mouthporn.net
#religious freedom – @assholeofday on Tumblr
Avatar

Asshole Of The Day

@assholeofday / assholeofday.tumblr.com

Asshole of the Day finds the public figures who are the biggest assholes each day
Avatar

David Green, Asshole of the Day for July 2, 2014

Hobby Lobby CEO won his case against the Obamacare contraception mandate this week, with the Supreme Court pretending, for the first time ever, that for-profit corporations have religious rights, just like people do. We named Justice Alito Asshole of the Day for these new corporate religious rights he made up out of thin air.

But the story doesn't end there. A big part of the case hinged on the "strongly-held religious beliefs" of Hobby Lobby's owner when it came to abortion. He believed, despite medical and scientific evidence to the contrary, that certain forms of birth control were in fact abortifacients, meaning they cause abortions. "Strongly-held religious beliefs". That's the key here.

But are they really a strongly-held religious belief? Back in April it was discovered that the company 401K for Hobby Lobby was invested in companies that made those drugs that David Green found so objectionable. And also at the time, many people pointed out that Hobby Lobby products are mostly made in China, a country which has widespread abortion, with women forced to have them after their first child. But none of those things seemed to bother Mr. Green-- his "strongly-held religious belief" only seems to apply when it comes to the employee health care plan.

And now we know it's even more cynical than that. Apparently Hobby Lobby covered these abortifacients up until the moment that Obamacare required them:

The Greens re-examined the company’s health insurance policy back in 2012, shortly before filing the lawsuit. A Wall Street Journal story says they looked into their plan after being approached by an attorney from the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty about possible legal action over the federal government’s contraceptives requirement.
That was when, according to the company’s complaint, they were surprised to learn their prescription drug policy included two drugs, Plan B and ella, which are emergency contraceptive pills that reduce the chance of pregnancy in the days after unprotected sex. The government does not consider morning-after pills as abortifacients because they are used to prevent eggs from being fertilized (not to induce abortions once a woman is pregnant). This is not, however, what the Green family believes, which is that life begins at conception and these drugs impede the survival of fertilized eggs.
At any rate, Hobby Lobby stopped covering those drugs in its plan and took the health care contraceptive mandate to court, represented by the Becket Fund.
The only caveat here is Hobby Lobby said it didn’t know it was covering the drugs.
"Coverage of these drugs was not included knowingly or deliberately by the Green family. Such coverage is out of step with the rest of the Hobby Lobby’s policies, which explicitly exclude abortion-causing contraceptive devices and pregnancy-terminating drugs," the company stated in its court filing.

Now you could argue that the company owners didn't know, and that the moment they realized it, they changed it in accordance with their religious beliefs. But I call bullshit, and here's why:

If opposition to abortion is such a "strongly-held religious belief", then why does the company seem so passive about checking for abortion in the places that so many other religious people always look?

  • They never looked at what companies their 401K was invested in
  • They continue to buy the bulk of their products from China, the abortion capital of the world
  • They never checked to see what drugs they were covering

Now every one of these things has a solution-- the 401K could invest in funds that don't include those drug manufacturers, they could buy their products from somewhere else, and they could have never covered those drugs in the first place. But they did none of this.

So I ask you, does this sound like the actions of someone with "strongly-held religious beliefs"? It sure doesn't to me. It sounds like someone who doesn't care until someone else points it out, and specifically someone who hates Obamacare first and finds a reason later.

Lionel Hutz: Now, Mrs. Simpson, tell the court in your own words what happened after you and your husband were ejected out of the restaurant.
Marge: Well, we pretty much went straight home.
Lionel Hutz: Mrs. Simpson, remember that you are under oath.
Marge: We drove around until three in the morning looking for another open all-you-can-eat seafood restaurant.
Lionel Hutz: And when you couldn't find one?
Marge: [crying] We... went... fishing.
Lionel Hutz: Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, do these sound like the actions of a man whose had ALL he could eat?

Yeah, that's right. David Green's "strongly-held religious beliefs" look pretty weak when compared to Homer Simpson's commitment to all-you-can-eat fish.

So, for suddenly having "strongly-held religious beliefs" only when he could use it to oppose Obamacare, David Green is the Asshole of the Day.

Avatar

Louie Gohmert, Asshole of the Day for April 3, 2014

So often with Louie Gohmert the question is -- is he an asshole? Or an idiot? And when I phrase it that way the most common answer is "why can't it be both?" Louie Gohmert often says the dumbest things of any congressman, which is saying something with Michele Bachmann and Paul Broun as colleagues, and what always stands out is how uncurious he is to learn the facts and how content he is with his limited understanding of things. And for being an idiot who doesn't seek to be smarter, when the facts are within his grasp, he is an asshole.

And his latest pronouncement is typical for him-- it combines a limited understanding with an unwillingness to think it through. See if you can spot the problem when he starts talking about the separation of church and state:

Gohmert pointed out that a Congressional Research Service report revealed that President Thomas Jefferson, who coined the phrase “separation of church and state,” had also attended church services at Statuary Hall.
“But it was to be a one-way wall, where the state would not dictate to the church,” the Texas Republican insisted. “But the church would certainly play a role in the state.”
“So, that’s a little different idea than a lot of people have about separation of church and state now,” he added. “Including some of our esteemed Supreme Court, who are not quite as familiar with our history as they probably should be.”

This really isn't hard-- church and state either must be separate or not. There can't be a role for the church in state without the state being in the church. And here's why: how does he decide which church gets to play a role in the state? How do you balance the competing interests of different churches?

As he may know, there is more than one religion and church in this country. Would he like the Muslim churches to play a role in the state, or is he only reserving that role for Christian churches?

And of course there are many Christian sects with different views on things— for example, not all Christian churches think abortion or contraception or gay marriage are against their religion. Would he be OK with those Christian churches having a role in the state, or only his denomination?

And that's where it becomes pretty clear that Louie Gohmert isn't interested in thinking things through because he's settled on his church being the one that has influence and dictating laws to the rest of the country, many of whom don't share his view of Christianity or aren't even Christian at all. But he doesn't care if the religious needs of others are trampled. He doesn't see-- and isn't interested in seeing-- that keeping religion out of the government protects the religious interests of everyone, including him.

The Founding Fathers didn’t set up a theocracy, but since he's doesn't see that, and does't care understand how important that is, he is the Asshole of the Day.

It is Louie Gohmert's third time as Asshole of the Day. Previous wins were for saying that cutting food stamps would help poor people avoid obesity and saying that pregnant women should have to give birth to brain-dead babies.

Full story and video: Raw Story

Avatar

Is David Green Asshole of the Day?

Is Hobby Lobby CEO David Green asshole of the day for going to the Supreme Court to avoid paying for employee contraceptives on religious grounds when he matches 401K contributions that invest in those same contraceptives?

I must admit when I first saw this story yesterday I thought it was an April fool. But it's not.

When Obamacare compelled businesses to include emergency contraception in employee health care plans, Hobby Lobby, a national chain of craft stores, fought the law all the way to the Supreme Court. The Affordable Care Act's contraception mandate, the company's owners argued, forced them to violate their religious beliefs. But while it was suing the government, Hobby Lobby spent millions of dollars on an employee retirement plan that invested in the manufacturers of the same contraceptive products the firm's owners cite in their lawsuit.
Documents filed with the Department of Labor and dated December 2012—three months after the company's owners filed their lawsuit—show that the Hobby Lobby 401(k) employee retirement plan held more than $73 million in mutual funds with investments in companies that produce emergency contraceptive pills, intrauterine devices, and drugs commonly used in abortions. Hobby Lobby makes large matching contributions to this company-sponsored 401(k).
Several of the mutual funds in Hobby Lobby's retirement plan have holdings in companies that manufacture the specific drugs and devices that the Green family, which owns Hobby Lobby, is fighting to keep out of Hobby Lobby's health care policies: the emergency contraceptive pills Plan B and Ella, and copper and hormonal intrauterine devices.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/04/hobby-lobby-retirement-plan-invested-emergency-contraception-and-abortion-drug-makers

His religion, according to him, won't let him contribute to employee insurance if it covers these drugs because it makes him a party to abortion, which he considers murder (ignoring the medical science that says the drugs in question aren't abortifacients), but then he doesn't care at all that the matching funds in the 401K are going to the companies that make the drugs he's so upset about. Wow.

Photo source: https://www.facebook.com/DavidGreenHobbyLobby

Avatar

Is Jan Brewer Asshole of the Day?

Is Gov. Jan Brewer asshole of the day for helping to write the anti-gay bill she later vetoed as unnecessary and behind the times?

We were happy when Gov. Brewer vetoed it

But it turns out Brewer was in on the bill at the beginning, and not someone who had to make a tough decision at the end:

Before it attracted any national attention, advisers to Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer (R) offered guidance on the anti-gay legislation that she eventually vetoed at the end of February -- a veto that came down even though the bill's drafters say they made every change that the governor's office requested.

Capitol Media Services reported Monday on the meetings that Brewer's advisers, Michael Hunter and Joe Sciarrota, had with the Center for Arizona Policy, which drafted and pushed the bill. They began in January before the legislative session commenced; the bill was introduced Jan. 14.

CAP president Cathi Herrod told the news agency that her organization made every change Brewer's aides asked for. One of the biggest alterations was a three-pronged test to determine if somebody's exercise of a religious belief was covered by the proposed law.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/brewer-office-worked-anti-gay-bill

Yeah, so she was in on it. Yes, it's nice she vetoed it, but let's not overlook what an asshole she was in helping to propose it.

Of course we always knew she was no hero-- we called her out for taking too long to decide on a veto. We asked how hard is it to decide whether to legalize bigotry or not?

I guess it really did take the NFL threatening to take the Super Bowl away for her to change her mind on this, whereas many people were wondering what it would take to make up her mind.

What an asshole!

Photo source: https://twitter.com/GovBrewer/status/438838664928325633

Avatar

Is Michele Bachmann Asshole of the Day?

Is Michele Bachmann asshole of the day for saying "the gay community has bullied the American people"?

Regarding Arizona SB1062 Rep. Bachmann said:

“And the thing that I think is getting a little tiresome is the gay community have so bullied the American people and they have so intimidated politicians that politicians fear them and they think they get to dictate the agenda everywhere. Well, not with the Constitution you don’t.”

She added that gay people and “activist judges” are trying to take away her freedom: “If you want take away my religious liberties, you can advocate for that but you do it through the constitutional process and you don’t intimidate and no politician should give away my religious liberties or yours.”

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/michele-bachmann-laments-gay-community-have-so-bullied-american-people

No, it's not bullying to insist on equal rights. And neither is it unconstitutional.

You know what's bullying and wrong-- trying to push laws that allow discrimination.

The Constitution does not say that your religion trumps mine or anyone else's. It does not require that I follow your religious rules, or that the state should make me. Your religion is your business. If you choose to do business, then the state has the right to regulate it. 

Freedom of religion is not freedom of business.

Photo source: http://bachmann.house.gov/about-michele/official-photo

Avatar

Is Pat Robertson Asshole of the Day (again)?

Is Pat Robertson asshole of the day for saying Attorney General Eric Holder is "raising sodomy above the rights of religious people"?

“And what we’re seeing now, more and more, the rights of homosexuals – the practice of Homo.Sex.U.Al.Ity, sodomy, consensual sodomy — is being being raised and elevated above the rights of religious believers,” the TV preacher ranted, pointing his finger at the camera. “And that is terrible!”
“The fundamental articles in our Constitution, in the Declaration of Independence is our right of religion. Congress shall pass no law respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”
But Robertson insisted that laws like Arizona’s proposed SB 1062, which would allow businesses to discriminate against LGBT people, had “nothing to do with limiting homosexuals.”
“It has to do with giving religious people the right to practice their religion freely,” he concluded.
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/02/26/pat-robertson-eric-holder-elevated-sodomy-over-the-constitution-so-impeach-him/

Oh, this is so tiresome. Gay rights are not being elevated over rights of religious people.

Gay people being allowed to have consensual sex in their own home is not your business, and does not affect your right to practice your religion. You do not have a right to practice your religion in someone else's home against their will.

You do not have a right to make everyone in the country abide by your religion. That is not what freedom of religion means; that's a theocracy.

Photo source: Paparazzo Presents via http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pat_Robertson_Paparazzo_Photography.jpg

Avatar

Is Todd Starnes Asshole of the Day (again)?

Is Todd Starnes asshole of the day for saying Jan Brewer made "Christians in her state second class citizens"?

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer makes Christians in her state second class citizens.
— toddstarnes (@toddstarnes) February 27, 2014

No, sorry. She kept gay citizens on the same level as everyone else.

How many times do I have to keep saying this-- discrimination against homosexuals is not a right that is being taken away.

The only way Todd Starnes is correct here is if he also believes that by getting rid of Jim Crow that white Southerners were made second class citizens. Will he say that? I doubt it. But make no mistake-- that's what he's saying here with regards to discriminating against gays.

And it's also just so insulting that he defines Christians as so maniacally focused on hating gays. Because he isn't suggesting that Christian businesses discriminate against

  • adulterers
  • divorcees
  • liars
  • murderers
  • robbers
  • people who covet
  • people who say "God damn it"

Nope. Only the gays.

Discriminating against gays is the most important part of Christianity to Todd Starnes, and I wish more Christians were upset about him wrapping his bigotry in their religion.

There's a more thorough destruction of this poor Christian baker forced to serve gays argument when we named Erick Erickson Asshole of the Day for saying serving a gay couple is "aiding and abetting sin".

Photo source: https://twitter.com/toddstarnes

Avatar

Is Tucker Carlson Asshole of the Day (again)?

Is Tucker Carlson asshole of the day for saying businesses being forced to serve gays is "fascism"?

CARLSON: Well it's pretty simple. I mean, if you want to have a gay wedding, fine, go ahead. If I don't want to bake you a cake for your gay wedding, that's okay too. Or [[it]] should be. That's called tolerance. But when you try and force me to bake a cake for your gay wedding and threaten me with prison if I don't, that's called fascism.
Carlson's attempts to distinguish between refusing to provide services related to a gay wedding and refusing to serve gay people in general ignore the substance of the bill. New York University constitutional law professor Kenji Yoshino has noted that the measure is broadly written enough that it would allow any individual or business owner to refuse services to any gay person as long as he or she contended that providing services would burden his or her religious beliefs. Carlson's Fox colleague Megyn Kelly seized on the "potentially dangerous" implications of the bill, pointing out that it could allow a doctor to refuse medical treatment to a gay person.
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/02/26/foxs-tucker-carlson-its-fascism-for-businesses/198232

Fascism? Really?

I suppose since comparisons to Nazis are usually so widely ridiculed as hyperbole, then calling something fascism which is so widely connected to Hitler would then be the Hitler - 1 hyperbole.

In any event making businesses not discriminate against customers for bigoted reasons is not fascism. Businesses can't refuse to serve people for being black, so why should they be allowed to serve someone for being gay.

Or, Mr. Carlson, do you think it's wrong to stop businesses from refusing to serve blacks too? Because if you think one is wrong then the other is wrong too.

Photo source: http://dailycaller.com/author/tucker/

Avatar

Is Rush Limbaugh Asshole of the Day (again)?

Is Rush Limbaugh asshole of the day for saying Jan Brewer is "being bullied by corporate America to advance the gay agenda"?

Limbaugh on Tuesday told his listeners that the media’s “soap storyline of the hour” is whether or not Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer will veto SB 1062, which the state’s legislature passed last week.
“Religious beliefs can’t be used to stop anything the left wants to impose, unless they’re Muslim religious beliefs and then we have to honor those. But any other religious beliefs are not permitted,” Limbaugh said. “The left will not allow them. Now, the current thinking is that Gov. Brewer will probably veto the bill, which, you might think on the face of it will make her a hero with the news media and the rest of the left.”
Sure, it might make her a hero, he said — “for five minutes.” And then she’ll go back to being a “near criminal conservative Republican,” Limbaugh continued, because “their reaction will be, what took her so long? Why did she even consider not vetoing this?”
“She’s being bullied by the homosexual lobby in Arizona and elsewhere,” he said. “She’s being bullied by the nationwide drive-by media, she’s being bullied by certain elements of corporate America in order to advance the gay agenda. I guess in that circumstance bullying is admirable. In fact, this kind of bullying is honorable.”

http://www.politico.com/story/2014/02/rush-limbaugh-jan-brewer-veto-103925.html

Let's just skip by the bullying accusation, because really it's just tiresome for Rush Limbaugh to accuse someone else of bullying. That's just rich.

But he makes two other claims that are both ridiculous:

  1. Advancing the gay agenda. The only agenda here is that gays get the same treatment and protection under the law that everyone else does. There's nothing sinister about that.
  2. The left favors Muslim religious beliefs at the expense of Christians. This bill is about letting Christians discriminate against gays under the guise of religion. Muslims are not accorded anything comparable. And more than this, the Arizona law is so broad that Muslims could discriminate against nonbelievers such as Christians, which "the left" also opposes here.

I'd say the facts don't support Rush here, but he's never cared about facts.

Avatar

Is Erick Erickson Asshole of the Day (again)?

Is Erick Erickson asshole of the day for saying that a business serving gay couples is “aiding and abetting sin”?

In her column, Powers, an evangelical Christian herself, argued that Christians shouldn’t refuse services to people simply because they disagreed with them, noting that many “Christians serve unrepentant murders through prison ministry.” Erickson responded by asserting that, unlike prison ministers, businesses that serve gay couples would be “aiding and abetting” sin
http://equalitymatters.org/blog/201402210001

Erickson is arguing that doing business is ministering, basically that every act is ministering, and therefore if someone is going to sin then you shouldn’t help them. Oh, it sounds great, except let’s look at all the mortal sins (10 Commandments) that he’s not telling people to bake cakes for:

If someone might commit murder, should a baker refuse to sell them a cake?

If someone might commit adultery, should a baker refuse to sell them a cake?

If someone might take the Lord’s name in vain, should a baker refuse to sell them a cake?

If someone might be envious, should a baker refuse to sell them a cake?

If a child is talking back, should a baker refuse to sell their parents a cake since the child is not honoring them?

If someone might lie, should a baker refuse to sell them a cake? How will politicians ever eat?

Avatar

Is Bryan Fischer Asshole of the Day (again)?

image

Is Bryan Fischer asshole of the day for saying allowing homosexuals to have rights is like Jim Crow against Chrisitans?

Rights based on sexual deviancy are Jim Crow laws against Christians. Lead to segregation, illegal religious discrimination.
— Bryan Fischer (@BryanJFischer) February 19, 2014
Jim Crow is back: special rights for gays lead to economic, educational, social & employment disadvantages for Christians.
— Bryan Fischer (@BryanJFischer) February 19, 2014
The civil rights cause of our day: protecting 1st Amendment rights of Christians against the bullies and bigots of Big Gay.
— Bryan Fischer (@BryanJFischer) February 19, 2014
Liberal Democrats passed Jim Crow laws against blacks then, and are enacting Jim Crow laws against Christians today.
— Bryan Fischer (@BryanJFischer) February 19, 2014

This is just an awful argument, as we pointed out previously with Cresent Hardy, whose complaint was that protecting gays from being fired for being gay was somehow putting them above straight people who I guess could be fired for being gay. That's equality and fairness, not raising one group over another.

Look, ending second class and unequal treatment against one group of people is not discriminating against another group. Whatever you think of affirmative action, ending discrimination is not affirmative action.

Allowing rights to gays that everyone else enjoys is not Jim Crow for everyone else, unless you think you could make the argument that ending Jim Crow laws and giving blacks equal treatment under the law was Jim Crow for whites who were losing their ability to force the government to be racist and discriminatory. It just doesn't work.

Of course for Bryan Fischer this is just par for the course. He's always making ridiculous analogies to make his hate and bigotry sound like the victim and not the perpetrator of discrimination, and has already been named Asshole of the Day FIVE TIMES in 9 months, with countless other nominations.

But this is an argument that keeps popping up lately-- that treating gays fairly and the same as everyone else is really just discriminating and oppressing Christians. It's not, and we're going to keep calling it out.

Photo source: https://twitter.com/BryanJFischer

Avatar

Is Brian Kelsey Asshole of the Day?

Is Sen. Brian Kelsey asshole of the day for pushing a law allowing people to deny goods or services to homosexuals?

A new bill was recently introduced in the Tennessee State Legislature that, if passed, would allow people and businesses to refuse to provide goods and services to homosexuals. It was filed by State Sen. Brian Kelsey, who represents Memphis and Germantown. The bill notes that businesses can refuse services and goods only if it furthers a civil union, domestic partnership, or same-sex marriage. The person or business would just have to say it was against their religion. For example, if a same-sex couple wanted a cake for their wedding reception, a bakery could refuse to cater to them.
http://www.myfoxmemphis.com/story/24698365/sen-kelsey-introduces-turn-the-gays-away-bill

And really, why stop there? Why not let businesses deny services to people who have Obama bumper stickers? Or to people who believe in gun control?

Or if it's OK for a business to deny services to people with different religious beliefs, shouldn't these businesses require that everyone who buys an ice cream cone first accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior? That seems reasonable, for an ice cream cone, right?

Photo source: http://www.capitol.tn.gov/senate/members/s31.html

Avatar

Scott DesJarlais, Asshole of the Day for February 4, 2014

When people bring up religious freedom these days, it's often perverted to mean "freedom to celebrate religions I find acceptable", sometimes stretched to claim the Founding Fathers only intended their religion under religious freedom. But despite his many other faults, at least Rep. Scott DesJarlais understands it correctly-- it's allowing religions to practice without interference or sanction from the state.

But, since he's a xenophobic bigot, Rep. DesJarlais doesn't like religious freedom. In fact he BLAMES religious freedom laws for allowing a mosque to build a cemetery:

While members of the mosque celebrated the decision, DesJarlais believes that the BZA’s approval could have been withheld if only the state legislature had not passed a law protecting religious freedom. “Unfortunately the Tennessee Religious Freedom Act, passed by the TN General Assembly, may have played a key role in allowing this cemetery to be approved,” the two-term representative wrote. “There is a difference between legislation that would protect our religious freedoms and legislation that would allow for the circumvention of laws that other organizations comply with on a daily basis.”

"Unfortunately" a mosque was allowed to have a cemetery. Unfortunately. Wow.

Let's see if we understand what he means here:

It's unfortunate that Christians have to live in an area where Muslims are allowed to exist.
It's unfortunate that Christians have to live in an area where Muslims are allowed to bury their dead.
How DARE those OTHER religions want to bury their dead too. The nerve!

So, for being such a bigot that he thinks true religious freedom is a bad thing, Scott DesJarlais is the Asshole of the Day.

It is Scott DesJarlais' second time being named Asshole of the Day. His previous win was for telling an 11-year-old girl to her face that her father should be deported, even though she is a citizen herself.

And if his name sounds familiar, remember that in 2012 it came out that, despite being a pro-life Republican, he had been caught pressuring the women he slept with outside of his marriage to have abortions.

Full story: http://thinkprogress.org/world/2014/01/30/3225551/desjarlais-mosque-cemetery/

Avatar

Is Scott DesJarlais Asshole of the Day (again)?

Is Rep. Scott DesJarlais asshole of the day for complaining that religious freedom allowed a mosque to build a cemetery?

While members of the mosque celebrated the decision, DesJarlais believes that the BZA’s approval could have been withheld if only the state legislature had not passed a law protecting religious freedom. “Unfortunately the Tennessee Religious Freedom Act, passed by the TN General Assembly, may have played a key role in allowing this cemetery to be approved,” the two-term representative wrote. “There is a difference between legislation that would protect our religious freedoms and legislation that would allow for the circumvention of laws that other organizations comply with on a daily basis.”
http://thinkprogress.org/world/2014/01/30/3225551/desjarlais-mosque-cemetery/

"Unfortunately" a mosque was allowed to have a cemetery. You see, it's unfortunate according to this asshole.

Let's see if I can paraphrase what he's really saying:

It's unfortunate we don't live in an America where only Christians are allowed to have cemeteries. I mean, how DARE those OTHER religions want to bury their dead too. The nerve!

And just in case you doubt how racist this guy is, remember that he tells 11-year-old girls to their face that their father should be deported, even though she is a citizen herself. Or what a monster he is in general when he claims to be pro-life in public but pressures the women he's sleeping with outside of his marriage to have abortions.

Photo source: http://desjarlais.house.gov/about

Avatar

Is Lynn Luker Asshole of the Day?

Is Rep. Lynn Luker asshole of the day for pushing a law to allow people to deny services to homosexuals?

Idaho lawmakers and conservative Christian allies who contend faith is under siege by gays, lesbians and the government are launching a "pre-emptive" strike to bolster rights of licensed professionals to refuse service or employment to those they conclude violate their religious beliefs.
On Tuesday, Rep. Lynn Luker outlined a plan to shield religious people from the threat of having their professional licenses — issued for everything from midwives and doctors to physical therapists and nurses — revoked.
Luker, a Boise Republican, knows of no example in Idaho of an actual challenge to a professional's license on these grounds. Still, he points to efforts by gays and lesbians elsewhere seeking to end what they contend is discrimination against them as a sign Idaho must act quickly to protect the faithful before something similar arises closer to home.
http://www.idahostatesman.com/2014/01/28/2995918/rep-pre-emptive-strike-needed.html

So no more shall we have public transactions and commerce now in Rep. Luker's world. Instead, before anyone can pay for something, the cashier can ask if they are gay or eat shellfish or use birth control or have tattoos or think women should not have to submit to their husbands or believe in evolution or a round Earth, because depending on which parts of the Bible are important to the business owner, they won't have to sell. 

And what could go wrong in a world where every transaction requires a full Inquisition and heresy check?

I mean, didn't the Founding Fathers set up a theocracy?

Photo source: http://lynnmluker.com/

Avatar

Is John Hagee Asshole of the Day?

Is John Hagee asshole of the day for saying that people who don't like hearing "Merry Christmas" should leave the country?

John Hagee delivered a sermon to his congregation during which he raged against the supposed "War on Christmas" which he began by declaring that America was founded as, and still remains, a Christian nation. As such, if atheists and humanists don't like being wished a "Merry Christmas" ... well, they can just get out of the country.
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/hagee-people-who-dont-hearing-merry-christmas-should-leave-country

I guess expressing your religious bigotry is the true spirit of Christmas for this man.

Photo source: http://www.jhm.org/Home/About/PastorJohnHagee

Avatar

Is Gretchen Carlson Asshole of the Day?

Is Gretchen Carlson asshole of the day for complaining that some other religion is blocking her view of a nativity scene on government property?

Gov. Rick Scott’s (R) office approved a request to install a Festivus pole made of Pabst Blue Ribbon beer cans next to a nativity manger and a Three Wise Men display. Festivus is a holiday created by the television show Seinfield, but it often celebrated by atheists as an alternative to Christmas.
“I am so outraged by this,” Carlson told Catholic League President Bill Donohue on Tuesday. “Why do I have to drive around with my kids to look for a nativity scenes and be, like, ‘Oh, yeah, kids, look, there’s baby Jesus behind the Festivus pole made out of beer cans! It’s nuts!”
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/12/10/fox-news-host-flips-over-atheist-holiday-display-baby-jesus-is-behind-the-festivus-pole/

As we pointed out yesterday with Asshole of the Day Bryan Fischer claiming that only Christians are protected by the 1st Amendment, if you want your religion represented on public/government property, then you have no right to complain that another religion (or mock religion) is also represented. If you do complain, then you're trying to infringe on someone else's right to free expression of religion.

So, Ms. Carlson, if you want nativity scenes, maybe you should just view them on private property, and not expect the government to put them up. How about that?

And, it should be noted, Carlson's guest didn't stop there:

“We don’t have to have the Klan out there on Martin Luther King Day with their monuments right next to a bust of Martin Luther King,” Donohue agreed. “We don’t want to have neo-Nazis out there to stick it to Jews on Yom Kippur. And we shouldn’t have people out there ready to trash Christianity given that proximity.”

Now here they have equated different religions with the Klan and Neo-Nazis. Oh, the things people will say to gin up outrage!

Photo source: http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/personalities/gretchen-carlson/bio/

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net