Legend (1985) dir. Ridley Scott
reblog and put in the tags what type of content you post on your blog.
Reblog and put in the tags the most perfect casting choice you have ever seen in any movie or TV show.
Period dramas + Art (parallels)
(Un)fortunately I didn't jump on the Marvel train until recently, and I'm a bit confused regarding Loki and the torture everyone keeps talking about? My rough timeline is, after Thor 1 he ended up in Jeff Goldblum's planet,,,,, aaand Avengers 1. I don't know when or why Thanos had him or whatever. Also, does it get outright stated in a movie or is it subtext? My biggest question is what the even fuck was doing Loki hanging out with Thanos in the first place
Welcome!! I do hope you enjoy the movies and fandom!! Your timeline seems to be missing Thor 2, and the chronological watching order should be:
- Thor 1
- Avengers 1
- Thor: The Dark World
- Thor: Ragnarok
- Infinity War
That Loki is/was tortured around/during Avengers 1 is canon! And so is the fact that the scepter he was using through the movie was also influencing him! Both of these are made pretty explicit and shown on-screen, though it’s never talked about or referred to again outside of the film, so many people watching casually are likely to miss or dismiss it due to his role as the main antagonist in the film.
At the end of Thor 1 Loki fell into a wormhole, then in that same movie we are shown in the credit scene after the film that he survived, but he isn’t exactly looking too good:
This follows into Avengers 1 and it’s typically accepted that it takes place around a year or so after Thor 1.
In Avengers 1 Loki is implied to have spent his time in space with ‘allies’ (later revealed to fall under the Ultimate Big Bad who is Thanos, someone who can and has used torture on-screen on numerous occasions to get what he wants). The film opens with it being revealed that Loki will be allowed rule of Earth in exchange for the Tesseract (which he has the unique ability to obtain), and is able to use the army his ‘allies’ provide to complete both sides of the bargain.
Upon his arrival at Earth he looks and acts disoriented and crazed, attacking agents and using the sceptre he was given by his allies to mind control a few people. He stumbles and can be seen sweating profusely during these scenes as well as contradicts his position through the previous movie that he didn’t want to rule. He also uses an oxymoron about freedom and proceeds to leave hints at his plan through the film, but that leads into the theory that he wasn’t trying to win with his invasion and is open to interpretation.
Despite coming from ‘allies’ he essentially looks in worse condition at the beginning of the film than the end when the heroes have defeated him.
Loki is only shown conversing with his ‘allies’ once, and we are shown he is doing the invasion under duress (threats, physical harm, heavily implied psychological harm) which is why his forced cooperation by them is explicit.
Deleted Avengers 1 footage tells us that the 'allies’ had a telepathic link which caused pain and had him being monitored through the course of the invasion too but those scenes aren’t canon canon.
Here are a few other posts about this with gifs detailing symptoms and going into theorizing into what torture was involved because while we know Loki was tortured we’re not given many details, and a lot of people deny it. (x) (x) (x) (x).
It’s worth noting that this never being addressed in-canon again has basically resulted in the MCU retconing it years later and deciding Loki was motivated completely on his own with the invasion and was using Thanos to achieve the goal of gaining power because he’s powerhungry and has control issues since he was a baby apparently (they also got rid of a few other backstory things of his), but that’s kinda not what the narrative Thor 1 and Avengers 1 tells us on-screen, so it’s open to however you wish to interpret it.
Can I just add on that it’s canon from Marvel that Loki was under the influence of the mind stone and didn’t act entirely by his own accord. If you hold Loki responsible, you should also hold Hawkeye responsible. I know it’s not entirely about torture, but it does put Loki’s actions in a different light.
INTERSTELLAR (2014) dir. christopher nolan
↳ space scenes
do not go gentle into that good night; old age should burn and rave at close of day. rage, rage against the dying of the light.
must a fictional relationship be “healthy” or “functional”? is it not enough to simply watch two made up people destroy each other, hand in unlovable hand???
hey what the fuck is wrong with you people
idk, what is wrong with me? i’m in a healthy and stable relationship with a great partner, i’ve had lots of therapy that has helped me establish strong boundaries and recognize red flags, and i have an active social life and fulfilling career. could it be that i just… like to read books and watch movies and tv shows about dysfunctional people??? you tell me, tumblr user girlcreator!
You’re a bourgeois degenerate who wants to see shitty despicable & violent relationships for your disgusting sense of entertainment— and you should feel fucking ashamed of yourself.
I agree with @girlcreator but I definitely know there’s something wrong with you. People like you are a huge red flag to me. Bad vibes, for sure.
can you weirdos just smoke some fucking weed
shakespeare frantically rewriting macbeth’s marriage to be healthy and adjusted becuase no one will ever want to watch the original
Shakespeare frantically rewriting Hamlet because no one is ever going to want to read/watch that train wreck.
Shakespeare frantically rewriting Romeo and Juliet to where they wait until their adults to date because no one will ever want to read/watch crush loves turn to funerals.
And don't even get me started with Oedipus and how terrible a person Sophocles must have been to write such filth.
Or any stories about Zeus and Hera. Or let's just say the majority of Greek and Roman mythology.
No one should ever read or watch such terrible stories, they are big red flags all throughout them. What's wrong with you people?! * sarcasm *
Hello yes I saw your tag and I am here to tell you the Lighthouse is a Fucking Lot (we saw it in the cinema while reasonably pissed and I think my kneecaps melted)
I can't decide if this is a warning or an endorsement and I love it
Both?? Probably both. I'd like to watch it sober but when we left I was like... well I never want to watch that movie ever again
It is VERY intense, and quite claustrophobic. The sound design is what mostly contributed to my melted kneecaps (*insert foghorn noise*)
I am definitely gonna watch it now, even if it's just because then I've seen it and I never have to again.
It's rare for me to find something I won't watch again so the prospect oddly excites me!
Apparently I'm going to have to watch this too. I love disturbing movies.
Anyone else been thinking about 12 Monkeys lately? Just me? Ok.
i had no idea subtitles were such a hot topic for americans. people are really coming out of the woodwork to admit that they cannot fucking read huh and i don’t mean people who struggle with illiteracy for some reason i mean white americans who think it’s beneath them to read words on a screen
As an white American, I have subtitles and sound on when watching anything if at all possible. Some times it is because I miss things being said. Some times it is because I want a better understanding of what is being said so I will watch subbed and dubbed. They don't always match up. Either way I enjoy having subtitles regardless and it isn't distracting to me.