In the BBU/WRUinverse, the party line is that Pets chose that status, and that seems to be fairly well integrated into their public perception.
But what is the public view on their designations? Do they think expressed preferences are honored? Or are they aware that someone may volunteer for one designation and end up in a different one entirely?
In the BBU I write, "everyone knows" that people sign up and you get whatever designation you asked for.
It's in all the commercials, and besides, the anti-Pet lawyers would be on that like mad if WRU didn't give people what they signed up for!
It'd be illegal to do otherwise! WRU works strictly under the established Pet laws, entirely by consent. Anyone who has gone and actually toured a facility will tell you...
In my verse I can imagine the contract having a no responsibility clause about which designation they end up being, as that is assigned by the buyer. And because every single pet is a volunteer, nobody knows beforehand what their designation is gonna be, so they receive general training. All pets are in the system before they go to their forever homes. :) there’s no need to worry about those rumors about special orders. Every one of them was in the system before the client’s request was submitted. :)) owners may have specific tastes, but PCS has a wide variety in their catalogue :):):) after all, PCS exists to give everyone a chance :) :) :)) to live happily with someone, together:):))))