else: O_O

Garnet: what. I missed it too

also Amethyst made a banner that says HAPPY FUCKING BIRTHDAY STEVEN in very large writing

Connie: what’s going on

Steven: Amethyst is allowed to say fuck now

Connie: oh! are we all allowed to say fuck now??

Greg & Pearl in unison: NO!!

Peridot: what’s fuck

I love this XD

Avatar

steven universe gets a lot of shit and ive only seen one season so who am i to say? maybe it deserves it.

but today i was babysitting a little girl for the first time and she asked me the question i fear the most “are you a boy or a girl?” i launched into the usual “y’know im not really any of those” and was prepared for the worst but she just nodded and said “so youre like stevonnie!” and immediately moved on.

so like. thank u miss rebecca sugar i owe you my life ma’am.

This is awesome

Avatar

When someone toxic needs a friend

I just wanna add a little personal reflection to the discussion of Spinel’s treatment in Steven Universe: The Movie.

A few signposts so you know where I’m starting with this:

A criticism I’ve seen: 

Steven was not particularly warm to Spinel. He did not hug her. He did not offer to be her friend. He spoke carelessly and triggered her toward becoming murderous again. He only cared about what she could do for him.

A perspective I’ve seen: 

LOTS of people with borderline personality disorder or strong feelings about abandonment personally relate to Spinel and are critical of Steven from this perspective.

Rebecca Sugar’s commentary on Spinel:

The thing about Spinel is that she’s a really toxic person. 
She’s so toxic that she’s literally trying to poison people. 
In my interactions with friends who have had a history difficult enough to make it hard for them to trust other people and sometimes even actively want to hurt others, it’s just a very difficult situation to navigate. In the case of Spinel and all of these characters, that’s extremely exaggerated because cartoons have the ability to be extreme exaggerations. I wanted to explore what it’s like when you’re trying to help someone who really doesn’t want to help themselves, who wants to embody the negative feelings that they have about themselves. I think that’s something really real. I hadn’t seen that in a cartoon before. 
Spinel, unlike many other characters, actually has the goal of hurting people, which is new territory for the show. She really wants to hurt Steven, and there’s a reason that she does—because she’s in so much pain. I just wanted to explore all the dimensions of that.
I also think Steven has his way of trying to handle and dissolve conflict. It’s not necessarily a good way for him to handle this situation. It really leaves him in a difficult state, and I think what I wanted to show in the way that they interact is that at a certain point, when you can’t help someone, you have to be able to protect yourself. 
Ultimately, he can’t really convince her to change. It’s something she’ll have to want for herself. But what he can do is protect himself from her, making it impossible for her to hurt him. 
It’s sort of up to you if you would like to love her. If you watch this movie and she, you know, frustrates you, that is totally fair. I want that to be a big part of who she is.

So here are a few things I want to shed light on.

It’s very interesting that Rebecca intended Spinel to be read as “a toxic person” because so many fans fell in love with her, said they’d be her friend, hated intensely on Pink Diamond because of what she did to abandon the poor Gem, and sympathized with her directly. But Rebecca was looking at Spinel from Steven’s perspective. And that’s also what I did.

I’ve been Steven. I have VERY much been Steven.

When you meet someone who was done dirty, when you recognize the horror they’ve been through, when you see how much pain they are in and agree they have the right to be angry, it’s natural for empathetic people to offer themselves as comfort.

But when you’re Steven, you also know it isn’t YOUR fault either. Before you have the ability and experience to set boundaries, you can get sucked into other people’s stormy waters and think you’re helping if you drown in solidarity with them. What’s really important to preserving yourself is learning that you can stand on the boat and toss a life preserver. That it doesn’t ACTUALLY HELP to jump in the water and sink with them.

Some folks are angry that Steven didn’t jump right into sacrifice himself on the altar of friendship in the service of an intense, literally murderous stranger who tried to poison him and his planet and lash out at his friends, robbing them of their rich pasts and their relationships because all of it hurt HER so much. It is SO easy to understand WHY SPINEL WAS ANGRY. But nothing she was doing to Steven, his friends, or the Earth was going to fix her problems, and furthermore, she FULLY UNDERSTOOD that it was NOT THE FAULT of any of the people she took her anger out on. It was irrational, yes, and that is part of her dysfunction. But also, in these situations, what helps explain it still does not excuse it.

Some have railed at Steven saying he somehow forgave genocidal tyrants like the Diamonds but couldn’t be friends with a damaged Gem like Spinel who just wanted friendship. The big difference there is that Steven got involved with the Diamonds when both parties believed he was a different person. The Diamonds believed he was the lost Pink Diamond, and Steven has also spent much of his superhero life believing he WAS his mother and was therefore obligated to accept punishment for her crimes or to clean up the messes she made. Now that he knows he is not her and that she did some pretty horrible stuff, he also wants the right to stop feeling responsible for every person Pink hurt in the entire region of space.

Steven gave Spinel basically compassionate treatment. He did not abuse her. He did not insult her. He occasionally coddled her when it seemed important (and though some said he was too businesslike while he pursued his mission, he was literally looking at the world ending within two days if he didn’t solve the problem). And most importantly … .

He let her leave the garden.

Spinel stayed in the garden all those millennia because Pink Diamond told her they were playing a game. All that time, she had visions of Pink returning so she could see her smile, hear her laughter. We see a sequence where she tried to follow Pink out of the garden and Pink manipulated her into staying willingly. We watch those feet leaving and one pair of feet staying behind. We see Pink disappear.

When Steven goes to leave the garden, Spinel follows in the same manner. Some have criticized him for letting go of her hands.

But he invited her out of the garden. He didn’t say stay. He said come with me.

As he sang about her deserving someone better, he was sincere. But he did not say the person to make her feel found should be him. He did not want to take on another person with thousands of years of baggage who would require a specific brand of attention and so much tenderness to avoid snapping. He did not allow her to be held by the hand and led out. He recognized that she needed encouragement to leave this place because of what was done to her, but he wanted her to take the steps.

Compassionate people are crushed all the time under the weight of needy people who make it hurt to love. People like Steven can acknowledge that Spinel deserves love and deserves to be happy without accepting that it’s heartless to stop short of personally doing it. Especially when you literally have to take physical, mental, and emotional damage as a general consequence of offering support and counseling. It is sometimes just beyond what you can do.

I made the mistake several times of getting very close to someone who treated me poorly while taking comfort in my presence. I cared that they were hurt and I didn’t know how to say “You deserve love” without stepping in and loving them. In EVERY case I was involved with, the person went from initially grateful to “why don’t you help me more?” shockingly quickly, and two of them deliberately tried to create situations where I would be trapped with them and isolated from others. 

I could get very personal here but I don’t think I need to. Those of us who relate all too well to Steven wanting to help others will have been in this situation. Your heart hurts for people who live with pain that has never touched you, but when they’ve made it clear with one of their first actions that they feel satisfied at the idea of ruining your life, trusting them could mean the end of you. Especially if they demand that you risk life and limb to fix and save them before you’d dare to call it love, and especially if they want to be fixed without feeling responsible for initiating any of it. Some people mistake suffering for working hard toward a goal. Both can hurt but only one is constructive. If I’m expected to spend extensive resources on someone, I need some partnership in the goal, and I can’t accomplish that with someone whose wish for companionship manifests as “I want you to feel as bad as I do, and will take steps to hurt you so I have someone to cry with.”

Steven risked his actual life while he didn’t have powers so he could go talk to Spinel, and he wouldn’t fight her when she wanted to fight. He protected himself while she spent her anger. He STILL put himself in the line of fire far more than a less compassionate person would. He took time and tenderness to listen to her story and sympathize with her, tell her she deserved better, bear witness to what she’d become after being treated like a discarded plaything, and bring her hope with promises of a new future and a way to feel found.

Sadly, Spinel flipped back to being murderous at the first sign that Steven might be about to prioritize someone other than her, reframing his reasonable needs as if he was planning to abandon her, isolate her, discard her. This was a trauma reaction, yes, and she isn’t entirely to blame for being upset because she was worried she was just being used and none of her actions were logically thought through. 

But does someone ever “deserve” the friendship of a specific person who can’t feel warm toward them because of their OWN bad experiences? 

No! 

Steven has a big heart but he has his very own huge storehouse of trauma, and being physically attacked with his family and planet put in danger over the actions of his mother is at the top of the list. Instead of assuming that the person who has trauma the loudest is the most hurt, can’t we just acknowledge that Spinel’s and Steven’s respective traumas make them NOT the best match for friendship?

The ending of the movie, with Spinel going off with the Diamonds, might seem a little disturbing with all the codepencency floating around there, but if you want to talk about compassion, I think this is a good place for Spinel to start. 

She just wanted to make Pink Diamond laugh and enjoy her life. She longed to do that for so long and then it all ended when she found out she would NEVER GET TO DO IT. I think bonding with the other Diamonds and having a familiar, safe place to experience the kind of love she’s used to will be a good FOUNDATION for building herself into a person beyond that. For now, she needs comfort. I hope they treat her well.

This is basically the much more spelled out version of what I’ve been saying.

Spinel has trauma that is incompatible with being friends - really friends- with Steven right now, and Steven doesn’t need to wreck himself for her. ESPECIALLY considering he’s still just a kid what is wrong with people.

I love Spinel but she needs something Steven can’t give her.

 … . also like:

1. “You have to prioritize me, accept all my interpretations of your actions, never ever let me think you love someone more than me, even if I actively and directly hurt, attack and harm you, because We Have A Relationship, and you doing otherwise means you’re a horrible person” is literally abuser-logic and an active, common abuse tactic.

It doesn’t stop being abuser-logic and an abuse tactic because the person doing it is sweet-looking or female-presenting, or because the abused person is male-presenting, or because you feel REALLY SORRY for bad things the abuser has gone through. That’s just flat out what it is.

There isn’t a Nice Bright Clear Line between People Who Have Suffered Trauma And Deserve Healing and People Who Are Abusing Others. That Venn diagram overlaps like a MOTHERFUCKER. And no that doesn’t mean “if you have suffered abuse and trauma you are DESTINED!!!! AND DOOOMED!!!! TO BE AN ABUSIVE BASTARD!” because that’s also ridiculous and untrue.

However: being a victim of abuse and a survivor of trauma does not automatically guarantee you won’t abuse other people. “I was traumatized” does not make abuse not abuse. Even “I was traumatized by someone who REALLY RESEMBLES YOU/IS OF THE SAME GROUP AS YOU/IS RELATED TO YOU” does not make abuse not abuse.

Is there a complicated space to negotiate, as a human being, where yes there is a difference in a fundamental way between “bad things done because trauma has broken a brain” and “bad things done out of malice and negligence”? Yeah, sure. It is actually different, although even that difference can get quite complicated.

But that space does not simplify to “so we let that person with trauma get away with anything they want, and anyone who does not supply their emotional needs or who protects themselves is Evil and Selfish and Cold.” Because that’s fucking bullshit.

Now this is not a NEW thread in fandom takes, mind you: “well they have TRAUMA so anything they do is forgivable and anything other than total understanding and support and forgiveness and love and admiration from other characters is those characters being TERRIBLE!” has been around my entire fannish life and I’m (terrifyingly) what counts as An Old these days, and I know it predates that.

It’s what soured me on “redemption arcs” for characters who’ve killed, assaulted, injured, raped, murdered, mass murdered, committed genocide, and then suddenly everyone’s supposed to love and support them. It’s what absolutely flat ruined Thor: Ragnarok for me, because “but Loki has ~*trauma*~ so it’s totally understandable that he’d get the guards around the Casket of Winters murdered, lie to his adopted brother to obtain power, then try to kill same along with who knows how much collateral of sapient beings, and then attempt to literally obliterate and genocide an entire race out of the universe, and anyone who doesn’t want to see him One Of The Heroes with all sins forgotten is just ~*mean*~” has been around for just short of a decade now and then apparently we’re just gonna … make that canon?

Not that I’m bitter.*

2. I mean, I am gonna totally get personal here:

- growing up I fully accepted the idea that Good Friends Would Literally Do Anything For Each Other, and that ANY emotional, behavioural or self-protective boundaries meant you were A Bad Friend. This signed me up for roughly ten years of deeply abusive and toxic friendships and nearly got me killed.

- I have watched the same thing happen to others and watched one or two people rip their way across friendship after friendship leaving behind significant collateral damage and still be very sure that it’s all about the other people being mean, or abandoning them, or whatever.

- it’s amazing how stuff that we DO know is Abuser Logic as long as it comes from an apparent cis male ends up with people claiming it’s very fair or whatever when it comes from someone who isn’t. This doesn’t mean that it ISN’T abuser-logic from guys: it is, and to be entirely fair it has taken us DECADES OF WORK to get to the point where even, say, mainstream agony aunts go “okay no the fact that he is Very Sad And Traumatized does not excuse the fact that he flipped his lid and attacked you when he thought you were going to leave him, get out, and don’t let him know where you’re going.”

But that doesn’t stop fucking being true because the categories of the person doing it also change. And for that matter, the abuser doesn’t stop having trauma because they belong to a category we recognize as prone to trying this bullshit. That’s not how this works.

- it took me fifteen years to stop having residual guilt for protecting myself from people who, when literally all I did was cut contact and try to go on with my own life, stalked me for several years and did their level best to poison everything about my life they could get their hands on (which wasn’t much, because by that point I really withdrew) because the fact that I didn’t stick around and continue to accept their abuse meant I Was A Bad Friend, and the fact that I did indeed know they had (probably still have) genuine trauma that informs their actions meant that I was A Selfish Ablist Hater for drawing the lines and calling shit where I saw it. So, you know. Fuuuck that shit.

3. I think this is the important one for me, in case anyone reading needs to hear this: you don’t have to stay friends with someone who harms you. You don’t have to become friends with someone who harms you, and you don’t have to stay friends with someone who harms you.

All we actually “owe” each other is to behave decently, to regulate our own behaviour, do act as ethically as we know how to in any given moment, and to act without malice. So no, you shouldn’t (say) as you’re leaving that friendship spend a bunch of time attacking the other person and trying to ruin any other relationships they have and Make Them Feel Terrible: that’s not being decent.

And sure, you should be aware that they will have their own perspective on what happened, and they get to have their own reaction to that, and if you discuss shit publicly they also get to discuss shit publicly, so maybe consider these aspects in how you remove yourself from the relationship.

But if you’re suffering harm, it’s fair to get out of that relationship, that interaction, merely because it’s harming you. That’s all that’s needed. Do so as simply and civilly as possible, preemptively remove their ways of interacting with you, and move to a place you can start healing.

That doesn’t mean you’re “a bad friend”. It doesn’t mean you’re not a compassionate person. You’re not required to set yourself on fire to keep someone else warm.

Not even if that other person is [another girl/also queer/also a survivor of trauma/whatever]. You are not required to set yourself on fire to keep someone else warm. And that goes for every kind of relationship: romantic, platonic, familial, whatever.

*nb: I love villainous characters; I also love complex and questionable characters; some of my heart’s darlings are in fact absolute vicious clusterfucks who any number of people have EVERY REASON to want to see dead; that’s not what the ‘verse did with THAT plotline. This is not me going “you’re only allowed to love ~*good*~ characters” because that’s absurd. It’s “it’s kinda suspect to actually rewrite how reality and basic ethics work to argue that being a genocidal mass murderer is okay if your brother’s friends made fun of you and your parents lied about you being adopted.”

This!!!

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net