mouthporn.net
#social history – @aegor-bamfsteel on Tumblr
Avatar

Irascible, fire-breathing mule.

@aegor-bamfsteel / aegor-bamfsteel.tumblr.com

I blog about: 1) ASOIAF/GoT (particularly House Stark, House Blackfyre and its allies, and Bracken women) 2) Animals, animal care, and animals in captivity (particularly elephants, horses, cats, and frogs) 3) History, art and military history, historical artifacts (particularly from antiquity and the medieval period) var sc_project=11604890; var sc_invisible=1; var sc_security="0afff774"; var scJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://secure." : "http://www."); document.write("<sc"+"ript type='text/javascript' src='" + scJsHost+ "statcounter.com/counter/counter.js'></"+"script>");
Avatar

modern medieval fantasies don't have enough weasel-based necromancy

Avatar
maniculum

Please elaborate on this topic at length

i think i've made my position clear

anyway here are some medieval discussions of weasels and their necromantic abilities:

gerald of wales: The weasel also, when its young are dying from any hurt, recovers and restores them to life by the use of a yellow flower. We are told by persons who have witnessed the fact, having put the whelp to death to make the experiment, that the weasel brought the flower in its mouth, and first applied it to the wound, and then to the mouth, nostrils, and other orifices of the little animal, that it might inhale the odor, by which, through the efficacious touch of the plant, breath was restored, though life seemed extinct, some slight and imperceptible vestiges of it only having remained.

aberdeen bestiary: it is said, also, that they are skilled in healing, so that if by chance their young are killed, and their parents succeed in finding them, they can bring their offspring back to life.

thomas of cantimpré: Accordingly they are said to be expert in all the arts of medicine, so that, if they find their offspring dead, they make them naturally recuperate by means of a herb

also in marie de france's lai eliduc, guildeluec uses a flower she got from a weasel that was resurrecting its weasel friend to resurrect guilliadon

conclusion:

behold, a necromancer

Avatar
reblogged

In medieval Europe, walrus ivory was a highly sought-after commodity, particularly after the Crusades disrupted the trade of elephant ivory. Norse explorers, driven by the need for new sources, expanded into the North Atlantic, establishing settlements in Iceland and Greenland. However, recent research reveals that the ivory traded in Europe came not just from areas near Viking settlements but from remote hunting grounds in the High Arctic…As Vikings ventured into the Arctic, they did not encounter an empty wilderness. The Thule Inuit and other Indigenous peoples had long been established in these regions, hunting walrus and other marine mammals. This research supports the theory that early contact and trade between the Norse and Indigenous Arctic cultures occurred as far back as the 11th century.

Avatar
reblogged

Vindolanda tablet -   A Birthday party invitation from Claudia Severa to Sulpicia Lepidina (early 2nd century AD).

The two women were wives of Roman cavalry officers who were stationed in garrisons in northern England. They became friends and apparently wrote to each other frequently. Two of the Claudia’s letters written on a wooden tablet have survived the ravages of time. In the letter above Claudia invites her friend to a birthday party that shall take place on the 11th of September. Caudia also explains that the day would be even more enjoyable to her, if Lepidina could come. Most of the letter has been written by a scribe but down right there are also a few lines of Claudia’s own handwriting. It’s a kind of closing of the letter there she describes Lepidina as her “sister” and “soulmate”.

 Source: Fæ [CC-BY-SA-3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

Avatar
reblogged
  1. The Middle Color: Medieval scholars inherited the idea from ancient times that there were seven primary colors: white, yellow, red, green, blue, purple, and black. Green occupied a central position, symbolically balanced between the extremes of white and black. It was also regarded as a soothing color.
  2. White vs Red: Michel Pastoureau writes that “the true medieval opposite for white was not so much black as red.” This can be seen in the way Europeans adapted chess. It was only towards the end of the Middle Ages that the white versus black dichotomy became more favoured. A key factor in this shift was the advent of printing, where black ink was used on white paper, reinforcing the perception of these colours as natural opposites
  3. Knightly Colours Arthurian romances, one of the most popular forms of literature in the High Middle Ages, frequently employed colour symbolism, particularly in the depiction of knights. Pastoureau notes that these narratives used colours to convey deeper meanings and character traits. He writes: The color code was recurrent and meaningful. A black knight was almost a character of primary importance (Tristan, Lancelot, Gawain) who wanted to hide his identity; he was generally motivated by good intentions and prepared to demonstrate his valor, especially by jousting or tournament. A red knight, on the other hand, was often hostile to the hero; this was a perfidious or evil knight, sometimes the devil’s envoy or a mysterious being from the Other World. Less prominent, a white knight was generally viewed as good; this was an older figure, a friend of protector or the hero, to who he gave wise council. Conversely, a green knight was a young knight, recently dubbed, whose audacious or insolent behavior was going to cause great disorder; he could be good or bad. Finally, yellow or gold knights were rare and blue knights nonexistent
  4. Black vs. White monks: During the Early Middle Ages, monastic rules stipulated that monks should not concern themselves with the colour of their clothing. However, over the centuries, their attire became increasingly darker. The Cluniacs, one of the most influential monastic communities, believed that black was the appropriate colour for one’s habit. This perspective faced backlash in the twelfth century when the Cistercians adopted a white habit. The debate over monastic colours was intense among the leaders of these orders.
  5. The Color of Islam: Green is widely associated with Islam, but this association only developed in the twelfth century because “Its symbolism is associated with that of paradise, happiness, riches, water, the sky, and hope”. While green was linked to Muhammad’s descendants, different colours were associated with the ruling Islamic dynasties: white for the Umayyads, black for the Abbasids, and red for the Almohads.
  6. The ‘Blue Revolution’: Michel Pastoureau’s book on blue begins by highlighting the neglect this colour faced among the ancient Greeks and Romans, who rarely wrote about it or used it. This neglect persisted through the early Middle Ages until the twelfth century. “Then suddenly,” writes Pastoureau, “in just a few decades, everything changes – blue is ‘discovered’ and attains a prominent place in painting, heraldry, and clothing.”
  7. The Decline of Yellow: Yellow initially benefited from its resemblance to gold, which bolstered its reputation. Many medieval heraldic symbols incorporated yellow, and possessing blonde hair was considered highly fashionable. However, in the Later Middle Ages, yellow began to acquire negative associations, including envy and heresy. Judas, the apostle who betrayed Jesus, was increasingly depicted wearing yellow clothing. Yellow also became associated with Jews, and as European Christians enforced clothing regulations on Jewish communities, yellow was often (though not always) included. By the early modern period, yellow fell out of favor, perceived as gaudy and unpopular.
Avatar
Avatar
justadram
Anonymous asked:

How did cultures of the mediveal people view aging? Were their ageism

Actually, there was a whole thread in historiography dedicated to the argument that the medieval era was like the golden age for being elderly. And I’d probably guess it was less ageist than modern youth oriented consumerist culture, but probably not as great as some historians claimed either.

Old age started around age 60, and there were plenty of elderly people kicking around. It’s high infant mortality rates that skew the average to like 30 very misleadingly! So, the elderly weren’t like a freak population. About 15% of the population would have been over the age of 60 in the late medieval period.

The elderly often were considered wise and more pious, which was admired. There are lots of saints lives about elderly saints who were not just spiritual warriors but also physically powerful. Lots of grey haired warriors in the epic poems, and old wise kings too.

In the Middle Ages, it’s all about the Community rather than the Individual, and there are good and bad parts to that. The elderly were still very much a part of the Community and as important as the other members. They didn’t exist as their own lesser category. They were considered capable of work, for example.

And if they were infirm and could no longer contribute, there were community institutions in place to protect them. Most people were cared for by their families. Others entered religious houses to retire. Some paid for a retirement setup within another household. But the church preached care for the infirm, so that was considered the right thing to do.

The law also protected the elderly. People who abused the elderly or took advantage of them were prosecuted.

But they also recognized ‘drawbacks’ to aging. There was some obsession over facets of aging we’d recognize, such as advice about changing dietary needs or brews and potions to regrow hair. And they did have some funny notions like some writers proposed the elderly weren’t capable of sex. But the writers tended to be male churchmen and they had all sorts of weird ideas about sex.

Avatar
Avatar
reblogged
  • Alewife/ale-conner- due to commercialization of beer making by the end of the Middle Ages
  • Luparius (wolf catcher)- due to the extinction of wolves in England by the 15th century
  • Warrener (overseeing rabbit warrens)- due to decline in demand for rabbit fur/meat in modern times
  • Pinder (tracking down lost animals)- due to better fencing
  • Cofferer: A craftsman who made chests.
  • Fuster: This person did not make horse saddles, but rather the frame on which saddles were made on.
  • Lorimer: Another person who had a very specific job related to horses. He made the metal pieces used for a horse’s bridle and stirrup. But he did not make spurs, as that job belonged to the Spurrier.
  • Collier: A charcoal maker.
  • Parchmenter: Specialized in buying and selling parchment, they saw their business plummet with the growth of paper.
  • Pardoner: In the thirteenth century the Catholic Church came up with the idea that they could should try to sell ‘indulgences’, basically a note forgiving someone for their sins. Being proactive, the church even hired clerks or friars to travel about and sell these indulgences. Pardoners were widely hated for their role in this money-making scheme, but the practice continued until it was abolished by the Pope in 1562.
  • Groom of the Stool. He had to empty the royal chamber pot after each use. Having such an intimate responsibility meant that he would likely be close to the king most of the day, so he had to be someone the monarch knew and trusted. Fortunately, with the invention of indoor plumbing, this job became redundant.
Avatar
reblogged

How can you tell who the "barbarians" are in Roman art?

You could often tell barbarian men by their facial hair, which contrasted with more clean-shaven or trimmed Romans.

Images of barbarian women were rare, but can similarly be identified by their hairstyles, which are less-kempt than the Romans’:

Barbarians also wore pants, which no self-respecting Roman would have worn:

Avatar
Avatar
justadram
Anonymous asked:

Could or did medieval kings create new towns? King Charles is planning to do this with his foundation and I never thought of that before but did this happen in medieval times

Yes! Most towns disappeared with the collapse of the Roman empire. When they began popping up again, they'd typically either be under the feudal umbrella of a lord or a king, who granted them a charter with certain rights and privileges. Towns liked kings because they tended to be more remote than a local lord. Remote is always better. Kings liked towns because they were a source of wealth and educated individuals, who weren't clergymen. That's how you eventually get a professionally run government and a professional army you pay to fight your wars instead of hoping your feudal armies answer the call. 100s of years down the road, but that's all how it starts. Towns!

Avatar
Avatar
reblogged

Lutkin reveals some of the extravagant expenses for the wedding [between Princess Isabella of England and Lord Enguerrand VII of Coucy, which was held on 27 July 1365, at Windsor Castle. This included a payment of £100 for a group of minstrels. The gifts for the bride and groom were lavish – each received a crown, with Isabella’s costing more than 1000 marks and decorated with sapphires and diamonds. She also received other expensive gifts from her family, including two brooches, four diamonds, four sapphires and four clusters of pearls with a diamond in each cluster. Lutkin notes that at least £4,505 2s 4d. were spent just on work by goldsmiths for the wedding, a fortune during the fourteenth century and much more than was spent at the weddings of Edward’s other daughters.

Avatar
reblogged

REPOST : Roman stylus 70AD, in comon vanacular translates into “i went into the city and all i bought you was this lousy pen” , link and full translation in the comments [640 x 320]

Fucking screaming, shitty souvenirs haven’t changed a bit in almost 2000 years

Avatar
ordinarytalk

The inscription has been painstakingly examined and translated by classicist and epigrapher Dr Roger Tomlin. It reads:

‘ab urbe v[e]n[i] munus tibi gratum adf(e)ro acul[eat]um ut habe[a]s memor[ia]m nostra(m) rogo si fortuna dar[e]t quo possem largius ut longa via ceu sacculus est (v)acuus’

‘I have come from the City. I bring you a welcome gift with a sharp point that you may remember me. I ask, if fortune allowed, that I might be able (to give) as generously as the way is long (and) as my purse is empty.’ In other words: the stylus is a gift to remind the recipient of its sender; the sender acknowledges that it is a cheap gift and wishes that they could have given more. Its tongue-in-cheek sentiment is reminiscent of the kinds of novelty souvenirs we still give today. It is the Roman equivalent of ‘I went to Rome and all I got you was this pen’, providing a touching personal insight into the humour of someone who lived nearly 2000 years ago.

Avatar
Avatar
alzerin

OBSESSED with the fact that buttons got so popular in England during the 13th century that they had to pass laws limiting how many buttons you were allowed to put on a garment. They really had to bring in the government to shut down the button mania. Buttons are the sexiest clothing fastener.

yesss! and I remember reading in fashion history class that some women sewed Too Many buttons on their garments but argued their way out of the fines because the extra buttons had no matching buttonholes so OBVIOUSLY they weren't actually functional buttons but beads!

I found the source again! The first-hand account is actually set in Florence in the 1300s (a little later than the 13th century and not England) but there too women would flagantly flaunt the sumptuary laws regarding, among other things, buttons and how many were suitable. Italy too said NAY BUTTONS ART TOO SEXY FOR THE MASSES.

Here is a snippet from Il Trecentonovelle by Franco Sacchetti translated into English:

Then he goeth farther and meeteth a woman wearing many buttons in front of her dress; he saith to her, 'Ye cannot wear those buttons,' and she answereth, ‘Yes, Messere, I can, for these are not buttons, they are beads, and if ye do not believe me, look at them; they have no hanks, neither have they any button-holes.'

Sources: 1, 2

Avatar
ralfmaximus

Why on earth was Too Many Buttons illegal? Was there a real safety concern? Or were they just anti-fun?

Avatar
tobaeus

No real expertise here, but a guess from a book I once read on the time period. During that time, kind of like all time, any time the poor could emulate the rich, they had to find a way to shut it down. At one point, the church called it a sin to wear clothes that were slashed to reveal another layer/color of fabric beneath. If the rich got to have buttons first, and down the line, an easier way was found to produce them, then poor people would have been very excited to have them, which would offend the rich, who loved having things poor people couldn't.

tl'dr: Probably rich people having a tantrum because poor people were trying to be like them.

Avatar
emilysidhe

Quick quibble: while sumptuary laws did sometimes prevent poor people from dressing like rich people (if, through trade or invention, there was suddenly a new way to dye fabric in a color that was previously super expensive and therefore a show of wealth, there would quickly be a sumptuary law about who could wear that color), in general they were more about preventing wealthy peasants (i.e. merchants) from dressing like the titled nobility.

If you could look at someone from an untitled merchant family and tell right away from their clothing that they were richer than a titled land owner with a small estate in the country, you might get the “wrong” idea about what their respective statuses were, and a feudal society can’t have that!

So they had these laws to prevent those peasants who were wealthy enough to buy the same clothes as the nobility from dressing like them, lest people start getting ideas about who was really in charge of the kingdom (or who should be.)

You are using an unsupported browser and things might not work as intended. Please make sure you're using the latest version of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, or Edge.
mouthporn.net