Feyre being immortal does not mean she should wait a few centuries to have a child. A woman can decide at any point in their life when THEY are ready to have a child. That isn’t up to you. Feyre wanted to have a child and we had whole build up to this decision in acofas. Feyre CHOSE to want to get pregnant, and she CHOSE to speak with rhys about it, and then they CHOSE to start trying for a baby with one another. Rhys did not force her to have a child nor did he mind r*pe her into having a child with him…You’ve made this narrative because of how much you hate them, and it’s such a disgusting argument.

And the false feminism too… you’d be calling it girl power if Feyre was in the club but because she chose to become a mother, and you don’t like pregnancy plot lines and have a nasty view point on motherhood, you’ve made her becoming a mother a monstrosity. You only have feminism towards a character when they are doing something you personally like, it’s disheartening. I see this done with Nesta too.

I don’t understand why Feyre choosing to become a mother is always “uncomfortable, she’s too young, rhys is using her as a breeding mule”

And never “this is empowering. A woman has decided to become a mother. One of the most important and beautiful aspects of being a female is the choice of motherhood.”

Saying Rhys forced her is insane omg people are deranged

If YOU think Feyre painting the cottage was cringe (it wasn't), that's a YOU problem. No where in the books is it stated any of the IC had a problem with it. Mor even participated and the cabin already had the paints in it. I'm sure the IC, who have snowball fights and like to fuck shit up, do not care about her painting a magical cabin. Like be so serious. Just say you hate Feyre and her growth and move on.

No because with one flick of his hand Rhys can wipe it all away why are people so pressed about it

Am I the only one who when reading acotar, if it’s not an actual plot point about something, then I genuinely don’t care?

Lemme explain

When people hate on Rhys and Feyre for getting a fifth house after the war when their people are trying to rebuild the city. It’s like?? Thats never been brought up as an issue in the books so why should I care about that? Why should you care about that?

(Besides the fact that in ACOFAS, the people have to force feyre to go home and stop helping)

Or when people say they dislike feyre because she ‘destroyed the spring court’ and ‘made hundreds of people from the spring court homeless.’ Like that is not a major plot in the book. We literally do not know anything about any of spring court people that fled.

Not to mention that 1.) feyre told tamlin she would do exactly that and he didn’t listen 2.) all feyre did was expose tamlin. Every instance, she gave him a chance to do the right thing and he didn’t EVERY. TIME. 3.) tamlin had already teamed up with prythians BIGGEST ENEMY, an EVIL king. You think that was gonna end well for the spring Court even if feyre hadn’t intervened??

But my point is, why should you care about this hypothetical situation that we don’t even know is accurate enough to have it as a reason to dislike feyre??

Did tamlin’s people abandon him? Yes. Do we know for certain that they’re homeless? No.

they could actually be thriving, happily in another court for all we know.

But considering the kind of high lord tamlin was, I’m fairly certain those people are better off.

Tamlin was willing to let his people starve if they couldn’t pay taxes. Tamlin sided with Ianthe sooo much, even after she sold out Feyre’s sisters, to the point that he allowed one of his won soldiers to be whipped even after that soldier exposed ianthe for using magic on him. Tamlin sided with Hybern and allowed his forced to come into his last. Tamlin beat up Lucien and was physically violent with feyre. Tamlin did NOTHING under the mountain.

And it would be different if we got to meet a spring court inhabitant that fled tell their story and show that that did in fact happen and that feyre ruined the lives of all these people. But we didn’t.

“Whatever you did … it worked. Tamlin’s sentries abandoned him. Over half his people refused to appear for the Tithe two days ago. Some are leaving for other courts. Some are murmuring of rebellion. It seems you made yourself quite beloved. Holy, even.”

Abandoned him. Leaving for other courts. Murmuring of rebellion. Not scrapping for food. Not homeless. All feyre did was show them exactly who tamlin was. The people of the spring court finally saw that and abandoned him. They loved feyre enough to leave their homes, to possibly rebel against tamlin. You think they would love feyre this much if they had to flee and were on the brink of starvation and homelessness? No.

But it’s feyre fault that his people left him because they hypothetically could’ve become homeless? You hate her because of this? Oh ok

Or the people that hate Rhys for the hypothetical children of the court of nightmares that are stuck there.

Like what is the point in making up these problems and scenarios that aren’t plot points in the book in order to dislike/hate on characters?

And I feel like it’s just Feysand that gets this type of hate where someone has to bring up these situations and problems that aren’t even rlly mentioned in the books?

Like I could understand mentioning the female Illyrian wing clipping. (even tho that was completely explained in the books, but I digress.) something that actually happens in the book and is an actual plot point and we see an actual character effected by (emerie)

But to bring up stuff like that, I’m just genuinely like?? Why should I care?? Why should that make me dislike Feysand?

I just don’t get it.

Does this make sense?? Is this just me?? Pls let me know

It wasn’t until I joined this fandom that I realized people nitpicked these books to death. In the beginning I would be like “oh yes this completely hypothetical situation is wrong”

Now I just don’t care.

Like you honestly have nothing better to do than complain about Rhysand’s hypothetical money and what he does with it

“Y’all just listen to everything Sjm says and take it as facts.” You mean we base our arguments on things that actually happened in the text instead of things that we personally feel should have happened? I wonder if y’all would still be saying “canon is the problem” if Feyre had ended up with Tamlin.

Wait so who are we supposed to listen to if not the literal author of the book

I-