mouthporn.net
#words – @anjellynajolie on Tumblr
Avatar

who's a heretic now?

@anjellynajolie / anjellynajolie.tumblr.com

started as an angelina jolie fanpage, magnanimously expanded toward more actresses, films and tv shows, thoughts, and more.
Avatar

so i’ve finally reached the kiss. the thing about Jennifer crying is that even though we know Bette is slightly jealous about Tina’s affairs and has moments of discontent/tension in her relationship with Jodi, nothing in the episode  actually suggests the depth of feeling that Bette still has for Tina that comes out here. the tears in this scene are dredged up from a secret place that Bette doesn’t show to her friends, to Jodi, to anyone, and most incredibly, that Jennifer doesn’t even show to the camera. it suggests that Bette exists outside of all the existing clips we have seen (which is a fucking achievement of acting). and let’s talk about Laurel. Tina finally touches Bette’s body after the most prolonged kiss in which Bette proves her passion for her. and the fact that when Bette reacts to that by crying and shaking in her arms, Laurel doesn’t even (NEED TO) open her eyes - she knows what is happening and is there to comfort her, she uses a little bump of her nose against Jennifer’s forehead to say hey, look up, before kissing her again. these two are so fucking in sync, their love scenes say more than their dialogue. they understand and live in their characters so well. “the truth of those characters” really comes out in this scene unlike ever before.

Avatar
reblogged
Lila was able to speak through writing; unlike me when I wrote, unlike Sarratore in his articles and poems, unlike even many writers I had read and was reading, she expressed herself in sentences that were well constructed, and without error, even though she had stopped going to school, but–further–she left no trace of effort, you weren’t aware of the artifice of the written word. I read and I saw her, I heard her. The voice set in the writing overwhelmed me, enthralled me even more than when we talked face to face: it was completely cleansed of the dross of speech, of the confusion of the oral; it had the vivid orderliness that I imagined would belong to conversation if one were so fortunate as to be born from the head of Zeus and not from the Grecos, the Cerullos.

Elena Ferrante, “My Brilliant Friend” (via jennamacaroni)

Avatar
“To love. To be loved. To never forget your own insignificance. To never get used to the unspeakable violence and the vulgar disparity of life around you. To seek joy in the saddest places. To pursue beauty to its lair. To never simplify what is complicated or complicate what is simple. To respect strength, never power. Above all, to watch. To try and understand. To never look away. And never, never to forget.”

— Arundhati Roy, from The End of Imagination

Avatar
“[The older generation of writers who had established the rules for modern fiction under the assumption that their experience was “universal”] gained the ability to write stories where they could “show” and not “tell" … They had this ability not because they were masterful stylists of language or because they dripped with innate talent. The power to “show, not tell” stemmed from the writing for an audience that shared so many assumptions with them that the audience would feel that those settings and stories were “universal.” (It’s the same hubris that led the white Western establishment to assume its medicine, science, and values superior to all other cultures …) Look at the literary fiction techniques that are supposedly the hallmarks of good writing: nearly all of them rely not on what was said, but on what is left unsaid. Always come at things sideways; don’t be too direct, too pat, or too slick. Lead the reader in a direction but allow them to come to the conclusion. Ask the question but don’t state the answer too baldly. Leave things open to interpretation… but not too open, of course, or you have chaos. Make allusions and references to the works of the literary canon, the Bible, and familiar events of history to add a layer of evocation—but don’t make it too obvious or you’re copycatting. These are the do’s and don’ts of MFA programs everywhere. They rely on a shared pool of knowledge and cultural assumptions so that the words left unsaid are powerfully communicated. I am not saying this is not a worthwhile experience as reader or writer, but I am saying anointing it the pinnacle of “craft” leaves out any voice, genre, or experience that falls outside the status quo. The inverse is also true, then: writing about any experience that is “foreign” to that body of shared knowledge is too often deemed less worthy because to make it understandable to the mainstream takes a lot of explanation. Which we’ve been taught is bad writing!”

— — Cecilia Tan, from Uncanny Magainze 18 (via violetephemera)

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
lifeinpoetry
Wintering in a dark without window At the heart of the house… This is the room I have never been in. This is the room I could never breathe in.

Sylvia Plath, from “Wintering,” Ariel (via lifeinpoetry)

Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
ultraviolece
“Life and death, energy and peace. If I stop today, it was still worth it. Even the terrible mistakes that I made and would have unmade if I could. The pains that have burned me and scarred my soul, it was worth it, for having been allowed to walk where I’ve walked, which was to hell on earth, heaven on earth, back again, into, under, far in between, through it, in it, and above.”
Gia (1998)
Michael Cristofer
Avatar
reblogged
Avatar
cmcyan
I remember when I was in the army, 20 years ago, suddenly developing chickenpox. The itch was agonising. A friend, Viknesh, accompanied me as I waited for the ferry to take me back to the main island. I couldn’t chat much with him; I was in too much discomfort. I knew I couldn’t scratch the vesicles on my skin, but I needed to dissipate that terrible urge. And then Viknesh started drumming on the surface of a table with his hands. I closed my eyes and listened. The beats he produced were complex: I tried to figure out which ones were made with the base of his palms, his fingers, his fingernails. When he stopped, I said to him, ‘Eh, don’t…please continue.’ Viknesh happily obliged. The music had transported me, brought me out from the shell of my pain. It was sublime distraction, and one of the very few shining things I remember from the murk that was BMT. Which is why I cannot understand why musical instruments for Thaipusam are banned by the government. This isn’t pseudo-science: research has shown that music can interfere with the signal pathways for both acute and chronic pain. To deny devotees this mode of relief–or put another way, this connection to the transcendent, the circuit between soul and divinity that bypasses the flesh–is cruel. And to seek refuge in the idea that 'this is the law of the land’ shows a lack of moral imagination–there are some laws, fixated on the utilitarian (traffic disruptions, noise 'pollution’), that are also inhumane. Shanmugam makes the claim that religious foot processions are a 'privilege’ granted to the Hindu community, and denied to the other religious communities. This is a very poor argument which presupposes that every single religious community in Singapore has foot processions as an integral part of its faith. Some people mention the banning of the Muslim procession celebrating the Prophet’s birthday (Maulid/Maulud Nabi), observed in countries like Malaysia and Indonesia. But this procession is not mandatory, and observance takes different forms depending on the cultural practices of respective countries. And puritan Muslims like the Salafis and Deobandis believe the observance to be an innovation or heresy (bid'ah) and should be forbidden. Also, I am not entirely certain that foot processions are completely banned for other religious communities in Singapore. I have seen Chinese funeral processions before, and surely these are of a 'religious’ nature? And there is also the Nine Emperor God festival (famous for a swaying sedan chair carried by devotees), which involves a procession from a Taoist temple to a water body (like Serangoon River or Punggol End Beach). But I never like making this kind of argument about seeming 'unfairness’ because the state has a tendency to respond by rolling back the rights of others, instead of extending these rights to the ones making the plea. To my Hindu friends, I just want to say that I believe that the majority of Singaporeans do not support this kind of heavy-handed and iron-fisted approach to a community’s religious rights. I think I speak on their behalf when I say that the government is not acting on our behalf with this ban. What is the whole point of having 'Inter-Racial and Religious Circles’ when the state can’t recognise the fundamental religious liberties of a community? Why can’t they see that the perception of religious persecution is a far greater threat to public peace and harmony than traffic snarls and loud music? It’s filled me with sadness that the country is moving in a direction further and further away from the Singapore I once knew. Or perhaps what we are really observing is a government that is steadily drifting away from the Singaporeans that they are supposed to represent.
Avatar

The signs as emotions you can’t explain

Aries: Rubatosis

the unsettling awareness of your own heartbeat.

Taurus: Onism

the frustration of being only in one body, being able to be only at a one place at a time.

Gemini: Monachopsis

the subtle but persistent feeling of being out of place.

Cancer: Jouska

a hypothetical conversation that you compulsively play out in your head.

Leo: Adronitis

frustration with how long it takes to get to know someone.

Virgo: Onism

the awareness of how little of the world you’ll experience.

Scorpio: Lachesism

the desire to be struck by a disaster and surviving it.

Libra: Liberosis

the desire to care less about things.

Sagittarius: Yū Yi

the desire to see with fresh eyes, and feel things just as powerfully as you did when you were younger-before expectations, before memory, before words.

Capricorn: Énouement

the sadness of arriving to the future and knowing how things turned out, but not being able to tell your past self.

Aquarius: pâro

the feeling that no matter what you do is always somehow wrong

Pisces: Ambedo

a kind of melancholic trance in which you become completely absorbed in vivid sensory details.

Avatar

Q & A with Margaret Atwood

Q: When were you happiest?
A: Can't pick and choose, it's bad luck.
Q: What is the trait you most deplore in yourself?
A: Getting too involved in too many things. It eats your brain.
Q: What is the trait you most deplore in others?
A: Begrudging mean-spiritedness.
Q: What is your favourite word?
A: And. It is so hopeful.
Q: Is it better to give or to receive?
A: To give, definitely, because you have no say in what you receive.
Q: How would you like to be remembered?
A: By members of a human race who have managed to avoid annihilating their entire species and can thus still do some reading, and remembering.
Q: What is the most important lesson life has taught you?
A: The only way out is through.
You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net