not to be emotional on main but fanfiction is a gift and it’s so fundamentally human to tell each other stories and i am deeply grateful to have that in my life. thank you all for adding so much emotion and meaning to the world with your words
people in fanfiction are so good at identifying v specific smells. I literally struggle to identify vanilla when I’m sniffing a candle labelled “VANILLA” how are these kids getting woodsmoke, rain, mint, and a whiff of byronic despair from a fuckin tshirt
Once I read a fic where they were like “he tasted like” and I’m expecting the typical formula (1 cooking ingredient + 1 natural phenomenon + “something uniquely [character name]”) but instead they said “he tasted like mouth” and it was one of the greatest fic moments of my life
click and drag to find out what your shitty fanfiction kiss tastes like
*if ur on moble screenshot it
writing original ficton is so frustrating when you also write fanfiction. I finished a few short-stories these last few months but where's kudos? where's comments? where is reviewer going "dfhgjkdfjgfdgj???????"?
It just sits there.
*pokes story with a stick*
Do you ever think you'll stop drawing fanart? No offense it just seems like the kind of thing you're supposed to grow out of. I'm just curious what your plans/goals are since it isn't exactly an art form that people take seriously.
Ah, fanart. Also known as the art that girls make.
Sad, immature girls no one takes seriously. Girls who are taught that it’s shameful to be excited or passionate about anything, that it’s pathetic to gush about what attracts them, that it’s wrong to be a geek, that they should feel embarrassed about having a crush, that they’re not allowed to gaze or stare or wish or desire. Girls who need to grow out of it.
That’s the art you mean, right?
Because in my experience, when grown men make it, nobody calls it fanart. They just call it art. And everyone takes it very seriously.
It’s interesting though — the culture of shame surrounding adult women and fandom. Even within fandom it’s heavily internalized: unsurprisingly, mind, given that fandom is largely comprised by young girls and, unfortunately, our culture runs on ensuring young girls internalize *all* messages no matter how toxic. But here’s another way of thinking about it.
Sports is a fandom. It requires zealous attention to “seasons,” knowledge of details considered obscure to those not involved in that fandom, unbelievable amounts of merchandise, and even “fanfic” in the form of fantasy teams. But this is a masculine-coded fandom. And as such, it’s encouraged - built into our economy! Have you *seen* Dish network’s “ultimate fan” advertisements, which literally base selling of a product around the normalization of all consuming (male) obsession? Or the very existence of sports bars, built around the link between fans and community enjoyment and analysis. Sport fandom is so ingrained in our culture that major events are treated like holidays (my gym closes for the Super Bowl) — and can you imagine being laughed at for admitting you didn’t know the difference between Supernatural and The X Files the way you might if you admit you don’t know the rules of football vs baseball, or basketball?
“Fandom” is not childish but we live in a culture that commodified women’s time in such away that their hobbies have to be “frivolous,” because “mature” women’s interests are supposed to be marriage, family, and overall care taking: things that allow others to continue their own special interests, while leaving women without a space of their own.
So think about what you’re actually saying when you call someone “too old” for fandom. Because you’re suggesting they are “too old” for a consuming hobby, and I challenge you to answer — what do you think they should be doing instead?
This whole modern approach is also seriously undermining just how important fanfiction is - from a historical standpoint.
The concept of fanfiction formed and forged the earliest stages of literature in Europe. Because the majority of authors in France, Germany and Great Britain looked at that funky little Celtic dude Arthur and thought “hey, he’s neat. I wanna write about him”.
The entire concept of a book outside of religious purposes was born out of fanfiction in my country.
There is no “first canon” for Arthur where he came as the prince of Camelot, with his sidekicks Lancelot and Merlin and his endgame love interest Gwen.
Arthur was some random hunter when he started out.
Someone’s fanfiction made him a prince.
Someone else’s fanfiction gave him a round table.
Someone else’s fanfiction gave him Merlin at his side.
Someone else’s fanfiction gave him Morgana, gave him Gwen, gave him his swords.
And, to this day, we still write Arthurian fanfiction. Literally last year there was a movie adaptation that is, by all intends and purposes, fanfiction, because it wasn’t even close to a literal adaptation of the source material (The Kid Who Would Be King). Heck, BBC’s Merlin, itself an Arthurian fanfiction, remains one of the biggest fandoms that people today write for on AO3.
You were a joke in the middle ages if you tried to write your own stuff. Who’s interested in your stuff? You were only a respected author if you wrote fanfiction. The most famous medieval German authors are famous because they wrote fanfiction about some knightly OCs they created who served on Arthur’s court. That is the literary legacy of the middle ages. Arthurian fanfiction.
Yet somewhere along the way, this concept of “I find x story/element cool and want to elaborate on it more, shift the focus onto an aspect of this original source material” has gotten this “eh, it’s fanfiction” connotation and lost respect.
Even though this very concept is still being used - even outside of the actual medium of fanfiction - and it is still being used for the very same purpose it was used for in medieval times. Original movies often don’t get as much recognition as adaptations of existing source material that the audience is familiar with. People see a movie about a character they’re familiar with and seem more inclined to buy a ticket to see the 10th new interpretation of Batman or Superman or Snow White. How are these new interpretations of familiar source material that usually add to the lore, reinterpret characterizations and dynamics, any different from fanfiction?
But heaven forbid we call The Dark Knight Nolan’s Batman fanfiction. No, fanfiction is that silly thing that we can’t take seriously, but that new Joker movie, that however is high-end art.
SO IMPORTANT
This. Fanfiction is variations on an existing theme, simultaneously making use of and satisfying people’s existing love for a story that they’re happy to consume more of, and cultivating the synergy between an existing story/mythos and a new author who, in interacting with characters they’d never have created themselves, creates something that neither they nor any of the story’s previous tellers could have made all by themselves.
Fanfiction is the new whole being greater than the sum of its parts, and fanfiction is the story being made limitless, retelling by retelling, and it is wonderful.
It’s also worth noting that Batman himself only came into being because of The Scarlet Pimpernel, a series of books about an extravagantly rich foppish playboy by day, daring hero in disguise by night (I mean, loosely. He also fopped by night and heroed by day, but you get my drift). Written by a woman no less.
Batman is a transformative work with a modernised crime-fighting SP but also borrowing strongly from earlier comic books, and yet it is seen as definitive.
Coming back here to say that I think the derision for fanart also has some of its roots in our capitalist hellscape.
It’s the age old “If thing not make you money, why you care about thing?” that’s so prevalent in the system. Of course some people do make money with their fanart, but I think that is still part of the scorn.
It’s supposed to be something you do not just for fun, but for practice, people like this think. Once you’re good at it, you can drop it and make money by focusing on your OCs and original work!
**smashes reblog**
Couldn’t agree more. Fan art and fic are absolutely valid. We really need to stop putting an age limit on fun as well!
Funnily enough, my Mum sent me this just today. It was in the front of the Doctor Who book she’d just purchased. (My Mum’s in her 70btw… tell her she’s too old for fandom, I dare you…)
Fandom, fanart, and fanfiction is for everyone. No, it isn’t something you “have” to grow out of. If it brings you joy, then who cares?
Always reblog
we’ve all clicked on a fic out of morbid curiosity before
and sometimes we even liked it
Sheenagh Pugh, The Democratic Genre: Fan Fiction in a Literary Context, p. 219 (via nihilistelektra)
So I’m on AO3 and I see a lot of people who put “I do not own [insert fandom here]” before their story.
Like, I came on this site to read FAN fiction. This is a FAN fiction site. I’m fully aware that you don’t own the fandom or the characters. That’s why it’s called FAN FICTION.
Oh you youngins… How quickly they forget.
Back in the day, before fan fiction was mainstream and even encouraged by creators… This was your “please don’t sue me, I’m poor and just here for a good time” plea.
Cause guess what? That shit used to happen.
how soon they forget ann rice’s lawyers.
What happened with her lawyers.
History became legend. Legend became myth…. And some things that should not have been forgotten were lost.
I worked with one of the women that got contacted by Rice’s lawyers. Scared the hell out of her and she never touched fandom again. The first time I saw a commission post on tumblr for fanart, I was shocked.
One of the reasons I fell out of love with her writing was her treatment of the fans… (that and the opening chapter of Lasher gave me such heebie-jeebies with the whole underage sex thing I felt unclean just reading it.)
I have zero problem with fanart/fic so long as the creators aren’t making money off of it. It is someone else’s intellectual property and people who create fan related works need to respect that (and a solid 98% of them do.)
The remaining 2% are either easily swayed by being gently prompted to not cash in on someone else’s IP. Or they DGAF… and they are the ones who will eventually land themselves in hot water. Either way: this isn’t much of an excuse to persecute your entire fanbase.
But Anne Rice went off the deep end with this stuff by actively attacking people who were expressing their love for her work and were not profiteering from it.
The Vampire Chronicles was a dangerous fandom to be in back in the day. Most of the works I read/saw were hidden away in the dark recesses of the internet and covered by disclaimers (a lot of them reading like thoroughly researched legal documents.)
And woe betide anyone who was into shipping anyone with ANYONE in that fandom. You were most at risk, it seemed, if your vision of the characters deviated from the creators ‘original intentions.’ (Hypocritical of a woman who made most of her living writing erotica.)
Imagine getting sued over a headcanon…
Put simply: we all lived in fear of her team of highly paid lawyers descending from the heavens and taking us to court over a slashfic less than 500 words long.
all of this
Reblogging because I can’t believe there are people out there who don’t know the story behind fan fiction disclaimers.
Reblogging because I CAN believe there are people out there who don’t know the story behind fan-fiction disclaimers
FanFiction respects the expressed wishes of the following authors/publishers and will not archive entries based on their work:
- Anne Rice
- Archie comics
- Dennis L. McKiernan
- Irene Radford
- J.R. Ward
- Laurell K. Hamilton
- Nora Roberts/J.D. Robb
- P.N. Elrod
- Raymond Feist
- Robin Hobb
- Robin McKinley
- Terry Goodkind
And don’t forget Rowling’s cease-and-desist orders to sites with sexually explicit Potterverse stories featuring underage Potterverse characters (or weird pairings, like Harry Potter/Crookshanks (Hermione’s half-Kneazle pet cat, for those not in the fandom). And does anyone else remember Another Hope? Or all of these cease-and-desist letters (recorded in Fanlore.org)?
Disclaimers existed for a damned good reason.
I’m reading Don Quixote for my world literature class and apparently when it was first published in 1605 it was world-changingly popular, one of the first “popular novels” as we know it today, and there were all sorts of people who were writing and publishing their own unofficial fan-sequels to Don Quixote which was basically the first fan-fiction, and then in 1615 the original author wrote an official sequel in which Don Quixote reads a piece of fanfic about him and sets out on a quest to beat up the author who mischaracterized him
This is all true. What happened more specifically is that one fan fiction got really really popular and since people weren’t all that familiar with how novels worked (because there weren’t really any other novels in Europe yet), a lot of people just took this as a valid sequel. Cervantes (the original author) had pretty much stopped working on any kind of sequel to the original at point, but he got really pissed that people were reading this fan fic and assuming it was as legit as his canon. So he got off his butt and wrote this sequel, which academics call big words like “meta-textual” when really it was Cervantes trying to make sure people understood his canon correctly and didn’t get carried away with their silly fan theories based on this one fic writer’s interpretation. Now-a-days, the “true sequel” is normally just lumped in and stuck onto the end as a “part II,” in case you are wondering why you’ve never heard of a Don Quixote the Sequel. By all accounts, the fan fic was pretty bad, which makes it’s a perfect beginning to the grand tradition of fanfiction. Calling this the first instance of fanfiction, though, comes from the fact that this was the first time, as far as we know, that the author of the original stepped in to officially denounce fan work as not canon. For most of history (at least western history) there wasn’t really an idea that stories had ownership. Most famous greek plays and poems are based on other works. Virgil’s Aeneid can easily be called Homer fan fiction (we have no real way of knowing how much of the story existed in folk tradition and how much he made up). Most of the versions of greek myths you know come from Ovid’s Metamorphosis, which is largely his short fics about other myths. Moving out of the classical world, bible fic constitutes a lot of what literature is for a while. Dante’s Inferno, specifically, (which is, lets be clear, a self insert fic where the author meets his fave author - so it’s also RPF - and they take a tour through a crossover fic between the Bible, historical fic, and greek myth) was so popular that it’s kind of crossed over into fanon (quick - biblically how many cicles does Hell have? Answer: none, they all come from Dante and in turn Virgil, and eventually Homer…) On the run up to Don Quixote, we have Shakespeare, who adapted most of his plays directly from other works by other people, from which he asked no permission (nor was he expected to.) The real move that makes this false sequel the first official fan fiction is that the author of the canon material asserted his ownership of the intellectual property that was the characters and the story. Not in the legal sense - there was nothing illegal about this sequel - but in the sense that you could call this sequel “unauthorized.” It’s the beginning of thinking of characters and stories as belonging to a specific person, rather than simply being created by said person.
I can’t wait for the days where scholarship has to muddle through ff.net and ao3 pseudonyms like “guys, I have evidence to believe that starfucker69 was a pseudonym for one of our landmark literary figures of the 21st century and that they in fact first began their writing career with filthy sinful Steggy smut.”
As an academic and a fan I both want and fucking dread this day because academics trying to tackle things like A/B/O, magic!cock, g!p, mpreg, rule 63, sex pollen like… the language academia is going to have to invent my god
future thesis: bottomdean89’s famously kudos'ed story, “A Knot to Remember,” operates at first under the conventions of the A/B/O genre, using omega heat sickness as its primary device for doing so, but in chapter 14, bottomdean89 clearly introduces the fuck or die trope to create a dialectic through which the ultimate theme of soulmates is realized
Future rebuttal: The secondary gender genre of alternate universe fanworks (colloquially referred to as “A/B/O” or “omgeaverse”) has, at its heart, an amalgamation of conventions and tropes, including chemical compulsion to copulate (”sex pollen”), coital tying (”knotting”), impregnation of those whose primary gender is considered to be male (”mpreg”), survival dependent on coitus (”fuck or die”), and metaphysical connection (”soulmates”). Rather than changing genres in chapter 14, bottomean89 merely shifts the focus from one element of the genre to another. This not only maintains thematic consistency–a predominant trait of bottomdean89′s future works–it also unites the chemical compulsion to copulate convention with the survival dependent on coitus convention in a way that is unique to the secondary gender genre. After all, the chemical compulsion of secondary gender reproductive cycle syndrome (”heat sickness”) is, at its epitome, a biological imperative, and should the characters fail to heed it, propagation of the species will not result, which can be considered a type of “death.” Additionally, situational risks to the character experiencing secondary gender reproductive cycle syndrome–such as dehydration, disorientation, hormonal fluctuations, and suggestibility–can lead to the character’s actual physical death, should they not be handled properly by a competent inseminating partner. In short, one of the primary hallmarks of the secondary gender genre is the fusion and unification of the chemical compulsion to copulate convention and the survival dependent on coitus convention, something which bottomdean89 illustrates with great skill in “A Knot to Remember,” and which allows for the ultimate metaphysical connection between the characters.
Your analysis is on point.
Issues in Slash Fandom
So a grad school classmate asked if I had sources she could cite about the abundance of queer voices in slash fandom, and I went a little overboard… But then I realized that this would make for a kinda decent masterpost that I can refer back to, so I just went with it X-D
Collection of the results of many small surveys:
Masterpost for the largest, most comprehensive survey to date:
And of course, this is all set within a larger, multifaceted social context that doesn’t revolve around that sort of quantitative data anyway:
- What “slash” even is (and who gets to define it), in light of the complex relationship between straight women and queer men where one side has straight privilege, and the other has male privilege
- Why slash is important to queer fans, and intra-slash fandom disputes over its relationship with mainstream representation (here’s my no-holds-barred take on that question, fwiw…)
- Society’s overall denigration of women-dominated activities and social spaces, and misogyny disingenuously presented as “defense” of queer men
- The differences in how queer men are alternatively vilified or erased, while queer women are alternatively fetishized or erased (and the intrinsic intersectionality involved in how society treats women’s sexuality overall), and how this affects queer representation in the media (e.g. see slide 5 – labeled “3”; see also the larger context for those slides)
- Bi-erasure, and how it comes into play in intra-community conversations about gay vs. bi representation
- The question of how much the focus on male/male relationships, and the oftentimes corresponding less-than-positive response to straight love interests in the source texts, is due to internalized misogyny vs. frustration with heteronormativity and queer erasure. And also, how systemic misogyny too often makes the source texts’ women characters less developed and compelling in the first place (or put the other way around, how mainstream media’s well-developed characters and relationships are overwhelmingly male)
- Criticism of the overwhelming dominance of white men in slash, and questions about to what extent that’s the fandom’s fault vs. secondary to how white cis men dominate the pool of well-developed characters that are available for fans to interact with in the first place
And oh man, that’s not even getting into the cultural value of fanfic overall [1][2][3][4 - nsfw; gifset version], slash AUs set in societies with gender roles that are not based on being male or female (a double-edged sword, since it highlights the arbitrary nature and social construction of gender roles on one hand, but potentially erases women from the very discussion of sexism on the other), not to mention the intersection between such AUs and trans issues… But now I’m getting way, WAY off topic from what you asked about!
But, yeah, it’s one of those things that starts out seeming like a relatively small sub-facet of one particular sub-culture, but turns out to be interconnected with pretty much EVERYTHING! And as you can tell, once I start talking about this stuff I tend to get way too excited and forget to shut up X-D
…I don’t know the extent of her prior fandom experience, so I figured I’d play it safe and not outright introduce her to BDSM and omegaverse AUs unless she asks for clarification on that point lol
But really, who was the first person to take two characters from a fandom and be like
“Yeah, right, but get this; what if one of them is a barista,”
this NSYNC fic was written like pre-2001 and is either the first or one of the first coffee shop-type fics, the more u know
important history lesson
the more important question is how is angelfire even still alive
How does reading about the same two fuckers falling in love over and over again make a person so goddamn happy.
Seanan McGuire, “Let’s Talk About Fanfic.”
(hat tip to kassrachel for the link!)