mouthporn.net
#history – @aurianavaloria on Tumblr

Tamrielic Thedosian of Faerûn

@aurianavaloria / aurianavaloria.tumblr.com

Auri | ♀ | INTJ | Lawful Good/Lawful Neutral This is a multi-fandom blog for posting my various projects and anything else I like. I frequently reblog faves. Favorite Fandoms: Dragon Age, The Elder Scrolls, Forgotten Realms D&D (3.5e Only), Star Trek: Voyager, Kingdom of Heaven
Avatar

The Religious History Of Chess

At some point in history, priests were banned from playing chess because it was seen as a distraction and a waste of time. Some sources even say that it was a form of gambling and a step towards sinning, as it could cause bouts of frustration and draw forth other negative reactions.

Because of this, in the year 1125, a priest invented the first folding chessboard and made it look like two books were lying together to play his games in secret.

Avatar
reblogged

i entirely get why people are like "actually knights were historically land-owning nobles waging war on people" and reminding people that idealised modern conceptions of knights are not historically accurate, it's just really really funny given that people have been idealising the institution of knighthood since like. the twelfth century or earlier, go take it up with fucking chrétien de troyes

(in fact i would argue that when most modern people refer to "medieval knights" they are not in fact referring to the historical institution of knighthood at all, but to the literary tradition of knights as found in chivalric romance, and therefore thinking of them as hot men who rescue damsels and defend the weak is not inaccurate, as long as one recognises that this is a literary knight and not a historical knight, and also that this knight probably still commits wildly horrifying murders every now and again and doesn't really respect women despite rescuing them)

lotta people reblogging this with tags about how the modern concept has drifted so far from the historical reality that the term has lost its meaning or whatever but that's completely missing the point i was trying to make. i'm saying that that idealised fantasy has been there *all along*. practically as soon as you get a formalised institution of knighthood, you've got people writing stories about how cool and sexy and chivalrous knights are. it's not that the modern conception as found in fantasy novels has drifted, it's that the modern conception has always been based on chivalric romance more than on reality.

the literary history of knights is a different strand of history than the historical reality of knights and that is the history that many people are responding to; it remains a historical idea and concept even if it has always been a literary one. "correcting" people's understanding of literary knights with reference to historically 'accurate' knights is, most of the time, comparing apples and oranges and then complaining that the 'apple' has segments when it was in fact always an orange

Avatar
nebmia

An extention to this is that (to my understanding) the noble and chivalrous knights of the literary tradition are, in part, originally written like that in an attempt by the people surrounding early medieval knights to convince them that it would be cool of them to do a little less fighting.

So rather than being am effort to present an idealised image of knights to the general population, as you might expect, it was an effort to present an idealised image of a knight to real world knights in the hope that they would imitate it.

Avatar

Your thoughts on The Battle of Montgisard?

Avatar

Definitely one of those "once in a century" type events, imo.

There's quite a few YouTube video analyses/documentaries (and even attempts at various video game recreations) of the battle, so I won't repeat what you can easily find elsewhere.

But, suffice it to say, I think it was the combination of just the right factors that led to Baldwin's seemingly-impossible victory. These included (but are not limited to) the young king's own leadership skills, those of his commanders, Saladin's lack of preparation... and just plain old luck.😆

There's a quote from a user manual of an old RPG I used to play that says "Overconfidence can be an epitaph". This was very nearly proven true at Montgisard. Saladin's overconfidence, I think, was probably the biggest contributor to Baldwin's win. He thought he had Baldwin hemmed in at Ascalon, didn't think that the king would break past the force he left behind (or, at the very least, not that quickly), and let his army spread out too much. That plus the environmental conditions with the mired baggage train, and it became a recipe for disaster for Saladin - and a prime opportunity for Baldwin.

If you want a good laugh, there is an absolutely hilarious discussion of it here. BUT be warned that it is the kind of humor that is riddled with foul language, so if that's not your thing, beware. XD

Avatar

I have read some articles that refer to or show Balwin as somewhat sadistic, for example in one I read that he used to go on excursions and burn, rob and kill Saracen villages and he shows us as a ruthless and arrogant guy. Have you read anything about that? What do you think about it? Do you think it's false?

Avatar

Admittedly, even though I have collected quite a few resources on the historical Baldwin IV over recent months, I haven't had the chance to pore over them in detail.

However, from what little I have read, I do know that, after Baldwin refused to renew Raymond III of Tripoli's truce with Saladin and decided to resume Amalric's efforts to curb Saladin's growing power, back-and-forth raiding on both sides was rather frequent. And though we would condemn such behavior today, in medieval warfare, it's par for the course. Part of the strategy behind doing such things was not only to obtain valuable (and sometimes scarce) resources, but also to damage the opposing side's economy to make their efforts more difficult. Saladin sacked and looted farms and villages on his way to Jerusalem before the Battle of Montgisard; likewise, Baldwin engaged in raids during the tug-of-war over Jacob's Ford - all of which was likely exacerbated by the problems with famine at the time. Unlike Ridley Scott's depiction in KoH, these battles and raids back and forth across the borders of the Kingdom of Jerusalem and Syria were broken only by very short truces that seem to have revolved around resource availability and temporary interests elsewhere.

Does this make Baldwin "sadistic"? By the standards of his day, no. Any other monarch of the period would have likely made the same choices with an enemy force on their doorstep and whilst in a semi-permanent state of war. Further, we don't really have any insights into Baldwin's reasoning for his decisions because we aren't privy to his personal thoughts on the matter. On top of that, what little first-hand accounts we have all possess their own biases, which was also common - those on the side who performed such raids would see them as clever/advantageous, and those on the side being raided would see them as abominable.

It is interesting to note that, during one of these later defense-testing missions at Darayya, Baldwin apparently threatened the great mosque there, but when the Christians local to the area protested for fear of retaliatory harm to their churches, he promptly abandoned the idea and left.

Avatar
Avatar
blueiscoool

Archaeologists Unearth Ancient Mosaic of Winged Medusa in Spain

The stunningly preserved Ancient Roman mosaic floor was found at the Huerta de Otero site in the city of Mérida.

In both ancient and modern interpretations, Medusa is often known as a monster — a Gorgon with tresses of serpents whose stare turned men to stone. This version typically appears in children’s movies and fantasy thrillers, but her image hasn’t always been so awe-inspiring. In late June, archaeologists in Western Spain uncovered an Ancient Roman mosaic floor that depicts Medusa with tiny wings and flowing locks of hair, thought to have been used as a protective symbol.

The mosaic was found in the city of Mérida’s Huerta de Otero archaeological site. Ancient Romans established a colony there in 25 BCE named Augusta Emerita. Traces of its former inhabitants — including an amphitheater and a bridge — can be found throughout the modern-day city. “[The site] is of an exceptional nature due to the level of conservation of the ruins and, above all, the ornamental elements that decorate the well-preserved house: not only the mosaic of the Medusa but also paintings and sculptural motifs,” said archaeologist Félix Palma in a statement.

The Huerta de Otero location was excavated in 1976 but lay untouched for decades. Research picked back up in 2019, when the city employed professional archaeologists and students from its Barraeca II Professional School to explore the ruins. Since then, the team has uncovered an Ancient Roman defensive wall, a road, and the home of a wealthy family.

The Medusa mosaic adorned the floor of this home. Depictions of fish, peacocks, and carefully tessellated patterns surround the artwork’s central figure: a human-like Medusa, her gaze turned to one side.

Although this image diverges from some contemporary renditions of the mythological figure, the mosaic’s winged version was common in Ancient portrayals of Medusa. While early Greek depictions of the mortal-turned-monster, cruelly punished for being raped by the god Poseidon, show her as grotesque, Medusa’s image softened by the time of the Ancient Romans. Beginning in the Classical Greek period, her face acquired more human attributes. It started to be rendered with symmetry and youthful beauty in the following centuries.

Other Ancient Roman mosaics featuring the head of Medusa have been discovered throughout Spain. Medusa again comprises the focal point of an Ancient Roman mosaic in a 115–150 CE work found in Rome, where she can be seen sporting human curls and a snake around her neck. A 1st-to-2nd-century ornament from a chariot pole shows a young woman with curly locks (although a couple of snakes still peer through her tangle of hair).

In Ancient Greek mythology, Perseus killed Medusa to avoid being turned to stone. Medusa, in her early terrifying form, was used as a protective symbol — “an image of evil to repel evil,” Madeleine Glennon writes in a 2017 essay for the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The goddess Athena famously included a representation of Medusa’s severed head on her protective cloak or aegis. In Ancient Rome, her beautified image was still employed as a protective symbol, although the depiction shifted into a form more similar to a woman than a monster.

By Elaine Velie.

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net