charles xavier meeting scott summers
that overwatch-support feel when the other support isn’t doing any healing.
people comparing scott and chris and calling them both bad fathers/husbands is so funny like...scott was in manhattan for like a month before he went back to alaska? CHRIS WAS IN SPACE FOR FOURTEEN YEARS. THAT MAN WAS NEVER GONNA COME BACK
Scott was a great father once he realized Sinister’s plot. It was a matter of getting over the programming of both maddie and sinister, and finally having jean back in his life. he was a good father, even to the point of sacrificing his son so that he could live a better life than what he could provide after the techno-virus invaded the child’s body.
people love to pull up scott leaving alaska as him being a bad husband/father while making it clear they never actually read those moments; never read the context, never read maddie’s ultimatum, never read the misunderstanding and tragedy there.
scott’s a perfectly fine husband/father. but he’s also human, very fucked up, and not getting therapy.
Check my Patreon out if you’d like to support the comic, even a little bit helps. Or just to check out the reward tiers, there’s some neat bonus stuff and I tried to make them fun: https://www.patreon.com/waitingforthet
This might be the funniest line in the entire script
All I wanted to do was change the world. To see my children grow up to be something other than time-traveling freedom fighters. To see mutants able to use their powers for more than just fighting killer robots.
catnip for telepaths
I probably would have been better able to articulate this after last night’s all-nighter when this first really sunk in and came to me. But anyways, I think there’s something really troubling and... kinda chauvinist/misogynist about writers painting the ‘reason’ Scott Summers has been involved romantically/sexually with multiple telepathic women is only because his mind draws in people with that power set to dick around in.
--Putting aside a conversation concerning Jack Winters’, Mr Sinister’s, Xavier’s, and Emma Frost’s abuse of him and the layering of their telepathy with real-world abuse tactics-- trying to reason out why so many women (most of whom are telepaths) keep falling for Scott implies that there’s nothing there otherwise any man-attracted person (specificaly men-attracted women) would be interested in.
And like, what’s really problematic about this is the fact that Scott thematically is implicitly set up to be a foil to the various representations of traditional comicbook masculinity in x-men books. Most pertinent to this argument, Scott is a foil to wolverine and wolverine’s representative type of masculinity: hyper-aggressive, traditional, conservative, comicbook masculinity.
So by trying to come up with an excuse for lady-characters finding Scott attractive, that line of thinking condemns the character for not adhering to the exaggerated traditional comicbook masculinity the media is oversaturated with. Y’know, the comicbook masculinity that has twisted and warped inevitably into toxic masculinity?
tl;dr: thinking lady telepaths are drawn to scott summers like a drug is really gross, diminishes the agency of and belittles women characters, diminishes any sense of exploring a pov that isn’t cishet white male (let alone exploring povs of dude-attracted people esp dude-attracted women), sets scott up as not a ‘real manly man because only alpha males get all the chicks’, and downplays the positive feminine/alternatively-masculine traits scott has been written with for like almost 70 yrs and which could easily be seen as ‘attractive’.
i gotta say, as someone whose read old mr sinister stuff and like. had the opportunity to talk to mr claremont in real life about the character its so frustrating to see him turned into what is pretty frankly a homophobic stereotype when that just isnt what the character is. he’s a child’s idea of what a supervillain is, he’s a slimy schemey mastermind, he isn’t ~wacky and flamboyant~ and therefore evil
mr sinister could be a great way to re-delve into villains who are just fun.
Horrible monstrous villains yes, but villains who aren’t caught up in ‘oh boo hoo poor me i was sad once’ or ‘i am evil thus superior to all you petty weak feeling lifeforms’, or the recently popular ‘oh they’re just misunderstooooood’ kind of tropes.
mr sinister is the boogeyman. at least in a thematic way. he’s upsetting, unnerving, has creeped on and obsessed over heroes to the point of instilling permanent psychological damage in them (coughcough scottsummers cough), and he’s just so deliciously evil about it. He chews the scenery and should be fun to read and write about.
The last thing mr sinister should be, though, is a joke. And that’s what we’ve been getting, sadly. -__-
Emma Frost slapping people.
There is another.
i’m legit doing a paper on goddam scott summers for academia because i asked, and now i’m trying to do up a timeline of major events and moments and meta stuff that affected his character and BOY HOWDy there’s a lot.
i knew there would be a lot, but i didn’t realize how much ‘a lot’ that would entail. just
i just marked down a note on the children of the atom origin re-telling miniseries and that’s only AFTER skimming over the phoenix bullshit...
FUCK I FORGOT ABOUT ALL THE TIME BABIES, SHIT!
Remember when Scott told Lee he didn’t want to kiss her so she got mad and left him alone and blind on a strange island and he was like ‘im such a jerk I deserve this’ cause I think about that a lot
- You did all that.
- It wasn’t a big deal.
- When you were seven.
when you think about all the potential your favourite character had that the writers let go to waste
Reminder that “tard” and all variations of it (“fucktard,” “libtard,” etc) are literally just a “PC” way of calling someone a r*t*rd and I’d really appreciate it if my mutuals stopped putting words like that on my dashboard.
I had to get schooled on this one myself a while back; I’d mistakenly assumed it was meant to evoke “bastard”. But nope!
As ever, we learn better, we do better.
The same is true for the ‘reeeeeee’ noise.
^Important addition
Most of the people who say these things absolutely know what they mean, and choose to say them anyway. On the off chance that someone truly does not know what they mean, here’s your chance to learn and do better.
it’s making fun of meltdowns! its formally called “autistic screeching”, its a stereotype made to mock us and its absolutely offensive 💞💞