@allagherii Yup. When I worked at a public Catholic school I was required to pray every morning as well as during staff meetings.
I did it because it was a job requirement, but it shouldn't be.
For context to non-Canadians: The Charter of Rights and Freedoms is kind of like Canada's version of the American constitution + Amendments
Life hack for atheists at job interviews
If you're asked how often you go to church or how you expand your spirituality or something of the kind at a job interview and you're a recent graduate, you can respond with "Well, to be 100% honest, I haven't had much chance to do more than eat, sleep, study, and classes lately."
If they ask you what you did before school got in the way, you can say things like "I've read all/most of the bible cover to cover" (memorize a couple of "favourite passages" just in case) and "I've studied about other religions so I'm better prepared to counter their claims".
Yup.
There was a Supreme Court decision that says it's ok for public Catholic schools to not only ask about a person's religion but also to
- explicitly give preferential treatment on the basis of religion to job applicants e.g. when I interviewed for the job in thy OP they explicitly asked me if I was Catholic/Christian and told me "You don't have to be, but it definitely helps.")
- fire someone if they did not disclose that they aren't Catholic
- deny someone employment on the basis of religion
- deny enrollment to kids that fall in the school's catchment area if they (or their parents) are not Catholic (which is something schools do)
- deny enrollment to kids that fall in the school's catchment area if they or their parents are living in a way "which is not consistent with the Catholic lifestyle" (meaning if the child or their parents are LGBT+ or if the parents are divorced or have had an abortion)
I'm not sure if this means that schools with a public religious program (my hometown has Islamic and Jewish public school programs) can do the same, since they're technically part of the would-be secular public school division or if only only the public Catholic school division can discriminate at will (they are separate but both are paid for with public funds).
Here's a job post I saw a while back when searching for work:
Also, there's no way to know what the views of the admin at a potential school or the view of a school district are, so you don't know if you're applying to a school where you absolutely have to be Catholic, have to be some form of Christian, can be of any religion, can be LGBT+ or have to stay in the closet, etc. That means that if you disclose that you're not Catholic/Christian at an interview for where you need to be Catholic/Christian you'll probably get blacklisted from the entire district if not several districts.
Why do Yanks always assume everyone online is American?
Me: I can legally be fired from a public Catholic school for being an atheist.
American Christians: Uh, no, that’s illegal. And it’s also illegal to have public religious schools.
Me: …I’m not American. Different countries have different laws.
Thinking again of the random American tourist who stopped me and my friends in our school uniforms, made a shitty joke about the colour, asked if we’d get hit (??) for not wearing them, my friend made a nun joke and he was surprised that we went to a public school. Which had nuns. In a Catholic country.
This is the same man who told us we didn’t have Irish accents btw.
I follow a blog literally titled @allthecanadianpolitics and every few months they have to point out to an American that the news article they posted is about Canada and not the US because the article title didn’t explicitly say that the news is about Canada.
Hell, sometimes Yanks assume it’s about the US even when it explicitly says that it’s about Canada.
This is true. 🥲
The religious schools in the US are privately owned, whereas the ones in Canada that I'm talking about are public schools. I'm paying for the schools with my taxes but I'm not allowed to attend the schools or work in them.
Standing along Edmonton’s 118th Street, wearing a t-shirt that reads “Not Today Satan”, Dale Desjarlais and a small but mighty crew of volunteers hand out food and drinks to people in need.
He’s been doing this on and off for two years, mostly in the downtown area.
Every two weeks — on the Saturday after payday — Desjarlais takes to the streets. He uses his own money and time to buy and make bannock and soup while also handing out any other food people have donated.
“When people are getting fed I feel happy because I know how it feels to be hungry or have to go without food for two, three days,” he said.
Desjarlais previously struggled with drug and alcohol addiction after suffering physical and sexual abuse as a child.
Now he wants to use his experience in healing to support others who are struggling.
Tagging: @politicsofcanada @abpoli
i know this is coming from a place of like intense sexual objectification and homophobia and racism not to mention the world ending efforts of big oil but unfortunately it is so funny
can we talk about how cramped and overdesigned this ad is too? like half this thing is text and all the different blocks of text are in different styles of boxes and its jumbling my brain.
This is the most Alberta ad to ever exist.
As an Albertan, it makes me want to both laugh and cry so much.
Nearly a third of North American students think the Holocaust was exaggerated or fabricated, according to a new study, which also found that 40 per cent of students reported learning about the Holocaust through social media.
Evangelical Christian conservative Republicans are Nazi's. They will destroy America, and then the world.
This isn't just about the US, it applies to all of North America, which is much worse.
To Conservatives upset at the criminalization of conversion therapy because it supposedly infringes on your Charter rights
It doesn't infringe on your Charter right to freedom of religion because your Charter rights aren't limitless; the Charter states that all rights listed therein stop at the point where your actions infringe on someone else's Charter rights.
From Justice Canada:
ever notice how whenever a muslim/jewish/sikh/hindu/indigenous person runs for office or holds a position of power, they're always asked "but how do you rectify this position with your religious beliefs?" or "how can you balance your faith with science/law/politics?"
like..our current prime minister is a catholic, but I don't see him being asked these questions
some of the most recognized scientists in white history were christian/catholic but they were never asked to forego their religion
it only really seems to come up when a religiously marginalized (often non-white) person is involved
there is an assumption among white folks that other white people can set aside their religion if need be, or that they shouldn't have to set aside their religion
yet I'm asked how I can believe in science and Allah? because they think my religion blinds me to all else, but that would never happen with white people
we saw it in the last federal election with folks saying that there was no way jagmeet singh could be objective, he's "too religious" because he wears a symbol of his faith. but of course, a white man wearing a cross/believing in god is capable of being objective
white people and athiests: think on this next time you question a marginalized person's ability to balance their faith with their occupation
Being an avid Jagmeet Singh fan who votes NDP at every election in the hope that he becomes PM, I was getting ready to agree and mention that the rhetoric is the same used in regard to other minorities (e.g. women) when I reached the conclusion of your post and came across this:
"white people and athiests: think on this next time you question a marginalized person's ability to balance their faith with their occupation"
Cue the vinyl scratch sound.
Say what now?
Careful, @politicsofcanada, your bias and bigotry are showing.
You're telling a marginalized group whose ability to balance faith and their occupation is repeatedly brought into question to the point where most of us aren't even out as being members of that persecuted group to think twice before questioning a marginalized person's ability to balance their faith with their occupation.
I can't afford to tell people I'm atheist because it would affect my job prospects. If you think that most prospective employers wouldn't put me in the "denied" pile the moment they found out I'm an atheist you're grossly misinformed about the situation in Canada.
It's legal in Canada to discriminate against non-Catholics when it comes to public Catholic school admissions and employment, meaning half of my job prospects would immediately disappear if I were to come out as an atheist because employers could legally assume I can't do my job because of my religion or lack thereof.
And in case you think that this religious privilege isn't enforced, here's a job post from the last time I looked for a job:
Being openly an atheist is typically considered the biggest religion-related liability in getting elected as a political leader. It's basically considered political suicide.
Granted, in Canada there was one 2017 poll that found that an atheist PM isn't quite as much of an impossibility as an American President would be (alas, Sikhs took the place of atheists in the biggest impossibility spot); but the majority of people aren't aware of this poll and people who vote "strategically" could very well be a hindrance because the public mindset is that atheists are unelectable.
And it's not just our ability to perform our occupation that gets constantly brought into question either.
Atheist parents are disproportionately more likely to be denied custody of their children because the court deems that being placed with someone religious is better for the child's well-being.
We're also repeatedly told that we are dangerous individuals because we have no morals (since one supposedly needs to believe in a deity in order to know right from wrong).
While there are certainly plenty of racist and overall bigoted atheists out there, the majority of atheists question a person's ability to lead when the person makes it blatantly clear that their religion affects their ability to perform their occupation.
- Politicians pushing to ban abortion because it's against their religious beliefs
- Politicians saying they will go home to "pray on it" about political decisions (to quote John Oliver, "I know this isn't the most important point here, but... can't you do that from the office?"
- When politicians oppose banning conversion therapy despite the science saying it's bunk and harmful because said politician's personal religious beliefs say that being LGBT+ is a choice
- When politicians push to allow public officials to refuse to do their jobs and marry gay people because of the beliefs of the politicians' and public officials' religion
- When a company refuses to serve someone because of the company owner's religious beliefs
- When doctors don't want to do their jobs when it comes to certain patients because of the doctor's religious beliefs
Christian Privilege (10/?)
It is legal in Canada for public Catholic schools to discriminate in admissions and employment.
And as I've had Christians ask me this before, a public Catholic school is a school funded with tax dollars where kids are also required to take religion classes on how Catholicism is true.
And as I've had Americans claim I'm lying because public schools aren't allowed to teach religion: American laws only apply to the United States. Other countries have their own laws.
^ An example of a job post I came across a while back when searching for a job in my field.