mouthporn.net
#war on women – @assholeofday on Tumblr
Avatar

Asshole Of The Day

@assholeofday / assholeofday.tumblr.com

Asshole of the Day finds the public figures who are the biggest assholes each day
Avatar

Brian Greene, Asshole of the Day for February 4, 2015

How long will it take before people understand that consent is required to have sex and that it is not enough that "they didn't say no"? And to that end, unconscious people can never, ever consent. A few months back it was CeeLo who didn't get this, and now it's a Utah state legislator.

Rep. Brian Greene is trying keep a law in Utah from defining sex with an unconscious person as being rape:

If an individual has sex with their wife while she is unconscious ... a prosecutor could then charge that spouse with rape, theoretically," said Rep. Brian Greene, R-Pleasant Grove. "That makes sense in a first date scenario, but to me, not where people have a history of years of sexual activity." ... Green later made clear that while he did not support having sex with unconscious people, he questions whether sex with an unconscious person was "rape in every instance — dependent only upon the actor's knowledge that the individual is unconscious. That's the question. That's what I struggle with."

Frankly I don't even know how it matters whether the rapist is aware of whether the person is unconscious-- if the person you're having sex with is unconscious and you can't be bothered to notice, then that's rape too in my book.

But back to his main assertion that in a marriage that it could be OK to have sex with an unconscious person and therefore not be rape. How could it possibly matter? So what if you're married? It's not like the marriage vows include a line about allowing sex while unconscious. Getting married doesn't mean a lifetime of rape.

But Rep. Greene, I guess he doesn't care about wives consenting to sex. He's more worried that some husband might get charged with rape for forcing himself on an unconscious wife. And for that, he is the Asshole of the Day.

It is Brian Greene's first time as Asshole of the Day, but one of many for saying horrible things about rape.

Avatar

Rick Brattin, Asshole of the Day for December 17, 2014

Republicans clutch the pearls and cry foul every time someone suggests there is a war on women. But, if they are so in tune with the needs of women, why is there a neverending parade of Republicans who say awful things about rape and are always trying to limit women's access to abortion and contraception?

Today's episode of Republicans being assholes about rape and abortion comes from Missouri, where State Rep. Rick Brattin thinks men ought to get a say in whether women can get abortions:

Rick Brattin, a state representative from outside Kansas City, filed the bill on December 3 for next year's legislative session. The proposed measure reads, "No abortion shall be performed or induced unless and until the father of the unborn child provides written, notarized consent to the abortion."
The bill contains exceptions for women who become pregnant as the result of rape or incest—but there are caveats.
"Just like any rape, you have to report it, and you have to prove it," Brattin tells Mother Jones. "So you couldn't just go and say, 'Oh yeah, I was raped' and get an abortion. It has to be a legitimate rape."
Brattin adds that he is not using the term "legitimate rape" in the same way as former Rep. Todd Akin (R-Mo.), who famously claimed that women couldn't get pregnant from a "legitimate rape" because "the female body has ways to try to shut the whole thing down."
"I'm just saying if there was a legitimate rape, you're going to make a police report, just as if you were robbed," Brattin says. "That's just common sense." Under his bill, he adds, "you have to take steps to show that you were raped…And I'd think you'd be able to prove that." The bill contains no provision establishing standards for claiming the rape or incest exceptions. It also doesn't state any specific penalties for violating the law nor say whether a penalty would be imposed on the woman seeking the abortion or the abortion provider.

Yes, he really does say "legitimate rape". It would seem that once you're explaining what you mean by "legitimate rape", maybe you should reconsider your argument, but not for him. He just keeps on going.

Now there are two objectionable things here-- the consent of the father, and his views on rape-- so let's take them one at a time.

Legitimate Rape. He asserts that if it really is a rape, you have to be able to prove it. This assumes that if you can't prove it, it isn't legitimately a rape. But when there only witnesses are the rapist and the rape victim, proof isn't going to be perfect every time. Yes, there is some physical evidence, but what if it isn't conclusive or there isn't enough of it? Then, according to this asshole, it's not legitimate. The legal standard of proof is such that we err on the side of the presumption of innocence. But his standard here will be to err on the side of not believing there was a rape. And the clock is ticking on getting this abortion, so if you can't prove it fast enough, you're still stuck with the rapist's baby!

Consent of the Father. I suppose it sounds nice to say that men should get a say in whether the baby comes to term, but it's a false fairness. Women don't get an option in whether they or the man carries the baby to term, so giving the man more say in what happens without giving the woman more options is just one more burden on her. But I suspect that Brattin really doesn't care about the woman. He wants to outlaw abortions, and if he can't, then harassing women will do for now.

So, for giving women more burdens without giving them more options, along with his lack of empathy for rape victims, Rep. Rick Brattin is the Asshole of the Day.

It is Rick Brattin's first time as Asshole of the Day.

Full story: Mother Jones

Avatar

Asshole of the Day for November 19, 2014

Asshole of the Day, November 19, 2014: Don Lemon

We feel like we keep repeating ourselves, but here goes nothing: when someone tells you they’ve been raped, the only acceptable comments are:

  • That’s horrible!
  • I’m so sorry to hear that.
  • You’re brave to share your story.

Your advice is not needed at a time like this, especially when said advice has an accusatory tone. CNN wonder boy Don Lemon obviously doesn’t read this blog - if he did, maybe he wouldn’t have put his foot in his mouth during a recent interview with a woman who says comedian (and scolder of low-income African-Americans) Bill Cosby raped her.

"You — you know, there are ways not to perform oral sex if you didn’t want to do it."

Thanks, Don…this is exactly what women need: tips from a man on how to not get raped.

Never mind that the woman was stoned - all 15 of Cosby’s alleged victims say he drugged them before he raped them. Forget that she was probably scared beyond comprehension. And let’s ignore the fact that she probably had to separate her mind from her body just to get through the attack.

Those things don’t matter because, as Lemon reminded us, there are some things women can do to prevent rape.

We’ll stop short of calling Lemon’s questions victim blaming. You can decide on that.

But, consider this: if you were mugged, and some snooty TV host asked you why you didn’t fight the guy (gal) who snatched your purse…how would you feel? Would you like it if the cops asked you what you did to prevent your car from being stolen?

Rape victims, unlike victims of other crimes, are repeatedly asked to explain their actions leading up to, during and after the assault. There is still this persistent belief that what a victim wore, what they drank, whether or not they fought back or whether or not they immediately told someone about what happened are indicators of ‘real rape’.

Lemon’s question plays right into that thinking.

Of course, he apologized - we’re sure he wants to keep his job. It probably pays well.

Too bad apologies don’t mean much to us - we’re still naming Don Lemon Asshole of the Day.

This is Don Lemon’s first time as Asshole of the Day.

Avatar

Teddy Harris, Asshole of the Day for November 12, 2014

Abortion is protected by the Constitution, at least for now. But apparently the Constitution doesn't matter when you're trying to avoid drama according to Rossville Mayor Teddy Harris:

He said they wish to keep abortion clinics out because they could bring "drama" to the city.
"We want to be a peaceful city," Harris said. "We don't want to have any protesters."
"I just don't think (clinics) are appropriate for our city, " Harris said.

I guess it’s too dramatic allowing women to exercise their constitutionally protected rights. 

Of course there's no evidence out there that he is avoiding the "drama" of letting people exercise their 2nd Amendment rights, because, well, you know, those rights are for men. Macho men. 

Look, protecting rights is hard. It's messy. Especially things like free speech or privacy. Finding the right balance between the public good and the individual right is difficult. But we don't just throw away people's rights to avoid "drama". But Mayor Harris thinks that's a good reason, and for that, he is the Asshole of the Day.

It is Teddy Harris's first time being named Asshole of the Day.

Avatar

Cory Gardner, Asshole of the Day for October 1, 2014

Personhood bills and amendments are designed to give clumps of fertilized cells in a woman's uterus the same rights that fully-realized humans have, with the purpose being to make all abortion illegal, as well as many forms of contraception. For example, the Personhood bill that was introduced in Congress in 2013 says:

The bill, according to the summary, "declares that the right to life guaranteed by the Constitution is vested in each human being beginning at the moment of fertilization, cloning, or other moment at which an individual comes into being."

So, as you might imagine, something as extreme as giving clumps of cells the same rights as the woman that is carrying them, and thereby taking away control over that woman's body from her is unpopular with a lot of voters. Which is how we get to the point where Rep. Cory Gardner denies he's ever supported a Personhood bill, to the point of claiming it doesn't even exist:

"There is no such thing as a federal personhood bill," Gardner said, more than once, despite the objections of Fox 31 Denver's Eli Stokols.

But of course there is a federal personhood bill. He is a co-sponsor of it!

He has not renounced his cosponsoring of the bill; he merely wants to pretend it doesn't exist until he can win this Senate election in Colorado. He wants people to vote for him as a reasonable, non-extremist, except he won't walk away from that extremism. Guess what he'll do when he gets to Washington?

So, for pretending a bill he co-sponsored doesn't exist, Cory Gardner is the Asshole of the Day.

It is Cory Gardner's first time as Asshole of the Day.

Full story: Talking Points Memo.

PS: If you're as outraged as we are by politicians pretending they aren't the extremists they have shown themselves to be in the past, give this a read: Is Extremism Not A Character Issue?

Avatar

Greg Gutfeld, Asshole of the Day for September 25, 2014

Republicans tell us there is no War On Women, and in fact just this week Ann Romney said that accusations of Republicans War on Women were "ridiculous" and "offensive". I guess she is ignorant of all the restrictions on birth control and abortion Republicans have pushed through the last few years, as well as their ongoing opposition to the Violence Against Women Act and equal pay laws.

Or maybe she just doesn't watch Fox News. Because if she had, she would have seen two male hosts mock a female pilot that a female host was praising:

Kimberly Guilfoyle took a moment to salute Major Mariam Al Mansouri, who reportedly led her country's airstrikes Monday against the Islamic State. Guilfoyle noted how rich it was that an Arab woman was leading the charge against the militant group, given that women aren't even allowed to drive in some countries in the region.
"The problem is after she bombed it she couldn't park it," co-host Greg Gutfeld quipped. "I salute her."
"Would that be considered boobs on the ground or no?" Eric Bolling chimed in.

Even their co-host wondered "why did they ruin my thing?" after.

Yes, we ask, why can't these men restrain themselves from shitting on a woman's achievement in an area that women have historically been excluded from? Why do they feel that on air on Fox News they can do this?

Because they completely lack any empathy for the struggles of women, or frankly anyone less fortunate than their white male asses. Their only point of view is their own.

It is reassuring that not only did Guilfoyle express her frustration with them but also that later so did Greta Van Susteren. We can only hope that someone breaks through and these two assholes think twice before doing it again. But it's Fox News, so we're not hopeful.

Now there were two assholes here, but we don't give out group awards. Of the two, Greg Gutfeld was first and his comment played on sexist stereotypes as well, so it he is the Asshole of the Day.

It is Greg Gutfeld's first time as Asshole of the Day, but one of many, many Fox News personalities to be featured here.

Full story: Talking Points Memo.

NOTE: This story was updated after readers pointed out that it's Gutfeld, not Gutfield, which was misspelled in Talking Points Memo, and which I picked up without noticing.

Avatar

Rush Limbaugh, Asshole of the Day for September 16, 2014

Colleges are finally starting to tighten rules on sexual assault and rape, though certainly not as much or as fast as they should. And while many people consider less rape to be a good thing, there are those who come to its defense, especially on college campuses. For example, back in June George Will derided studies about the prevalence of rape on college campuses by calling rape victims liars.

But George Will is not alone in decrying attempts to stop rape on college campuses. Yesterday Rush Limbaugh explained how new rules at Ohio State violate his own beliefs about what is and isn't rape:

Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh mocked The Ohio State University's new policy telling students to get clear, verbal consent before having sex. Limbaugh went on to ask guys "how many of you guys, in your own experience with women, have learned that no means yes if you know how to spot it?"
"Let me tell you something in this modern world — that is simply, that's not tolerated," Limbaugh continued. "People aren't going to try to understand that one. I mean it used to be a cliche. It used to be part of the advice young boys were given. See that's got to change. We have got to change the way we raise men."
"Why do you think permission every step of the way — aren't these just lawsuits just waiting to happen if one of these steps are not taken," Limbaugh said.

"Why do you think permission every step of the way?" To ask this question is to just not care about consent. To not care whether the other person wants to have sex with you. So they kissed you, so you think you can ignore them now saying no and go all the way? That's what Rush is crying over.

As I mentioned when CeeLo was named Asshole of the Day for saying it's not rape if they're asleep, focusing on whether there is a no is the wrong discussion. Rather than "did she say no?", we should teach people that they should only have sex with people who want to have sex with them, just like we do with everything else. Amanda Marcotte pointed out that someone has to have permission to come into your house, with her basic argument being that it's not OK unless the homeowner says no in a certain clear way. You're just not allowed to barge in, so you shouldn't be allowed to force yourself on someone sexually unless they tell you no-- they have to invite you. And an invitation to sex, just like an invitation into their house, is revokable. They can change their mind and ask you to leave. If they invite you into the living room, you aren't allowed to barge into their bedroom unless they lead you there or tell you that you can. Why is it so hard for people to understand that the same rules should apply to sex?

Probably because they don't want to. They don't think it's wrong to have sex with people who don't want to have sex with them. They don't think it's wrong to take more from someone than that person is willing to give.

Look, the rules around rape won't trip up anyone who is focused on only having sex with people who want to have sex with them. But Rush Limbaugh doesn't care-- he feels entitled to sex with women, and wants to keep them from expressing that they don't want to have sex with him, because then he thinks it's OK. And he thinks all men should be so entitled. And for that, he is the Asshole of the Day.

It is Rush Limbaugh's seventh time as Asshole of the Day. Previous wins were for

Full story: Talking Points Memo.

Avatar

Ben Carson, Asshole of the Day for September 9, 2014

And now we have Dr. Ben Carson, who is traveling the country, possibly preparing to run for president, who sees the Ray Rice video and then... defends Ray Rice:

Ray Rice hasn’t found many media defenders on Monday after the Baltimore Ravens terminated his contract and and the NFL suspended him indefinitely following the release of surveillance video showing him punching out his then-fiance Janay Palmer. Until now.
During an appearance with Steve Malzberg on NewsMax TV, Dr. Ben Carson shared his opinions on the matter, in essence defending Rice and laying near equal blame on Palmer:
"Let’s not all jump on the bandwagon of demonizing this guy,” Carson continued. “He obviously has some real problems, and his wife obviously knows that, because she subsequently married him. So they both need some help. So rather than just jumping on a punitive bandwagon, let’s just see if we can get some help for these people.”

Why is his first reaction to think about the abuser? Remember this isn't an innocent until proven guilty situation. Nothing is denied. The tape is clear.

And why does his heart not go out to the victim?

The way Dr. Carson considers that the fact that Rice's wife married him after this somehow makes it any less criminal or less awful shows how little Carson knows about domestic violence. Maybe he should read 19 #WhyIStayed Tweets That Everyone Needs to See to get a sense of why domestic abuse victims stay. It's hard to read those, or any other stories of domestic violence and come to the conclusion that staying somehow exonerates the abuser.

But Dr. Carson doesn't care about any of that. His first instinct is to side with the rich and powerful man being demonized for well-documented abuse. And for that, he is the Asshole of the Day.

It is Dr. Carson's fourth time as Asshole of the Day. Previous wins were for

Full story: Mediaite.

Avatar

Fox & Friends says they take domestic violence seriously. We call Bullshit.

Like many, we called out Fox & Friends yesterday for joking about domestic violence, naming ringleader Steve Doocy Asshole of the Day for it:

“We should also point out, after that video — and now you know what happened in there — she still married him,” host Steve Doocy explained. “They are currently married.”
“Rihanna went back to Chris Brown right after [he assaulted her],” co-host Brian Kilmeade noted. “A lot of people thought that was a terrible message.”
I think the message is take the stairs,” he added, as co-host Anna Kooiman giggled.
The message is, when you’re in an elevator, there’s a camera,” Doocy concluded.

This morning they said on air:

“Comments that were made during this story made some feel like we are taking the situation too lightly," he said. "We are not, we were not. Domestic abuse is a very serious issue to us, I can assure you.”

HuffPo posted the quote under the headline 'Fox & Friends' Spends All Of 13 Seconds Addressing Horrible Ray Rice Comments, which about sums it up.

Sorry, Fox & Friends, we're not buying it. You joked and laughed. It will take more than 13 seconds for you to convince us you think domestic violence is serious. But of course if you were to discuss it more than that, you might have to point out all the Republicans who blocked the renewal of the Violence Against Women Act for so long. The ones who appear on your show all the time.

Photo source: https://www.facebook.com/foxandfriends

Avatar

Steve Doocy, Asshole of the Day for September 8, 2014

When the video of Ray Rice assaulting his wife in the elevator first surfaced, ESPN's Stephen A. Smith suggested that women should try really hard not to get beaten. As though it's anyone's fault that someone beats them. ESPN suspended him, we named him Asshole of the Day. And hoped people would stop saying stupid things like this.

But then TMZ released the video today and it was a new opportunity for stupid comments, this time over at Fox & Friends:

“We should also point out, after that video — and now you know what happened in there — she still married him,” host Steve Doocy explained. “They are currently married.”
“Rihanna went back to Chris Brown right after [he assaulted her],” co-host Brian Kilmeade noted. “A lot of people thought that was a terrible message.”
I think the message is take the stairs,” he added, as co-host Anna Kooiman giggled.
The message is, when you’re in an elevator, there’s a camera,” Doocy concluded.

Look, assholes, domestic violence is no joking matter. And laughing at the victim is pretty ugly.

And to Steve Doocy's first point, it doesn't matter whether she married him after this happened-- that doesn't excuse it or make it legal. But I suspect his point is to laugh at the victim for marrying Rice.

The really offensive part is where he says the message is to take the stairs, where there's no camera. Because then the domestic violence goes unrecorded. Even as a joke, this is way over the line. And that is why Steve Doocy is the Asshole of the Day.

It is Steve Doocy's first time as Asshole of the Day, joining a long line of assholes featured here from Fox News.

Full story: Raw Story.

Avatar

CeeLo Green, Asshole of the Day for September 3, 2014

Last night CeeLo Green was defending himself against accusations of rape and sounded a lot like Todd Akin when he tweeted:

“If someone is passed out they’re not even WITH you consciously. People who have really been raped REMEMBER!!!”

“Really been raped” sounds a lot like “legitimate rape”. And I noted that they each had different reasons for narrowing the definition of rape, but they were engaged in the same bullshit. Since tweeting that, CeeLo deleted the tweets, deleted his Twitter, restored his Twitter, and tweeted a short apology. But forced apologies aren't worth much, and there's no hint that he really understands why his reasoning is wrong, only that he's sorry he said it (maybe).

Now Green wasn’t even charged with rape, but the assertion is out there, so he feels he must defend what he’s accused of:

Green’s lawyer argued the two had “consensual relations,” despite the woman’s claim that she woke up in bed next to Green and was unsure of what happened the night before.
Green faced one felony drug charge. Prosecutors’ claim of lack of evidence led to no rape charges being filed, but he was still sentenced to three years of probation, plus 45 days of community service.
The Voice coach also emphasized that he wasn’t admitting guilt by making a no contest plea.

This case and CeeLo’s defense goes to the real heart of many debates about rape these days-- guys like CeeLo, along with their defenders over on Fox News, such as George Will, think that it’s not rape unless there’s a very clear no. That is, they aren’t focused on consent, but on protest. But that just ignores all the time that the person is incapacitated or under threat not to protest. The absence of protest is not consent. Consent must be a positive act, and without it, you’re in rape territory.

Amanda Marcotte at Raw Story explained this very well in July under the headline Instead of asking, “Did she say no?”, we should start asking, “Did she want to have sex?”

Here’s a piece I wrote kind of detailing out my problems with that argument, mostly that it’s a strawman and that assuming someone is automatically in a state of consent unless they phrase their refusals just so is not held for any other intimate behavior, such as allowing people in your home or allowing people to watch your children, and just for sex. Which is to say anti-feminists are actually arguing that the barrier for someone barging into your house should be higher than for them barging into your body. (And considering how most of them are anti-abortion, it follows that they believe the barrier for to force someone to have a baby should be lower than to force yourself into their house to sit on their couch.) Which is fucked up, to say the least.
...
What if, instead of saying, “Did she say no?” to this young man, the question was, “Did she want to have sex with you?” The answer to that seems screamingly obvious. Far from making things more complicated, framing the question this way would have made things much simpler.
Sure, there will always be men who will whine that it’s so hard to get laid if you have to bother knowing if your partner wants to have sex, too. But so what? If I ran around saying that it’s so hard to get invited to dinner without just walking into people’s houses uninvited, that wouldn’t change the fact that I’m criminally trespassing. If I insisted the only way I get to visit people is by barging into their houses, you’d tell me that it’s my responsibility to learn how to make friends so I get invited. Men who want to have sex should be held to the same minimum standard.

So, just as it’s not OK to rob someone’s house while they are asleep, it’s not OK to violate their person because they are asleep or too sleepy or drunk to put up a fight. But CeeLo thinks there's a difference between the two, and for that he is the Asshole of the Day.

It is CeeLo Green's first time as Asshole of the Day, but one of many for saying horrible things about rape.

Full story: Buzzfeed.

Avatar

CeeLo Green is starting to sound a lot like Todd Akin

Behold how they both try to split hairs on rape to suit their own purposes.

If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.
Green’s lawyer argued the two had “consensual relations,” despite the woman’s claim that she woke up in bed next to Green and was unsure of what happened the night before.
“If someone is passed out they’re not even WITH you consciously,” he said, adding, “People who have really been raped REMEMBER!!!”

Photo source: 

https://twitter.com/toddakin

https://twitter.com/CeeLoGreen

Avatar

Phyllis Schlafly, Asshole of the Day for September 2, 2014

Every now and then the GOP will try to hide their war on women by pushing front and center a woman who is also happy to do so. Last summer during Rick Perry's push to restrict abortion under the guise of protecting women's health (despite there being no exception to save the life of the mother), they trotted out Rep. Jody Laubenberg who justified the lack of exception for rape by claiming "rape kits prevent pregnancy", instead of that they are merely to gather evidence of the crime of rape. Last week I satirized this as

The GOP doesn't discriminate based on gender--women are free to join in the oppression of women, minorities and the poor along with the men.
— Top Conservative Cat (@TeaPartyCat)
August 28, 2014

And of course one woman has relished her role in trying to keep women oppressed for almost 40 years-- Phyllis Schlafly. And over the weekend, she spoke out and claimed that rape and domestic violence are the fault of single, career women:

We all know that married men can still be violent to their families, but they are far less likely to be violent against women than are live-in boyfriends.
Why is this? It’s true that women who have found men who are already better partners are more likely to marry them, but it’s also true that marriage settles men down. Being married makes a man care more about his family’s expectations and future because he sees his family as enduring. It also makes him more faithful and committed to his partner. Marriage makes men directly protective of their wives, and living in a home with their daughters gives them the opportunity to be directly protective of them as well. Marriage also creates indirect protection for wives and daughters, because married women and their children tend to live in safer neighborhoods.
So what’s the answer for women who worry about male violence? It’s not to fear all men. It’s to reject the lifestyle of frequent “hookups,” which is so much promoted on college campuses today, while the women pursue a career and avoid marriage.

She starts by identifying that women are less likely to marry men who commit violence against them, which should adequately explain why domestic violence is more common among unmarried women. That makes sense and we can all agree on that. I've even made that exact same argument in June when Bradford Wilcox blamed single moms for the sexual abuse of their daughters.

But rather than stick with the wisdom of women to explain these differences, she goes the other direction and assumes that in marriage women calm men down so that they are no longer interested in hurting women. Thus women who haven't married are the real culprits here. It's important to note how ridiculous this is-- where many conservatives will blame a woman for her own rape because of what she was wearing, etc., Schlafly is blaming all single women (and especially career women) for all the rapes and domestic violence in the world.

Another point here is that she assumes that domestic violence and rape are part of the nature of single men. To her men are all monsters, but that's OK, because that's how God made them. It's not their fault-- women are supposed to fix that, and if not, well, that's the woman's fault.

So, for blaming single women for domestic violence and rape, Phyllis Schlafly is the Asshole of the Day.

It is Phyllis Schlafly’s second time as Asshole of the Day. Her previous win was for saying the best way to help women is to pay men even more or women will never get married.

Full story: Right Wing Watch.

Avatar

Todd Akin, Asshole of the Day for July 10, 2014

We didn't start Asshole of the Day until May 2013, so we missed Todd Akin the first time around. But he's back, and he has a book, and God help us all, it sort of sounds like he might run again.

Back in 2013 he said:

"if it's a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down."

But apparently the criticism he faced for that, which helped to derail his senate campaign, was not enough. Rather than just slink away, he wants to talk about it again 2 years later. He rescinds his apology and says he was right all along:

"By asking the public at large for forgiveness," Akin says in the book, "I was validating the willful misinterpretation of what I had said."
He adds that the media misconstrued his words and explains why he's still right about rape and pregnancy. "My comment about a woman's body shutting the pregnancy down was directed to the impact of stress of fertilization. This is something fertility doctors debate and discuss. Doubt me? Google 'stress and infertility,' and you will find a library of research" on the impact of stress on fertilization, he writes.
And Akin doubles down on the term "legitimate," which he says refers to a rape claim that can be proved by "evidence," as opposed to one used "to avoid an unwanted pregnancy."

But of course Todd Akin is wrong, wrong, wrong. As we pointed out last year when we named Rep. Trent Franks as Asshole of the Day for claiming “the incidence of rape resulting in pregnancy is very low.”, women do get pregnant from rape. Lots of them. It's not a small number-- 30,000 women get pregnant by rape each year:

Medical experts agree that rape does not lower the incidence of pregnancy, with one study by the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology finding that more than 30,000 pregnancies result from rape in the United States each year.

And why does it matter that Todd Akin is wrong about this? And why does he keep saying that rape somehow magically prevents pregnancy? Because majorities of Americans have consistently supported abortion as an option in cases of rape. But guys like Todd Akin want to outlaw abortion in every case, so to get people to go along, they have to convince people that they aren't forcing rape victims to carry and raise rape babies. And the way some of them do it is by coming up with cockamamie arguments that raped women don't get pregnant because then there doesn't need to be any exception. That's why.

Which is also why Akin is suggesting that some rapes aren't legitimate-- because by defining legitimate rapes as so horrible the woman's body is so stressed it doesn't become pregnant, then he's defined away all those other women as not being legitimately raped.

It's horrible and offensive that Akin made this argument to start, and even more offensive that he's still making it now. But make no mistake-- this is the argument that he's making with all his "legitimate rape" and "stress prevents pregnancy" bullshit. He's doing it to hide how he wants to compel rape victims to bear their rapist's baby. And for that, he is Asshole of the Day.

It is Todd Akin's first time as Asshole of the Day.

Full story: Mother Jones

Avatar

Dr. Ben Carson, Asshole of the Day for July 1, 2014

Yesterday the Supreme Court decided that Hobby Lobby had corporate religious rights which were infringed by having to cover drugs that it felt (erroneously) were causing abortions. The reasoning was tortured and limited in ridiculous ways, and we named Justice Alito Asshole of the Day for it, in part because it pretends that corporations have religious rights like people do.

But of course that court case won't end the debate about abortion. There's still plenty of hyperbole where opponents compare abortion, and sometimes even contraception, to the Holocaust. And they keep searching for more and more outrageous comparisons to fire up supporters and dismiss critics.

And in that vein, we hear Dr. Ben Carson make this odd comparison:

“It’s interesting,” Carson said, “that we sit around and call other ancient civilizations ‘heathen’ because of human sacrifice, but aren’t we actually guilty of the same thing?”

Yes, Dr. Carson is now comparing abortion to human sacrifice.

Human sacrifice is a religious ritual to appease some god to spare the lives of others. Comparing it to abortion makes no sense except as another way to condemn and marginalize those women who need it and the people who support their right to access it. There is no call to god in abortion. There is no authority who is sacrificing the woman to a volcano or angry god-- it is the woman's choice, sometimes in consultation with her doctor. It is not forced.

So, for comparing abortion to human sacrifice, Dr. Ben Carson is the Asshole of the Day.

Full story: Raw Story

Avatar

Justice Samuel Alito, Asshole of the Day for June 30, 2014

The Supreme Court finally decided the Hobby Lobby case today. We highlighted Hobby Lobby CEO David Green previously when it came out that he sued for the right to deny his employees contraceptive care as part of his company's health insurance, even though the very same birth control methods he opposes on religious grounds are part of his investment portfolio. Others pointed out at the time as well that he opposes his employees getting birth control because he believes (incorrectly) that they are really forms of abortion, while he buys all his materials from China, the country which for 30 years has told its citizens to abort any baby after their first.

And the Supreme Court decided that even though Hobby Lobby is a for-profit corporation, that corporations are people and have religious rights, and so the company can deny its employees contraception on those grounds. Justice Alito wrote the majority opinion which explains that:

This decision concerns only the contraceptive mandate and should not be understood to hold that all insurance-coverage man-dates, e.g., for vaccinations or blood transfusions, must necessarily fall if they conflict with an employer’s religious beliefs. Nor does it provide a shield for employers who might cloak illegal discrimination as a religious practice.
...In any event, our decision in these cases is concerned solely with the contraceptive mandate. Our decision should not be understood to hold that an insurance-coverage mandate must necessarily fall if it conflicts with an employer’s religious beliefs. Other coverage requirements, such as immunizations, may be supported by different interests (for example, the need to combat the spread of infectious disease) and may involve different arguments about the least restrictive means of providing them.

This is really something. So Alito has given corporations the rights to have religious beliefs (something they did not have previously), and then he limits the decision here to contraception. Other forms of medicine are still allowed to be imposed on religious people, including corporations, just not contraception if the employer decides that they think (even though medical science contradicts them) that it's abortifacient. But religious objections to other things don't matter. It's almost like he's saying that it's OK to deny science and medicine if it oppresses women, but not if religion is used to hide other nefarious purposes, like say deciding they can't get a blood transfusion or vaccine which might affect men too.

So, for giving employers a religious right to meddle in the affairs of women's health and medicine, Justice Alito is the Asshole of the Day.

It is Justice Alito's first time as Asshole of the Day, though not the first Supreme Court justice to be featured here-- that honor belongs to Justice Scalia.

Full story: Right Wing Watch

Avatar

Mark Meadows, Asshole of the Day for June 20, 2014

Obamacare's website is fixed and it exceeded the original projections for enrollment in the first year. The insurance companies who participated and plan to participate next year aren't raising prices astronomically. It's working. It could be better, but Republicans aren't interested in negotiating fixes, only full repeal.

And while Republicans won't admit that their predictions of gloom and doom were wrong, they just keep moving on to new accusations and negatives with no perspective of whether they were wrong in the past. They don't care. In a very insightful post, which I recommend you read, Jon Chait compares Republican critiques of Obamacare to vegetarian reviews of a rib joint. Since they are ideologically opposed to subsidized or standardized or regulated insurance, they will always harp on something because it can't work. He concludes by saying

It’s not the case that the flaws were all imagined, and some aspects of the law will struggle badly. But the basic enterprise is workable. I used to go on Twitter and ask conservatives to lay out what the criteria for Obamacare working as intended would look like. I never got a satisfactory response. You don’t take your barbecue reviews from people who think meat is murder.

And that's where we are. Which is how you get things like Congressman Mark Meadows complaining that insurance shouldn't cover maternity care:

MEADOWS: So you have to buy maternity, even though you may never have a child?
COHEN: That is correct.
MEADOWS: Are there other things you have to buy that you may never use?
COHEN: It depends on your personal family situation and your medical situation. I’ll say as an internist, and a primary care doc, that sometimes you don’t know what that medical situation will be going forward, and that’s the nature–
MEADOWS: But maternity is one that you can probably analyze pretty well for someone who’s in their 50s.
COHEN: Right, but it’s a minimal essential benefit we wanted to make sure that all Americans had access to.

This is offensive. Yes, you're 50 and you and your wife don't expect to have any more kids. But so what? You were both born of woman. You did not spring from the Earth one day. And if we're going to have health insurance, then shouldn't it include something that is so basic that it will effect every baby born henceforth? Do we only make laws for the living and not for the future?

And if you take his argument at face value, there are plenty of things that health insurance covers that only effect older people, but they are included. How do I know I'll grow to 50 or 60? Maybe I'll die. So why should my health insurance premiums this month or this year include things like dementia and heart disease? I'll pay those in my premiums when I'm 50 thank you. That's what he's saying. And once everyone's doing that, then it's not insurance, it's just pay as you go. If that's what he wants, then say it-- say you don't want insurance in America. But you don't, do you. You just keep harping at the problems or drawbacks of insurance, and offer no real plan that works.

So, for suggesting that since he's too old to need maternity care that it shouldn't be included in insurance, Mark Meadows is the Asshole of the Day.

It is Mark Meadow's first time as Asshole of the Day, though one of many for on the topic of Obamacare.

Full story: Think Progress

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net