David Green, Asshole of the Day for July 2, 2014
But the story doesn't end there. A big part of the case hinged on the "strongly-held religious beliefs" of Hobby Lobby's owner when it came to abortion. He believed, despite medical and scientific evidence to the contrary, that certain forms of birth control were in fact abortifacients, meaning they cause abortions. "Strongly-held religious beliefs". That's the key here.
The Greens re-examined the company’s health insurance policy back in 2012, shortly before filing the lawsuit. A Wall Street Journal story says they looked into their plan after being approached by an attorney from the Becket Fund for Religious Liberty about possible legal action over the federal government’s contraceptives requirement.
That was when, according to the company’s complaint, they were surprised to learn their prescription drug policy included two drugs, Plan B and ella, which are emergency contraceptive pills that reduce the chance of pregnancy in the days after unprotected sex. The government does not consider morning-after pills as abortifacients because they are used to prevent eggs from being fertilized (not to induce abortions once a woman is pregnant). This is not, however, what the Green family believes, which is that life begins at conception and these drugs impede the survival of fertilized eggs.
At any rate, Hobby Lobby stopped covering those drugs in its plan and took the health care contraceptive mandate to court, represented by the Becket Fund.
The only caveat here is Hobby Lobby said it didn’t know it was covering the drugs.
"Coverage of these drugs was not included knowingly or deliberately by the Green family. Such coverage is out of step with the rest of the Hobby Lobby’s policies, which explicitly exclude abortion-causing contraceptive devices and pregnancy-terminating drugs," the company stated in its court filing.
Now you could argue that the company owners didn't know, and that the moment they realized it, they changed it in accordance with their religious beliefs. But I call bullshit, and here's why:
If opposition to abortion is such a "strongly-held religious belief", then why does the company seem so passive about checking for abortion in the places that so many other religious people always look?
- They never looked at what companies their 401K was invested in
- They continue to buy the bulk of their products from China, the abortion capital of the world
- They never checked to see what drugs they were covering
Now every one of these things has a solution-- the 401K could invest in funds that don't include those drug manufacturers, they could buy their products from somewhere else, and they could have never covered those drugs in the first place. But they did none of this.
So I ask you, does this sound like the actions of someone with "strongly-held religious beliefs"? It sure doesn't to me. It sounds like someone who doesn't care until someone else points it out, and specifically someone who hates Obamacare first and finds a reason later.
Lionel Hutz: Now, Mrs. Simpson, tell the court in your own words what happened after you and your husband were ejected out of the restaurant.
Marge: Well, we pretty much went straight home.
Lionel Hutz: Mrs. Simpson, remember that you are under oath.
Marge: We drove around until three in the morning looking for another open all-you-can-eat seafood restaurant.
Lionel Hutz: And when you couldn't find one?
Marge: [crying] We... went... fishing.
Lionel Hutz: Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, do these sound like the actions of a man whose had ALL he could eat?
Yeah, that's right. David Green's "strongly-held religious beliefs" look pretty weak when compared to Homer Simpson's commitment to all-you-can-eat fish.
So, for suddenly having "strongly-held religious beliefs" only when he could use it to oppose Obamacare, David Green is the Asshole of the Day.
